Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Wednesday, February 20, 2019

With a tweet that trumpeted “Case reopened,” Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) set off a sustained roar of hyperbole about Hillary Clinton’s emails. As chair of the House Oversight Committee, Chaffetz and seven other Republican committee chairs — along with the ranking Democrats — received a very brief letter on Friday from FBI Director James Comey. In three paragraphs, he informed them that while looking into “an unrelated case,” his agents had found “emails that appeared to be pertinent” to the Clinton server investigation. He had directed investigators to look at the emails, he wrote, and determine their significance.

Nothing could be less surprising than the partisan response to this news by Chaffetz’s fellow Republicans, ever ready to string up someone named Clinton immediately, if not sooner. Reince Priebus, eager beaver RNC chair, leapt to fill the big blank spaces left by Comey’s letter.

“The F.B.I.’s decision to reopen their criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s secret email server just 11 days before the election shows how serious this discovery must be,” said Priebus, although Comey had not characterized it at all. “This stunning development raises serious questions about what records may not have been turned over and why, and whether they show intent to violate the law,” he added, although Comey had said nothing to support any such negative inferences.

Donald Trump, conning and clowning as usual, went still further before a raucous crowd in New Hampshire: “I have great respect for the fact that the F.B.I. and the [Department of Justice] are now willing to have the courage to right the horrible mistake that they made. This was a grave miscarriage of justice that the American people fully understand. It is everybody’s hope that it is about to be corrected.”

What Trump thinks everybody hopes will be “corrected” was Comey’s recommendation last July against any prosecution of Clinton in connection with her private email server. He pretended not to notice that the FBI director had said nothing to satisfy the manic desire of Trump and his followers to see Hillary Clinton “locked up.”

During the hours that ensued, the news that leaked out from “senior officials” scarcely could have encouraged Trump, Priebus, and their squad of would-be executioners. While the outlines of the renewed investigative effort remained dim, it was still possible to discern what was not happening:

Contrary to Chaffetz’s excited tweet, the FBI director’s letter did not indicate that the bureau has “reopened” its investigation of Clinton.

The emails in question were not found on Hillary Clinton’s email server, although some or all of them may be merely copies of emails previously examined by the FBI.

Those emails did not represent evidence intentionally withheld by Clinton from the FBI.

And there was no indication that those emails had prompted Comey to reconsider his July recommendation against prosecution, or his related conclusion that there was “no intentional misconduct” in the handling of evidence by Clinton and her lawyers.

The unrelated case that led to the email discovery, according to the New York Times, was the investigation of former Rep. Anthony Weiner — recently separated from Huma Abedin, Clinton’s top personal aide — for allegedly sending sexual messages via text to a teenaged minor girl.

In the course of that probe, the FBI had taken electronic devices belonging to both Weiner and Abedin from their Manhattan home. On a laptop used by both, agents reportedly found work-related emails written by Abedin, who was questioned in the original investigation. Since the FBI hasn’t examined those thousands of emails yet, they don’t know whether any of them contains “classified” information or is relevant in any other respect.

Indeed, they evidently don’t even know whether any of these emails is actually “new,” or all are merely copies of documents already produced in evidence.

But to protect himself, Comey decided to disclose the emails’ existence to the Congressional committee chairs within a day after learning of them himself, knowing that the Republicans would instantly exploit and distort that information for partisan purposes. (He knows that because Republican leaders distorted the facts to defame him.) Certainly he had no legal obligation to reveal the existence of the emails before he knew anything about them.

The response of Clinton to these disturbing events was tough, firm, and measured. Rather than indulge in conjecture, she and her campaign manager demanded facts.

In an afternoon statement, John Podesta bluntly noted the unrelenting pressure on Comey from Republicans on Capitol Hill and in the media, replete with accusations of collusion, corruption, and “rigging” the election that the FBI may now have swayed toward Trump:

“Upon completing this investigation more than three months ago, FBI Director Comey declared no reasonable prosecutor would move forward with a case like this and added that it was not even a close call. In the months since, Donald Trump and his Republican allies have been baselessly second-guessing the FBI and, in both public and private, browbeating the career officials there to revisit their conclusion in a desperate attempt to harm Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.

“FBI Director Comey should immediately provide the American public more information than is contained in the letter he sent to eight Republican committee chairmen. Already, we have seen characterizations that the FBI is ‘reopening’ an investigation but Comey’s words do not match that characterization. Director Comey’s letter refers to emails that have come to light in an unrelated case, but we have no idea what those emails are and the Director himself notes they may not even be significant.

“It is extraordinary that we would see something like this just 11 days out from a presidential election.

“The Director owes it to the American people to immediately provide the full details of what he is now examining. We are confident this will not produce any conclusions different from the one the FBI reached in July.”

At an evening appearance in Iowa, Clinton stepped before the cameras:

“I have now seen Director Comey’s letter to Congress. We are now eleven days out from perhaps the most important national election of our lifetimes. Voting has already started in our country. So the American people deserve to get the full and complete facts immediately. The director himself has said that he doesn’t know whether the emails referenced in his email are significant, or not. I’m confident whatever they are will not change the conclusion reached in July. Therefore it is imperative that the bureau explain this issue in question, whatever it is, without any delay.”

Writing to FBI  employees on Friday afternoon to explain his decision, the FBI director admitted that “we don’t ordinarily tell Congress about ongoing investigations, but here I feel an obligation to do so given that I testified repeatedly in recent months that our investigation was completed. I also think it would be misleading to the American people were we not to supplement the record.  At the same time, however, given that we don’t know the significance of this newly discovered collection of emails, I don’t want to create a misleading impression.  In trying to strike that balance, in a brief letter and in the middle of an election season, there is significant risk of being misunderstood…”

But the Department of Justice has clear guidelines prohibiting its employees, including every official and agent at the FBI, from seeking to influence the political process. In a March 2012 letter to all Justice employees, former Attorney General Eric Holder laid down a clear rule: “Law enforcement officers and prosecutors may never select the timing of investigative steps or criminal charges for the purpose of affecting any election, or for the purpose of giving an advantage or disadvantage to any candidate or political party.”

Holder’s letter also established protocol for all Justice Department employees — a category that includes the FBI director — who must decide how to proceed in a politically sensitive case before an election. “If you are faced with a question regarding the timing of charges or overt investigative steps near the time of a primary or general election, please contact the Public Integrity Section of the Criminal Division for further guidance.”

Did Comey consult the Public Integrity Section before he contacted the highly partisan Chaffetz and his colleagues? Given his undue haste, that seems unlikely. But either way, the gleeful reaction of the Republicans leaves no doubt as to who got the advantage from the FBI director’s vague little letter. It remains to be seen whether and how he can ameliorate this reckless and ethically dubious act before Election Day — or if he will even try.

  • Share this on Google+0
  • Share this on Linkedin0
  • Share this on Reddit0
  • Print this page
  • 1714

525 responses to “Ethical Questions Surround FBI Director’s Decision On Email Probe”

  1. the actual Bajmahal says:

    This is going to backfire on Comey and the repubs. I’ve spent the day madder than the proverbial wet hen, but I’ve already voted. However, two different friends that I’ve been ranting/commiserating with told me how this stunt has prompted their more apathetic loved ones to get off the fence and vote — FOR Hillary. Our collective anger and ranting may have had something to do with it. Americans don’t like cheaters and don’t like feeling manipulated.

    • I Am Helpy says:

      It’s gonna cost this guy the FBI directorship, for a whole host of reasons. Hope he thinks this 10 minute non-scandal was worth it.

      • AgLander says:

        And you were effusively praising him just a few weeks ago!! What happened?! Your display of hypocrisy on steroids just confirms once again you are the spit blowing idiot of the village. Go back downstairs and stay there this time (we’ll throw you egg salad sandwiches and water at meal times).

        • I Am Helpy says:

          I’m sorry that you have to make up ridiculous lies. It’s part and parcel of being a traitorous America-hating neo-Nazi, I suppose.

          • AgLander says:

            Don’t be so sad…..remember, you’ll be getting lots of egg salad sandwiches down there in the lower level!

          • I Am Helpy says:

            OK your elementary school insults sure do make up for the fact that you can’t find a single bit of dirt on Clinton after three decades, and also are gonna lose. Sorry your candidate is an actual goddam child molester – but then, all you neo-Nazis are at least that gross.

          • AgLander says:

            I’m only doing it for you! When at an elementary school, talk in a way that allows the little kiddies to understand. And it seems to be working on you!

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Equal parts impotence and desperation. I love it! You gonna lose!

          • Mama Bear says:

            thanks for the great visual of old AgLander and his “impotence”
            I love, Helpy, best visual for this imbecile yet and more than likely true in every sense:)

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Dude is seriously scared of cooties – which is not becoming in a guy who has to be at least 60 years old.

          • Mama Bear says:

            You do realize he is a paid troll. They are paid on the number of comments they generate. If you block him you will cut off his source of income and that, in my experience, always works. He will go away to try it on another site.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            I just like the fact that he can never back up anything he says, and that he reeks of despair.

          • skisok says:

            We’ll be giving you lectures only in your cell and if you’re good, we’ll throw you a dog biscuit.

        • Daniel Jones says:

          hAg-sLander!!

          Surprised you weren’t around for the previous article, helping itsfun lie via copy-paste in claiming the Department of Justice does not employ and command the FBI.

          (Incidentally, I do not give a rat’s ass about your actual gender, the derivation of your “pen name” applies.)

      • Mama Bear says:

        Hope the RNC made it worth his while.

      • sigrid28 says:

        Maybe Comey has plans to run on the ticket with one of Trump’s sons in a general election happening in the dystopian future as imagined by the senior Trump, who is so impressed by Putin, a former agent in the KGB.

  2. Theodora30 says:

    When will Democrats realize they should never, ever appoint a Republican to these kinds of offices no matter how upstanding they may seem. Clinton got bamboozled into appointing “Boy Scout” Louie Freeh as FBI Director. Freeh spent years and lots of our $$ helping Ken Starr try to bring Clinton down with bogus investigations.

  3. Dominick Vila says:

    The proverbial October surprise, this time involving a more sophisticated version of pregnant chads, raised its ugly head once again. Eleven days before a presidential election.
    Whether or not FBI Director Comey acted under tremendous pressure from Congressional Republicans, or the FBI actually uncovered more e-mails that “may be pertinent to the investigation” into Hillary’s private server or not, that fact is that this latest attempt to derail Hillary’s path to victory is, once again, evidence that our elections are, indeed, rigged.
    The only silver lining I can think of is that I doubt The Donald will talk about rigged elections during the remainder of this presidential campaign.
    It remains to be seen whether or not the American electorate takes the bait. In my case, I am glad I voted early…for Hillary!

    • AgLander says:

      Get to high ground, my friend, because a wave election is now a real possibility as the nation and even the liberal, Clinton loving media has no choice but to turn on this queen of corruption…….Supporting the Clintons requires so much energy because you have to turn a blind eye to so many scandals and illegalities occurring right in front of you, but the human brain can only take so much of a badgering and “Clinton Fatigue” is now a very real factor. “Enough is enough” is the best way to describe what undecided voters are thinking this morning.

    • charleo1 says:

      Exactly! Whatever the FBI might eventually find on Anthony Weiner’s shared laptop, does nothing to make Trump any more qualified, any more suitable of an alternative, or any less dangerous to the security of the Country as its President.
      In fact, and it is amazing how he does it. But he manages to disqualify himself all over again every time he opens his mouth. Yesterday, him and his mob, given what they perceived to be a lifeline to Trump’s embarrassment of a campaign. Could hardly contain themselves. Trump leading the disgusting spectacle, Braying, and bellowing like some mentally deranged third world Mussolini, “Worse than Watergate!!” He screamed into the over amped up public address system. :Crooked, crooked, Hillary! He repeated ad nauseam as the crowd roared, “LOCK HER UP!” LOCK HER UP!! I had to remind myself which Country, and under what system of justice that first presumes innocence, I was living.

      • msnyc10 says:

        Interesting how selective we are about when we apply presumption of innocence. I don’t want Trump in the White House any more than you but the subjective and selective application of reasoning is possibly more scary than anything else.

    • sigrid28 says:

      My recommendation–New HRC ads blanketing the airwaves: Repeating loops of Bernie Sanders shouting, “I’m tired of hearing about Hillary’s damned emails!”

      • Mama Bear says:

        Dems sure have the money to do that. Great idea.

      • dtgraham says:

        Sigrid, I’m so glad to see you back on the National Memo again. The last time that I saw your posting name, you were telling me what chances the Democratic candidate had against Joni Ernst in Iowa. You were working for that Dem candidate’s campaign as I recall and you were telling me how it was going. That was in late 2014, and I’ve never seen your posting name since. Nice to see you back.

    • Marilyn says:

      Why did Comey send the letter only to Republicans? There are Democrats on that committee, too. This makes me question his motives.

      • Dominick Vila says:

        …or who was putting pressure on him to do this. The fact that the latest revelation, which according to Comey, may contain information pertinent to the investigation into Hillary’s decision to use a private server, involves correspondence by former Rep Wiener, a sexual predator, highlights how low the neo-Nazis are willing to go to win an election.

        • msnyc10 says:

          Pretty sure Comey and/or the Republicans didn’t have any control over where emails pertinent to the investigation showed up. Dems digging up women to tell (embellish? lie/) about their experiences with Donald 20 years ago isn’t low, the FBI informing Congress that new emails have surfaced pertinent to the formerly closed *criminal* investigation of the presumptive POTUS is. Remarkable. I’ll grant you that how the Republicans and Trump spin it is ludicrous however it is politics as usual.

          • sigrid28 says:

            What proof do you have that Democrats are “digging up women to tell . . . about their experiences with Donald”?

    • skisok says:

      I think most Americans have made up their minds and are not going to fall for a last, stupid attempt by the GOPS to change the outcome. Trump has already made his bed and time for him to sleep on it. The first thing I would do as President is to have the IRS fully investigate the Donald. Oh no, wait, he’s already under investigation for misappropriation of campaign and Foundation funds. Let’s keep digging until we get all of the dirt on him.

      • Dominick Vila says:

        Plus a rape case involving a woman who claims to have been raped by Trump when she was 13 years old!

      • msnyc10 says:

        Do you think changing the conversation to allegations against Trump changes the fact that there are allegations against Hillary. To repeat; the Federal Bureau of Investigation informed Congress that they were amending their prior testimony regarding closing the CRIMINAL investigation against the now presumptive POTUS as new emails had surfaced in an unrelated investigation that were “pertinent” and that they were going to review those to assess if they needed to re-open the investigation or not. Who cares about Trump? We all know he’s unfit and all the reasons. This is about Hillary Clinton and an entirely valid and important investigation. If this were Bush running you’d be all over it. Try making your decisions objectively you’ll have a lot easier time of it. Me, I already decided I have to vote for Hillary to stop Donald yet that doesn’t mean I’m putting my hands over my hears when the FBI provides information about such a critical issue.

        • sigrid28 says:

          During this election, we have all had to give a lot of thought to what it means for two things (or persons or situations) to be “equal.” You are right that “false equivalency” has led many astray. Even media organizations that strive to be fair don’t have time to go into the particulars because the discussion might be too lengthy and very complicated. What these media don’t admit is that delving into both sides of a “false equivalency” is likely to invalidate it. Then how would these media have the time and resources to be fair?

          To be fair–that is why news organizations give apologists for Trump’s excesses equal time whenever minutes are devoted to Hillary, because these media see this as a way of providing balanced coverage. Trump’s surrogates have made a trope of responding to the Donald’s latest excess by glancing over it and pivoting to something related to Hillary (comparing their foundations, for example).

          Yet to give up the idea of balanced news coverage is to go the route of Fox or Breitbart or the RNC whose leader “will not be dominated by fact-checkers.” These media cover lies and conspiracy theories as if they were the truth. That is why Comey’s brief letter plays into their hands.
          However, Comey represents the FBI and our branch of government that is devoted to the rule of law and order, not a news organization operating under the presumption that its coverage is fair. Those who question his motives observe that what he had done could effect the outcome of the election and that he has done this by overlooking protocol meant to protect the independence of our separated branches of government. Surely, we can be critical of his motives while still admitting the possibility that Hillary’s private server may have, inadvertently, led to security breaches. Voting for her, with this controversy simmering in her name, is far different from voting for Trump, who is being tried at the same time as he runs for office for sexual predation and business fraud and tax violations.

          • msnyc10 says:

            I don’t disagree with your last sentence at all and nothing in my replies suggested as much. My point is only that objectively one cannot object to the FBI prosecutor alerting the US Congress he had just testified to that he had closed a criminal investigation against the likely next POTUS that he had been alerted about new information that may be germane which would require further review on his part.

            Laslty, if emails on Hlllary’s private sever led to security breaches that was not “inadvertently”: the classified information is not to be kept on private servers for that precise (and other) reasons and IF she kept classified data on her server and IF it led to security breach that is neither inadvertent nor is it legal, it is in fact a single person putting the nation at risk by flouting the law. I’m far less critical of Trumps’s motives in spinning the Comey email than I am of her motives in breaking the law on handling of classified information if she did and her motives in lying about it.

          • sigrid28 says:

            Spare me and all of the other intelligent, well-meaning folk on this comment thread. We have all heard Trump bloviating to the effect that the consequences of Clinton’s use of a private server were INTENDED to be evil and traitorous and whatever else pops into Trump’s head–anything but that lapses in confidentiality were entirely “unintentional.” Most sensible people do not mop up the conspiratorial drivel that you are trying to validate.
            There is a point of logic in all of this. If Hillary Clinton cannot claim as a defense the “law of unintended consequences” with respect to her email server then neither can the NRA’s gun manufacturers, who have so far paid good money to Trump and his ilk to make sure that they cannot be sued by parents when their products result in “unintended consequences” like the deaths of preschoolers at Sandyhook and elsewhere. These gun manufacturers know exactly what they are doing.
            If Hillary Clinton cannot claim as a defense the “law of unintended consequences,” then Donald Trump cannot claim that, in doing as other billionaires have done routinely by paying no federal income tax, he did not intend to stiff the military and all of the other federal programs paid for through taxes. Even Donald Trump must have known that the failure to pay federal taxes was a failure to pay his fair share toward supporting this government programs.
            The difference between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, with respect to “unintended consequences,” is that she is remorseful and admits to the error in following Collin Powell’s advice and using a private server. Donald Trump blames Washington for his failure to do his part while implying that in his tax bracket such malfeasance is a privilege of the elite.
            The difference between Hillary Clinton and the gun manufacturers is that the gun manufacturers will not take responsibility for unintended consequences resulting from their products. Clinton has apologized for selecting a server that may have led to unsecured transmission of classified material she and her staff had every intention of protecting. There is a difference even if you willfully refuse to see it.

  4. dbtheonly says:

    Be fair to Comey. He has been instructed to report to Congress anything that may impact the “Clinton emails”. One simply does not ignore Congress.

    Blame the Lamestream Media for taking an investigative “may” and converting it to does.

    Blame the Lamestream Media for getting every story with legal ramifications wrong.

    Blame the RWMO for their exploitation of anything with the name on it.

    But don’t blame Comey for complying with a Cogresssional order.

  5. AgLander says:

    “Houston, we have a problem!”

    “Pants Suit Airlines” has been lost from radar and presumed lost; downed in the swamp of corruption from which it was created!

    • I Am Helpy says:

      The desperation which you dumb losers are trying to spin this non-scandal into something is incredibly hilarious.

      You gonna lose!

      • AgLander says:

        I suppose there’s a chance Johnson could win with voters abandoning crooked Hillary, but I doubt it.

        • I Am Helpy says:

          Yes yes you got nothing and you’re terrified of women.

          You gonna lose.

          • AgLander says:

            Hillary a woman? Can you offer proof of that right now?

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Absolutely terrified. I love it! You gonna lose!

          • AgLander says:

            For sake of accuracy, please be informed that I’m terrified of harpies but not women! Glad to help you set the record straight.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Again, it’s gruesome watching you attempt to “joke”, and it does not disguise your cowardice. You bleat it out on every article, man. It’s unbecoming a senior citizen like yourself.

          • AgLander says:

            Admit it……the Clintons have exhausted every ounce of energy you had remaining as you chased after all the false promises that turned out to be a truckload of lies. You are young, you were gullible. You have learned a valuable lesson…..DON”T TRUST A CLINTON! There’s a 3 decades long trail of criminality that you ignored and look where it got you today….

