Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Sunday, January 20, 2019

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet.

Many progressives are in a major defensive crouch. We’re all about resisting everything Trump does, no matter what. We should stop his appointments, decry his PR efforts on jobs, chide him for his love affair with Putin and atomic weapons, defend the social programs he threatens to destroy, ridicule him for his climate change denials, advocate for groups he threatens to deport or discriminate against, and most importantly, impeach him as soon as possible for his disregard for the constitution.

While resistance is critically important, we will fail unless resistance is contained within a long-term strategy to reverse runaway inequality and upend neoliberalism (defined as systematic tax breaks for the rich, cuts in social programs, anti-union legislation, financial deregulation and corporate-managed trade). If we don’t build an alternative movement, our defensive struggles could enhance Trump’s popularity rather than to diminish it.

Here are some of the risks of a resistance-only response.

1. It makes our politics Trump-centric or even Trump-dependent.

Trump thrives on being the center of attention. Attacks feed his ego, propel him into action and energize his base. The more he is attacked personally, the more he can command center stage in every discussion, on every news show and in every forum.  A resist-only strategy, without a broader movement-building effort, allows Trump to set the terms of debate — he is for X, then we are against X….he is against Y, then we must be for Y.

Of course, resistance is badly needed. But it also must be part of, and lead to, the promotion of a pro-active positive agenda along the lines field-tested by the Sanders campaign. The key items include a financial transaction tax on Wall Street, free higher education, single-payer health care, massive infrastructure spending, a halt to the off-shoring of jobs, criminal justice reform, taking money out of politics, and reducing global warming. That’s our agenda, not Trump’s.

The fact that few if any of these issues are being discussed today shows the weakness of a Trump-centric approach.

2. Trump resistance can slide into defending the status quo.

The 2016 election featured a major revolt against runaway inequality and all the elite corruption that goes with it. Sanders from the left and Trump from the right attacked the neoliberal order with considerable success. Hillary Clinton was viewed, perhaps by a majority, as an elite representative of the old order in league with Wall Street.

A full court Trump defense can back us into defending the established order. The Affordable Care Act is such an example. Already progressive groups are rallying to defend it against the Trump/Republican attack. But defending the Affordable Care Act is also a defense of the private insurance and pharmaceutical industries. Our job is to fight in behalf of Medicare for All rather than defending a program that enriches the private healthcare establishment.

But, if Obamacare is eliminated won’t millions of low and moderate income families lose their coverage? Isn’t it foolish in the era of Trump to press for single-payer?

Long-term movement building requires that we make the case for what we really believe in. As Trump reopens the healthcare debate, we need to clearly define and promote the progressive position, rather than accept the polls of a debate that claims the only real choices are Obamacare or something worse. We should be joining forces with Labor for Single Payer and others who continue to press for a rational single-payer system that eliminates the power of the insurance and pharmaceutical industries.

3. Resisting Trump by itself will not win back swing states.

It appears that the defense-only mode assumes that because Hillary won the popular vote, it’s not important to win over marginal Trump supporters who are seeking an alternative to the status quo. We have a national majority so there’s nothing lost by writing off Trump voters.

But this is a very risky assumption. Key swing states may remain in Trump’s column if all we do is resist. A marginal voter could view progressive resist actions as simply disruptive if we don’t put forth a positive agenda that frames our resistance and expands the debate.

Impeachment efforts also have a way of backfiring. It’s important to recall that the impeachment of Bill Clinton made him more popular not less so. And Hillary’s barrage of anti-Trump ads had very little impact on marginal Trump voters. The future goes to whichever camp develops the most compelling vision for America. A negation of Trump is not a vision.

4. Resisting Trump on trade and the off-shoring of jobs is a big mistake.

Progressives are sneering at Trump’s efforts to lure jobs back to the U.S., and using high tariffs to threaten companies that off-shore jobs to low-wage areas. But attacking Trump for saving 850 jobs at Carrier, for example, is politically stupid, morally wrong and factually incoherent.

Here are the simple facts we ignore at our own peril:

  • Trump did indeed save those 850 jobs. There are 850 people and their families (half of whom are women and minorities) who have avoided disaster. It’s a sad commentary on establishment politics that Trump is the first president who has so intervened. But it’s good for American working people when companies are pressured to stay in the U.S. Intervening into our supposedly sacred free-markets is not a sin. We need to advocate for more efforts to slow down the movement of capital rather than critiquing Trump’s interventions.

  • The $7 million given to Carrier to remain in Indiana is par for the course and not a new bribe invented by Trump. Each and every day, in every state of the union, government agencies are showering companies with cash and tax forgiveness either to lure jobs into their states or keep jobs from leaving. In fact, the $7 million is a bargain compared to similar recent efforts in Connecticut and New York.

The fight against off-shoring and bad trade deals should be a progressive cause as it was during the Sanders campaign. We should be rallying in support of workers who are losing their jobs due to off-shoring and support the legislation Sanders is proposing to stop it.

