Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Friday, October 21, 2016

By David O’Reilly, The Philadelphia Inquirer (TNS)

WASHINGTON — Pope Francis on Wednesday surprised and irked victims of Roman Catholic clergy sex abuse when he praised a gathering of U.S. bishops for their “courage” in handling the crisis and consoled them for how stressful it had been.

He also insisted that sex abuse at the hands of clergy must never happen again.

But his remarks brought a stinging rebuke from some abuse victims, who said the word courage should be reserved for themselves.

“The bishops are poster boys for the faint hearted and timid. They have been cowards in the face of rape and sodomy of innocent children,” said the National Survivor Advocates Coalition, which called Francis’ characterization “a fairy tale.”

To the bishops assembled for the first full day of Francis’ six-day U.S. visit, the pope said “I realize how much the pain of recent years has weighed upon you. And I have supported your generous commitment to bringing healing to victims — in the knowledge that we, too, are healed — and to work to ensure that such crimes will never be repeated.”

In 2002, news reports of widespread clergy sex abuse in the Archdiocese of Boston — and extensive concealment of those crimes and reassignments of the abusers — launched a scandal that touched almost all of the nearly 200 Catholic dioceses in the United States.

The Archdiocese of Philadelphia was the target of two devastating grand jury investigations in 2005 and 2011 that found at least 65 and “perhaps hundreds” more priests had abused minors since 1950 — and that many of the crimes were concealed by church authorities.

“Sexual abuse is a criminal act. Bishops have moved predators rather than expose them to the criminal justice system,” the Survivor Advocates statement said.

Francis praised those bishops whose dioceses — such as Boston, Los Angeles and Wilmington — had been forced to sell off properties for hundreds of millions of dollars to compensate victims who have brought successful lawsuits against them.

“Nor have you been afraid to divest whatever is unessential in order to regain the authority and trust which is demanded of ministers of Christ and rightly expected by the faithful,” he told them.

According to data from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, more than 6,900 priests were credibly accused of sexual misconduct with at least 16,900 minors between 1950 and 2011 — and dioceses around the country had paid out more than $2.5 billion to compensate a fraction of those victims.

One of the hardest-hit was the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, which paid $740 million to more than 500 victims, vastly more than the $84 million that the Archdiocese of Boston paid in 2002 — a shocking number at the time.

A dozen dioceses have since filed for bankruptcy in the face of extensive lawsuits, claiming they do not have the resources to pay them. The Diocese of Wilmington in 2011 paid $77 million to settle with more than 150 victims.

In August, the Diocese of Milwaukee, which had filed for bankruptcy protection, agreed to pay $21 million to 330 victims after four years of litigation that one of the victims’ lawyers called “hardball tactics” by the archdiocese.

The Archdiocese of Philadelphia has never revealed how much it has paid out to clergy sex-abuse victims, and most settlements stipulate that the amount be kept confidential.

It is thought unlikely that the payouts by the archdiocese come at all close to those of Boston or Los Angeles, however, because Pennsylvania’s statute of limitations in cases of child sexual assault long required the victim to come forward within two or three years of an assault. By the time many young victims recognized the emotional damage of their abuse, it was too late to file criminal or civil charges against their assailants.

Recent legislation has greatly lengthened the time in which an assault victim in Pennsylvania may bring charges or sue.

“I am … conscious of the courage with which you have faced difficult moments in the recent history of the church in this country,” he said in his lengthy remarks. He praised the bishops for doing so “without fear of self-criticism, and at the cost of mortification and great sacrifice.”

The survivors’ group took exception to the pope’s use of the word “courage” to describe the bishops.

“The word courage should never be used to describe the actions of bishops in the United States — or anywhere else in the world — regarding this crisis.

“This word should be reserved for the survivors alone.”

One Philadelphia victim, John Salveson, said he found the pope’s comments to the bishops — especially his use of “courageous” and “generous” — to be “both insulting and hurtful to survivors of clergy abuse.”

“In reality, the Roman Catholic Church in America has treated clergy sex-abuse victims as adversaries and enemies for decades,” said Salveson, president of the Foundation to Abolish Child Sex Abuse.

Salveson, who has lobbied the Vatican to be able to meet with Pope Francis, said later Wednesday that “I’d meet with him if he wanted to have a serious conversation. I don’t want it to be a photo op.”

The pope’s lengthy address then touched on numerous other topics, with no overt reference again to the clergy abuse crisis. Journalists were not permitted inside the cathedral during the talk, although it was broadcast on television.

While the published itinerary for his U.S. visit does not indicate that the pope will meet with victims of clergy sex abuse during his travels this week, the Vatican Press Office and others have indicated that it might happen.

Philadelphia Archbishop Charles J. Chaput was questioned about the clergy sex-abuse scandal when he appeared last month at the Religion Newswriters Association conference in Philadelphia last month.

Asked if he thought it important for Francis to meet the victims “here,” meaning Philadelphia,” the archbishop replied “I do, and victims do.”

Chaput inherited the scandals and had to deal with the fallout after he became archbishop in Philadelphia in 2011.

He told the religion writers that it was possible Francis would meet with victims in Philadelphia.

“It may happen,” he said, but it is “not something we’d announce in advance.”

A 2005 Philadelphia Grand Jury report asserted that at least 65 priests of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia, “and perhaps hundreds more” had sexually abused hundreds of minors since 1950. But it went on to slam Cardinals John Krol and Anthony Bevilacqua for what it called their “callous, calculating” concealment of their priests’ crimes, which it said “was at least as immoral as the abuse itself.”

Another grand jury report in 2011 found that at least 20 priests who had been credibly accused of misconduct or inappropriate behavior were still in ministry.
Chaput hired a special investigator to interview victims and advise him on which priests should be removed from ministry and which should be returned. He said the investigation cost the archdiocese more than $11 million.

Since the Archdiocese of Philadelphia is hosting the Vatican-sponsored World Meeting of Families this week — and because of the 2005 and 2011 investigation reports were so damaging, many observers speculate that Philadelphia would be the likeliest city for Francis to hold such conversations.

Pope Benedict XVI, in 2008, met privately in Washington with victims of clergy abuse, a gesture generally regarded as the pinnacle moment of his visit, which also took him to New York.

(c)2015 The Philadelphia Inquirer. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Photo: Pope Francis addresses a joint meeting of the U.S. Congress in the Chamber of the House of Representatives on Capitol Hill in Washington September 24, 2015. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

  • Insinnergy

    “A 2005 Philadelphia Grand Jury report asserted that at least 65 priests of the Archdiocese of Philadelphia, “and perhaps hundreds more” had sexually abused hundreds of minors since 1950. But it went on to slam Cardinals John Krol and Anthony Bevilacqua for what it called their “callous, calculating” concealment of their priests’ crimes, which it said “was at least as immoral as the abuse itself.”

    Welcome to the mental disease that is religion.

  • bckrd1

    It seems all the religions are filled with perversions and especially perversions involving children. There is not a day that another story hits the news depicting a believer who has been molesting the kids while the congregation wrings its collective hands and come to his defense and blame the 4 year old for being seductive.