Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Monday, June 18, 2018

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters for America.

In the month after Navy SEAL William “Ryan” Owens was killed in a botched raid on a terrorist camp in Yemen, none of Fox News’ prime-time hosts even mentioned the incident.

During that January 29 raid — the first counterterrorism operation of President Donald Trump’s administration — “almost everything that could go wrong did,” according to The New York Times. Several news outlets have produced reports suggesting the raid was ordered without sufficient intelligence and preparation and that the administration has been untruthful about the operation.

As these questions have mounted, Democrats on Capitol Hill and Owens’ father have called for an investigation into the raid.

But Fox’s evening lineup has been virtually silent, airing only 12 segments with significant discussion of the story from January 30 to February 28, according to a Media Matters review.

By contrast, the network’s evening programs devoted a whopping 140 segments to the September 11, 2012, Benghazi attacks in the first month after that tragedy, according to data Media Matters compiled for a 2014 report. (NOTE: That study did not include Fox’s 7 p.m. Eastern Standard Time hour because it was not in Nexis, making the disparity even more stark.)

The two incidents are not perfectly comparable. One involved a U.S. ambassador being killed in an attack by terrorists, while the other involved a U.S. servicemember being killed in an assault on terrorists; one was immediately politicized by the opposition while the other was not.

And yet, the parallels between Fox News’ criticisms of the Obama administration’s handling of the Benghazi attack and the actual facts of the Trump administration’s handling of the Yemen raid suggest the network’s silence is deliberate.

Every show but The O’Reilly Factor aired more segments on the Benghazi attacks in the month after that event than the entire network lineup did following the Yemen raid. Special Report and Hannity each aired more than 40 Benghazi segments, averaging more than two per broadcast.

By contrast, Special Report with Bret Baier was the network’s leader in raid segments, but it produced only five in the first month; The Five was next, with just three.

After 7 p.m., none of Fox’s hosts said a word about the story. The rare discussions on their programs came from guest hosts or correspondent news briefs. Sean Hannity’s program never mentioned the raid in any way.

That drought ended on March 1 as the pro-Trump propagandists rushed to praise the president for recognizing Owens’ sacrifice during Trump’s February 28 speech to a joint session of Congress. Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, and Martha MacCallum all lauded the president while lashing out at progressives who suggested that Trump had used Owens’ death for political gain.

It’s not only the volume of coverage that has changed dramatically after a Republican became president — the character of the segments have changed as well.

One can’t overstate the degree to which Fox News sought to turn the Benghazi tragedy into a political cudgel with which to hammer the Obama administration.

Over a period of years, the network flooded its airwaves with coverage that portrayed the administration’s response as a major political scandal. In the first months, Fox’s focus was on President Obama, who was running for re-election. After he was victorious, attention shifted to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, the front-runner to be the Democratic nominee in 2016.

Fox repeatedly pushed myths about the attack, seeking to convince its audience that the administration had engaged in a conspiracy to deliberately withhold aid from the besieged Americans and then lied about the attack to the American people, all for political gain.

That narrative began immediately. In the first month after the Benghazi attacks, nearly a third of Fox’s segments suggested that Obama or members of his administration deliberately misled or outright lied to the public about the events. In a similar number of segments, Fox figures or guests characterized the administration’s response as a “cover-up.” Seven of the segments featured comparisons to the Watergate or Iran-Contra scandal.

These claims were false, as numerous investigations eventually showed.