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Hahahaha wow you’re even dumber than I thought. Sure, the email non-scandal sure is worse than the Republican candidate going on trial for raping a kid, if you’re an unemployable neo-Nazi who failed elementary school.

          • AgLander says:

            I’m here for you…..I just want to help you have a soft landing!

          • Gasping desperately for air to save your master’s backside.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Again, stop trying to be funny – you utterly lack the capacity.

          • ivory69690@yahoo.com says:

            we are still wondering what you are

    • “Earth to AgLander”–Your heat-shield has failed on re-entry from Pluto, and you’re about to be consumed in flames.
      Agatha, your attempts to sound normal are futile—much like sardines flipping out on the deck of a trawler hoping to get back into the ocean.

    • ivory69690@yahoo.com says:

      can only hope you was on that flight

  6. Mama Bear says:

    Here is my takeaway from reading this – once again Hillary is the only adult in the room. Her response was absolutely PRESIDENTIAL! She is unflappable and without a doubt going to be an amazing Commander-in-Chief….or is that Adult-in-Chief….

    • Theresajmitchell says:

      Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj218d:
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      !mj218d:
      ➽➽
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash219MediaJustGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!mj218d:….,….

    • bobnstuff says:

      If the tables were turned Trump head would be exploding right now. I do wonder about the FBI directors timing though. Who investigates the FBI?

    • kep says:

      She’s a corrupt lying bitch, not unlike the trash we already have occupying our White House.

      • Mama Bear says:

        and you are not fit to address me.

        • kep says:

          Too afraid of the truth? Liberals are like cockroaches when a light is turned on. They scatter when presented with anything true.

          • Mama Bear says:

            good night slug

          • kep says:

            Lol. They do keep you locked in a dark basement along with the other paid trolls, don’t they? It’s morning.

          • charleo1 says:

            A real zinger this one, eh? It is interesting, not that this creep probably realizes it. But the cockroach similitude was used by the German Storm Troopers when rounding up Jews out of Ghettos where they had first interned them, to be shipped off to the death camps. It’s sad what Trump has brought out in our fellow Americans…

          • Mama Bear says:

            My guess is he knew exactly what he was saying when he used the word, Charleo. I blocked him not so much because I found him offensive but because he is one of the paid trolls and the more comments they get the bigger their bonus. Starve him off this site.

          • charleo1 says:

            You sound like a Fascist thug. You know that right?

          • kep says:

            Fascist thugs are people like those hired by Hillary and the DNC to disrupt Trump rallies being paid $1500 and an iPhone.

          • charleo1 says:

            So you aren’t aware of the Storm Troopers instructions to search out Jews as if they were cockroaches? It makes my larger point, that you Trump supporters have no idea of what you’re actually supporting. And it is this ignorance that is your fundamental problem that is creating the threat to everyone’s liberty. But then, why on Earth should Hillary want to disrupt a man who’s hateful, and racist rallies represent the worst this Country could become? To interrupt Trump’s off the cuff rants, which are presenting the single best case for people to get out and support her candidacy? Even if it’s only to vote against Trump. What would be point?

          • skisok says:

            And you’re Trumps representative for these forums. I hope Trump stiffs you like he did all of his other cohorts.

          • skisok says:

            The GOPs don’t know the truth because they are so used to lying or stretching it beyond its elasticity.

      • jmprint says:

        But you’ll satisfy yourself with a dooky log in the house.

      • skisok says:

        Stop talking about yourself.

    • ivory69690@yahoo.com says:

      as then the child minded clown DONNY DUMP will be tweeting his B/S to her for the next 8 years . or until the DUMPSTER FOOLS go’s to far and is arrested for doing some or saying something stupid as he always dose

      • Karenhmarsh says:

        Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj225d:
        On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        !mj225d:
        ➽➽
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash225DirectEasyGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!mj125d:….,…….

    • skisok says:

      This will come back to haunt the GOP and deservedly so.

    • FT66 says:

      All in all James Comey must resign immediately. People have lost confidence in him. Republicans didn’t trust him then when he saw nothing to prosecute Hillary. We Dems don’t trust him now by interfering in our making DEMOCRACY at the last days in election and injecting politics in justice. Who is Comey still working for? Only for independents!

  7. AgLander says:

    The coffin containing the Clinton campaign is now ready for the final nails to be pounded into its top. We should have a raffle so everyone can compete for a chance to drive home one of those last nails!

    • charleo1 says:

      You’re gonna be so mad when this changes nothing. I’d look into that sheep syndrome, where you believe every lie a certified con throws at you, if I were you.

      • AgLander says:

        Sheep? Are you kidding me!! You continue to support a free roaming felon under CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION by the FBI and you call ME a sheep? Do you people enjoy parading around like naked fools?!

        • charleo1 says:

          I’m sorry, but I unlike Republicans do not deal in outright lies, and innuendo. I don’t recall Hillary Clinton being convicted of anything, much less of being a felon. The truth of the matter is, this politically motivated witch hunt being erroneously referred to as a “criminal investigation,” is nothing but a failing RW political apparatus grasping for straws. The other fact of the matter, which you ignore. Is that after more than year of dirt digging involving tens of thousands of emails. This so called “investigation,” ordered by partisan Republicans in a House of Representatives they control, has shown nothing, other than a Secretary of State dutifully carrying out her job. So yes, you have allowed yourself to become a dupe. And I imagine it’s gonna hurt when this all shakes out, and Hillary Clinton is elected President by huge majorities of Americans that have shown themselves more savvy, and better informed than yourself in ferreting out the lies. But that’s the way it goes when you allow yourself to be set up. Be smarter than to pick a buffoon to be President next time, and maybe that won’t happen.

          • plc97477 says:

            I’m sorry but the trump was the best they had to offer. They might be able to dig something up but it is doubtful. All they had to offer were buffoons.

          • ivory69690@yahoo.com says:

            the GOP gang of pinheads already admitted it is all plan to try to make Hillary look back . ADMITTED IT mind you those type of fools a judge prays for in their court . cant wait till the DUMPSTER loses and then go’s to court on rape and then get sued . but then all will find out DONNY DUMP has no money anyways . then he will say can I write you a check ?

        • kep says:

          Liberals aren’t too bright. They continously lie and try to rewrite history to further their communist agenda.

          • bobnstuff says:

            I would go light on talking about lies, you do know that Trump is trying to set a world record as the candidate who has told the most lies in one campaign. As far as Communist goes, you might want to look it up before you use the word.

          • kep says:

            No one can surpass the lying of the Emperor and Hillary. They hold the record for untruths told in a single sentence.

          • bobnstuff says:

            Sorry but she isn’t even in the running with Trump.He has told two different lies on the same thing in the same speech, it takes great talent to do that. My favorite is when he says he didn’t say something that is on tape. He’s running a 73% untruth rating right now. He is a marvel.

          • jmprint says:

            Republicans are easily manipulated, all one has to do is pull on their suspenders, and they repeat what the puppet masters tell them.

          • Jim Samaras says:

            and you guys are not guilty of the same? Ridiculous..

          • bobnstuff says:

            The republican party is run from the top down, that’s one of their problems with Trump but they still run things from the top. The democrats are run from the local level, I have seen it first hand as a ward chairman in the Republican party.

          • Jim Samaras says:

            Which is why the democratically controlled cities are in such a mess

          • bobnstuff says:

            Lets face it most major cities are a mess, underfunded and run by committee.

        • ivory69690@yahoo.com says:

          then again your wanna be B/F DONNY DUMP still has to answer to his rape of a 13 year old child . are you sad he didn’t send you pics ?

      • Anna Maria Yoakum says:

        I doubt that Aggie is a true believer of the Trumpster – all Aggie wants to do is spread the lies as per Ag’s job discreption of being a hired troll – every click is money in little Ag’s pocket. I just don’t know if Ag’s boss is Trumpty-Dumpty or Putin ?

        • charleo1 says:

          Maybe he is being paid. But I think if we are to face the arguments many on the Right are trying to make, we must assume people are who they claim to be, and believe what they claim to believe. Otherwise we can’t fault those who doubt our own sincerity. The high schooler who struggles to be who he is, and use a bathroom facility where he’s not going to be bullied. I think we must assume a Conman is revealing his true self when he suggests rounding up 12 million people, along with their 3/4 million American citizens children.

    • What delusions are troubling you today? Being an emissary and chief stooge for Trump is a tiring job, but you have the stamina to do it.

    • Genevieve Martin says:

      AfLander: Speaking of pounding nails in coffins – Wait for the early November surprise from the Dems…..it will truly be the Coup de Grasse to end all others – and I hear that once again it will be in his own words…….

  8. Carl Sdano says:

    The FBI director: “This may be misunderstood”. Ya think maybe?

  9. AgLander says:

    If you were a member of a search committee for your company’s next CEO and, in screening the list of candidates, you find that one of them has been shadowed by the nations top law enforcement agency, the FBI, for months over criminal conduct and they have just reopened that investigation with new evidence surfacing.

    Question: Would you forward this person’s name for further interviews and consideration for the top job in your company or would you quickly eliminate this person from any consideration?

    Another question: Would you even hire this person to handle the cash drawer at a Taco Bell?

    Another question: Would you steer as clear from this person as possible?

    • sigrid28 says:

      In what spy book–or universe–does Comey’s treatment yesterday, of potential emails related to Clinton’s utilization of a private server, fall under the category of “shadowing”?

    • charleo1 says:

      After years of investigation, after investigation, revealing no crime, I would start to wonder what all the investigations are really about? Which group of people are trying to cloud the hiring process? What is their agenda? And why is their case against this person so weak, and so false they need illusions? I would wonder about their credibility. What are they hiding? Why are they lying, and trying to create a scandal where none exists? Do they really want the best CEO for the company? Or the one that would serve their best interests? That’s what I would think.

      • Jim Samaras says:

        The Clintons are masters of plausible deniability charleo……they keep all their deceptive actions at arms length…..close enough to raise founded questions yet far enough to deny conviction. Sometimes it actually is a duck….

        • charleo1 says:

          Well I’m sorry Jim, in a Country of laws, where citizens are convicted or found to be not guilty by a process of evidence presented. Being labeled as guilty because they are thought to be in some court of public opinion to be masters of chicanery, may be good enough in some Counties, but not this one. In this one, we apply the same standards we would have applied to us if we ever found ourselves so accused. Now do we really want to change that? I don’t think so.

          • Jim Samaras says:

            Of course not! However, the court of public opinion has no such boundaries or limitations and enough circumstantial evidence is out there to sway even the most liberal view in my opinion. With as many questions that are out there would you hire this woman as a high ranking official in your corporation? If you’re being honest I think not!

          • charleo1 says:

            That’s your very subjective belief, unsupported by any facts, or hard evidence brought to bear to back it up. Use your vote to voice your opinions as is proper. But it’s dangerous turn of events I’m seeing, to expect the law to automatically underwrite them. Or if the desired results are not forthcoming, then put the courts, the process, and the law enforcement agencies on trial. That is another matter entirely. You see this, do you not? There is a process enshrined in this Country. If we throw that out for expediency’s sake, how wise is that? Not very.

          • Jim Samaras says:

            If there were no guilt there it would be hard to imagine the reason for this relentless oppression charleo. Can’t blame it on them being black so why the continuing pressure? The Clintons are very smart and cover their tracks like native Indians

          • charleo1 says:

            Ever hear of partisan politics? Ever hear of a smoke machine?

          • jmprint says:

            Speaking of native Indians, how much longer are you republicans going to keep stealing from them.

          • Jim Samaras says:

            LOL, as long as Washington and Cleveland keep the names of their ball teams

          • jmprint says:

            With her knowledge, and kind heart, YES. I would hire to be the next President of the United States. Look at the money people have made with conspiracy theories, they are racking in the funds, the brain washing business is a money making scam.

          • Jim Samaras says:

            Kind heart? Did you read what her ex Secret Service have said of her?

          • jmprint says:

            I’ve seen it, (disgruntled employee) but I have also read all of her good deeds and inspirations.

          • Jim Samaras says:

            Yet they all say how nice it was working for the Bushes. Not a Bush fan at all but just saying

          • jmprint says:

            Yet the Bushes are smart enough NOT to vote for Trump, maybe you ought to follow other leaders. Hillary for President 2016, that’s who there voting for.

          • JPHALL says:

            Yeah, they used to lynch people then find out it was a mistake. Public opinion versus rule of law? I choose rule of law!

        • bobnstuff says:

          I see you believe that the Clinton’s are far smarter then everyone in Congress and are true masterminds. They must be to get away with all the things people say they have done but explain how an intern could foul up these great masterminds? Do that make her the smartest person on earth? I’m amazed that you give the Clinton’s so much credit.

          • Jim Samaras says:

            I’ve never said they were stupid! That, they are not. But even the sharpest get caught eventually.

          • bobnstuff says:

            Or they might not be that smart but instead they really didn’t do the thing they are accused of, ever thought of that?

          • Jim Samaras says:

            Maybe not guilty of all accusations but if as little as 10% of the many things are founded then does she deserve punishment? Where there’s smoke there’s fire

          • charleo1 says:

            There are just a lot accusations, and always have been. There were in the 90s, over 60 million dollars worth of unfounded accusations, save one. Bill Clinton had an affair, and lied about it. He didn’t betray the Country, wasn’t derelict in the duty as President, didn’t collude with the Nation’s enemies, didn’t sell his office. He had an affair. So what’s the criminal penalty for that in this Country? Mined for political hay, what’s it worth? Not much as Republicans in that day found out. Yet here they come again. This time it’s Hillary. Same old strategy, same old endless accusations, never ending investigations. Now they are suggesting investigating the investigators! I would hope that Republicans, their own politics in disarray, would see better things to occupy their time.

          • bobnstuff says:

            Or it could be just someone blowing smoke.

          • jmprint says:

            Geniuses, I tell you, geniuses.

    • We will steer as far from you and Trump as possible, Agatha. Any other questions troubling your tiny mind? Would you invite Trump to make a move on your mom and daughters, is another question for you, Agatha.

    • Genevieve Martin says:

      AgLander And if the only other candidate for the position is a sexist, racist, vulgarian who lies constantly (sometimes in the same sentence) and who has several active, pending matters to be adjudicated by the various courts (some like the one set for December of quite a shocking nature or the matter with the University); and who has admitted on recorded tape, and outlined how he has grabbed and assaulted women……who has been accused by at least 12 women of sexual assault, who has no knowledge of critical subject areas related to the job, whose answer to for example, foreign affairs questions prompted the #Book Report series on Twitter, i.e. Book Reports done by teenagers who had not read the assigned book. This applicant would not make the list of persons to be interviewed for a job at Taco Bell or 7/11.

      • bobnstuff says:

        Don’t forget that he has crashed a number of companies in the past and skimmed of the profit. The number of people who will not do business with this man keeps growing. He has even stated outright that it’s OK to lie in business. Who in their right mind would want this person as CEO?

    • TMZ1928 says:

      No federal agency would be able to hire Hillary, even for a low-level GS job, because she would not be able to get a security clearance.

    • I Am Helpy says:

      Yes we should hire a rapist because imaginary email crimes. That isn’t stupid at all.

  10. Well, here’s another example of the utter rot that is still eviscerating a moribund system that can hardly stand up. And some of the rotting agents, Trump and the RNC, are gloating. This concerted effort by the FBI and the RNC is ostensibly intended to serve the cause of justice, when in fact it is just a sign of the desperation of the GOP in light of its own miserable record and that of its standard-bearer.
    And so, they futilely hope that this will distract us and shift the spotlight away from Donald’s racist and sexual predatory nature—all for the lust for power and wielding unchallenged influence.

    (Emails/Benghazi attack by jihadists) versus (Sordid acts/racism) are intended to be portrayed as evenly matched activities. Only minds ravaged by improper upbringing, rancor, a love for discord, and corruption would make such false equivalences.

    • Mama Bear says:

      Fear is evil’s best tool. Can you recommend a “beginner’s” book on Buddhism?

      • I’m not that well-versed in Buddhism yet I know the Buddha to be one of the Major Messengers sent by God to the subcontinent of India prior to Jesus’ Dispensation. He is mentioned in the Baha’i Writings as being one of the series of Messengers sent to humanity as part of the pattern called by Baha’u’llah as “Progressive Revelation”.

        There was a great PBS series on Religion which had a program on the Buddha which a group of us Baha’is and a Buddhist watched together and commented on afterwards. The title of the dvd is “The Buddha: The Story of Siddhartha” which Amazon has.

        There is also a book by a Baha’i scholar named Jamshid Fozdar entitled “Buddha Maitrya: Amitabha Has Appeared”, but it’s not a beginner’s book and requires patience to read. I have a copy, and it might be available on Amazon. I’ll have to check my book shelves to see if I have some other choices.

        I’ll let you know.

        • Mama Bear says:

          Thank you Aaron, much! For some reason I thought you practised Buddhism, maybe because you seem very calm and patient. I will check into the PBS series.

    • AgLander says:

      It’s currently 85 degrees in Muscat at 6:00PM local time. Christians, under edict from the Sultan, are nervously making their way to state authorized worship locations knowing that they would be in serious trouble if caught worshipping in their homes. Muslims, of course, can pray or worship anywhere they want in public or at home.

    • skisok says:

      I think it’s really intended to win the Senate and House elections. Trump’s goose is already cooked.

  11. TMZ1928 says:

    Comey is just trying to get ahead of a coming explosion. At the heart of this story is the action of Obama, Lynch and Comey in halting the indictment of Hillary Clinton just days after Bill Clinton’s “impromptu” conversation with AG Lynch on her plane. None of us would even know about this little meeting had an airport worker not observed and called a pal who worked for a local TV station. Perhaps Comey’s hand has been forced due to an anticipated release of information that will blow this out into the open. In sparing Hillary the indictment for her crimes, they have tarnished their own reputations for all time. She should be preparing for her trial right now, not running for president.

    • Grannysmovin says:

      For What????? you are really back to the AG Lynch conversation on the plane that other people witnessed. Oh maybe when Clinton kept Obama and Air Force One waiting on the tarmac because Billie was shooting the breeze, maybe he was talking to someone about the e-mails.

      • Jon says:

        Conspiracy theorists give meaning to the phrase beating a dead horse. When they have nothing they want to go back and whine about an issue that was already proven to be false. Of course the truth is a foreign concept for them.

    • Mama Bear says:

      Oh good grief, are you really saying that now, after 25 years of investigations (read: witch hunts) multiple tries at this crap they have something indictable? Is that what you are saying? Then would you like to buy a huge bridge I know about? Give you a great deal on it….

    • browninghipower says:

      Wait wait wait….we really got her this time…really..we got her after 25 years…we’ve finally got her…no, really…just wait for it…we’ve finally got her…oh, no, maybe not…but just wait…really… (The continual rantings of a party of lunatics)

      • Anna Maria Yoakum says:

        Just another senseless witch hunt. Wonder how much this one will end up costing the taxpayers ? The GOP is certainly good at blowing our hard earned money away. We need to can all our their sorry asses !

  12. Jon says:

    James Comey’s attempt to justify his effort to assist Trump by saying he had to inform Jason Chaffetz and his rabid band of witch hunters that he was investigating additional evidence involving Hillary’s emails is a bad joke. He doesn’t even know if it will be anything new. All he has is wild speculation and that is what he needed to aid Trump, Chaffetz, Gowdy, Priebus and their ilk. Comey was not doing his job to update the witch hunters in Congress. He was playing politics with the FBI. He needs to be held accountable for his despicable act of using the FBI for partisan political purposes. He knew damn well what those liars would do with the unfounded speculation.

    • skisok says:

      It sounds like another expensive, unnecessary investigation of taxpayer funds that should be devoted to catching real criminals.

    • Blueberry Hill says:

      They already know that Clinton did not send or receive them, and that they did not come from her server. That letter was to do nothing but play dirty politics.

      ..

      • Jon says:

        Yes. That is one of the most exasperating and aggravating things about Comey’s abuse of power and use of the FBI for political purposes. I am confident that all there is are duplicate emails. In any event, releasing a statement based on nothing more than baseless speculation cannot be justified by any set of facts. This is electioneering pure and simple.

