Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Wednesday, October 26, 2016

by Theodoric Meyer, ProPublica.

After intense criticism from both ends of the political spectrum, the Internal Revenue Service has delayed indefinitely proposed rules that would have imposed new limits on social welfare nonprofits, which have pumped hundreds of millions of dollars from anonymous donors into recent elections.

The agency said yesterday it would postpone a hearing on the proposal it released in November defining more clearly what constitutes political activity for such groups, and would revise the plan to reflect some of the more than 150,000 comments it triggered.

Officials put no timeline on the process, disappointing those who had hoped the new regulations might kick in before this year’s midterm elections.

“I think it’s unfortunate that new rules will be delayed even further and that we’re going through another election cycle” without them, said Paul S. Ryan, senior counsel with the Campaign Legal Center.

Others called the delay a prudent step that would give the IRS an opportunity to get a crucial change right.

“They’re not going to put out some slapdash rule just to check it off their list,” said John Pomeranz, a Washington lawyer who works with nonprofits that spend money on politics. He doesn’t expect the agency to finish the rules any time soon. “I think we’ll be lucky if they’re in place for the 2016 election.”

Social welfare nonprofits have poured money into politics since the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision in 2010, which allowed corporations, unions and nonprofits to spend unlimited money on elections.

Social welfare nonprofits spent more than $256 million in the 2012 cycle alone, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. Campaign finance watchdogs have viewed their rise with concern, fearing the influence of so-called “dark” money from secret donors, and had called for more oversight from the IRS.

Under IRS regulations, the groups can spend some of their resources on politics, but must devote themselves mostly to social welfare to keep their nonprofit status. But the rules defining what is and isn’t politics are murky.

Late last year, the IRS moved to clarify the issue, but its proposal came under fire from both the left and the right.

Conservatives complained that the rules would stifle political speech. The American Civil Liberties Union chafed at a provision in the proposed rules that would prevent nonprofits from backing ads that even mentioned politicians in the two months before a general election.

“We have no doubt that the Service is acting with the best of intentions, but the proposed rule threatens to discourage or sterilize an enormous amount of political discourse in America,” the ACLU said in its written response to the proposal.

The plan was also criticized for impeding nonpartisan election work such as voter registration drives and get-out-the-vote efforts.

The IRS, still facing fallout from accusations that it singled out the applications of conservative nonprofits for special scrutiny in the run-up to the 2012 election, decided it would make revisions.

“Given the diversity of views expressed and the volume of substantive input, we have concluded that it would be more efficient and useful to hold a public hearing after we publish the revised proposed regulation,” the agency said in statement.

Photo via Wikimedia Commons

Want more campaign finance news? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 The National Memo
  • mollycruz

    The spending might be good for the economy; the Truth Will Out, that’s what we have to remember. Maybe politics is taking the place of War as an economy boost! You have to admit that it’s preferable. The biggest mistake the Right Wing makes is to underestimate the intelligence of the American People.They are projecting their own general lack of wit on those around them. Their faith in money will be their downfall.

  • Albert Leviation

    Today’s democrats are a joke.

    • Patricia Robertson

      The republicans out spent the democrats in the last election thinking that they would win. They were too lazy to have volunteers to help peopleget register to vote, take them to the polls, encourage them to stay in those long lines for long period of times to cast their votes, provide refreshment for them and treat their voters like decent human beings. They were too busy bashing the president calling him lazy, stupid, and dumb rigging machine that when people voted for obama it would come up Romney and that failed, calling him community organizer and Romney the business man who knew how to hire and fire. They were t too busy listening to the wrong polls numbers so they could believe it when the polls showed that the president had been reelected, So no the democrats isn’t the jokers, the republicans men and women who crossed over and voted for the president proved that.