Over the past month, several criticisms of the Trump administration’s handling of the Yemen raid have emerged. These include:

  • Due to insufficient intelligence and preparation, “the attacking SEAL team found itself dropping onto a reinforced al Qaeda base defended by landmines, snipers, and a larger than expected contingent of heavily armed Islamist extremists.” This led to U.S. casualties and civilian deaths.
  • Trump was not in the White House situation room for the raid — his Twitter account tweeted and deleted a promotion for an upcoming interview while the attack was ongoing. He approved the action over dinner at a meeting that included political staffers.
  • The Trump administration has repeatedly falsely suggested that the Obama White House approved the raid.
  • Contrary to public claims from Trump and his administration that the raid was a successful intelligence gathering mission, reports suggest part of its purpose was actually to kill a top leader of al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, who “either slipped away or was not at the location.” The raid reportedly produced “no significant intelligence” according to U.S. officials who contradicted Pentagon statements in comments to NBC News. As evidence of the raid’s success, the Pentagon produced clips which were subsequently determined to be from a 10-year-old video that was already in the public domain.
  • During an interview on Fox News, Trump blamed Owens’ death on the military, saying, “They came to me, they explained what they wanted to do ― the generals … And they lost Ryan.”

Based on the Benghazi precedent, it is very clear that if a similar set of facts had emerged during a Democratic presidency, Fox’s coverage would have been apocalyptic. Instead, the network’s commentators have sought to carry water for the president.

“Also, what you probably have heard, and maybe not, is that there was an incredible amount of information, a treasure trove of intel that they were able to recover, they said, similar to the amount in terms of its importance to the intelligence community that we got with Osama bin Laden at Abbottabad,” The Five host Kimberly Guilfoyle said during a February 1 segment praising Trump for visiting Dover Air Force Base for the arrival of Owens’ remains.

Bud Jackson, chairman of the American Working Families PAC, was one of the only voices on the Fox evening shows to offer criticism of the Trump administration, suggesting the president’s decision to order the raid was “cavalier,” pointing out that “a lot of things went wrong” during the attack, and accusing White House press secretary Sean Spicer of using Owens as “a human shield.”

But during that February 27 edition of The First 100 Days, guest host Sandra Smith repeatedly sought to pivot away from Jackson’s comments, suggesting that Obama was really responsible for the raid. The other guest, former SEAL Carl Higbie, attacked Jackson for being “extremely disrespectful.”

At times, Fox did report on facts that cut against the administration’s narrative. On January 30, Jennifer Griffin said on Special Report that “One senior defense official told us this operation would not have been approved by the last White House.” On February 3, she pointed out that in “an embarrassing about-face,” the video clips the Pentagon had released as evidence that the raid had recovered valuable information were actually 10 years old and in the public domain.

Neither fact has been mentioned since during Fox’s evening programming.

Methodology

Media Matters identified segments based on a search of Nexis transcripts for The Five, Special Report with Bret Baier, The First 100 Days, The O’Reilly Factor, Tucker Carlson Tonight, and Hannity between January 30 and February 28 for “Yemen” or “William pre/2 Owens.”

We included each segment where the raid was the stated topic of discussion. We also included segments that were not limited solely to the raid but that featured significant discussion of the topic. Significant discussion is defined as at least two speakers in the segment talking about Benghazi to one another (e.g. the host asking a guest a question about the raid during a multi-topic interview).

IMAGE: Media Matters for America

18 Responses to Fox Gave Benghazi 10 Times More Coverage Than Trump’s Botched Yemen Raid

  1. Two factors: 4 americans were killed during the term of a President they hated. Yemen raid only killed one american during a term of a president they love. All the collateral damage(deaths of innocent civilians) was no problem because they were Muslims.

    • I hate to agree with you on this one but I think you are right. Fox News and Trump supporters are willing to follow this man over a cliff.

  2. FOX has a fixation on demonizing all who stand oppose to a rigidly conservative ideology which it wants to impose with jihadist fervor on America, and which would shed further light on a need to be obsessed with every thing related to Hillary, or to any other entity not subject to the mental illness of the GOP and its accomplices. Nothing can alter their course—they will not be “deturd”.

    • I profited $104k in last 12 months by doing an online job a­­n­­d I did that by working part-time for 3 or sometimes more hours /daily. I was following a money making model I stumbled upon from this website i found online and I am so amazed that i made such great money. It’s very beginner friendly a­­n­­d I am just so blessed that i found this. Here’s what I did… http://jump.wtf/CCcHHu1

  3. LOL. Maybe this will help your readers figure this out

    One of these things is not like the others,
    One of these things just doesn’t belong,
    Can you tell which thing is not like the others
    By the time I finish my song?