  13. Grannysmovin says:

    “The F.B.I.’s decision to reopen their criminal investigation into Hillary Clinton’s secret email server just 11 days before the election shows how serious this discovery must be,” Well Priebpussy that is not what the letter said – gee do you people not know how to read.
    1. Nothing was said about re-opening the criminal investigation, because they have not even determined if they are relevant to original investigation.
    2. They don’t know if they are copies of what they have already have reviewed.
    3. If there are new e-mails found once they have gone through to see if they are relevant to Clinton’s server, than they have to be sent to the State Department for their review to see if any were classified at the time they were sent.
    4. For anyone knows they could be Weiner’s wife sending e-mails bitching about the pervert she married.
    So buckle down everyone, the only issue here is that Cromy is a piss poor communicator and should not write his own letters or speeches.

    • msnyc10 says:

      Clearly the point is new evidence has been discovered that appears to be relevant to the Clinton emails and they are reviewing for the express purpose of determining whether to re-open the criminal investigation which they closed (with prejudice) based on the evidence they had on hand prior.

      • Grannysmovin says:

        How can you determine these are evidence against Clinton? Her is what Ring of Fire reported this morning, which is not a Clinton fan. “Initial speculation began, in part due to the imprecise nature of Comey’s letter. In the letter he wrote to Congress, he seemed intentionally vague in describing what had been discovered. As the hours rolled by, we found that the emails were not from Clinton’s server, had not been sent by Clinton, had not been sent to Clinton, and may not have really involved Clinton at all.” So before it can be tagged evidence it has to first be determined relevant to her e-mail server investigation.

        • Jim Samaras says:

          Just another example of the Clintons “plausible deniability”. Amazing that you don’t see the pattern here.

          • Grannysmovin says:

            You are another example of Clinton hate rather than waiting for facts.

          • Jim Samaras says:

            Hate would be a strong adjective, however with all the circumstantial evidence out there one could not be blamed for using it

          • Grannysmovin says:

            Well if it were strong circumstantial evidence than Comey would have recommended prosecution, but he did not.

          • Jim Samaras says:

            I don’t know about that. Circumstantial is just that…circumstantial. It’s very hard to convict in a court of law with that alone. The one of public opinion however is much easier

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Especially when you can just make up stuff and lie! For example, your post above, when you make up a completely fictitious link to the Clinton Foundation, because you are a democracy-hating fraud. The candidate you support sexually assaults women and is openly racist.

            You ought to be ashamed of yourself.

          • msnyc10 says:

            Funny how that is only applied to “your” candidate. Trump who has been convicted of nothing (not fraud, not rape, not groping even) has been convicted by every Dem alive. If you are ready to take a few women’s unsubstantiated claims from 1990 about Trump’s inappropriate touching than you should be ready to accept the FBI’s *statement* that they found hard data pertinent to the formerly closed (with prejudice) criminal investigation and not act like the FBI coming forward is some heinous partisan sabatoge whereas the women were not.

          • sick of the ignorance says:

            I take Trump at his word and his admission that he grabs them by the pu$$y and he can because he is a celebrity. He convicted himself. These women are just hte icing on the cake. He also has a court case for raping a 13 year old in federal court in NY on December 16 that a federal judge felt that there was enough evidence to proceed with a hearing. Those are facts…not just bull.

          • msnyc10 says:

            The story isn’t about Trump. It is about the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation has found new data it needs to review that is pertinent to the formerly closed criminal investigation of the presumptive next POTUS. Trump’s only relevance here is people’s willingness to listen to unsubstantiated testimony and convict him without evidence while objecting the fact that a legal judicial body has stated that it is possible that a criminal investigation could be reopened due to new information. Those are facts… not just bull. FYI. I think the allegations against Trump (groping, rape case, fraud, etc.) are important to hear and factor in an election for POTUS. This means I ALSO believe that an FBI investigation into potential criminal misuse of Top Secret Classified information by a US Senator running for POTUS is as well. I just don’t get people who believe in only 1/2 that paradigm.

          • Grannysmovin says:

            I always use the word allegations of his self proclaimed sexual assaulter, including the allegations of a 13 year old. 12 women is a more than a few, but just as they can not prove it happened because there were no witnesses, he can not prove they are lying because there were no witnesses. So we only have what he said on a video as his own admission to his acts.Some how I don’t think he would do anything with witness. He admits walking into the pageants dressing rooms while young girls and women were dressing – why? I have said allegations of his bribing the AG, I think since he goes to court next month it on Trump U Fraud it is more than an allegation. His financial ties to Russia were stated by his son and unless he releases those tax returns we only have his son’s word for it. He did violate the Cuban Embargo, but the possibility he violated the Iran embargo is an allegation. His illegal soliciting of charitable donations has been proven and his “self funding” charity shut down. He is also currently being investigated for allegedly soliciting campaign donations from foreign countries.

            Who lies more: Clinton’s Fibs vs. Trump’s Huge Lies

            ONE persistent narrative in American politics is that Hillary Clinton is a slippery, compulsive liar while Donald Trump is a gutsy truth-teller.

            Over all, the latest CBS News poll finds the public similarly repulsed by each candidate: 34% of registered voters say Clinton is honest and trustworthy compared with 36% for Trump.

            Yet the idea that they are even in the same league is preposterous. If deception were a sport, Trump would be the Olympic gold medalist; Clinton would be an honorable mention at her local Y.

            Let’s investigate.

            One metric comes from independent fact-checking websites. As of Friday, PolitiFact had found 27% of Clinton’s statements that it had looked into were mostly false or worse, compared with 70% of Trump’s. It said 2% of Clinton’s statements it had reviewed were egregious “pants on fire” lies, compared with 19% of Trump’s. So Trump has nine times the share of flat-out lies as Clinton.

            Likewise, The Washington Post Fact-Checker has awarded its worst ranking, Four Pinocchios, to 16% of Clinton’s statements that it checked and to 64% of Trump’s.

            “Essentially, Clinton is in the norm for a typical politician,” says Glenn Kessler, who runs Fact-Checker, while Trump “is just off the charts. There’s never been anyone like him, at least in the six years I have been doing this.”

            When I speak with Trump voters, they often argue that Clinton is an inveterate liar and crook, yet when pressed they draw from the same handful of examples.

            One is Clinton’s 2008 claim that she landed in Bosnia in 1996 “under sniper fire” and “ran with our heads down” from the plane. The Washington Post dismantled that claim; video shows that Clinton was greeted not by gunshots but by a crowd of dignitaries that included an 8-year-old Bosnian girl.

            But it’s also true that as the plane prepared to descend, security officials gave a spine-chilling briefing of the risks of sniper fire, and Clinton wore body armor in case of shooting.

            Critics also claim that Clinton lied to the families of the four Americans killed in Benghazi, but fact-checkers have said the evidence is unclear. Harder to defend is her disingenuous explanation of flip-flopping on the Asian trade agreement. And her accounts of her use of private email servers have been consistently false or misleading; astonishingly, she continues to mislead by claiming that the F.B.I. director, James Comey, judged her answers truthful (he didn’t).

            All this is junior varsity mendacity. In contrast, Trump is the champ of prevarication.

            You don’t need to go back eight years to find a Trump embellishment; eight minutes is more than sufficient. In March, Politico chronicled a week of Trump remarks and found on average one misstatement every five minutes. The Huffington Post once chronicled 71 inaccuracies in an hourlong town hall session — more than one a minute.

          • msnyc10 says:

            You seem to think I am defending Trump. I am not. You seem to think I am comparing Trump. I am not. My only point was and is this; even taking Trump out of the equation, one simply cannot make any sort of case for the FBI’s move being improper, partisan or “unfair”. *Certainly* if the allegations leveled at Trump are they are, but in a Universe where Trump never ran (the one that a future episode of Quantum Leap will fix) it is preposterous to act outraged. The FBI was informed that during an unrelated investigation some emails surfaced that “pertained” to the Clinton CRIMINAL investigation that had previously closed (with prejudice). The FBI therefore was doing what it is mandated to do, reviewing those emails to assess if it made the correct call in closing the case of if there is information in those emails that would indicate reopening the criminal case against not just a former senator but the presumptive POTUS. So the FBI informed Congress. Period. You can keep obfuscating with Trump all you want, those are the facts. It isn’t a ‘Witch Hunt’ it isn’t misogyny it isn’t Clinton bashing. It is democracy as it should be.

          • msnyc10 says:

            “Critics also claim that Clinton lied to the families of the four Americans killed in Benghazi, but fact-checkers have said the evidence is unclear. Harder to defend is her disingenuous explanation of flip-flopping on the Asian trade agreement. And her accounts of her use of private email servers have been consistently false or misleading; astonishingly, she continues to mislead by claiming that the F.B.I. director, James Comey, judged her answers truthful (he didn’t).

            All this is junior varsity mendacity. In contrast, Trump is the champ of prevarication.”

            I’m sorry you seem to be confusing scale with volume. Does Trump lie more, you bet.

            It is very hard to imagine any volume or percentage of lies Trump has done, or anyone in the world has done as being ‘junior varsity’ against:

            a) possibly lying to the families of the American killed in Benghazi (along with her other lies about Benghazi)

            b) her lies (sorry, “disingenuous explanations”) about her lies (sorry “flip flops”) about a Trade agreement that affects the economy of America

            c) her lies (sorry “misleading accounts”) to both the FBI and the American People about her keeping confidential US documents on her private server against Federal Law and national safety

            That isn’t JV baby, that is the Pros and the World Series Champs of lying at that.

          • msnyc10 says:

            And here is what is even scarier about her lying vs his; he won’t be POTUS; she will.

          • bobnstuff says:

            Had Clinton said I have released top secret emails and then they turn up you might not give her later claim that she didn’t do it much credit. Trump said what he liked to do, how he did it and why he believe he could. Now he is trying to say he didn’t do it. Big difference.

          • jmprint says:

            And another example of the rabid republicans, trying to break the chains for the red meat.

        • msnyc10 says:

          I didnt’ determine anything. I took the *FBI* at their word that they found emails “pertinent to” the formerly closed (with prejudice) criminal investigation against a Presidential Candidate.

          • Grannysmovin says:

            The text of the letter:

            In previous Congressional testimony, I referred to the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had completed its investigation of former Secretary Clinton’s personal email server. Due to recent developments, I am writing to supplement my previous testimony.

            In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation. I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.

            Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether this material may be significant, and I cannot predict how long it will take us to complete this additional work, I believe it is important to update your Committees about our efforts in light of my previous testimony.”

            Did you read where he wrote “appear to be pertinent to” Well if they haven’t reviewed them how do they appear to be anything? “Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether this material may be significant” again if the FBI has not reviewed them, how can they asses if the material is significant, how can anyone draw any conclusions other than Comey is a lousy communicator or is acting political which may or may not be a violation of the S.185 – Hatch Act Reform Amendments of 1993

          • msnyc10 says:

            You should compete on Dances with the Stars because you dance so well on the head of a pin. They “earned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation”. In other words someone(s) from another investigation said ‘hey you may want to review these emails they appear to be relevant/pertinent/related to your Clinton investigation”. So now they are going to “appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information, as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.” And they informed the Congress who had previously been informed that the FBI had in fact ” completed its investigation of former Secretary” and was now writing to “supplement [their] previous testimony” since that “former Secretary” is now the presumptive next POTUS. There is simply no way to object to that.

          • Jim Samaras says:

            Too late…act in haste repent in leisure

          • Grannysmovin says:

            Yes he did act in haste, I don’t think he was being partisan I do believe he is a man of integrity, but he just does not communicate well. He should have someone else write his letters or at least edit them and his speeches. The more he tries to appear non partisan the more he appears partisan.

          • skisok says:

            It’s obvious because of the timing that he acted in s political way.

        • Blueberry Hill says:

          Did you see where the DOJ already charged him with Abuse of Power and Interfering with a Presidential Election? Glad they acted quickly. He was to go to the DOJ first, it was not his place to send out that letter, that decision was to be the DOJs decision. It is so obvious that this was nothing more than a political stunt.

          I’M STILL VOTING FOR HILLARY, SHE HAS EARNED OUR TRUST.

          ..

          • Grannysmovin says:

            I did vote and don’t regret my vote for Clinton. I am not certain about Comey, I really think he just doesn’t know how to communicate things and now his poor choice in words once again lands him in hot water. Let someone else write your letters and speeches.

      • skisok says:

        The “why” these emails appear to be relevant to the investigation has never been explained which makes anyone with any sense determine this to be nothing more than a political stunt.

    • Anna Maria Yoakum says:

      Unfortunately the Trumpets will see, hear, read and believe only what they want to, they turn a blind eye to anything else. The GOP has done a great job of brainwashing its constituency. Then on top of that we have the trolls, bothe the Russian hired trolls and Dumpty’s trolls that flood the internet to quickly spread their lies.

  14. ivory69690@yahoo.com says:

    this FBI clown should be fired back when he stated that no charges should be filed on Hillary it should of been all he had to say . his opinion wasn’t needed on anything else after he said that . every thing else he said had a bias to it leaning to the GOP gang of pinhead idiots personality to it and only helped the GOP with more BULL thy use putting the king of BULL DONNY DUMP with more trash he spits out his DUMPSTER trash mouth . there seems to be no low for these GOP clowns as it is now the world laughs hard at the USA the farther that started our country have to be rolling in their graves . and 200 years from now thy will be writing books on how messed up the GOP made the country these days . one book will be how the country let a DONNY DUMP clown run for the white house with all the frauds ,cons, and scamming he did to 1000’s of people of the country and got away with it also how he sexual assaulted and raped women and case still to be heard a 13 years old little girl . I CAN SAY IT TODAY HOW MESSED UP THE GOP MADE THIS COUNTRY this is big time messed up . how sick is it that the country lets a clown run for the house that talks about having sex with his own daughter . never mind all the other bull this clown has done and said this country now is the comic show for the world . and we want the world to respect us when we cant even respect our self this is a very saddest time in history for sure . this is the GOP gang of pinhead &idiots way to go to a building and yelling fire .

    • skisok says:

      I agree. Although Hilllary did something that showed poor judgment, what she did was not a punishable offense. She did not willfully disclose sensitive information. And having worked in black ops, many moons ago, I know the oath I had to take and the ramifications.

      • ivory69690@yahoo.com says:

        the poor judgment was a mole hill its the admitting of the GOP them self that wasted all the time and money on the self made useless Mt. THY MADE OUT OF THE MOLE HILL its been planed by the GANG OF PINHEADS a long time ago thy knew Hillary was going to run for Pres. so thy started planting their land mines a long time ago throwing every and any thing the could at the wall to see if it stuck . its them before and DONNY DUMP now making a mockery of the country as to the world the USA is a comic show .

    • Anna Maria Yoakum says:

      I truly feel as you do. The GOP left its conservative roots long ago and with each election they lean more and more to right, until now they act like a bunch little dictators with the attitude that the USA is a ONE party system and there is no room for any other party except theirs. God help us, I pray that there will be many red seats LOST in this election and replaced with Blue govenors, senators and congressmen. It is the only hope for our nation to get America balanced again.

  15. yabbed says:

    Comey’s conduct is disgraceful and unethical. His attempt to influence the presidential election calls for his immediate dismissal. He can then fulfill his dream of being given a multi million dollar contract with Fox News.

    • Mama Bear says:

      November 9 White House agenda, page 1, 8:00 am – fire FBI director.

    • kep says:

      I thought that he should have resigned after he caved to political pressure when he failed to prosecute her in July. After Billy put in the fix with Lynch, all of them should have been in jail.

      • jmprint says:

        He would have to prosecute, Bush, Powell and Condoleezza Rice, that would open a HUGE can of worms, are you ready for that?

        • kep says:

          I’m more than ready to see ALL the corrupt elite ruling class to be prosecuted and removed from our government so we can get some honorable people to represent the American people and not just themselves.

          • jmprint says:

            Then why you voting for Trump?

          • kep says:

            Because he is not part of government. I want to see our Constitution followed. I want to see term limits. I want to see smaller government. I want to see our rights returned to us. Hillary will only serve Hillary, unless she is serving time, which I truly hopes happens.

          • skisok says:

            He manipulated government and will have a greater hand in it if he ever got in which is extremely doubtful.

          • kep says:

            Just how did he manipulate government? This should be good for a few chuckles.

    • Blueberry Hill says:

      Yes, the DOJ has already charged him with Abuse of Power, and Interfering with a Presidential Election. Wouldn’t it be justice to see him do some jail time?

      ..

  16. ivory69690@yahoo.com says:

    With a tweet that trumpeted “Case reopened,” Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) set off a sustained roar of hyperbole about Hillary Clinton’s emails. As chair of the House Oversight Committee, Chaffetz and seven other Republican committee chairs — but none of the ranking Democrats — received a very brief letter on Friday from FBI Director James Comey. In three paragraphs, he informed them that while looking into “an unrelated case,” his agents had found “emails that appeared to be pertinent” to the Clinton server investigation. He had directed investigators to look at the emails, he wrote, and determine their significance /// this in it self show how bias and GOP gang of pinhead’s do things the FBI clown is a POS doing anything he can do for the GOP morons to try to sway the votes fire this idiot . why not send the letter to ranking Democrats ? he did it knowing just what would happen . every one would start all their B/S crying foul . well there is a big time foul here and its the FBI pushed for sure by the GOP LAW AND ORDER DONNY DUMP you call for if that’s the case DUMPSTER it should be you and the whole GOP party that should be in court and fired or better yet jailed

    • Blueberry Hill says:

      I’M STILL VOTING FOR HILLARY, SHE HAS WON OUR TRUST. AND

      WE MUST REMEMBER TO VOTE ALL DEMS UP AND DOWN THE BALLOT,
      AND CLEAN OUT THE Rs IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE, TIME TO RETIRE THEM.

      ..

      • skisok says:

        I agree. The only GOP members I’ll give credit to are those that discredited the crooked Trump.

      • ivory69690@yahoo.com says:

        heres something that should be copy and pasted for the most of people should see and maybe it can hit home and help this election from being flushed in the DONNY DUMP toilet >>>

        im thinking I heard on the news DONNY DUMP says this new email BULL is bigger then water gate . then I thought what water gate was really all about . and it came up that it was all illegal things going on with in the country . a lot of people went to trial in Watergate and some went to jail even . on an interview with a guy that wrote a book on and for Hillary said that Watergate was bigger a lot bigger . then I thought was it really ? or could this be the beginning of some thing ( yes I know your saying (TOMMY WHAT YOU WANT TO WRITE A BOOK NOW ? ) but think about this . is it to far fetched to think that there’s more here that meets the eye ? Watergate was a lot of crime being done . now think of what has already happen . ADMITTED !!! the GOP says thy did the Benghazi thing and heck even could of been planning the email BULL also from the start . as thy did admitted thy were doing these things to make Hillary look bad . so knowing this one has to ask how far the GOP will really go to try to fix this election ? first the FBI COMEY said back at the start that he didn’t feel that after investigating the the emails he didn’t feel that any charges should be brought against Hillary . why didn’t he just leave it there ? why did he then have to say it was reackless and all those things after saying he didn’t feel charges were warrented . to me I talk that as just more of what the GOP ADMITTED TO BEFORE . and with the extra things he said (which really wasn’t need to be said it only was said to make Hillary look bad ) like what the GOP was doing and wanted to do from the start . fast forward to now . don’t you find it funny more so strange that COMEY came out with this BULL now just the head line nothing behind it nothing in the form of facts . (to me seems only done for one reason at this point in time ) he sent these letter to I believe 6or 7 heads of the GOP like lighting a match and starting a fire . the ATT. GEN. didn’t like this and she wasn’t informed of this . ok so say this could be the GOP new day Watergate !! how deep dose this go ? one knows the GOP talk openly about Hillary all the time and nothing nice to say never . Obama an d the AG should start an investigation now on COMEY should look into every thing he has done . if this is a form of the GOP new Watergate then COMEYS phone records and every thing of his should be tied into this investigation see just who he has been contacting . say it hit home . and then there are a lot of the GOP party that are into this . (ITS NOT LIKE THY HAVENT DONE SOMETHING LIKE THIS BEFORE ) FOR THY HAVE ADMITTED IT . this could very well go deep and could in be the 21STcentury Watergate ? whos to say it couldn’t be ? wouldn’t it be funny to push FBI COMEY and he cracks and say if it is a lot bigger then meats the eye . better to get on this now before its too late could very well save the country from having that DONNY DUMP CLOWN as POTUS . THIS IS SOMETHING I FEEL THAT NEEDS SOME LOOKING INTO FAST . MIGHT VERY WELL CATCH SOMETHING ( AND OIR SOME ONES ) BEFORE ITS TOO LATE

  17. rednekokie says:

    I strongly suspect — no most assuredly am convinced — that all this is no more than the director Comey attempting to protect his ass in the remote case that Trump actually wins the election.
    He is going against the stated rules of the DOJ in doing this —

    I’m betting that he is betting on the wrong horse, and will live to regret it.

