Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Friday, October 28, 2016

Before anyone even knew just how badly the Democrats would get trounced in the 2014 midterm elections, some pundits were already sending the party a message: Be more like the Republicans.

Now they don’t put it that way, exactly.

The professional campaign watchers like to say instead that the Democratic Party needs to move to the “middle” or the “center.” What they mean is that the Democrats should get closer to the Republicans on the issues.

Think about this for a second.

The turnout for the midterm elections was the lowest in 70 years. Can we really expect more people to get excited about voting if the two major political parties become more like one another?

It doesn’t make much sense, but that’s Big Media’s remedy.

For example, after Senate Democrats voted to give the populist senator Elizabeth Warren a leadership role in their caucus, CBS host Bob Schieffer told one Democrat that it was “going to leave the impression that the party is moving to the left,” when the advice from “a lot of people” is that nothing will get done in Washington unless “both parties move toward the center.”

USA Today actually recommended that Barack Obama steal an idea from post-Iran-Contra Ronald Reagan and apologize on TV. What for? The newspaper didn’t say.

The problem, as The New York Times saw it, was that the Democrats had gone too far to the left under Obama: “Democrats largely abandoned the more centrist, line-blurring approach of Bill Clinton to motivate an ascendant bloc of liberal voters,” the paper insisted.

But that’s a dubious description of Obama-era Democrats.

On foreign policy, after all, the White House has escalated the war in Afghanistan, carried out drone attacks on several countries, helped engineer a disastrous Libyan War, and is now going back into Iraq.

The centerpiece of Obama’s domestic policy, meanwhile — the Affordable Care Act — was borrowed from Mitt Romney, who established a similar initiative as the governor of Massachusetts. And the law’s “individual mandate” to buy insurance was first cooked up by the right-wing Heritage Foundation.

But if that’s what the media considers veering left, what do Beltway insiders think the White House should do to make up for it?

For them, the first order of business is, well, big business: Obama should push through the secretive, corporate-friendly Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal. People who actually turned up to vote must find this peculiar, since almost no one was talking up the deal before Election Day.

What else should Obama do, according to these pundits? Approve the highly controversial Keystone XL pipeline, which would pump dirty tar sands oil from Canada down to the Gulf Coast for refining.

Why would a president who says he cares about the climate crisis do this? To be more bipartisan, apparently.

Does any of this sound like the message voters were sending?

Not at all.

In fact, one of the most intriguing findings to come out of the 2014 exit polls was that voters overwhelmingly think the economic system favors the wealthy: 63 percent of respondents said so, up from 56 in 2012.

This would suggest that a more vigorous brand of economic populism would resonate with voters — even if the pundits would hate it.

Peter Hart is the activism director of Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting.

Distributed via OtherWords.

Screenshot: Face the Nation via OtherWords

Want more political news and analysis? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 The National Memo
  • TZToronto

    The Democratic Party does not need racist old white guys who hope (and pray) for the day when America will be like it was when they were growing up (or what they think they remember about when they were growing up). As a matter of fact, one thing the Democratic Party needs to do is to start yelling about how the Republicans are trying to complete their theft of the American Dream from what’s left of the middle class and how the Republican Party won’t be satisfied until everyone but the uber-wealthy is standing at Interstate off-ramps begging for loose change. Democrats have to start extolling the accomplishments of the Obama administration in spite of Republican obstructionism. Democrats have already moved too far to the right for most liberals. We want our party back, and it’s not the party of the right.

    • Sand_Cat


  • tranz2deep

    The pundits and their media enablers are bought and paid for, and they want the Democrats to fall in line.
    So help me, if that happens America loses the right to be *called* a democracy.

  • bobnstuff

    The Question is when did the media move from reporting the news to being part of the news. Who cares what the talking heads think about how the parties should locate themselves. These people are not experts on politics or national defense. They are experts in media at best. The politicians now play to the media instead of to the voters. We have people like Rush Limbaugh and Glen Beck who under the guise of news give out propaganda and miss
    information. These people are not journalists in any way shape or form but they present themselves as if they were. They have no professional training or education but people will believe anything they say. Just give us the whole and accurate news and let use make up our minds.

  • Sgt. O’Neil

    To be honest, the ideology of liberalism seems like it’s just not serious.

  • Cy Nin

    The underlying idea of today’s liberalism is the notion that liberals are morally superior simply because they proclaim to be.

  • Malcolm Powers

    Today’s liberalism seems to be impelled by the same forces as its socialist ancestors.

    • bobnstuff

      Todays liberals spring from Teddy Roosevelt not socialists. If expecting the government to serve the people instead of big business is socialist then maybe they are. Socialist wasn’t always a bad word in this country. Before Joe McCarthy you could believe in it and not be called a traitor.