Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Tuesday, September 27, 2016

WASHINGTON — We know there are coffee lovers and tea lovers, as well as lovers of baseball, football, art, literature, music and cars. But many years ago, Father Richard John Neuhaus, a hero to conservatives who earlier was a guide to religious radicals, identified a category to which I proudly belong: He said there were lovers of opinions.

I do love opinions — those I agree with, certainly, but often enough, even some I disagree with. Having grown up in a politically diverse extended family that spent a great deal of time arguing (fiercely but mostly amiably) about the world, I have always been enchanted by the process through which people reach their conclusions. The factors at play in opinion-formation describe the full range of human capacities and feelings: reason, emotion, experience, interest, calculation, faith, love, hate and willfulness. This brief list is by no means exhaustive.

My love of opinions quickly transformed itself into an affection for the magazines that purvey them. I began at an early age reading National Review and Human Events on the right, and The New Republic and Commonweal on the left. And imagine my joy in discovering that this list only scratched the surface. Rather quickly, I learned about The Nation and the Public Interest, now sadly defunct, along with Dissent and Commentary. I laughed louder than most at Woody Allen’s joke that an unlikely merger of the last two would produce a journal called Dissentary.

Piles of other opinion magazines, from libertarian to socialist, have cluttered every place I’ve ever lived. Such publications are about more than brisk polemics. They can change the world. That’s what William F. Buckley Jr. did when he started National Review in 1955. He and his writers provided the arguments and ideas that revitalized American conservatism. Its work led, eventually, to Ronald Reagan’s victory in 1980. I mourn the result but still admire Buckley’s daring.

What prompts these thoughts is a possible death in this great family of opinionators that could be averted. The American Prospect, a center-left magazine (for which I have occasionally written) faces a financial crisis that could soon force it to shut its doors. My interest here is, in part, unabashedly political, since I think it’s important for our country to have a vibrant publication devoted to an egalitarian brand of liberalism that honors the social contributions of a strong labor movement and values good reporting and writing.

The maddening aspect of The Prospect’s crisis is that it has been innovative in dealing with the new online world that, as an opinion-lover, I also appreciate (even if I would insist that opinionated writing can never substitute for the relentless daily reporting of the traditional news outlets). The magazine gave a start or a big push to some of the best younger progressive online writers now gracing us with their views. They include Ezra Klein, Matt Yglesias, Jonathan Cohn, Kate Sheppard, Dana Goldstein, Laura Secor and Jonathan Chait.

  • rustacus21

    It could very well be that ‘sensationalist’ media, on TV, etc., & can be sprouted from thin air, by rich investors looking to profit off the latest ‘fad’ is at the root of the demise of such a venerated institution as the ‘Prospect’. We all contribute, as much as we’re victimized by this orientation to mass media, over the last century or so. But what we’re missing is the type of deep, thoughtful journalism, which advocates for the Social Contract, Constitutional edicts, out of which ‘grow’ the natural progression of extending Liberties to formerly excluded classes, but most importantly, the institutionalization of justice & equality, which illegalizes greed, corruption, corporate power takeovers of government & mandates education as a public initiative, which is comprehensive, complete & produces a citizenry that IS responsible, elects representatives who anticipate being ‘accountable’ & where both are comfortable engaging each other, over policy. At current, American’s are unable to find media which is truly thoughtful, balanced, honest & keeping in the traditions of the Constitutionally mandated ‘FREE PRESS’ & critical to an ‘enlightened’ citizenry. The will to maintain independent thought will be determined by the want to be uncompromisingly independent of mass media, by the American public. But this would be a tragedy not only for intelligent media, but for Democracy on the whole…

  • William Deutschlander

    The REPUBLICAN MASTERS do not want the minions to THINK for themselves!