Furor Over Botched Oklahoma Execution Reflects A National Shift

Furor Over Botched Oklahoma Execution Reflects A National Shift

By Cathleen Decker, Los Angeles Times

The fierce reaction to a botched Oklahoma execution may be fueled by the slow weakening of public support for capital punishment, which has coincided with a shift among Democratic politicians toward opposition to the death penalty.

Capital punishment was one of a set of issues Democrats used in the early 1990s to toughen their image against accusations that they were soft on crime and criminals. Although many in earlier generations of politicians had opposed the death penalty — contributing to Democratic losses in national races — the candidates who drove the party’s resurgence favored it.

Then-Arkansas Gov. Bill Clinton laid an overt marker for his view in 1992, when he interrupted his presidential campaign to return to Little Rock for the execution of a brain-damaged cop killer, Rickey Ray Rector.

His wife, potential 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton, supports the death penalty, as does another potential candidate of her generation, Vice President Joe Biden. (President Barack Obama has defended capital punishment for “heinous” crimes; he voted as a state legislator not to expand its reach in less severe cases.)

Even in the supposedly liberal bastion of California, it has been rare since the early 1990s for Democratic candidates to oppose the death penalty. Barbara Boxer, a senator mocked by opponents as personifying the left, supports capital punishment, as does fellow Sen. Dianne Feinstein.

But younger Democrats are taking the opposite position, one that would have threatened to blunt their rise in past years. In California, Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom and Attorney General Kamala Harris oppose the death penalty, as does Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti. The three, all in their 40s, are presumed to be aiming for Senate or gubernatorial races in the not-so-distant future.

Newsom has been the most open about his views.

“I think we should repeal the death penalty,” he said last year during an appearance at San Francisco State University. “It’s not a deterrent; there are racial components to it.”

Likewise, Martin O’Malley, the 51-year-old governor of Maryland and would-be 2016 presidential candidate, last year capped a long campaign to eradicate capital punishment in his state when he signed a measure abolishing it.

“Over the longer arc of history I think you’ll see more and more states repeal the death penalty,” O’Malley told the Huffington Post. “It’s wasteful. It’s ineffective. It doesn’t work to reduce violent crime.”

Democrats have had some cover in their move toward opposition by fortuitous political circumstances: When Illinois became the first state to declare a moratorium on capital punishment in 2000, it was the work of a Republican governor, George Ryan. Ryan’s move came after a Chicago Tribune expose about mistakes that had consigned innocent people to death row.

Although coverage of exonerated prisoners may have influenced public views of the death penalty, the real driver of change has been perceptions of crime. Periods marked by greater fear about crime have generally coincided with greater support for capital punishment, and vice versa.

The high mark for support came in 1994, when 80 percent of Americans favored the death penalty, according to the Gallup polling organization, which has asked about the issue since 1936. Not coincidentally, Americans in 1994 listed crime as the country’s most pressing issue.

By last year, Gallup said, support had fallen to 60 percent of Americans.

Views on the issue varied by politics and ethnicity. According to Gallup, support among Republicans continued to run strong, with 81 percent in support, dropping to 60 percent of independents and 47 percent of Democrats.

Pew found that while 63 percent of white Americans supported capital punishment, only 40 percent of Latinos and 36 percent of African-Americans shared that view. Support had dropped for all three groups, Pew researchers noted.

The bungled execution Tuesday night in Oklahoma — drugs meant to kill a convicted murderer did not, though he later died of a heart attack — may influence the percentage of people who are troubled by the death penalty. According to a Pew survey taken in 2011, 27 percent of Americans said they opposed it because it was immoral, or wrong, or not within the rights of citizens. Another 27 percent cited the “imperfect nature” of the justice system, Pew said.

AFP Photo/Caroline Groussain

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Do You Have Super Ager Potential?New Quiz Shows How Well You Are Aging

When someone says that age “is just a number,” they’re talking about a fact of life that everyone knows: As some people get older, they hold onto a youthful vitality and suffer less from age-related illness, while others feel and show the toll of advancing years.

And with so many of us living longer than previous generations, the measure of lifespan, or the number of years we exist, is increasingly overshadowed by the concept of “healthspan,” meaning the number of years we spend in reasonably good health.

Keep reading...Show less
Putin

President Vladimir Putin, left, and former President Donald Trump

"Russian propaganda has made its way into the United States, unfortunately, and it's infected a good chunk of my party's base." That acknowledgement from Texas Rep. Michael McCaul, Republican chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, was echoed a few days later by Ohio Rep. Michael Turner, the chairman of the Intelligence Committee. "To the extent that this propaganda takes hold, it makes it more difficult for us to really see this as an authoritarian versus democracy battle."

Keep reading...Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}