By Jeff Madrick

Distrust In Government Taints The Media, Fueling Austerity Policies

April 13, 2012 1:46 pm Category: Economy, Memo Pad Leave a comment A+ / A-

Does government skepticism influence the way the media reports on austerity economics being practiced in Europe and the U.S.?

I participated in a panel at the Minsky Conference this week in New York City, sponsored by the Jerome Levy Institute and the Ford Foundation. The audience brought up this important question. We now have a lot of evidence that austerity economics — cutting spending and raising taxes when economies are weak in order to reduce budget deficits — almost never works. For those who still have doubts, please consult convincing, important studies from the International Monetary Fund, an organization not known for a progressive bias, that essentially prove the point by correctly analyzing failed historical attempts at creating growth through austerity.

Look no further than Britain for an example. Britain is a non-eurozone country, has had very accommodative monetary policy and a falling pound, but its economy is weakening and it keeps falling behind its deficit reduction promises. Why? Austerity economics in the form of harsh spending cuts and higher VAT taxes.

On top of this, perhaps the two most widely read economic columnists in English, Martin Wolf of the Financial Times and Paul Krugman of the New York Times, have been loudly and repeatedly making the argument that austerity will fail — that is, will make matters worse.

Why, then, do reporters on the beat give so much credibility to austerity economics? This is, of course, a subjective view of reporting, but it is widely shared. When rates go up for struggling eurozone periphery countries, reports usually seem to agree with eurozone ministers that it is because these countries are not tough enough on themselves in terms of cutting spending.

One reason is that government officials talk this way and an unadventurous press simply goes to a couple of sources and gets its story. Most Democrats in Washington talk this way, and of course almost all Republicans, though there are a few extremist supply-siders. Financial market participants also often talk this way. And maybe members of the media have their own biases. CNBC has a parade of blindered anchorpeople and reporters.

But all of this is prejudiced by the widespread skepticism of government that often warps political debate in America (and much of the West these days). There is a bias in favor of cutting spending or blaming it for economic ills. It may be that simple. It affects reporters. It certainly has little to do with the facts.

Pages →  1 2

Distrust In Government Taints The Media, Fueling Austerity Policies Reviewed by on . Does government skepticism influence the way the media reports on austerity economics being practiced in Europe and the U.S.? I participated in a panel at the M Does government skepticism influence the way the media reports on austerity economics being practiced in Europe and the U.S.? I participated in a panel at the M Rating:

More by Jeff Madrick

America Can Attain Full Employment With A Bold Approach To The Jobs Emergency

A new report from the Rediscovering Government Initiative lays out 15 ways the government can create more and better jobs starting right now. After five long years, the economy has at last produced enough new jobs to compensate for the 8 million lost in the Great Recession of 2009. But in that same period some

Read more...

The Progressive Caucus Budget Makes The Right Decisions

The “Better Off Budget” is the only budget proposal in Congress that really places people’s needs ahead of political compromise. The Congressional Progressive Caucus has issued its annual budget and it is in different ways the antithesis of what both the Republicans and Democrats are offering. The Caucus calls it the “Better Off Budget,” and it puts

Read more...

The Congressional Budget Office Should Serve The People, Not Politics

The CBO’s projections often miss the mark, but its mandate is to produce a politically useful number. The admirable Jared Bernstein entirely misses the point in his post about recent critiques of the Congressional Budget Office. Floyd Norris, Zachary Karabell, and Dean Baker have noted how often the CBO gets it wrong, and how it influences policy in damaging ways.

Read more...

Tags

Comments

scroll to top