    • AgLander says:

      “stated rules” of the DOJ? You funny!!
      There are no “rules” at the DOJ…..they operate simply at the petulant political whims of Obama. They serve as his blockers and tacklers. The DOJ as a legal institution ceased to exist the day Obama took office…it’s now simply a weaponized piece of the Obama regime serving political not legal ends.

      • Dan S says:

        Aggie smells fresh blood & leaps before having all the facts surrounding the emails. They’re nothing more than that. We don’t know if there’s any vital national security info in these emails. They more likely are meetings & political strategizing than anything. Even Secretary Clinton is calling for Comey to say what they know now. She’s not trying to cover up anything that hasn’t already been revealed

        • Jim Samaras says:

          She’s already covered up many things with bleached e-mails. It wouldn’t be wise to divulge evidence during an investigation as it could hamper future testimony.

          • bobnstuff says:

            Lets look at the evidence as it stands, It’s not her computer, she had no control over this computer and it may very well turn out that there is nothing new or questionable on it. If Clinton didn’t know about this computer then how would she know to tell the FBI about it and if she did know about the emails on it why would she have not dealt with it if she is a smart and evil as you seem to think.

          • Jim Samaras says:

            We don’t know the evidence yet. It could be a conversation between underlings that point directly to the corruption that I believe lies within the Clinton Foundation. We will see

          • skisok says:

            It’s funny that you point to corruption within the Clinton Foundation yet fail to mention the corruption within the Trump foundation not to mention the Trump University that never really existed.

          • Jim Samaras says:

            The difference being no sell out of America on Trumps behalf.

          • skisok says:

            Right! He sold out Americans who were rooked not to mention the tax money lost by the Treasury. His is proven fact, Clinton’s is nothing but unproven conjecture.

          • Dan S says:

            Bleached emails ? ???? Why do you believe all the lies perpetuated by Trump ? He’s the only one who’s even suggested such a thing. Please think what your saying, it was deleted & obviously recovered courtesy of Wikileaks. There was no deliberate attempt to bleach the emails

          • Jim Samaras says:

            And if you believe that let’s talk about the tooth fairy

          • Dan S says:

            Ok the truth is the tooth fairy isn’t real just as bleached emails aren’t real. Happy now ? ????

          • Blueberry Hill says:

            Can’t believe any emails that are stolen. Any one of us who has ever sent an email, knows that they can be altered and faked. If they are crooked enough to steal emails, they are crooked enough to manipulate them.

            ..

          • Jim Samaras says:

            Yet there has been no denial

          • skisok says:

            Everyone deletes emails they no longer need or feel are relevant. I’m sure that everyone who has been using email for the past few years has probably deleted several thousand emails.

          • Jim Samaras says:

            But electronically bleached insuring them to never be recovered? An expensive process used by criminals that don’t want any trace of a paper trail.

          • JPHALL says:

            But even if you erase an Email, it does not totally disappear. It remains on the servers it went through and on the devices that were used to read it.

          • skisok says:

            Well then. The administrator of that server should be under bright lights. I don’t think Hillary administers servers.

          • JPHALL says:

            You are correct. Funny that all the attention is on Hilary, someone who knows nothing about the technology and just used it. Shouldn’t the FBI know all this?

          • jmprint says:

            If there was something there worth convicting her, she would be in cuffs. Thats the way the law works.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            What has she “covered up”? What are bleached emails? Why are you so credulous? Even if she had covered up something, why on Earth would supporting a lunatic racist who sexually assaults women and kids be preferable?

        • Blueberry Hill says:

          I’M STILL VOTING FOR HILLARY, SHE HAS EARNED OUR TRUST.

          Not Comey, and the Trump Trash is a disastrous liar, etc.

          ..

      • skisok says:

        Keep writing and showing how ignorant you are. The stated rules are that the DOJ must not influence an election. This is undoubtedly such an attempt so close to an election. If not, why hasn’t the DOJ outline why they have reopened the investigation? Is their something there that meets the eye?

        • Blueberry Hill says:

          They are not to put anything like this out within 60 days of an election. Comey is already charged now by the DOJ for Abuse of Power, and for trying to Influence a Presidential Election. Glad the DOJ acted so quickly. The emails are not hers and did not come from her server, they already know that.

          ..

      • rednekokie says:

        You really don’t know what you’re talking about, do you! And I suspect stongly (no, most assuredly am convinced) that you sit and stew while you listen to Fox Noise all the time.
        A natural tendency when you don’t bother to research what you speak of.

  18. 1Zoe55 says:

    My thinking is that the Republican bloodsuckers are in a panic due to Trump being their nominee. Are they so afraid of a woman becoming president or is it this particular woman named Hillary Clinton? Clinton demonstrated that she was smarter, better prepared and more disciplined than Trump (the orange one) in their debates who could, indeed, be baited by a tweet. Does the Republicans’ hated of women extend to their mothers, wives, sisters and daughters? Now, we have a manipulation by the FBI into re-opening an investigation into Clinton’s e-mails, reminding one of the Hoover Era. Comey should be fired because he has brought disgrace to what (in my opinion) is an already troubled agency.

    • Jim Samaras says:

      Oh, now he is no longer your hero because he has raised, perhaps, a well founded question of her ethical values? Don’t care for the fact that the knife cuts both ways? Hmmm

      • jmprint says:

        Comey is no hero, he is an FBI employee. Her ethical values have already been judged. These emails were no on Hillary server, where are your facts of anything other then they need to look at these emails for further review.

        • Jim Samaras says:

          I am as in the dark as you are jm but will be interested in hearing what Comey eventually has to say

          • Now, there’s a ray of intelligence. Better to wait till the dust settles than to eagerly jump to conclusions as you and the RNC have long been doing up to now on a variety of issues.
            I despair having to come across your posts, much as a parent does when confronted by deeds of a wayward teenager.

          • Jim Samaras says:

            It’s not as much jumping to conclusions as much as the denial on the left that’s frustrating. When all the evidence, albeit circumstantial in some cases, points toward guilt in the mind of objective thinking and you guys defend what I consider the indefensible. This situation has yet to play out

          • jmprint says:

            We all are. I confident nothing else will come from these emails.

        • AgLander says:

          We agree!! Her ethical values HAVE already been judged…..67% of Americans consider her untrustworthy. We have found common ground in evaluating Hillary Clinton!!

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Weird, because that false statistic is almost exactly the real one for Donald Trump, the unelectable loser you dumb racists nominated. You gonna lose!

      • Hmmm, you’re still a walking contradiction not knowing whether to turn to Trump and Satan, or to turn your gaze heavenward.
        Jim the choice is yours—to follow the path of an idolatrous worship of Trumpism and the fallow ideology of conservatism, or to turn towards all that is of God. The two can’t be intermixed.

    • Anna Maria Yoakum says:

      I concur. The whole thing appears peculiar, why did this all surface now ? It is almost as though they orchastrated this fiasco so they could muddy the water and influence the elections. Since the device found is not Clinton’s and since the emails in question are neither to nor from Clinton – it reeks of just another Republican witch hunt and ultimately the lost of a ton of taxpayer’s money. Comey definitely needs to go, he has proven himself not fit for his position more than just this once.

      • Jim Samaras says:

        Do you mean like parading out a myriad of women accusing Trump of molesting them with no proof a few weeks before the election?

        • jmprint says:

          Those women are not being paraded by the democrats, they are trying to prove Trump is what he says he is.

          • sick of the ignorance says:

            He has a court date in December for a status hearing on a charge of raping a 13 year old. That is not some sort of made up story. A federal judge concluded that there were substantial issues of fact that need to be decided in a court of law. This lady came out well before the election.

          • Jon says:

            Is it jmprint who heads the super pac “Rapists For Trump”or is it one of the other misogynists here?

          • jmprint says:

            I know, I also know that one man (Trumps buddy) is already in prison for doing the same, at the same location.

        • Jim, that response of yours was another shameful disclosure of the satanic nature you harbor. These events are forcing you to reveal to us what you truly stand for, a man who secretly disrespects the woman who bore you, and who openly disrespects all women by extension.
          Before you post again, think about all I’ve replayed to you, based on your own comments.

          • Jim Samaras says:

            IMO, you’re too sensitive Aaron. No secret about it, I disrespect all who bore me not just women. Does not mean I SHOW disrespect if respect is given but most people have no time for dummies.

          • IMO, yes I am sensitive, Jim. Unlike you, I don’t share the same callous attitude that you have, I don’t in the least admire Trump as you do, and I am vehemently opposed to bullies like Donald, you and others with neo-Nazi sentiments.
            .
            But let’s get back to the point before you chose the tactic of deflection.

            By your insistence on blithely ignoring Trump’s arrogant and shameful behavior you simply are tacitly approving his behavior. Maybe that’s because you’re guilty of the same offenses as Donald, or you’re so insensitive about Donald’s predatory nature that you in fact disrespect your mother who bore you—“bore” is the past tense of “to bear”, as in child birthing.

            As for dummies, you’ve shown time and again that you’re proud to be accounted as one.

            You still haven’t addressed my observation that it is Trump and the GOP you bend your knee before, and bow your head. Which means you have chosen to the path of polytheism. You can’t bow your head at the altar of Trump and show obeisance to God—you must choose one or the other.

            “O SON OF EARTH! Wouldst thou have Me, seek none other than Me; and wouldst thou gaze upon My beauty, close thine eyes to the world and all that is therein; for My will and the will of another than Me, even as fire and water, cannot dwell together in one heart.”

            That underscores what you need to concentrate on in your posts moving forward. Then again, you may choose to remain veiled in darkness.

          • AgLander says:

            Sorry Aaron, you are in the USA and can’t intimidate Americans as if you were back in Oman enjoying super majority status in all matters….. religious, social and political. Your words are like water off a duck’s back!

          • If you consider yourself simply a duck, then so be it. And Agatha, you can’t intimidate as well. Being a whiner-in-chief for Donald won’t help him when he’s in court below, and in the Court beyond.

          • skisok says:

            If Trump should by some myrical win, although unlikely, we will all feel like we are in Oman. This country will have regressed at least 150 years.

          • tompinva says:

            Based on what?

          • Jon says:

            Do you know if Jim belongs to the “Rapists For Trump” super pac?

        • skisok says:

          That was not done by a political appointee. It was done by the women on their own volition.

    • skisok says:

      I think the GOPS have already conceded the Presidential election. Their only interest here is in preserving the status quo in Congress. Most folks have already made up their minds fir the Presidency and a lame political stunt like this will not change their minds.

  19. msnyc10 says:

    ““This stunning development raises serious questions about what records may not have been turned over and why, and whether they show intent to violate the law,” he added, although Comey had said nothing to support any such negative inferences.”

    Um. That is precisely what the Clinton Emai investigation is about. They found new emails in regards to the Clinton Emails that caused them to re-open the investigation as it might affect their earlier decision to not prosecute her.

    It gets so tiring reading partisan reactions on each side. A handful of women make unsupported allegations against Trump inappropriate remarks and unwanted advances and everyone convicts him and takes them at their word. The freaking *FBI* informs the congress they have new hard data they need to review in a case against Hillary that might indict her on serious felony charges but we aren’t supposed to ‘read between the line’. I am not a Trump supporters and probably forced to vote for Hillary simply so he does not become President (how did THAT happen?) yet watching people bend over backwards to excuse their candidate or vilianize another is what is truly disheartening.

    • bobnstuff says:

      Trump is caught on tape saying what he does to women and why and people come forward to support his claim. I think Trump has given all the support that is needed. They are just backing up his statement. If Trump said he fed the poor and poor people came forward to support his statement you would have no problem believing them.

      • msnyc10 says:

        I don’t convict or acquit Trump based on their statements. I in fact believe their statements. It is irrelevant. What is relevant is the hand-wringing over the fact that the FBI has found new emails pertinent to the Clinton email criminal investigation formerly closed and none about the unsubstantiated claims of the women. I’m not defending Trump; I’m arguing against total partisan lack of objectivity. If the FBI found emails “pertinent” to a formerly closed (with prejudice) criminal investigation of a presidential candidate it is their duty to inform Congress.

        • jmprint says:

          But, if he is not able to review ALL the emails before the election, the sole purpose to send the letter is to cover his a$$ from being impeached, after the election, and if the republicans find out, the witch hunters are all back on their broom sticks hovering over the FBI building.

          • msnyc10 says:

            So what if he can’t review them? It is relevant to Congress and the American People that new data was found that is pertinent to the case and that it may lead to reopening the investigation. How can that not be? Should he for instance keep quite, review the emails and late in 2017 prosecute the President of the United States while people ask ‘why didn’t you tell us?’. Complaining about his actions is indefensible partisanship and this is coming from someone who desparately does not want Trump in the White House and will vote for Hillary for that reason alone.

          • jmprint says:

            Not necessarily new date, could be same date, one doesn’t know. He should have communicated better by far. By stating facts. Or wait about three weeks after reviewing and possibly not finding at new data and then writing a letter and letting congress know they didn’t find anything different.

      • InformedVoter says:

        Feeding poor people is not against the law. Trump’s accusers have not had their stories verified. In fact, several have already had their stories destroyed as being lies.

        • bobnstuff says:

          The only place any of the stories have been destroyed is in the Trump universe, not in the real world. Trump has bragged about his sexual prowess, are you calling Trump a liar?

          • InformedVoter says:

            You have fallen victim to those who bought testimony from women looking for a payout! Trump made STATEMENTS during a setup session, about what he COULD do. You’ve made these same type of comments with your buddies in the bar and I trust you have not REALLY done what you boasted about doing.
            Trump was commenting about his popularity when he claimed he could shoot someone and not get charged (not unlike the Clinton clan getting away with killing those that would get in their way). So are you one of those dummies who are waiting for the authorities to charge Trump with murder?
            For the record, one of the accusers claimed that she was in first class with Trump “when the arm rest disappeared”. Well, the time frame she claimed this occurred uncovers a problem. ALL the commercial jets in service at that time had non-movable arm rest in first class. The plane manufacturers figured the seats were wide enough so there was no need to have movable arm rests. She no longer claims the encounter took place.
            Just like the liberal media has not published the stories of those raped by Bill, they splashed around the accusations, but have failed to announce the retractions.
            Soros sent out a request that he would pay big bucks for anyone who could come up with any dirt on Trump. What he got for is money were a bunch of women looking for money. And you fell for their lies and propaganda. No matter, you will vote for HilLIARy even if she was in prison. But this latest email scandal will cause some to change their minds. Just like all those who are seeing 150% increases in their Obamacare premiums. But that’s a different set of liberal lies!

          • bobnstuff says:

            I have never said anything like the comments Mr Trump made or been around anyone who went anywhere need that kind of statement and I have worked with some pretty rough people over the years. When he said he could shoot some one he didn’t go into detail that would lead you to believe that he had done it. Trump is a pig of the lowest order. He’s also a liar and a thief, how may time does he need to say I didn’t say when it’s on tape does it take for you to see it. How many people does he have to stiff for you to see that he is not someone you can trust. He has said in his book that lying is just another tool. You think these women are all lying and out for money and that lets you discount their stories even though they line up with Trumps own statements. Even if Trump hadn’t been caught on tape these stories would still be believable. Look at the other things Trump has said and see if there isn’t a pattern. Forget the sex thing, look at how he has lived his life, is this the story of a person who understands how real people live, do you think he understands about having to save money or wait to get something. Can you see him having the lesser cut of meat because it’s cheaper. For that matter can you see him looking at the price on the menu. He claims he cares about women and the working man but he has fired people for not being pretty. His workers have had to take him to court to get their money, regular people shouldn’t have to sue to get paid.

            Now explain to me the control Obama has over the health care costs. The bill was passed by congress and wasn’t the one he asked for. Everyone know there would need to be some changes done once it was up and running but the Republicans made sure those changes and fixes could not happen. The Republicans have worked very hard to make sure it failed and even with the problems they haven’t killed it. Have you seen the details of the Republicans plan to replace it? They have none. Insurance prices were going up by double digits before the law and the major reason for bankruptcy in the US was medical bills. I guess you liked being at the mercy of the insurance companies.

            Name the Secretary of State that used the government email system? List all the emails that were hacked from Clinton’s computer. List all the other people in government have also deleted emails, and how many of the Emails from other administrations do we have.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Obama got exactly what he wanted when they passed Obamacare! The Senate passed (with zero Republican votes) their version of the bill (which was exactly what Obama wanted). The House made changes, but when Kennedy died the picture changed. The folks in Mass. who already had a similar health plan in place – and not too popular at that, voted to replace Kennedy with Brown, who vowed to not vote for it. He won on that platform.
            So the Dems and Obama passed their original plan, full of problems from the beginning. If I recall, you were a great advocate of the law, so now that the wheels are falling off the wagon, you are claiming foul. I guess you can’t blame GW for the cost of the search for the WMD, that was caused by the faulty intel because Clinton has decimated the CIA and other agencies. GW had as much control over that, just as Obama had control over Obamacare.
            I don’t believe you when you say that neither you nor your rough friends never had “locker room” banter. And just because Trump used such language, does not mean he actually practiced it. He said he was so popular he could shoot someone, so are you claiming he actually did shoot someone?
            The charges against Bill Clinton have been proven to the extent that they paid large sums of money. The charges against Trump are starting to unravel daily. Some say it’s because of his threat for legal action, but that doesn’t hold much weight.
            So it appears that you condone HilLIARy for slandering those who claimed Bill raped them, but condemn Trump for accusations that have not been proven and have no other verification except for the women making the claims, and then only after Soros offered to pay for such claims. Give me a break!

          • bobnstuff says:

            I guess you were out of the country while they passed the law or you wouldn’t be making this statement. The republicans gutted the ACA and then didn’t vote for it. In most cases when a large bill is passed congress will go back and make corrections as needed but this was blocked by the republican for the simple reason that they wanted it to fail.

            There is a new video of Trump trying to force a kiss on a former Miss Universe. He did this after berating her. The hits just keep on coming, this by the way was in 2011. I think I will believe my own eyes in this case.

          • skisok says:

            You need to change your moniker. You’re as uninformed as they come.

    • Kris Krincle says:

      Trump in his own words told you how he treats women. Because the women come forward and say yest that is true we should not believe him? They are supporting what you heart Trump say in his own words.

      “The freaking *FBI* informs the congress they have new hard data they need to review in a case against Hillary that might indict her on serious felony charges but we aren’t supposed to ‘read between the line’.”

      Where did Comey say anything about indictment and bringing serious felony charges?

      • Jim Samaras says:

        And Hillary in her own words told us she wants open borders and completely free trade. We have no country without borders yet you’re supporting HC in spite of her own words. Which words are worse? IMO, hers…

        • msnyc10 says:

          Well even the two cases; say both are true. Trump gropes women without asking and/or don’t want him to. Hillary took classified US Gov’t emails on her private not to mention insecure server, knowingly against US regulations, in violation of Secrecy acts and law, knowingly putting that information and our country and allies potentially at risk.

        • Your hypocrisy and distorted perception of Trump’s transgressions shows that you have made little effort in distancing yourself from Trump. Your pretense at being concerned about emails of Hillary’s, while simultaneously turning to look the other way when confronted with Donald’s personal transgressions against women, betrays a macabre sense of justice and belittles the trauma Trump’s victims had to endure from this sexual assaulter.
          Are your sentiments and responses in synch with the Message and Spirit associated with Christianity? I ask you this as a Baha’i, and hope you can explain your disconnect with what you purport to believe in. You can’t have your cake, Jim, and eat it too, regarding the events transpiring in America.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Your argument falls apart from the beginning. The women who claim that they were assaulted by Trump have not been proven to be correct. In fact, many have already had their stories destroyed by a press that wants them to be believed. You have already convicted Trump of actions that probably will never be proven to be true.
            HilLIARy, on the other hand, has been proven to knowingly ignore security standards. Comey caved in when he didn’t request the DOJ press charges.
            You can quote your religious messages all you wish, but they do not make the actions Trump was accused of true. Even HilLIARy violated your religious standard when she destroyed the reputations of those women who were raped by her husband. These accusers of Bill have had their stories verified and proven to be true. Where’s you outrage against HilLIARy?
            You are a first class hypocrite! Shame on you of accusing someone else of your own crime.