5. Betting on Trump’s failure is reckless.  

Progressives are hoping that Trump will self-destruct, that he will do something so stupid the country will denounce him. At the very least, liberal economists tell us his billionaire-centric trickle-down polices will harm his working-class base and lead to their alienation.

But those are risky bets. We just witnessed Trump destroying the Republican field while bragging about the size of his penis. Somehow, in the general election, he also survived the groping video along with the many insults he hurled against women, the disabled and war heroes. Doubling down on the idea that his behavior will lead to his undoing seems a bit naive at this point, don’t you think?

Similarly, it is not a forgone conclusion that Trump’s economic policies will fail. It is possible that his use of the bully pulpit combined with his privatized infrastructure plans might create a jobs boom large enough to reach workers in key swing states. We don’t as yet know how far he will go on the job creation front, but he seems to be taking that task seriously.

So waiting for Trump’s collapse or just pushing for it, seems like an irresponsible political strategy. Instead, we actually have to do the hard work of building something new that is independent both of Trump and the neo-liberal establishment.

6. Resisting Trump could turn into an excuse to stay within our issue silos.

We have a long, long way to go before we can truly capitalize on what the Sanders campaign showed was possible. Clearly, waiting for Sanders to run again at age 78 is not realistic. Something new must be built starting now.

But progressive organizations are designed poorly for this task. For the last generation each issue, each cause, each identity group has developed its own silo.  Each group creates its own purpose, agenda and fund raising base to ensure its survival.  Most of our groups are highly dependent on philanthropic funding, and those foundations are also segmented into specific issues areas. The net result is extreme fragmentation among progressive organizations.

There is no common agenda, no common strategy, no common structure. We have enormous experience in promoting our specific agenda silos and very little practice in working together around a hard hitting common program that transcends all of our silos.

At the moment, resisting Trump is a proxy for a common cause. It could lead to a broad pro-active movement, but only if we aim it that way. It also could be another excuse to stay within our issue silos. As Trump and the Republicans go after social programs, they will negatively impact many of the issues around which progressives have organized  — voting rights, abortion, the environment, etc.  Defending what we’ve accomplished will seem like the first order of business while broader movement building, it will be argued, is pie in the sky during the Trump era.

That is the most dangerous path of all. Of course, we need to defend the rights we have won. But overall we will continue to lose ground to runaway inequality — something that impacts all of our issues. In fact we are likely to lose on our specific silo issues as well unless we build a broad-based unified movement.

Is movement-building pie in the sky?

Sanders proved that a social democratic movement was possible. But it can’t be sustained around one person. We need a tangible organizing effort that brings together our many issue groups. That entails four tasks:

  • We need a common agenda and common analysis. This should be a no-brainer. Bernie just about got us there last year. Now we need to lay it out simply and clearly and get everyone and their uncle to sign onto it.

  • We need a national educational campaign that explains the agenda and analysis all around the country, as the Populists did in the 1880s. At that time they fielded 6,000 educators that toured the country building local chapters along the way. Today, we need about 30,000 educators, especially in the swing states. (Several key union and community groups are working with our organization, the Labor Institute, to build such an educational infrastructure.)

  • We need a new national organization that we can all join as dues paying members. We should be able to go to Pensacola, Paterson, Pasadena or Poughkeepsie to attend chapter meetings to fight runaway inequality as members of the same national organization. We don’t need to abandon our issue silos, but we need to climb out of them to join something bigger, stronger and more clearly aimed at a new social democratic agenda.

  • Finally, we need to expand our own perceptions of the possible. After 40 years of neoliberalism, our vision has been curtailed. We now find it normal that students should go deeply into debt to attend college or trade schools. We find it normal to have the largest military establishment and the most prisoners in the world. We find it normal that companies can simply pick up and move jobs to low wage areas. And most importantly, we find it normal to believe that a coherent national movement is pie in the sky.

We will never succeed until our sense of the possible expands. Sanders proved that a new social democratic movement can be built. He raised more money than the Clinton machine and overwhelming won the support of young people for an agenda that only a few years ago would have been called socialistic. We can argue about why he didn’t win, but there is no question that his agenda caught on.

Trump’s election is another eye-opener. The very existence of someone called President Trump should shake us up enough to build a massive new movement that starts with resistance but goes far beyond. We really have no choice. Trump’s not playing little ball. Neither should we.

Les Leopold, the director of the Labor Institute, is currently working with unions and community organizations to build the educational infrastructure for a new anti-Wall Street movement.

IMAGE: People gather to protest against Republican U.S. presidential nominee Donald Trump on the sidewalk, outside the grand opening of his new Trump International Hotel in Washington, U.S. October 26, 2016. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

  • Share this on Google+0
  • Share this on Linkedin0
  • Share this on Reddit0
  • Print this page
  • 178

13 responses to “6 Reasons Why Resisting Trump Is Not Enough”

  1. Godzilla says:

    Resist, please, give us more seats in Congress and State houses. Keep calling us names, we want more seats in Congress and State houses. Start a Civil War for all we care….we all have an arsenal ready to go. Resist. Please!!!

