Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Saturday, October 22, 2016

Name the country whose highest court recently declared it unconstitutional for authorities to continuing jailing illegal migrants for automatic three-year terms.

It’s Israel. The Jewish state has long struggled with immigrants from Africa who enter through Egypt. Many of those coming across the border are children, and a lot of them ended up in overcrowded detention centers in the desert without charges. The court ruling should end that practice.

Israeli society has struggled with the dilemma of migrants in political dialogues that might sound familiar to Americans. Many politicians and citizens worry about security. Much is made of the racial, religious and cultural differences of the newcomers. Some see erecting giant walls as the only solution.

And you might have thought America’s immigration problem was another thing that makes it exceptional.

As hope of accomplishing comprehensive immigration reform fades for this U.S. Congress, it is instructive to broaden the view. North America’s issues with immigration are not unique, not by a long shot. People do not stay put after they are born. They never have and they never will. Throughout human history, large parts of the world’s population have been uprooted by wars, famines and natural disasters. Others have moved seeking better opportunities elsewhere.

The conditions that make migration possible, and in some cases necessary, are only accelerating. Demographic trends are diverging around the world, with the populations of many advanced nations aging and facing decline in decades ahead, while other countries strain to accommodate burgeoning populations. Economic globalization has created a global labor market, in which skilled and unskilled workers in one country or region compete with those in others. Deindustrialization, brain drains and exploitation have intensified as a result. So has migration.

A series of papers by the Migration Policy Institute is trying to enlighten policy makers on the evolving nature of population migration. They were published in advance a meeting of the United Nations High-Level Dialogue on Migration and Development next month. It’s an effort to align immigration policies globally in ways that will benefit nations economically while not exacerbating conflict, suffering and threats to security.

Begin by understanding that the global population has increased a remarkable fivefold in the last 100 years to 7.2 billion people. The number is expected to grow until about 2050 when it will plateau at under 10 billion.

The problem is that all those people are not distributed in ways that match commerce and labor needs. Currently, more than 230 million of the world’s population are immigrants.

Rainer Munz, a senior fellow at the Hamburg Institute of International Economics, summed up some baseline facts in this way: “People will continue to move from youthful to aging societies, and from poorer peripheries to richer urban agglomeration.”

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2013 The National Memo
  • disqus_ivSI3ByGmh

    As much as they do not like to admit it, Israel is not a homogenous country. Its people come from around the world seeking the freedom to live openly as Jews in one of the few countries where there is no shame in doing so.
    Part of the problem is a small group of people in Israel have attempted to define who is “Jewish” by their own criteria. Generally these are Ashkenazi from Eastern Europe. They demand all sorts of proof from Sephardim from North Africa and from the Ethiopian Jews who claim descent from the people who returned from Solomon’s Israel with the Queen of Sheba, but will accept the flimsiest “evidence” from any Russian who claims to be Jewish.
    The Courts have finally said “enough” and are forcing Israel to act like a nation of laws once again, instead of a thinly veiled theocracy dominated by an extremely small but vocal minority.

  • Robert Cruder

    A fair comparison between cheap unskilled labor and skills plus technology as is done in Japan favors the latter. People stay employed when the job accommodates their physical limitations.

    So-called labor shortages are created by employers who do not pay the workers cost of living and off load the difference to the taxpayer.

    Labor oversupply comes from countries that produce babies faster than they create wealth. Importing people with those proclivities into a prosperous country merely enables continuation of that pattern.

    The U.S. is already ratcheting down toward third-world subsistence not through high fertility but by the 1% taking 95% of created wealth. Why shouldn’t the 1% favor immigration when THEY can avoid the taxes? Why would any sane 99%er favor it?