          • That’s brave talk but you haven’t shown me proof to discount what I’ve said. So far in all your ramblings, your “religion” is the GOP and your gospel “The Book of Donald” is bogus.
            Please quote to me some religious text that dispute what I have shown you on numerous occasions—and I don’t mean the GOP gospel.
            You say that Hillary violated my standards—give an example and provide an example where Donald did not violate that same standard.
            Impress me by showing me if you are as informed as you boast to be, oh informed voter!! And do so using legitimate religious text and not something made up by a sidewalk minister.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Typical Aaron gibberish! Your original post was predicated on the Trump accusers having been proven to be telling the truth. In fact, just the opposite now seems the case with several of the accusers having their stories been proven to be lies.
            Meanwhile, you continue to ignore that HilLIARy went on the attack to defend her husband. She absolutely lied when trying to destroy his accusers. In the end, the Clinton’s paid out large sums of money to several parties. Several of the others are still showing proof that Bill raped them. Notice that the liberal media completely ignores publishing their stories, yet they had no problem splashing the Trump accuser stories around.
            Example that HilLIARy violated any normal person’s standard is that she lied to protect her husband. Trump has not been found guilty of committing ANY sexual crime, so for you to say he violated your standard would be total folly.
            As usual you post words that turn out to be just words. That’s why you get destroyed so easily when you try to match wits with me.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            ^ this guy fell for a hoax created in MS Paint and doubled down on it once it was undeniably revealed to be a hoax. It’s quite likely that there is nobody stupider than him posting on this board.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey Helpy Pathetic Dummy, Once more you are caught lying! I’m not the one who fell for some MS Paint hoax, it was you. You still claim that Debbie W-S did NOT resign because of the leaked emails. Now you lie when you post that I fell for a hoax that I never saw.
            For the record, last spring, The National Memo contacted me and indicated I was considered “A Distinguished Contributor” because of several factors regarding my posts. (I’m sure my financial contributions were a factor too).
            Since you have been caught lying on more than one occasion, I suspect that they’ve put you in the same category as your fellow posters who have had their comments shredded. These would include jmprint (outed as a racist and bigot) and aaron of p, who writes verbose meaningless articles in an attempt to give the impression that he actually knows something of value.
            So Helpy Pathetic Dummy, you can continue posting your lies, but everyone knows you for what you are.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Hahahahahahahahaha wow! Still having a meltdown; still can’t find a single quote to back up your dumb lies. What a sad loser you are.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey Helpy Pathetic Dummy, I PROVED it to the satisfaction of everyone BUT YOU. You have seen the proof, yet you continue to deny that Deb resigned because of the leaked emails. I guess I would have to get Deb herself to contact you and tell you it’s true, but then you’d probably say she didn’t know the truth herself.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            I’m sorry that you are so deluded. Obviously if you PROVED it in all-caps to the satisfaction of all the voices in your head, it would be super easy to quote the emails that PROVE your bizarre and stupid claims. You can’t do that, though, since you’re lying.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey Helpy Pathetic Dummy, I trust that others can read what you wrote. Thus, when I pointed out that you DID say what you’re now denying, that they can see that I was PROVEN correct and you were, once again, outed as a LIAR.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            A better answer would have included the all-caps PROOF you claim to have; you can’t do that, though, since there is none. You fell for a lazy prank and you’re too full of yourself to admit it – that’s why nobody can ever take your dumb opinions seriously.

            I hope that helps! Trump is gonna lose!

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey Helpy Pathetic Dummy, You keep claiming that you NEVER said that Debbie W-S didn’t resign because of the emails that showed she was fixing the DNC primaries for HilLIARy to win. I recently provided an almost word for word statement of your post. You continued to deny that you ever made the claim that Debbie did not resign over the fixing the primary scandal.
            Well, guess what? Being that I am classified as “A Distinguished Contributor” by TNM, I thought I’d send them a request to provide your posted statement. It took them a little time, but they provided the following information. This PROVES beyond any doubt that you have been denying what you wrote! Shame, shame, but HilLIARy has been doing this for years.
            The forum title was “Trump Campaign Reels Over New Groping Allegations”. You made your famous posts several times and have kept lying that you didn’t post the following words. Well, read ’em and go wash you mouth out with soap.
            Here’s one of your exact (no strawman or paraphrase) posts.
            You even boasted that “I could look up the charge that Deb didn’t resign over the fixing, as I had claimed.

            I Am Helpy InformedVoter • 15 days ago

            But to answer your questions and “points”:

            1. DWS did not resign over “fixing” the primaries. You could look this up!

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Hi meltdown guy! That’s absolutely correct, because there are no emails that show she “fixed” the primary, except in your imagination. That’s why you can’t quote one! However, that was only one of the DEEPLY STUPID claims you made, as you Gish galloped from lie to lie – the initial claim was that the emails “PROVED” that Hillary Clinton was paying pollsters to fake the polls. This is also 100% false!

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey Helpy Pathetic Liar, So the NYT link that I sent you a couple of weeks ago that stated that Deb was forced to resign because of the emails that showed she was trying to fix the primaries doesn’t mean anything?
            I don’t know about you, but I have much better things to do than try to access the leaked emails. I trust the multiple news sources that verified that dumb Deb resigned because of the emails. You can say you didn’t lie all you wish, but you have been outed and big time!
            So no more credibility in anything that you post since you can’t be trusted. I, on the other hand, have been recognized as “A Distinguished Contributor”, and you’ve just been shown to be nothing but a petty liar!

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Sorry you can’t seem to find any evidence for your dumb lies! That’s because you’re a dumb liar!

            I hope that helps!

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey Helpy Pathetic Liar; Let’s summarize this forum. I made the claim that the leaked emails caused Deb W-S to resign. First you claimed there were no emails that were negative to HilLIARy, then you claimed that Deb did not resign because the emails said she and HilLIARy fixed the primaries. After I produced the NYT link that proved that Deb did resign because the leaked emails showed she and HillLIARt fixed the primaries, you (for 8-10 days) claimed you never said she didn’t resign because of the leaked emails. I provided a pretty good paraphrase and you continued to deny that you ever said Deb didn’t resign. So I got TNM to provide your exact post and then you claimed you never denied. You’re a bigger liar that HilLIARy.
            And you were one of those who slammed me when I said that overseas polls showed that President Trump (doesn’t that have a nice ring to it?) was not behind like the fake media polls stated, but that he was actually up. Now the media is admitting that they faked the polls and let their bias taint the numbers. So this also proves that HilLIARy, indirectly was paying the pollsters to fake the polls.
            The American citizens have spoken and 306 – 232 is close to a mandate for President Trump (boy that sounds really good). And don’t try that lame statement that she won the popular vote. She got something like 300,000 more votes than President Trump, but California alone gave her a 3 million swing. If you eliminate either CA or NY from the popular vote, President Trump got millions more votes than HilLIARy. Just take a look at this and then tell me again how HilLIARy won. Pretty convincing isn’t it? But I expect you to continue with your lying ways and make some other outlandish claim. President Trump got more votes from women, blacks and latinos than Romney, so this debunks the theory that he alienated these voters.
            Look at this map and weep..
            https://twitter.com/tinacohen41/status/796444703990415366

          • I Am Helpy says:

            First sentence: a claim that’s still 100% false.
            Second sentence: not something I ever said, and something that I said that is 100% correct.
            Third sentence: outright gibberish.
            and so on.

            You’ve been having a meltdown for a month now. You’re really touchy about being called on your dumb lies.

          • InformedVoter says:

            I guess you are too dumb to realize how much of a liar you’ve been shown to be. All can read your posts and see that you have lied consistently. Me being touchy about my proven to be true posts? Not at all!
            I’ll give you one last chance to save some face. Please tell us why did Deb resign on the opening night of the DNC. I suspect you have no reason other than she was too preoccupied with planning what cabinet position she would be offered – chuckle, chuckle.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            So it’s been a month – how come you can’t come up with a quote that backs you up? I mean, surely if there was any truth to the dumb fables you told, you could have found it by now instead of having this protracted meltdown.

          • InformedVoter says:

            And the reason Deb resigned is ….?
            I produced a NYT link, one of many, that explicitly stated that Deb resigned because the emails show she was involved in fixing the primaries. You claimed that was not the reason and “you can look it up”. Well, everyone I know who looked it up, still came up with the same reason I posted – the leaked emails showing she was involved in fixing the primaries.
            So I challenge you one last time, if I can look it up, so can you. Please provide a reason why Deb resigned. Either that or just crawl back under your rock. Why do you keep denying sources like the NYT? It’s a lefty source. Once more you have no credibility – nothing but your feeble lies.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            So no quote, huh. Weird.

          • InformedVoter says:

            No reason for Deb resignation? If it’s so easy to look up, then why can’t you provide it? You have been lying from day one.
            HilLIARy worked with the news media to fake the polls. The leaked emails exposed this. This proved my claim.
            So, stop lying. Kindly produce the reason Deb quit. Was she bleeding out of here eyes? That must be it. Kind of like you’re doing now.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            So no quote, huh. Weeeeiiiiirrrrrrd.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Still awaiting your reason for Deb’s resignation. Typical liar response, try to change the subject.
            You have lost your argument and you know it! You keep proving you’re low information or now no information.
            Ha, ha, I’m still laughing at how you lefties fell for the fake polls that HilLIARy paid for. All she did was make her followers think she was in the lead and she never thought that there were so many out their who were voting against her.
            They realized that if they didn’t vote for either President Trump or her, that she might win. So to ensure she didn’t win, they voted for President Trump. Even MSNBC, through their tears, are saying that folks didn’t vote for President Trump so much as they voted against HilLIARy.
            Thus she paid pollsters to fake the polls and ended up costing herself the election. What goes around, comes around.
            When you build your life on lies (like you), you end up getting destroyed by those lies. The independent polls showed President Trump up 1-2 points while her paid for polls showed her up as much as double digits. Michigan is a classic example. The Detroit Free Press, who is now on suicide watch, published her polls with great confidence. They are now claiming that HilLIARy did it to herself by “believing her own false polls”.
            So, still waiting for the reason Deb jumped off the bridge. Anything but you stating the reason is a waste of your time. I can keep this up all day, all week, all month, all year, all EIGHT years.
            The only reason I’ll give up is if I get offered a position on President Trump’s transition team (not likely but possible). Also, he does have 4,700 other, non-transition positions to fill.
            I await the reason.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            So no quote, huh. Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrd.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey Helpy PROVEN LIAR, still waiting for the reason that Deb resigned. We can do this for 8 years, but everyone has already seen that you are the LIAR.
            I say “that’s not weird but par for the course” for lefty, low information trolls.
            You make yourself looking dumber and dumber with each worthless post.
            You keep claiming I have no quote, but I’m using your own quote that Deb didn’t resign because of the emails you said never existed. DUMB you are!

          • I Am Helpy says:

            So no quote, huh. Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiirrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrd.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey Helpy Pathetic LIAR, Where’s your reason for Deb resigning?
            Nolan Finley, from the Detroit News, a conservative paper, who was a member of the “Never Trump” crowd had a nice editorial today. Titled “Blame Clinton For Trump”, wrote “But Clinton and the Democratic Party made sure no other Democrat got the chance. They JACKED the nomination process so only she could win”.
            How’s that for a quote?
            So where’s your reason for Deb’s resignation?

          • I Am Helpy says:

            So STILL no quote, huh. So weird.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey Helpy Pathetic Dumb Liar; Even your fellow lefty posters can see how dumb and big a liar you are. I just gave you another quote. Yet you keep making yourself look dumb as well as being a liar!
            So STILL no reason for Deb’s resignation? Not weird, just normal dumb, lying, low information fools like you.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            So STILLLL no quote.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Several quotes HAVE been provided. Apparently you can’t read!
            Still waiting for the reason ole Deb resigned.
            FYI, the Detroit Free Press called the state of Michigan going to HilLIARy, shortly after the polls closed. They based this on the fake polls she had published. By 10 PM, the Free Press had to retract their story. They are blaming HilLIARy for Michigan going to Trump because of the faked polls. I’m sure you’ll respond with yet another denial of proof.
            So why can’t you produce the proof that Deb didn’t resign because of the leaked emails? Because you know damn well that’s the reason she resigned. So the leaked emails cost Deb her chair and HilLIARy the election! I just love it when dirty play comes back to haunt.
            So what’s the reason?

          • I Am Helpy says:

            So STILLLLLLLL no quote.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey Helpy Pathetic Dumb Liar,
            Quotes HAVE been provided. Still waiting for the reason Deb resigned! I guess Deb’s resignation, FOR NO REASON (according to you), cost HilLIARy the election.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            So STILLLLLLLLLLLLLL no quote.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey Helpy Pathetic Dummy Liar, Everyone else has accepted the proof and quotes given. They are all awaiting your reason why Deb resigned. Was it because she knew HilLIARy would lose and eventually get tossed into prison?
            WE await your answer.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            So STILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL no quote.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            PS: I don’t get why this is so difficult for you to understand (that’s a lie, it’s difficult because you’re dumb as hell). I’m not interested in your interpretation of opinion pieces – I want to know what evidence you have for any of your stupid claims, starting with the original: that you had seen emails “proving” that Hillary Clinton was paying pollsters to fake their results. That was a lie; no such emails exist, and no amount of Gish galloping to other (equally stupid & false) claims will change that.

            The onus is not on me to disprove your idiotic mumblings; it’s on you to provide evidence. You can’t do that, because you’re lying.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            PS: sorry that you can’t quite seem to identify & quote the emails you keep claiming exist. Probably it’s just because you’re inadequate as well as a deluded liar.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            PS: you still seem to be shouting about something I never said. What is up with that?

          • I Am Helpy says:

            PS: I still see you’re claiming I said things I never did. You are broken in the head.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey Pathetic Dummy, You are once more lying. In the forum thread of “Trump Reeling From Sexual Charges (or something like that”, I made the claim that the leaked emails were causing HilLIARy harm (now that thousands more have surfaced, it can’t be good news for HilLIARy), I stated that Debbie W-S resigned at the start of the DNC because the leaked emails revealed that she and HilLIARy conspired to fix the primaries. You responded that Deb DID NOT RESIGN BECAUSE OF FIXING THE PRIMARIES”. You even boasted “look it up”.
            Well let’s examine the facts. Deb was planning on running the DNC, but the emails revealed that she and HilLIARy were involved to fix the primaries, something that Sanders claimed about. So Deb resigned on the opening day. So if it wasn’t for trying to fix the primaries, then you can certainly provide the reason Deb resigned, can’t you?
            When I took you to task about your lie, you started claiming that you NEVER said that Deb resigned because of the emails that showed she tried to fix the primaries. Well, why don’t you go back and look at what you wrote? You certainly stated that she didn’t resign because of the emails.

            You have, once more, been outed as a LIAR!

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Sorry you think the elaborate strawman you constructed there has anything to do with your dumb lies, or proves anything at all. You are a liar and you got nothing.

            I hope that helps! Trump’s gonna lose!

          • Still strutting around as the Informed Sheriff in America denigrating all who see things differently than you. This urge to assert yourself is clearly the mark of being infested with satanic tendencies. If your “religious” ideology condones your arrogance then you have been following a false religion, and not the Religion of Jesus or any of the other True Messengers.
            Trump is not a prophet, nor is Trumpianity a viable offshoot.

            And yes, we know you are one of Trump’s hapless disciples.

          • Jon says:

            A group of evangelicals wants to exorcise the demons from Trump before November 8th so they can feel a little bit better about voting for him. Maybe those who perform the exorcism can give them a discount if InformedVoter’s demons are exorcised at the same time. My primary concern is whether they have enough holy water available for both of them.

          • Which reminds me that either the same group, or another, was uncertain about whether there were passages in the Bible that absolve Trump of the crimes assessed to him, or which may condone his speech.
            If Church clerics can’t see the disconnect between what is plainly laid out by Trump himself and the exact text of the New Testament, which isn’t that large an amount of pages, then the Church leadership is in a more pitiful state than what any of us had earlier surmised.

          • Jon says:

            True. I think the failure of moral leadership in many churches is at least partly to blame for the dwindling number of people who attend church or practice a religion. While there are many fine leaders, it seems the overall quality has diminished for the most part.

          • OK, InformedVoter—it’s time to help clear your lead-encased noggin’.
            1)You’ve pointed out accusations against Hillary(that’s how her name is spelled) without any references.
            2)You’ve made a career in wasting precious time studying in detail the transgressions of the Clintons, as though you have a mandate from God to ride out on a white horse
            to carry out a Holy Crusade against them.
            3) You make not one reference to the offenses of Trump, and by doing so you falsely create the illusion that Trump is squeaky clean and free of any defects.
            4) You have the annoying and officious habit of asserting your superiority, by claiming yourself to be more witty than I.

            Now, let’s take each point in succession:
            1) If you were an honest and thoughtful person you would provide sources to back up claims that someone lied from OBJECTIVE sources. By purposely misspelling
            her name, you seek to force the notion that Hillary lies while implying that Trump doesn’t. Not only is this a cowardly thing to do, but you’re wrong to think that
            Trump is truthful about anything. For example, Trump false accused some young men of having committed a crime without evidence(an act that violates openly
            the emphasis in the Bible, although it’s OK in the GOP bible.
            2) By your obsession with the past of the Clinton’s, your juvenile interest in the wrong-doings of Bill borders on a form of pornographic fascination with the Clinton’s.
            You are on a white horse bedecked in your shining armor, carrying out your 21st Century rendition of the Spanish Inquisition. You’re one of the many self-appointed
            Witch Hunters, and blood and saliva are dripping from your mouth and that of your steed.
            3) This statement is similar to “1”, but is worth noting again that you are quite willing to accuse someone else like Bill or Hillary who don’t go around parading their
            virtues and peppering everything they say about how great they are.The boasting of how great one is is Donald’s unique specialty—one which you seem to be
            proud of. Remember the passage in the Bible about “pride goeth before destruction”? You should look that passage up again, reflect on it, and see if you and Trump
            can work together on removing that excess baggage of pride which the two of you strut around with so gaily and blithely.
            4) This last point is a particularly troublesome one which you display project proudly. You still haven’t realized how pompous and arrogant you present yourself as,
            even before you strike your keyboard. Your sense of arrogance is noted by the name you chose for yourself, and suggests that humility, self-effacement, and
            nobility are at opposite poles from where you stand. It also connotes a racial superiority you feel oblige to bludgeon me with—a holdover from an ancient
            attitude that first took root in Europe and that branch of the Human Family which settled in Europe. No other people in the rest of the human world, and I’ve
            associated freely and regularly with members from every continent and in Australasia. This sense of need to assert one’s personal self is absent among them,
            and also absent among my white brothers and sisters who I personally know and who live in every corner of the country. But you and Trump take special pride
            in making sure that others know how superior and great you are. Which is why you felt compelled to boast of having more wit than me. This noisome trait is one
            that Arthur Jenson, Shockley, and Herrnstein wrote about with much fanfare—racial superiority of the White Race.

            So, given all this, I ask you to look at yourself again in the mirror. Then ask yourself, is this the way God expects me to behave? Should I continue to ignore God,
            and supplant Him and turn in adoration to Trump??? Reflect on these things, informed and superior one.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Blah, Blah, Blah; I’ve warned you before that your wordy posts impress no one except small children and dogs, OK maybe folks like Helpy Pathetic Dummy.
            In a nutshell, your religion, based upon what you said (after stripping out all the verbose garbage) is that it’s OK to condemn Trump for accusations that have been unproven or, in some cases, proven to be false.
            Also it’s not OK to condemn HilLIARy for the hatchet job she did on those women who proved they were raped by her husband.
            That’s one religion that I would want no part of, but the fact that it suits you fine, shows your lack of integrity when it comes to matters of women’s issues.