    • FireBaron says:

      As you and your ilk have spent since the 1980 trying to convince Americans that “Liberal” is an insult that should be sneered instead of spoken, you have already staked out your little agenda.
      Just remember this – every time the “GOP” agenda was put into full swing, the economy tanked for the lower and what remains of the middle classes. Only the top 1% benefit from whatever they do. As I extremely doubt you are in that top 1%, you too will feel the pain from this fiasco of your own creation.
      Remember, it’s the GOP that managed to allow the tax codes to change letting US based companies export all of their manufacturing to low wage, no safety protection countries.
      It’s the GOP that allows companies to rebrand themselves as based in Ireland, where the US tax codes cannot touch them.
      It’s the GOP that refuses to increase the federal gas tax from 1970s levels, allowing our infrastructure to crumble.
      It’s the GOP that says a little arsenic or lead in our drinking water is no problem.
      It’s the GOP that allowed us to get into a disastrous war that bore no rewards and thousands of our young men were left dead or injured for life.
      It’s the GOP that keeps cutting funding for the Department of Veterans’ Affairs and then calls the Secretary to task for not being able to provide the medical and psychiatric help vets need.
      So, like I have said in the past, you own it, you broke it, you deal with it.

      • RED says:

        Hehehe, you Fire Baron, all the little sick Cons like to believe they’re the ruling class. So they sit in their little mobile homes with their big trucks that are being hidden from the bank repo men and tell themselves how smart they are and what hardworkers they are and how it’s the poor people taking from them. It’s truly the culmination of the indoctrination of stupidity as the national character.

  2. Dominick Vila says:

    The sad truth is that the most we can hope for from our elected officials in Congress is delaying tactics. We simply don’t have the votes to stop Trump and his friends in Congress.
    The future of the Democratic party depends more on Republicans over reaching, than anything our elected officials can do to stop their agenda. The best thing we can do at this point is reflect on what happened, and develop a political strategy that will appeal to the average American.
    Moderate Republicans are not going to side with us. In fact, there may be more vulnerable Democrats defecting to the GOP side in Congress, than Republicans defecting their colleagues when it comes to supporting the Emperor’s proposals, and their own agenda.

    • RED says:

      We have never been able to have any hope from our elected officials, that’s not new. We as the people must stop them and make them answerable and afraid to us and of us. The games of fundraising and hoping new candidates will help us are over. The system is set-up for only the most corrupt to succeed and advance, there aren’t any poor people in Congress, I assure you. So don’t look to the politicians, look the Veterans at Standing Rock, look for the example of the Civil Rights movement, putting our bodies in front of the machine to make it stop, even if it’s only momentarily. Once we have that as our goal and a movement, then we will have the attention of the politicians who will either answer to us or be gone. Their power must be broken instead of us begging for them to throw us scraps!! This is the way forward, the system must be crushed! This time our entire future likely depends on it and you know I mean our survival as a species. And this system has proven over and over again that it places no value on us as people or even our survival as a species and instead only places value on their own greed and grasping for power. It’s truly sickening and if we don’t stop them their greed will consume all of us!

      • Dominick Vila says:

        I agree. Unfortunately, we keep re-electing them, and we just elected one of the most unqualified, inexperienced, arrogant, narcissists, to ever step in the Oval Office. Survival of the species is, indeed, a potential casualty. Hopefully, there are enough cool heads still around to prevent the unthinkable.

      • itsfun says:

        You’re right; its time to drain the swamp on both sides of the aisle. Check out the bank accounts of elected officials before being elected and after being elected. They have so many ways to get around the laws, its easy for them to get rich. Company XX needs a bill passed, so they give Senator xxx 100,000.00 to make a speech, and all of a sudden the bill is passed. That is just one way to get rich. A limit needs to be put on things like making speeches, maybe term limits, We don’t elect Representatives or Senators, we elect political party establishments. Day one in Washington they get summoned to a meeting telling them how they will vote on the issues or don’t expect any committee appointments or help getting re-elected. The system must be crushed as you say.

  3. Jim Samaras says:

    “Yes we can” was proven to be wrong. “No you can’t” was the result of the last election and the mid terms for the last six years. Get used to it libs, there’s a new sheriff in town

    • Teresaatucker says:

      Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj248d:
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      !mj248d:
      ➽➽
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash248MediaStarGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!mj248d:….,……

    • FireBaron says:

      As I have been saying – your guy won. Now you deal with it.

      • Jim Samaras says:

        We will….and all we can hope for is that he does the right things. He had a good start yesterday reeling the republicans in on removing the ethics committee as an example of how he will lead.

  4. dpaano says:

    Apparently, the author of this article is a Sanders devotee. Granted, Sanders had a great many good ideas, but the ability to see them through was non-existent unless we retook the Senate and the House.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.