By Justin Elliott

Broadcasters’ Last-Ditch Push To Hide Political Ad Data

April 26, 2012 1:09 pm Category: Memo Pad 3 Comments A+ / A-

by Justin Elliott, ProPublica

 

With the Federal Communications Commission set to vote Friday on whether to require broadcasters to post political ad data online, the industry has been scrambling to water down the proposed rule.

The data is currently available only on paper at TV stations. We’ve been tracking the flurry of lobbying against the rule by big media companies, including the owners of many of the nation’s largest news outlets. In the latest development, Communications Daily reported earlier this week that the FCC has become more receptive to the industry’s attempts to soften the proposed rule.

The exact contents of the rule may be in flux until the vote on Friday, and we won’t get a look at the text of the rule itself until sometime after the vote. Those who follow the FCC closely say that while we will likely know the broad outlines of the rule on Friday, the exact text is sometimes not completed and released until days or even weeks after a vote.

But because the FCC might water down the rule, it’s a good time to take a look at exactly what the broadcasters’ counterproposal would mean for the public’s access to the political ad data.

The FCC is made up of two Democrats who have spoken broadly in favor of the proposed rule and one Republican who has criticized it. Citing unnamed “agency and industry officials,” Communications Daily reported Monday (subscription required) that the two Democrats appeared to be showing some give on the crucial issue of whether broadcasters would have to put all — or just some — political ad data online.

“[T]hey said the potential for changes appears higher now than it did earlier last week, when [FCC Chairman Julius] Genachowski seemed set against any modifications,” the publication reported.

In a speech at the annual tradeshow of the National Association of Broadcasters in Las Vegas last week, Genachowski appeared to stand firm against the industry’s lobbying. He answered the industry’s arguments one by one and decried its stance “against transparency and against journalism.”

But Mignon Clyburn, the other Democratic commissioner, reportedly struck a “conciliatory note” in her remarks on the political ad files at the NAB show. “I can affirm to you that in terms of this process, this office is still open for engagement,” she said, according to Communications Daily.

Republican Robert McDowell has echoed the industry’s opposition to the proposed rule.

Lobbying disclosures filed with the FCC this week outline a final proposal written by a Washington attorney for a group that includes the National Association of Broadcasters, Fox, CBS, NBC, ABC, Univision and other stations. (Here is the full list.)

The proposal represents a last-ditch bid by the industry to undermine the rule, which is expected to pass in some form. Just a couple of weeks ago, NAB chief Gordon Smith, a former senator, visited the FCC to express the industry’s flat opposition to any online disclosure rule.

Pages →  1 2

Broadcasters’ Last-Ditch Push To Hide Political Ad Data Reviewed by on . by Justin Elliott, ProPublica   With the Federal Communications Commission set to vote Friday on whether to require broadcasters to post political ad data by Justin Elliott, ProPublica   With the Federal Communications Commission set to vote Friday on whether to require broadcasters to post political ad data Rating:

More by Justin Elliott

From Russia With PR

by Justin Elliott, ProPublica. Today, Vladimir Putin wrote an op-ed about Syria in the New York Times. The piece was placed by the public-relations giant Ketchum, BuzzFeed reported. On Nov. 16, 2012, we explored how Ketchum placed pro-Russia op-eds in American publications by businesspeople and others without disclosing the role of the Russian government. Ketchum’s latest public filing says

Read more...

Does The NSA Tap That? What We Still Don’t Know About The Agency’s Internet Surveillance

by Justin Elliott, ProPublica. Among the snooping revelations of recent weeks, there have been tantalizing bits of evidence that the NSA is tapping fiber-optic cables that carry nearly all international phone and Internet data. The idea that the NSA is sweeping up vast data streams via cables and other infrastructure — often described as the

Read more...

Dark Money Group Spent On House Race, Then Told IRS It Didn’t

by Justin Elliott, ProPublica. Shortly before Election Day last year, mailers went out to Texas voters featuring pictures of a Democratic congressional candidate and a rare species of spider, whose discovery had forced stoppage of an important highway construction project. “The same left-wing extremists who support Pete Gallego want more burdensome regulations that put the

Read more...

Tags

Comments

  • Johntheoldguy

    God forbid that a journalist would have to go to the TV station to collect the data before publishing it online. Journalism used to involve actual work.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_2XQAUUZDVBGZWAL6KWKI3J56LI Blaze Stryker

    I have no faith whatsoever in the Financially Controlled Commission.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100002208884267 Producto Endorsair

    Transparency is good for democracy. Democracy is bad for corporate capitalism. Guess who is going to win this battle.

    The solution is to be a smart serf and don’t harvest all your potatoes at once. Your feudal master wants to increase his share to 65% so leave some in the ground, then sneak back at night in the winter and dig them up.

scroll to top