          • Trump wants to be condemned, but you’re too mentally sluggish to realize it. Since Trump insists on putting his dirty laundry out for display and puts it in our face, he deserves the most severe rebuke.
            Alas, imparting alternative views is an exercise of casting pearls before swine.

          • InformedVoter says:

            So it’s comforting to know that you can read President Trump’s mind. What a crock!
            HilLIARy defies the media to take her to task for breaking many laws, so why aren’t you claiming she deserves to be rebuked?
            You condone HilLIARy and Bill (even after they paid millions to the women they sexually abused) and still condemn President Trump for unproven allegations. Several of his accusers have had their stories debunked and they have recanted their claims. Where do you think that leaves the other accusers? The claim of a rape against a 13-year-old was dismissed in California. Yes it was refiled in NY, but the judge has already ruled that no criminal charges will be a considered, only civil. It’s an obvious ploy to extract money.
            Boy, you certainly practice some weird religion. Like the old song “On The Eve Of Destruction” (I think) — hate your next door neighbor but don’t forget to say grace, etc. That must be what your twisted religion follows!

          • It’s no comfort that you’re still slavishly worshiping at the satanic altar of Trump. You may rant and protest all you want to, it won’t do a thing to wipe the mess Trump has made on himself. You’re obviously excited about the possibility that Trump might choose to sexually assault your sisters and daughters. What sort of man is comfortable with that prospect.
            Your juvenile devotion to worshiping Trump and your god of Whiteness are an act of blasphemy beyond what the Israelites displayed when worshiping the Golden Calf.
            You can’t worship God and that which redounds to the benefit of all humanity, and worship Trump and Whiteness—the two are incompatible, or is your mind too small to realize that??

          • InformedVoter says:

            So it has been noted that you have no defense for your screwed up religion! You condone vulgar and illegal actions because they think like you, but condemn someone who has not done anything illegal (nothing yet proven). In fact, the accusers have been dropping like flies as they recant their stories, yet you continue to believe that these liars are telling the truth.
            You are one sick and sad puppy.
            Is it any more comfort to you that Billy may sexually assault your female friends (if you have any)? Billy actually has been proven to have raped and sexually assaulted women. Trump has never been.
            You twist the truth to fit your screwed up religion. Take your blood sucking and witch burning religion and keep it to yourself. I have no interest in adhering to your evil worshiping ideals.

          • Since you don’t know what you’re talking about regarding any Religion being screwed up, let me help you understand something that you’re misinformed about, like so many other things you can’t fathom.
            First of all, you express a profound ignorance of religion, just as Trump does. Secondly, you are totally blind to the reality that all religions originate with God; to say that any one of the Major Religions is screwed up is to say that they all are.
            To help illustrate this for your darkened mind, recall that none of the Messengers of God repudiated or disparaged any other Religion—only dimwitted people like yourself have dared to make such foolish assertions that you make. Had you been paying attention while going to Church, you would have been able to discern by the passages in the Old and New Testament affirm the Oneness of God—the Truth is a point which the foolish have multiplied. You therefore, are one of the foolish by attempting to draw a distinction between the Baha’i Faith and between whatever Religion you belong to. You never answered my questions before about your Religion—Is it Christianity or Trumpianity? That’s not a trick question so don’t hurt your brain trying to give me an answer.

            “Beware, O believers in the Unity of God, lest ye be tempted to make any distinction between any of the Manifestations of His Cause, or to discriminate against the signs that have accompanied and proclaimed their Revelation. This indeed is the true meaning of Divine Unity, if ye be of them that apprehend and believe this truth. Be ye assured, moreover, that the works and acts of each and every one of these Manifestations of God, nay whatever pertaineth unto them, and whatsoever they may manifest in the future, are all ordained by God, and are a reflection of His Will and Purpose. Whoso maketh the slightest possible difference between their persons, their words, their messages, their acts and manners, hath indeed disbelieved in God, hath repudiated His signs, and betrayed the Cause of His Messengers.”

            InformedVoter, this quote pertains to anyone who is haughty and ignorant to disparage any of the Religions revealed by God, as you are trying to do. Please take note of the last sentence, because it speaks directly to you at this moment. Think before you type anything further on the subject above unless you wish to further embarrass yourself in front of the entire NationalMemo audience.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Must you display your religious ignorance to the entire forum?
            NOT ALL religions start with God. Many have more than one god. Ignorant you are!
            And just because someone believes and even “practices” a religion, that does not make them a good person. Your steadfastness to support a rapist protector and condemn a still innocent person demonstrates that you talk up a good story (in your own mind that is), but practice something extremely satanic. You consider yourself to be religious, but you don’t practice what you preach. You probably beat little kids and cheat on your spouse, but since you attend a religious service on Sunday, you puff out your chest and proclaim “what a good person I am”! What a crock!

          • Thank you for revealing how little you know. It’s good that we have your dearth of knowledge made known here.
            Where do I start? There are so many levels of lack of knowledge of Religions you have disclosed, so this should afford me the opportunity to dispel your illusions.
            1) The first problem you have is falling into the same trap as many Westerners do regarding your own Religion and that of other peoples Religion.

            a)You are at fault for interpreting what you see as multiple images of religious figures in Hinduism as a sign that they worship many gods. Those images are the result of differing sects within Hinduism choosing to have a different image to represent an attribute of God, who has numerous attributes. That many Hindus chose to anthropomorphize each attribute is not the result of what Krishna taught, but the result of a literalist interpretation of what people thought He was teaching.
            b) Certain Christians make a similar mistake—some thinking that God exists in 3 persons. That is “The Father”, “The Son”, and “The Holy Ghost”. These are references to aspects of the Station of Jesus. He isn’t God in Essence, but Jesus accurately reflects the attributes of God, just as a perfectly-polished mirror reflects clearly the sun when the mirror is turned towards it. The Sun isn’t in the mirror but its image can be seen, its light is reflected, and the heat of the rays are felt.

            2) Another flaw of yours is to be confused by names attributed to the Creator. Again, the result of lack of appreciation of the nature of language and a dismissal on your part to make an effort to learn another language and see that what you call something will be called by a different word in another language. For example, you no doubt thing that when Muslims use the word Allah for the Creator, you think they are speaking of another God. Allah in Arabic means God, and was used to distinguish what was represented in the Kaaba in Mecca(a structure built by Abraham during His journey from what is now an area near present-day Kuwait, to the Hijaz region. Abraham built a structure to re,mind the Arabs of the time that there was only One God. The Arabs had forgotten the Teachings of Hud and Salih, and other Messengers about the One true God, and began to worship multiple figures carved fron wood and stone, numbering over 300. The term for the “lesser” images was “ilaahat”.
            By the time Muhammad appeared, these images were destroyed by Him, and He taught the Arabs the following creed—“la ilaaha ila llah” (There is no ilaaha but Allah, or another way is to say there is no “god”, but GOD—to distinguish between the idols and the unseen God).
            Native Americans refer to the Source of Creation by various names, including “The Great Spirit” and what not.

            In summary, you need to take a serious course in Religion, use your own mind to determine more fully what I’ve summarized briefly, and don’t just rely on lies and misinformation handed down for generations. I won’t charge you, but expect you to reply more intelligently on this theme next time.

            All of this probably is falling on deaf ears and a computer screen that blocks your reading intake. But others here may benefit from what I’ve typed.

            You’re still an angry white male and you didn’t answer the question about what religion you belong to, or whether you have a religion at all save the worship of Trump.

          • Your display of ignorance of Religion has been made quite clear by this post. You’re confused about Religion on several accounts.
            1) You have a literalist mind and are confused by how other Religions describe the Creator.

            a) When any Religion uses a different name for “God” doesn’t change “God” the unknowable, the Omniscient, the Omnipresent. Your attempt to fit “God” inside a breadbox like a finite human brain is like trying to fit infinity between 0 and 1.

            2) You mistake the numerous images in Hindu Temples and depictions as a sign of many gods, when they are ways that various Hindus think of the attributes of God. Had you taken the time to study the Indian culture you would have arrived at the same understanding.

            3) You assert that I attend Church on Sunday, yet you’ve been to enamored with yourself to take to think and realize that I’m a Baha’i, a member of an independent Religion that has different days and manner of worship. If you hadn’t been so consumed with love of yourself, you would have made an effort to trouble yourself to look up what I’ve written regarding Baha’u’llah, or followed the numerous links I’ve posted.

            In all, you’re just a bigoted and frustrated man who is forever asserting a colonial mindset in these discussions. Your very name you chose for yourself is a constant reminder of your adoration of yourself. All of which speaks volumes of an angry white male who has contempt for others.

          • Still angry, distraught and acting like a curmudgeon. That isn’t a Christian attribute, you know.

          • You’re evading the points again. Are you a coward and too timid to address my observations about you? Did you attend church today, and what, if anything, did you learn?
            And are you OK with Trump’s assertion that being a “star” gives him permission to attack women and then brag about it on the air?

            Come on, INFORMED VOTER! Prove to me that you can make unbiased and extemporaneous comments rather than relying on truculent, terse, and trite replies.

            I realize you are too lazy to read wordy posts, especially when you’re accustomed to reading headlines or reading the tick-tape at the bottom of FOX broadcasts.

            If these questions are too weighty for you, then I’ll ask you some simpler ones.

            And are you OK with Trump’s assertion that being a “star” gives him permission to attack women and then brag about it on the air? You still must be OK with him making a move on your mom—yes or no?

            As long as you insist and persist in conducting yourself in a haughty, imperious manner, you must be ready to receive long comments from me. My style differs from Foxoholics who rely on simplistic responses—memory retention problems.

          • InformedVoter says:

            My previous post destroyed and undressed you as religious fake. You’re just too naive and ignorant to accept locker room banter for what it is. That’s the problem with the PC police. We can all look forward to correcting that problem after Trump’s victory.
            So, if you wish to embarrass yourself with wordy, meaningless posts, filled with words used incorrectly, that’s your choice. You just keep making yourself recognized for what you are – a low information poster who thinks he’s considered intelligent because of the size of his posts. How does that expression go? Large post, little manhood!

          • All of your posts are childish prattle with the intent of asserting white male superiority—a child-like phase you don’t seem intent on leaving behind. You’re just an angry male whose upset that your haughty arrogance is fading fast.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Your knowledge of religion is abysmal and extremely weak. Your understanding of religion is even worse! But we were not discussion religion, you changed the subject to religion when I exposed your hypocrisy. You condone HilLIARy for lying when she tried to protect her rapist husband, but you condemn President Trump (doesn’t that have a nice ring to it?) when he made some locker room banter that millions have done in the past (including you). Making locker room banter does not prove any of the statements are true. So you claimed that your religion allowed you to have this fake morality. This means that your religion is based upon hypocrisy.
            The American public has spoken and given President Trump a mandate to fix all the things Obama has broken. Take a look at this and weep. Pretty dramatic isn’t it! This led to a 306-232 drubbing in the electoral college.
            https://twitter.com/tinacohen41/status/796444703990415366

          • When Trump admits on air that he can make a move on women because he’s a star—is that an accusation on my part, or is it a careless and thoughtless admission on Trump’s part?
            You want to have your cake, and eat it too. Well, I’m not going to let you get away with it. And that’s a warning, homey.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            I see you’re still having a meltdown about me. Sorry you couldn’t back up your bizarre lies – not my fault, though.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey Helpy Pathetic Liar, How’s that bar of soap tasting?

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Hahahahahaha 6 days and that’s the best you got.

            Sorry you can’t find any evidence for your lies! Better luck next Putin-sourced smear!

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey Helpy Pathetic Liar, You have been outed as being a big a liar as HilLIARy. Anything you post from now on will be considered to be a lie. You can’t help it though, it runs in your pathetic family of low information posters.
            Liar, liar
            Pumpkin eater
            All fall down!

          • I Am Helpy says:

            So no quote huh. It’s been a month and all you got is the feeblest insults I’ve ever seen. You are a liar.

          • Carole Moore says:

            Once again, you strew misinformation about “those women who proved they were raped by her husband” which in and of itself, is inaccurate, non-truthful and misleading… but evidently, YOU do not know how to read or do research, or you would cease making that statement over and over again..

          • InformedVoter says:

            OK, then please explain why the Clinton’s gave Paula Jones $800,00, or why they paid other women similar amounts to keep quiet? HilLIARy attacked the women who charged Bill with unwanted advances. If I recall, she referred to their charges as “a vast right wing conspiracy”. Time and again these women have provided evidence that the “attacks” took place, yet the press buries their stories on page 16 of the obituaries. Meanwhile, after Soros announced he would PAY for anyone who could come up with some dirt on Trump, these women, who told no one earlier that they were attacked, provided only sketchy details and have no coordinating testimony, get front page coverage. The case of the woman who claimed that when she was in first class with Trump, said “suddenly the armrest disappeared”. Well Carole, ALL the commercial jets in service during the time frame she stated, had stationary armrests in first class. At the time, ALL the air manufacturers figured that first class seats were large enough to not require movable armrests. So please explain how the armrest disappeared! She has since recanted her story, with some claiming it’s because Trump has threatened to go to court to clear his name. Many of the other accusers have backed off their claims. Meanwhile, Clinton’s accusers, having had their stories confirmed by others, have continued to press their charges. So how can you condone HilLIARy slandering those who charged her husband and condemn Trump when not one of those accusing him has produce even a shred of evidence? Perhaps one of them has a blue dress?

          • Florenca Mcdowell says:

            Right the fact that they filed police reports mean NOTHING to you. Get over it SHE lost and yes he is a rapists. I did not have sex with that woman.
            OOPS I lied and got impeached.

          • InformedVoter says:

            You keep making statements that President Trump is vile because of the unproven sexual accusations against him. I keep telling you that the unproven allegations, one by one, have been debunked. Yet you continue to act like President Trump is guilty. You keep ignoring HilLIARy’s lying to cover up Bill’s rapes. You are a hypocrite!
            Here is another recent debunk of the sexual allegations. Might be time for you to shop for another religion.
            http://www.barenakedislam.com/2016/11/07/trump-accuser-lied-hillary-clintons-anticipated-knock-out-punch-against-trump-died/

          • I paint what Donald presents. If you want me to paint a different picture of you or him, then give me a different pose. Otherwise, you’ll have to be content with what I put on the canvass.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Sorry, but that’s YOUR interpretation of what President Trump presents. What will you do when HilLIARy gets indicted and her and rapist Bill flee to the same country they’ve been moving millions to? You know, the same country with no extradition treaty with the USA.
            You claim you paint the picture President Trump presents, but you don’t seem to paint the picture that inmate HilLIARy presents do you? That’s my point, you have a biased (bigoted) view and it permeates your logic. The fact that you introduced religion into this forum speaks volumes about your biased (bigoted) views. It’s folks like you who are the evil ones, not President Trump. No one is perfect, but you’ve proven you’re a hypocrite.

          • skisok says:

            And I guess the 13 year old girl also lied.

          • InformedVoter says:

            You may wish to do some research before making such a statement. The woman filed charges last winter in California. The judge dismissed that charges because of improper paperwork and lack of evidence. Upon appeal, the charges were once again dismissed and the plaintiff was ordered to pay all court costs. She claimed she only had $300 to her name and pleaded hardship and requested that she not be forced to pay court costs. She then shopped her case around and a New York group filed new charges last April. The judge immediately scheduled a preliminary hearing for December, but cautioned that the statute of limitations would prevent any criminal charges from being charged. The NY lawyers filed a motion to move the date forward, but the judge has rebuked their requests.
            The case rests upon a friend of Trump, who has been convicted and served time for underage sexual encounters. The NY lawyers claim that Trump is a friend and therefore must have been involved. The judge has warned that just proving Trump was a friend will not carry much weight. It seems obvious that the poor girl, having no money, is trying to catch a big paycheck and her lawyers are looking to do the same.

          • skisok says:

            Actually, you need to state the facts. Yes, the case was dismissed but not because there was no evidence but because of a technicality, improper filing of paperwork as the address she listed was abandoned. The case has been refilled and is allowed to proceed.

          • InformedVoter says:

            You may wish to follow your own advice. I did state the facts correctly. She filed charges and they were dismissed because of a paperwork problem. This was in California. They re-filed the charges, again in California, and the charges were again dismissed. The judge ordered the plaintiff to pay court costs. Claiming she only had $300 to her name, that part of the court order was vacated. The plaintiff shopped her case around and found a lawyer in New York who took her case. He filed charges in NY. The judge immediately delayed the preliminary hearing until December. She also indicated that because of the statute of limitations, only civil charges (meaning money) would be considered. Her lawyer filed a protest. The judge reiterated her position and told the NY lawyer that just because Trump knew and associated with the a convicted sex offender, that would not be enough evidence to get past the preliminary hearing.
            Like I said, you should follow your own advice and do some research before displaying your ignorance of the facts.

          • Carole Moore says:

            Wow, you are really good at making up fairy tales!!!

          • Jim Samaras says:

            Trump has not sold out America Aaron! Why just now are these women coming forward? Is it not possible they are paid shills from the same people who brought chaos to Trump rallys or are you in denial of that?

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Ah right, all the women who come forward about Trump, with witnesses and consistent stories, are somehow making it up. The fact that he was BRAGGING ON VIDEO ABOUT SEXUALLY ASSAULTING WOMEN is somehow not important. This is the candidate you support.

            You are garbage.

          • Why are the email investigations just coming out? For once in your life, GROW UP! Show some fairness and wisdom for a change, or is that possible?
            Your sense of balance is so one-sided that all you care about is covering Trump’s bare ass. Unlike any other candidate in history, Donald brags about his proclivities, lies repeatedly, makes up situations in order to incite people like you to riot and froth at the mouth, and proclaims himself a saintly person while being ever so quick to judge others. If that doesn’t convince you of his opposition to Christian ideals, then nothing will.
            You and Trump can’t with any certainty profess to be Christian because daily the two of you make a travesty of Jesus’ Message, and you relish every moment you do so.

            Jim, you’ve got to let go of the blasphemy of repudiating what Jesus and all the other Messengers have instructed you to be like. Your current attitudes are in conflict with the ideals of Religion. Won’t you even try to make an effort to rehabilitate your current condition, and get off the path that leads to an abysmal fate for you AND Trump???

          • AgLander says:

            It’s 12:00AM local time in Muscat with a temperature of 80 degrees. Muslims are sleeping comfortably while Christians are sleeping lightly and react nervously if they hear a noise outside their doors.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Thanks for reminding us that you’re a bigot!

          • Thanks for that irrelevant weather report. I fail to see how it relates to the story unless you have some convoluted way of showing one. Furthermore, the heat in Musqat is having an adverse effect on your brain in the US. Why else would a man desperate for attention be infatuated with the idea of inserting Oman into every other comment he makes ever since I mentioned going there several months ago.
            Agatha, you need to see a counselor to explore your childish behavior. Run along now and play with the kiddies in Musqat.

            Be very careful—the Muslims are waiting to get you. Don’t open your door on Halloween.
            BOO!!!

        • Carole Moore says:

          Jim, go back to sleep, it’s past your nap time…

      • msnyc10 says:

        Trump didn’t tell me anything. He was caught on tape in a private conversation #1. #2 he said he grabs women and they let him because he is famous. Which is in fact true of women and famous men. What he said was gross and inappropriate, yet he did not as the press/media/public say he likes to grope women who don’t WANT to be. He said basically he is a big famous stud and has access to women whenever he wants. That still doesn’t support the women who came forward with stories markedly different than his and in any event the point is; they came forward because they were coereced to either tell their story, embellish their story or outright lie. Really doesn’t matter; it was anecdotal evidence supporting our “suspicions” of him (he’s an inappropriate pig).

        Comey didn’t have so say anything about indictment or felony charges those were always what the FBI was investigating. Remember dems and Hillary breathed a sigh of relief when the FBI decided to NOT pursue criminal/felony charges against her. So when Comey says they found new evidence that is “pertinent” to that closed investigation that they will be reviewing, it precisely means that they are going to review the new evidence to see if not only pertient and relevant but warrans reopening the criminal investigation. Far more concerning to me then Trump kissing a woman without asking and far more compelling source and data.

        • Jon says:

          No one breathed a sigh of relief when the FBI decided not to pursue criminal charges against Hillary. Everyone, including her persecutors, knew that it was just one more partisan witch hunt.
          You are completely misstating Comey’s letter. Go read it again unless you are purposely changing words and doing your own editing.