    Did you guess which thing was not like the others?
    Did you guess which thing just doesn’t belong?
    If you guessed Benghazi is not like the others,
    Then you’re absolutely right!

    Even if you insist on drawing such a laughable false equivalency, you should also then acknowledge that the Yemen raid was proposed under Obama, planned under Obama and was greenlit by Obama. It’s just an example of Obama’s incompetence extending for a week past the end of his misadministration.

    • You do realize that after the election Trump and his transition team started getting full security briefings. If you remember Trump famously boasted that he didn’t need to attend the briefings. To try and say that this was Obama’s raid is ridiculous. Trump didn’t have to approve the raid. He could’ve have waited for Gen McMaster to be confirmed. He could’ve sought more counsel from the Generals that advise him. But Trump decided he want to make a big splash, more than likely he wanted to show the world and Obama that he was a better CIC and that Obama was a failure as CIC because of Benghazi.

    • “It’s Obama’s fault Trump is an incompetent failure!!!”

      Yeah, claiming that Trump is too stupid to do his job is an interesting tactic. Don’t think it’ll prove effective, somehow!

    • Unfortunately, President Obama did NOT “green light” this action; in fact, he held back on it because of insufficient information.

  4. “Fox Gave Benghazi 10 Times More Coverage Than Trump’s Botched Yemen Raid”

    And we are surprised because. . . .?

  5. I have made $104,000 last year by freelancing on-line a­n­d I was able to do it by w­o­r­k­i­n­g part time f­­o­­r 3 or sometimes more h every day. I used a business model I stumbled upon online and I am amazed that i was able to make so much money. It’s beginner-friendly a­n­d I’m just so thankful that I found out about it. Here is what i did… http://safeandsecure65.weebly.com

  6. I profited 104 thousand dollars last year by freelancing from my house a­n­d I manage to accomplish that by wor­king part-time f­­o­­r several hours each day. I used a money making opportunity I found on-line and I am so amazed that i made such great money. It’s very user-friendly a­­n­­d I’m so happy that i found it. This is what i do… http://s.id/1dR

  7. I’ve earned 104000 dollars previous year by doing an on-line job and I did it by work­ing part-time f­o­r 3+ hrs every day. I’m using an earning opportunity I was introduced by this web-site i found online and I am so excited that i made so much money. It’s newbie-friendly and I’m so thankful that i found this. This is what i did… http://www.wzurl.me/wo_i5g

  8. I was paid 104000 dollars last 12 month period by doing an internet work furthermore I was able to do it by w­orking in my own time f­o­r several hours during the day. I used work opportunity I found out over the internet and also I am delighted that I was capable of to earn such great money. It’s seriously newbie-friendly and I’m so blessed that I found out about it. Have a look at what I do… http://mybm.com/WQsLg

  9. I was paid 104000 bucks last 12 month period by doing a web-based work and consequently I was able to do it by w­orking in my own time f­o­r quite a few hours each day. I applied job opportunity I came across on-line and I am thrilled that I was able to make such decent cash. It is really newbie-friendly and I’m so grateful that I discovered out about it. Look into what I do… http://shrty.link/BaQXOB

  10. I was paid 104000 dollars past year by doing an internet work and consequently I was able to do it by w­orking in my own time f­o­r quite a few hours during the day. I applied job opportunity I stumbled upon on the internet and also I am thrilled that I was succeed to earn such decent earnings. It is actually newbie-friendly and therefore I am so pleased that I discovered out about it. Look out for exactly what I do… http://urll.in/9RNdJ

  11. If you ever in search of genuine web based making money opportunity but yet exhausted with on-line fraudsters then this is actually what you need. Was doing this job two years back and I am earning 7 thousand bucks or over per month very easily. You can also earn income like me… Take a look at the details >>>>>>>>>>> http://ipt.pw/lnfEMS

Leave a reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.