          • msnyc10 says:

            I am practically quoting his email. And the very term Partisan Witch Hunt is a laughable oxymoron. When your party is being investigated it is a ‘Partisan Witch Hunt’ when the other party is it is not. The FBI itself never concluded that this was a wasted-time-investigation which is what they would have found had it been a witch hunt. Their findings stated that: “Mr. Comey rebuked Mrs. Clinton as being “extremely careless” in using a private email address and server. He raised questions about her judgment, contradicted statements she has made about her email practices, said it was possible that hostile foreign governments had gained access to her account, and declared that a person still employed by the government — Mrs. Clinton left the State Department in 2013 — could have faced disciplinary action for doing what she did.”

            No Witch Hunt there. While we are at it and you accuse me of misstating let’s read the whole release:

            In previous congressional testimony, I referred to the fact that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had completed its investigation of former Secretary Clinton’s personal email server. Due to recent developments, I am writing to supplement my previous testimony,” Comey wrote.

            “In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation. I am writing to inform you that the investigative team briefed me on this yesterday, and I agreed that the FBI should take appropriate investigative steps designed to allow investigators to review these emails to determine whether they contain classified information”

            Supplementing my previous testimony to the US Congress regarding Clinton’s Emails as an unrelated case has uncovered emails pertinent to the investigation which we need to investigate to determine if they contain classified information.

            It’s what HE said not ME. And what he SHOULD have said. Go spin to people who can’t or don’t read ok?

          • Jon says:

            Next time quote don’t practically quote. You have put some serious spin on what he actually said.

          • msnyc10 says:

            Nope you have to spin it to make it what you want. As a quote it’s pretty loathsome, as a spin it’s condoning sexual assault. But cool you got the conversation on Trump again so we don’t have to worry about whether the next POTUS stored classified documents on her server against the law and interests of the country and lied about it. From any one else you’d be seething and calling for blood. What is so funny is I am voting for Hillary too and I loathe Trump too. I just have the ability to apply some impartiality to my viewpoints.

          • Jon says:

            This is a waste of time. You are lying about me as just like a good Trumpie. Enjoy Trumpland.

          • Carole Moore says:

            Bush, Cheney, Rice, 22 million emails….hmmmm, selective memory, pick and choose, typical conservative one way street, hmmm… so let’s compare, shall we??

    • jmprint says:

      You are putting words in his memo. Where did you read he “new hard data”

      “yet watching people bend over backwards to excuse their candidate”

      This statement applies to Trump, it’s not just about the 13 women that have come out to back up what Trump is quoted of saying. It’s about his promoting of racism, his past business dealing, how he sues so not to pay his bills, how it’s not about the people, but about him, the Trumpf…and about his pending cases on fraud, racketeering and rape.

      • msnyc10 says:

        And you wonder why people support Trump? “It’s” not about Trump at all. “It’s” about, allow me to repeat, the Federal Bureau of Investigation reporting that it has found evidence “pertinent” to the formerly closed (with prejudice) criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton. I did not say “hard evidence”. I said “hard data”: they have emails/documents (hard data) that are somehow “pertinent” to the formerly close (with prejudice) case against her and are reviewing those to see if they affect their prior decision or not. The data they have is “hard” (unlike say the allegations about Trump), appears to be pertinent to the Clinton emails and may or may not upon review shed new light on the investigation and that new light may or may not prompt the FBI to re-open the Criminal Investigation of the de facto next President of the United States. Leave Trump out of it for a moment since he is superfluous really; how is that not relevant for the FBI to inform the Congress about?

        • Jon says:

          The standard for prosecution is not whether you possess hard data. It is whether you possess reliable relevant data or evidence.
          If hard data is your requirement, Trump’s confession to Billy Bush on the Access Hollywood videotape is as good as it gets.

          • msnyc10 says:

            Are you intentionally not understanding? I didn’t say he had or claimed hard facts for prosecution. I’ll repeat; he claimed that another investigation informed him that they had come across emails “pertinent” to the criminal investigation he had just testified to the US Congress he had closed and that as a result he needed to amend his testimony that he still had “hard data” he needed to review that had recently come to light. Keep making it about Trump. It is not.

          • Jon says:

            First pertinent implies relevance. There is no showing of relevance or pertinence in. its looser definition of somehow related. For all he knows all he has are duplicates of emails he has already seen. Also the investigation had never been closed. Like most investigations that have not reached the point of adjudication, the case remained open but dormant.
            Announcing an investigation when you have nothing more than baseless speculation is appalling. If that is the new standard, then law enforcement agencies have become nothing more than political hacks. This is nothing more than banana republic politics.
            As for Trump, you mentioned him above and seemed to imply that the unknown evidence about emails found on someone else’s computer was fair game but evidence against Trump supported by his confession is not. The evidence against Trump has probative value. The alleged evidence against Hillary has no value at this time.

          • msnyc10 says:

            He didn’t announce an investigation. He announced that he had been *informed* that “pertinent” emails had been found and was going to investigate those to see if they were relevant/classified. He himself said he was going to determine if “relevant”. Right now all he knew when he informed Congress was that in another investigation they had come across emails they felt were “pertinent”. That isn’t baseless speculation.

            I won’t even go into Trump with you since it is not germane, suffice it say all he “confessed” to was being piggish when it came to women. It was every one else that decided that what he meant was he groped women who didn’t want to be.

            No one alleged any evidence against HIllary so stop saying it. They said they found emails that were “pertinent” to the prior investigation and as per their responsibility were investigating those to see if they were in fact evidence against her in light of the fact they previously swore to Congress that the evidence they had was not sufficient to warrant *criminal charges* (though the warned her actions were inappropriate, could have put the country at risk, and were she still to be Senator worthy of disciplinary actions). I’ll take Donald making clumsy passes any day of the week (if you want to make this about Donald that is, to repeat it is. about. Hillary).

        • jmprint says:

          It is about Trumpf he is a high class low life, nobody trusts him either, “allegations”, they are indictments, not allegations. Trump is lying by calling Hillary a criminal, when emails found on Humas computer have not been reviewed yet, she is not a criminal. And what can congress do with this information, nothing except put our for innuendos.

      • kep says:

        Those women are a standard Clinton response to any opposition. They have done the same thing to near anyone that would run against them. Funny how they all came forward at the same time, even though years have passed. Bill had women coming out when he assaulted them, and they were either threatened by Hillary, or paid off

  20. sick of the ignorance says:

    As a Democrat and Hillary supporter I am livid. (Livid enough to go out canvassing for the next ten days and giving money!) Comey did this knowing full well that the republicans would use it, mischaracterize his words, and tip the scales to Trump. I would be just as livid if this was done to a Republican 11 days before an election. There were policies in place and Comey didn’t follow them. He knew that this has an effect on the election and that effect is to further declare her guilty without evidence and without a trial. That is why they are not suppose to comment on ongoing investigations. I didn’t see this kind of “diligence’ with Trump and the investigation that is on going about the Russia ties. There is a bias here and it shows. He probably violated the Hatch Act on top of it. Apparently, there is a different Hatch Act for him as it would be for any other federal employee. Unless there was real evidence of some sort of illegal act by CLINTON (not her aides!) he should not have sent that letter and editorialized as he did. NOW, as far as I am concerned the FBI is total is DIRTY. They will use their power and taxpayer funding to take down political enemies of the Director. Every employee of the FBI is going to get to wear this STINK, where before they could claim they were non-partisan and now they are just a new arm of the party in power. Comeny needs to tender his resignation and President Obama needs to accept it.

    • Blueberry Hill says:

      I hope President Clinton fires him on her first day. He totally mishandled this and charges from the DOJ are filed on Comey. See my post below here.

      ..

  21. Blueberry Hill says:

    I’m so glad the DOJ is already on it. They filed charges against Comey for Abuse of Power, and for Influencing a Presidential Election. The emails were not even Hillary’s and did not come from her server. Wouldn’t it be justice to see Comey spend some time in jail? He was clearly trying to influence the election.

    I’M VOTING FOR HILLARY ANYWAY, SHE HAS EARNED OUR TRUST.

    Comey has not, and the Trump Trash is a disaster.

    ..

    • TWM says:

      The DOJ did not file charges against Comey. The Democratic Coalition Against Trump, an anti-Trump super PAC, filed a complaint against Comey with the Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility. I abhore the orange menace, but also believe in not spreading misinformation.

      • AgLander says:

        You came to the wrong place because the Clinton sycophants use this site as a dumping ground for misinformation and propaganda.

        • TWM says:

          I am pro-Clinton. Unfortunately, in this day and age, the amount of misinformation and straight-up lies disseminated via social media make it difficult for many to discern what is fact and what is fiction. But, from my observations, the amount of cesspool garbage spewed from the Breitbart/InfoWars hose far outweighs what is put out on the Clinton puff-piece sites. Thank heavens for a few reputable journalists who understand sourcing, verifying, and double-verifying before publishing.

        • I Am Helpy says:

          Sorry you can’t ever seem to prove anything you say! Maybe it’s because Stormfront isn’t the best source of news?

  22. 1standlastword says:

    This is where decades of pay-to-play between the buyers and sellers of influence have landed us? All the careerists are seeking a safe corner to either protect their power or acquire more power. In the end what will we be left with…a new and improved leadership??! Functional leadership??!

    • Right you are. This season has unveiled what has been building up fordecades now. The chickens are all coming home to roost.

      • 1standlastword says:

        All the leaks are like a flash light shined on the dark deeds we never knew about and the roaches and rats are scampering!
        Technology is a double edged sword isn’t it??

        • I’m not worried at all because this is all part of a much greater unseen drama being played out. I am more intrigued about the “skeletons” still unearthed in Donald’s cellars, and hidden in the dark pages of his business records.
          We’re not lost, we’ve only lost our way momentarily and this chaos is intended to begin the process of house-cleaning.

  23. sick of the ignorance says:

    I think the Washington Post writer who said that there is a reason for the policy and procedure not to make statements about on going investigations close to an election. I for one have questioned why there are no FBI statements about the on-going Trump/Russia investigation. The same reason: it would affect the election. This is proof of Director Comey’s bias, because he has one set of rules of releasing information on investigations for Clinton and a different one for Trump. He violated the Hatch Act right there. I wonder why it wasn’t a big hurry to report the Trump investigation…but hey let’s cause a Category 5 crap storm to smear Clinton.

    • Blueberry Hill says:

      Exactly! They were not her emails, it was not her computer and didn’t come from Hillary or her server. Of course, it is so obvious that this was a complete election stunt. Glad the DOJ was on the job and charged him already with Abuse of Power and Interfering with a Presidential Election. I think it would be justice if he had to spend a little time in jail for what he tried to do to Hillary’s campaign.

      ..

  24. AgLander says:

    The safety of our very nation is at risk. With the latest disturbing announcement of thousands of Clinton State Department emails found in the apartment of a disgraced pervert and his careless wife, it is imperative that Hillary Clinton’s national security clearance for access to see any and all classified documents must be suspended until further notice and a full investigation by the FBI is carried out. The safety of every American’s life and that of their children demands it!

    • mary5920 says:

      Wow, you’re so right!!! Disgraced perverts should NOT have access to security briefings. That’s why Donald Drumpf is a disgrace and should be quarantined, for the safety of every American’s life and so on….
      BTW, you seem to be in love with Hillary Clinton, choosing a Photoshop version of her for your avatar and all. But I guess if I really looked like an angry chicken as you did in your previous one, I’d change to something else too.

      • Miz Julia says:

        Wow, Ag is concern trolling for THE SAFETY OF OUR VERY NATION! ;-)) I must agree that Melania was very careless to have married such a perv. Does that make HER an enabler of pervs?

        • AgLander says:

          Your biggest worry now is that Hillary feels the heat and hops on her plane and becomes and international fugitive from justice…….leaving all you lemmings standing there with nothing but streamers, campaign signs and broken promises for comfort!

          • Miz Julia says:

            RWNJ – projection is thy name. LOL.

            Trumps already said that after the election he’d take a nice long vacation. Somewhere without an extradition treaty.

            ETA: Oh, quit typing, you literally have NOTHING of use to say, AgLander.

          • AgLander says:

            All I know is that Hillary is very angry and it’s a certainty that she and Huma will be sleeping in separate beds tonight!

          • mary5920 says:

            You sound jealous. And catty.

          • AgLander says:

            Hey, don’t feel sorry for Hillary. Until she met Huma she had spent decades sleeping by herself, remember? She’s very used to it and will adjust!

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Every time you post you can’t help but reveal how much you hate and fear women. It’s hilarious!

          • Jon says:

            Ag makes you think he may be a member of the “Rapists For Trump” super pac.

          • Blueberry Hill says:

            I guess he is counting on his minions not knowing that he is going to trial on Nov. 28 for 1500 fraud charges. And the trial begins in Dec. for the rape of a 13 year old girl (just 1 girl of several). She told him “Mr. Trump, I don’t want you to do this”, to which he replied “I don’t care” and proceeded to tie her to the bed and roughly raped her while she kept pleading for him to stop. He was at his rich friend’s mansion, and that guy was raping another young girl (14). An employee walked in on Trump and saw what he was doing. Trump and his friend had wild Cocaine parties and raped the young girls they lured there with the promise of modeling jobs. His long vacation that he mentions must be the jail time he will be serving.

            ..

          • Miz Julia says:

            “His long vacation that he mentions must be the jail time he will be serving”.

            I’m Miz Julia and I approve your message. 😉

          • Jon says:

            I have to wonder whether Ag is part of the “Rapists For Trump” super pac.

          • Blueberry Hill says:

            The answer is yes, she is a complete troll and is usually dumped immediately.

            ..

          • Jon says:

            Thank you.

        • mary5920 says:

          I find these women very mysterious. Yes, she got money and fame from this alliance–but what a horrible trade off.
          BTW good to see ya!

          • Miz Julia says:

            Good to see you too!

            I’ve read that Melania’s father is very much like Drumpf.

            I like what Michelle Goldberg at “The Nation” said one day when she appeared on MSNBC – “she seems like the type of person who would marry Trump”. (paraphrasing slightly).

            I think her statement is very apt. 😉

          • AgLander says:

            You are sounding so much like a homely, dateless female long ago embittered to your fate……….your catty high school girl like envy statements are what gave you away.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            ^ Terrified of women.

          • Miz Julia says:

            Pro tip – to make something sting it has to have some resonance to the person you’re addressing. This post merely reveals the right wing victim ideology that you and Trump possess. Everything is rigged, everything is someone else’s fault, liberals are mean, the media is (finally) vetting Trump and it’s so unfair. Please, stop with the crying already. It’s very unseemly.

          • AgLander says:

            Simply flashing your posted words of jealousy in front of you to force you to read them……apparently you aren’t used to being called out like that and didn’t like what you saw. Sorry if I hit a nerve, princess.

          • I Am Helpy says:

            ^ terrified of women.

      • AgLander says:

        Hillary Clinton and her home brew server were every hackers’ best friend for 4 long years…..did you just awake from a Rip Van Winkle length nap?
        I’d call you an idiot for not grasping the point but I have a feeling you have long ago accepted that status!

        • mary5920 says:

          Here’s a good comment from somebody that actually works with classified data from a comment er on Daily Kos: (I’d link to it, but my previous links got edited out)

          Thanks so much for this diary — and good luck on Nov. 8! I’m so tired
          of trying to explain to people who have no understanding of classified
          data just what a load of nothing this has all been. Documents are
          upgraded all the time for any variety of reasons and no one person is
          expected to read something and guess whether it will be classified at
          some later point in time. While I appreciate your final paragraph, if
          Comey felt he “had” to notify the committee, he should have taken the
          time to make his notification much, much clearer.

          You’ve been a right wing troll for a long time. Maybe someday you’ll grow a conscience.

          • AgLander says:

            I know how difficult it must be for you……the only way to defend the Clintons on a daily basis is cheap rationalizing away their malfeasances. I do sympathize with your plight, I really do! And it’s good you mention a conscience…that means you are aware that they actually exist even though you have no desire to have one!

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Weird how you can’t seem to articulate a single wrong thing they’ve done that actually happened, and instead have to make up stuff. On the other hand, you somehow manage to justify supporting a child molester for President, so that’s probably just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to your delusions.

          • Mama Bear says:

            Mary, he is a paid troll and his paycheck depends on how many comments he garners. Starve him out…block him and he will go away.

          • ivory69690@yahoo.com says:

            its funny ! dosent anyone else find it strange that hackers can break into all these accounts for emails . if its that easy then why hasent the hackers broke into DONNY DUMPS bank account and his taxes ? if it be that the banks have such a secured system that maybe the government should use the banks system ? that good a system why not the USA using it ?

          • Mama Bear says:

            great point Ivory. But if a foreign government wants TrumpDump to win he would not hack his accounts.

          • ivory69690@yahoo.com says:

            that’s my point mama bear . not in so many words

          • Jon says:

            Have you ever wondered how many of the misogynists here belong to the “Rapists For Trump” super pac?

          • In-depth reading hurts Agatha’s circuitry. He’ll burn out beyond the 1st paragraph. He relies on headlines and the first few sentences.

          • mary5920 says:

            Ag may be a female, but we don’t really want him. Ag-grieved, Ag-gravating, A great boofhead and it never learns.

          • I don’t think Ag is really a human. His comments suggest he’s an android powered by sophisticated software, but with major programming flaws.

        • I Am Helpy says:

          I get that you and facts are distant strangers, since you live exclusively in the Stormfront media bubble, but Hillary’s email server was never hacked.

          I hope that helps!

        • Agatha, tell me—Are you a human, or a computer program which Putin and company put together, complete with Artificial Intelligence software?
          If you’re an A.I. machine, the software needs upgrading. You’re stuck in a tight “If-Then” loop. For instance, you see the word “Oman” and the software jumps to a Class function called “Oman” with various objects that spit out trite statements related to Islamic culture; if your software recognizes a response from a woman, it jumps to a module called “Abuse Women” and several choices for responses are available to choose, including “egg salad sandwich”.
          Give me your email address and I’ll download some new functions for your aging software. Your “Racist” module need tweaking as well.

      • Miz Julia says:

        This is Comey – Jamison Foser from Media Matters tweeted this comparison to Dr. Fishman from Arrested Development. Very funny:

        • mary5920 says:

          This is great! Thanks very much.

          • AgLander says:

            Why don’t you go make yourself an egg salad sandwich and try Netflix? Your brain is on atrophy mode obsessing too much over hero worship of the Clintons. Go ahead, take a break!

          • mary5920 says:

            Egg salad and Netflix, eh? Is that how you relax after a hard day of trolling?

          • Miz Julia says:

            AgLander eats at The Cracked Egg Diner, an upbeat diner offering homestyle fare for breakfast & lunch, plus booze, in a colorful setting. lol.

          • mary5920 says:

            Probably so, that’d be the place for him. I doubt he could fry an egg himself, although he loves to lay them on a regular basis.

          • Always on the prowl to attack someone and verbally abuse them. Your favorite targets are women. You must be proud of your prowess in attacking females online. What you do in your neighborhood is probably more frightening.
            But, I’m sure you think you’ve done your good (un)Christian deed for the day, and will no boubt awake the next morning to satiate your lust for abuse. You’d make an excellent ISIS supporter.

          • AgLander says:

            Attacking females? You funny. Especially since you live in a male dominated Muslim society where your poor wife (or wives) need your permission to simply go the grocery store!

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Literally every insult you’ve posted here has related to the supposed femininity of the person you’re abusing.

            Also, you gonna lose!

          • Yes, you would think it’s funny attacking women. By the way, have you had your egg sandwich for today??
            I live in America but your mind is too torpid to realize that.

    • I Am Helpy says:

      OK thanks for explaining why you support a child molesting serial bankrupt: because you’re terrified of women.

      • AgLander says:

        ….and I was just about to toss you an egg salad sandwich and a bottle of water! Your loss.

        • I Am Helpy says:

          Please stop trying to be funny. It’s the worst thing you do – and since you’re supporting a racist child molester for President, that’s saying something.

          • AgLander says:

            The fact that you claim you don’t enjoy it gives me immense pleasure! But I think the truth is you’re just jealous because you are too dull witted to keep up in that category .

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Yes of course you’re sadistic as well as racist and stupid; it’s probably why you can’t tolerate America. You gonna lose, though.

          • AgLander says:

            …and you’re gonna continue to live in that basement on a diet of egg salad sandwiches that mommy makes for you (when she isn’t doing your laundry).

          • I Am Helpy says:

            Yes I get that you got nothing but feeble insults; it’s because you’re impotent in every sense of the word.

            I hope that helps!

          • I Am Helpy says:

            PS: I keep forgetting to tell you you’re gonna lose. I regret the oversight.

          • First it’s Oman on the brain. Now your tortured little mind is obsessed with egg salad sandwiches. What will your childish mind grow obsessive over next??

        • I Am Helpy says:

          PS: you gonna lose!

    • I Am Helpy says:

      Oh I nearly forgot to mention: you gonna lose!

    • Jim agrees with you. I’m suspecting that you and he are androids whose programming need modifications. The two of you are stuck in a vicious software loop, much like a LOGO turtle that keeps moving towards the same obstacle, backing up, and moving towards it again, ad infinitum.

  25. Jim Samaras says:

    From what I’ve been reading, it appears that while investigating Anthony Weiner’s emails and sex texts (some to an underage girl), the FBI uncovered emails in which Weiner bragged about helping to broker a deal where HC would double aid to Israel in exchange for $100 million to the Clinton Foundation, if she were elected. Huma Abedin was also involved and broke down in tears when she learned the FBI had re-opened their investigation. If this is true, it’s treason.

    • mary5920 says:

      Where are you reading all this, pray tell?

    • I Am Helpy says:

      OK that is 100% not true. Stop spreading lies.

      I hope that helps!

    • Jake Hawkes says:

      Where are you “reading” that? Breitbart? The Drudge Report? Hannity Blog?

    • Jake Hawkes says:

      A. No one would ever let Weiner in on a deal like that.
      B. Hillary will not be able to double aid to Israel if she is elected president.
      C. The Israelis are way too smart to ever get involved in a quid pro quo so obvious.
      D. Bill Clinton doesn’t need any help from Hillary to get money for his foundation.
      E. The FBI has not said they reopened the investigation.

    • Box says:

      Ive not read that but its not hard to believe.

      All of you commenters below want to know where its coming from, try this one in which Hillary is gearing up to sell Executive Orders to the highest donors (news via more leaked emails)

      http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines-2016/executive-orders-for-sale-leaked-email-shows-hillary-camp-answering-wealthy-donors-questions-about-how-executive-orders-work.

      So, Samaras may be right, its not far fetched.

      • I Am Helpy says:

        Of course it’s not hard to believe if you’re already a dim-witted conspiracy theorist. Clinton Foundation!!!1 Never actually done anything wrong, but you just somehow KNOW the REAL SECRET TRUTH (because you are dumb as hell).

        • Jon says:

          Box’s bible is Red Flag News and being so religious he reads it daily. Just because he is a member a fringe religious group doesn’t mean he can’t worship as he pleases or state his opinions no matter how unhinged and stupid they are.

      • Jim is a pawn of Trump’s, and keeps playing hooky from Church services. Otherwise, by now, you and he should have had the mist dissipated from your faculties of insight.
        For now, it appears that you and Jim are quite comfortable with a sexual predator like Trump making plans for your moms and wives.

      • You’ll believe whatever the denizens of the Red Zone tell, and will regurgitate that to others.

    • charleo1 says:

      My question is, says who? Some RW rag? Some, “unnamed public official, not authorized to speak?” Poster, “Box,” says, as for him, it’s not hard to believe. And just why is that, do you think? Because if true, it would be the bombshell of the election. News channels would break in on regular programming to report it. Yet neither he nor anyone else has heard it. Then, why Israel? The Country with the most powerful lobby in Congress, would need a deal brokered? When the President does not control the purse strings? When $100 million buys you something that might happen, if Hillary is elected? And who paid this handsome bribe? Like a smart pol like Clinton would have Weiner involved? You’re a smart guy. If you believe this, you need to ask yourself a question. Why am I not questioning these sources that try to pass such crap? Instead of automatically believing everything they’re selling? You need to question why they feel as if they can insult your intelligence. Plus, it not right. It’s unfair to Clinton, and it’s unfair to the American public. If we truly want better government, all of us are going to need to be smarter than this.

    • Jim, are you still obsessed with the sexting and trying your best to implicate Hillary any way you can? Is this your idea of being a good Christian, or do you even care about being a good Christian?
      Talk to me, Jim, and let me know who your allegiance lies with—Trump or with Jesus and God? This isn’t a trick question, and even someone as unschooled as Peter, the first and foremost disciple of Jesus, was able to figure out immediately if his loyalty should be with Jesus, or with Caiaphas, the equivalent Trump-like figure during Jesus’ time.
      Wake up from your slumber in the nightmarish realm of conservatism, and then you may come to your senses. I’m telling you this as a concerned friend.

    • Independent1 says:

      Wow!! And the lies just keep rolling off your fingers!! Do you have a ghost writer or do you just make this up on your own. Fact is, they hadn’t actually tied Hillary to any of the emails – so said the FBI investigators- which is why those actually investigating the emails were outraged at Comey’s lying letter to Congress.

  26. Apostol Pappas says:

    It is going to be Donald Trump!
    How Americans would ever consider sending the Clintons back to the White House intrigues me. They have previously desecrated it. How the corruption and the lying tongue of Hillary can blind so many just amazes me. Reading the comments baffles me. Concerning the latest from the FBI at such a delicate hour……..clearly something very sinister there.

    • I Am Helpy says:

      OK thanks for explaining how a child molester is going to win because of imaginary crimes the Clintons did.

    • Is that right? You’re just thrilled that a sexual predator might be your Groper-in-Chief.

      Would your mom feel comfortable having Trump put his greasy fingers all over her, Apostol? Would you recommend she submit to this lascivious creature’s advances and not complain, Apostol? Would you coerce your daughter(s) to be his concubines?

      If the answer is “Yes” to one or more of these questions, then give me your phone number and I’ll have the police check you out for questioning.

      Y’all be good now, ya’ hear?

    • Independent1 says:

      And you really want to see a guy become president who is an absolutely terrible businessman?? A guy who couldn’t even make money running a casino?? A guy who had to be bailed out time and time again by Daddy as business deal after business deal went sour – and Daddy had to pony up millions upon millions of dollars.

      And a guy that PolitiFact says only tells the truth about 9% of the time?? Which means virtually everything he says is a lie. And a guy that even his lawyers won’t meet with him on a one-to-one basis because he lies so much that they know they can’t trust him to follow through on anything they’ve agreed to in a meeting – unless there’s a witness, because he’ll lie and say he never agreed to to this or that??

      Which means he’d be a president that not one of America’s allies could trust; and just how well do you think that would work out?? America having a president which virtually the leader of every major country in the world would refuse to deal with??

      Given the way Trump lied about the meeting he had with the president of Mexico, do you think the president of Mexico will ever be willing to meet with Trump again one-on-one?? I doubt it. Ain’t that great. The president of America is so untrustworthy leaders of other countries shun dealing with him and therefore America. How would Trump ever make trade deals when other countries couldn’t trust him to follow through on what had been negotiated???

      Talk about a loser!! Trump is the poster boy of losers the great!!

      • Jon says:

        Do you know if Apostol belongs to the super pac “Rapists For Trump” or
        am I mixing him up with someone else?

        • Independent1 says:

          Sorry Jon, no I’m not aware of that ‘Rapists For Trump” PAC. Doesn’t sound like it has people in it that I’d like to deal with.

    • sigrid28 says:

      Such a good comment. Let’s consider, hypothetically, what kinds of content in emails might be upgraded to classified long after they were written:

      An email dated August 2012 mentions someone who is identified in April 2013 as a member of ISIS. Now the 2012 email is classified.

      An email dated August 2012 mentions someone who was said to be married to Jane Doe but who is, in April 2013, found to have had a first marriage to Jan Doe, who is the half-sister of a prominent member of ISIS. Now the 2012 email is classified.

      I could go on and on. That’s because intelligence is not a stable entity. By it’s very nature, it invites elaboration and demands to be corrected–if it is any good. The fact that some emails on Clinton’s server were upgraded to classified could be seen as a sign that they contained information good enough to be validated by being upgraded. Nobody talks about that.

  27. Box says:

    Huma, who is now at the center of the new investigation has a little problem. She already testified under oath that she gave up all devices. All, that is, except Wieners phone in which she stored Hillarys mails.

    Plot thickens! Someone is going to swing. Will Hillary make Huma fall on the sword to save Hillary from prison for espionage? Will the FBI even accept the lie that Hillary “didnt know until she read in the news that there was even a phone storing emails and, my god, how could that horrible Huma do that to me?? I trusted her and I had no idea she was storing emails!! I knew she was no good and i was going to fire her but the pressures of the campaign made me forget to do so! Please believe me!!”
    http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines-2016/prison-for-abedin-huma-swore-under-oath-she-gave-up-all-devices

    Moreover, this article says mutiny in the FBI staff caused the additional looking for information because the staff knew Comey was wrong.
    http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines-2016/exclusive-fbi-mutiny-reopened-clinton-investigation

    Now Comey looks like an idiot for re-opening because the investigation was supposed to be thorough and wasnt.

    Donna Brazille says Comey cant re-open the case. Nice frickin try, Donna. Right, another person who suffers from cognitive dissonance.
    http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines-2016/dnc-interim-chair-donna-brazile-on-clintons-fbi-news-she-has-already-been-cleared

    • I Am Helpy says:

      Why are you copy-pasting this nonsense everywhere? None of it is true. I guess you’re distraught that the guy you’re supporting is going to court over child molestation charges, and – rather than withdraw your support like a non-broken person – you have to resort to dumb lies.

      You ought to be ashamed of yourself.

    • Your childish obsession with the Clinton’s is cause for concern about your mental health status. Is their some deep emotional and physical sense of impotence that motivates you daily to embark on this fool’s errand investigation that consumes you?
      Whatever the psychological/physiological source causing your sense of impotence might be best dealt with by seeking professional help.

      Not once in all your rambling rantings and in all of your prattle in this forum have you expressed a tidbit of concern about solving humankind’s common problem. Not once have you directed your comments on finding ways to address the issues of misogyny, racism, economic/class disparities, nor have you offered any signs of hope for the betterment of humankind. Yours is a selfish and odd quest to assert the dominance of yourself over the Clinton’s; yours has been a quest to project dominance of one Party over another, as though these were two contending contestants in a universal battle for supremacy of the universe, like some “Transformer” Cartoon epic drama.

      When will you start to redirect your attention and comments which well up from a recognition of the Oneness of Humankind, instead of a perception you have of a fractured universe your tortured mind has conjured up—one based on a rigid balkanizing of America into disparate camps of Left versus Right, black versus white, Clintons versus non-Clintons.

      Your enclosed little universe is a frightening place which no sane person would ever want to enter.

      • Jon says:

        You make good points throughout your reply to Box. Your point about excessive watching of cartoons and the limitations it places on intellectual development is relevant to many more than Box. They also tend to rely on other fantasy sources such as the National Enquirer and Red Flag News. Their capacity for intellectual and emotional growth and maturity is not only stunted but their thinking becomes delusional. It should come as no surprise that they are anti-intellectual and morally bankrupt.

        • Thank you, Jon. You, I, and others have a large battle ahead of us, which will be good exercise for our minds. I hope that others around the world watching in silence are able to take away something positive from our comments and interchanges.
          Yes, there is indeed moral corruption, with plenty to go around for all of us. We just need to try to make each day better than the previous one.

          Cheerio, good friend.

          • Jon says:

            Yes Aaron we all have much more to do to work on our human weaknesses and try to become better people. While none of us will obtain perfection, we must strive for it daily. Both the mind and the spirit grow weak if we fail to make conscious efforts to improve ourselves.
            I hope your book club is going strong. I think it is an excellent idea.
            Have a great day my friend.

        • idamag says:

          They think ignorance is a virtue. It is a drag on civilization.

          • Jon says:

            That is true. Read their comments here and on other sites, visit the sites they read to get their “facts”, watch them on tv and listen to them on the radio, and read their comments on twitter and other social media sites. Their ignorance, lack of civility, vulgarity, delusional thinking, dishonesty, and hatred seems boundless.

          • idamag says:

            I just read where the Bush Ethics Chair has filed a suit against Comey for violating the Hatch act and abuse of power.

          • Jon says:

            Trump will blame Hillary and Obama. One or both of them is always doing something seen as wicked in Trumpland.

          • idamag says:

            It gives me a sick feeling in the pit of my stomach as to where this country is going. We have citizens shot multiple times in the back by police. We had a man, walking around the Walmart store gunned down by police. We had juries who turned a cold blooded killer, of a teen, loose. We just had a jury turning the most horrid thugs loose. We have a director of the FBI who thinks it is okay to get into this mess and try to smear a candidate. I remember when a Rockefeller could not become a candidate for president because his wife filed for divorce. Now, look what is acceptable. A woman who wants to be first lady and her bare bottom is all over the internet. Her husband brags about sexual assault, He openly admitted going into Miss Ten America and Miss America dressing rooms while the ladies were changing clothes. We are getting so uncivilized, I don’t know how long it will be before we are Neanderthals.

          • Jon says:

            It is very troubling. The character of a candidate used to be a factor voters relied on in evaluating who they would vote for. I know that many people say Hillary is a liar, crook, etc. While no politician is 100% truthful, independent fact checkers have rated her one of the most honest. They have rated Trump as the most dishonest in the history of these fact checkers.
            When people tell me that she is crooked, I point out that millions of dollars have been spent involving 6 serious allegations made against her and there has never even been enough evidence to file charges against her. Trump has lost more than 300 cases involving theft or fraud. The response I get is that the Clintons pay off or intimidate their opposition despite there being no proof of that. They say that Trump was cheated because he is unconventional and not a politician so the courts were rigged against him. They do not believe anything negative about him even in the face of overwhelming verified evidence.
            Trump has no rational plans to accomplish anything he promises. Neither congress nor Mexico will pay for his wall. To deport 11 million odd immigrants is not only impossible but would do a great deal of harm to the nation and the economy. His law and order plan is for police to randomly stop and frisk minorities. His education plan will cause significant harm to public education and result in nearly 500,000 layoffs of teachers. His tax plan gives large cuts to corporations and the wealthy while doing little to nothing for the middle class and poor. His economic plan will result in massive layoffs and destroy our ability to trade with other countries. His foreign policy is far more pro-Russian than pro-American and his fascination with using nuclear weapons should scare the hell out of everybody. His supporters say he tells it .like it is despite his nonstop lying. They also don’t understand the effects of what he says. All they understand is ‘build that wall” “lock her up” “lying mainstream media” “drain the swamp” and “make america great again.”
            With thinking so shallow I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that they support such an immoral and vile man. It doesn’t bode well for our future.

      • idamag says:

        According to the profile of a hate=mongering toll, box gets his bravado behind the mask of anonymity.

    • Thoughtopsy says:

      I suspect you’re just a bot for “Redflagnews”.
      Your statements make no sense and you keep posting links to them.

    • skisok says:

      Now that the truth has come out, the American people were conned. There was nothing there as Comey has explained and the fix was on. Nothing but a political stunt that should have consequences but unfortunately, appears to have been let go.

  28. Karenhmarsh says:

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj225d:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !mj225d:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash225DirectEasyGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!mj125d:….,….

  29. ivory69690@yahoo.com says:

    its funny ! dosent anyone else find it strange that hackers can break into all these accounts for emails . if its that easy then why hasent the hackers broke into DONNY DUMPS bank account and his taxes ? if it be that the banks have such a secured system that maybe the government should use the banks system ?

    • 1standlastword says:

      First a little speculation: DJT might end up like Lee Harvey Oswald because he poked his pecker in the Bush (no pun intended)

      His narcissism has compelled him to angle in on a game played at a dimension above the street: A dimension where the players are a global power elite where the Bushes have old contracts and ancestral relations.

      Donald and his inherited dirty money and pedestrian success v. Jeb and his blue blooded legacy was displayed in head-to-head competition on the primary debate stage where Jeb was flummoxed by DJT’ brash impulsive gutter tactics and attack style (I loved it by the way)

      If we look carefully we can ‘sense’ Jeb looking down his nose at the self-made, wannabe bigger, loudmouth, ignorant Mr. Trump; This was belied by Jeb’s initial attempts to flaunt his policy knowledge and speak to the Hispanics fluently in Spanish while Donald just boasted about his wall

      While the upper crust and well connected had uses for Lee Harvey Oswald he was provided with cover until the Kennedy plot was complete. I suggest Donald’s accounts haven’t been hacked because it doesn’t suit the purposes of the global elite that would like to use him in the role of POTUS.

      After he loses the election they will no longer have use for Donald but he will have made ‘more’ powerful enemies at home and abroad; like JFK.

      P.S. What I’ve been wondering is why haven’t we heard from Dick Chaney? XMAS surprise perhaps?

  30. msnyc10 says:

    After reading all these comments I can only come to one single conclusion; Donald Trump is the best thing to EVER happen to Hillary Clinton.

    • Jon says:

      I don’t know. There are people who believe a super pac, possibly “Rapists For Trump”, is going to make a huge push for him between now and November 8th. With the kind of support he has, he may surprise people.

    • 1standlastword says:

      Without doubt the best thing to ever happen to the GOP!! And, yes–not without consequences to the democratic establishment whose whole fate is in the hands of one HRC

  31. fortunev says:

    Croney is a member of the GOP criminal syndicate. Why would he not support his nefarious brotherhood?

  32. AgLander says:

    To keep Hillary from attempting to flee the country and avoid facing justice, she should be asked to voluntarily turn over her passport to authorities while the investigation addresses what has now been reported as 650,000 emails found on the computer in Wienies apartment. Right now, Hillary Clinton is currently America’s most notorious free roaming felon and she must not be allowed to leave this country under any circumstances.

  33. butterbean says:

    The rigged system is being exposed. And the shoe is on the other foot. It is the Trump folks who rig the system. The liars and bitches are all conservative hacks. The media is Trump. He is the system and everything wrong with this country. But the “Jerry Springer” crowd will always go for the chance of seeing a fight or seeing someone get punched over any process for changing this country. They are the fools.

    • sue.suggs says:

      Acquire 90 bucks a day for working over the internet from comfort of your own home for few h every day… Get paid regularly weekly… Everything you need is a personal computer, internet connection, as well as a little free time… http://ow.ly/n1nP303oO1A

  34. ivory69690@yahoo.com says:

    ok lets put this all in a frame one might understand . as for Hillary the time and money wasted on all the emails and Benghazi thing could of funded a presidential campaign of more then likely over $1 billion buck . now what is or was done in the pass (what 5 plus years ) with all the GOP gang of pinhead idiots and all their very costly investigations that came up with prey much nothing . but the GOP find it today not to be important enough to (even just check ) into ties with the DONNY DUMP and Russian ties ? the DUMPSTER had a Russian with ties to all kinds of crazy thing managing is campaign . and this is the clown that might be PRES. ? he wont show his taxes (which may explain a lot of thing that the people should know about ) it comes down to 2 things the pass and the future . the pass cant be changed and the future is yet to come . what’s more important ? trying to find out things in the pass that cant be changed (and nothing has been found in it in the first place after the waste of time and $$ big time money ) or finding out what the might be Pres. could have plans in the future of the country and or world ? between witch hunting and hunting for the facts and the maybe road for the country and the world id say the facts and the future is more important . there is something (and all know of this mind you ) very dirty and dangerous about and with DONNY DUMP

  35. skisok says:

    I’m really surprised that Comey and Chaffetz are not being investigated for obviously rigging the election. Was that the end of it? Why wasn’t Comey fired?

  36. nichole_jenkins says:

    One year have passed since I decided to leave my old job and that decision was a life changer for me… I started to work on-line, over a website I found online, for several hours /a day, and I make much more than i did on my previous work… My last month check was for Nine thousand bucks… The best thing about this job is the more time i got with my family… http://korta.nu/MDe

  37. blanche.herrera.92 says:

    After 5 yrs I decided to leave my previous work and i couldn’t be happier now… I started to work on-line, for this company I stumbled upon over internet, several hours every day, and my income now is much bigger then it was on my last job… Check i got for last month was for Nine thousand dollars… Superb thing about this gig is the more free time i got for my family… http://chilp.it/8d93f4b

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.