New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman .

According to news reports, Schneiderman is targeting the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, perhaps the most powerful lobby in Washington, to find out whether they illegally deployed $18 million in non-profit donations to fund campaign attacks. It would be the “first significant [investigation] in years into the rapidly growing use of tax-exempt groups to move money into politics.”

Our freedoms are based on people of goodwill. When we’re confronted with people who are bent on our destruction, we must defend ourselves and unfortunately that means temporarily giving up some of our freedoms. One of those freedoms, in the case of Muslims, is freedom of religion.

The Muslims have amply demonstrated that they are bent upon the destruction of the United States. They are an implacable enemy. It’s a religion that encourages the killing of anyone deemed to be an infidel.

This cannot be tolerated, because it threatens the lives of American citizens in our own country. In light of the Muslims’ belief that they have God’s permission to carry out their religion’s tenets, we must protect ourselves. The first step is to make it a crime to be a Muslim.

You might want to rethink the proposition of calling me ignorant on economic issues. I’ve read your diatribe and I would swear you have copied that from an Obozo apologist website. Most of it seems word for word what I have responded to from another poster in this sea of leftist insanity only a coupl of weeks ago. And it’s all the same perverted Keynesian bullsheet that you all post. You dont even know what the hell you’re posting on here, Patty. You cant know. You defy common sense. Here is my response to you…

1) Why do you think those Euro countries are having to go through austerity in the first place? Huh? Come on be honest, just a little bit honest. Is it because they have been so fiscally disciplined and conservative in past years? Noooo…. Is it because the politicians just want to be mean? Nooooo… Do you think maybe it’s because THEY SPENT TOO DAMNED MUCH MORE THAN THEY TOOK IN FOR DECADES? uhhhhhhhhh…… HELL YES!!!!! Of course that’s why they are having to follow autsterity measures. They have too much debt brought on by decades of irresponsible spending.

2) Having established that austerity is a budgetary measure instituted in response to a government that has TOO MUCH DEBT and cannot make payments any longer, why would you idiots suggest more of the same that got them in this position in the first place? Why? Because you are STUUUUPID! That’s why.

3) Does the Fed really set interest rates? To a moron, they do. But they don’t really. The Fed controls what they call the Federal Funds Rate. This is the rate at which banks can loan excess cash to one another on very short term basis (overnight). Real interest rates are set by the bond markets. So, for example, the fact that the Euro Central Bank may have their main rate set at 1%, the bond market will NOT buy any of Spain’s 10 Yr. bonds unless they are yeilding over 7%. So what is the interst rate? 7%. Who set it? The market. That’s who.

4) Every time I see one of you leftist nutjobs try to discuss the Keynesian “Multiplier Effect”, it makes my stomach turn. It’s gone from like $1 turns into $1.50 all the way up to $3 to $4 now. Why not say $10 or even $100? Just make up whatever you want.

H0w stupid can you all be? Really, how absolutely stone cold stupid can you be? Apparently, very stupid, and stuck on it, too. Let’s cover this real quickly. If what you say is true,why after nearly $6T spent by Obozo alone are we not increasing our GDP by at least $18T? Why? Because it’s not feasible to go into more debt to make ourselves more prosperous. That’s why. Every single dollar of deficit spending is NOTHING MORE than a future tax increase that must be levied to pay for it. This whole notion that speding more on cops and teachers and firefighters and ditch diggers will somehow make us more prosperous is nothing but a fools game. You must be a complete and utter moron to believe this.

There is no such thing as “stimulus”! You dummies that still think JM Keynes was correct have ZERO capacity to think. Where does government get the money it spends? From taxes, from borrowing, or from simply printing money. It does not get money in any other way. So, when government spends money it does not have, what happens? We have debt. Who pays the debt? That’s right, ultimately, taxpayers must pay the debt with the earnings from productive work. So, in the end, the government is actually spending OUR money and calling it “stimulus” when we in the end we must pay for it anyway. In other words, they spend my earnings that I then have to pay them back for it. What kind of idiot thinks this is a good deal? Only leftist nutjob idiots think this is a good deal.

5) All of you leftist morons that claim putting money in peoples hands creates DEMAND are about the biggest ignoramuses there are around. You think that because the government puts either someone else’s money or borrowed money in a person’s hands, that all of a sudden they want to eat? Or they want transportation? Or they want electricity? Are you stupid? Yes is the answer to that question. People demand the basic necessities of life in order to stay alive. And that’s where economic needs begin. Food, clothing, and shelter. They dont happen just because you give them money. They happen because they are people. Demand is there already. You dont create it. And when there is little to no incentive for someone who is productive to meet those demands with goods and services, economic activity slows down. There are 2 sides to every equation, Patty. Demand AND Supply. And we dont create demand just by giving non-producing members of society more money. Like I said, demand is there naturally. The trick is to incentivize risk takers to come up with new ways to meet demands more efficiently and at lower cost. The risk taker who tries to meet demand is the one who hires the people that need work in order to earn to pay for and satisfy their own demands.

6) Clinton had a nearly balanced budget in the last year of his terms because Newt Gingrich and the Republicans were effective at curbing spending for a time, and Clinton was a pragmatist. Obozo is NO pragmatist. He is a leftist idealogue with no other story than the proletariat vs. bourgeois.

7) The laws of mathematics of budgeting and finances apply equally to all, regardless of personal, business, or government. You cannot spend more than you take in forever. Eventually, you cannot pay even the interest on your debts. This is what you are seeing in Europe. It is coming to America, no doubt.

Have a nice day!

________________________________
From: Disqus
To: emadismail@sbcglobal.net
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 11:20 AM
Subject: [thenationalmemo] Re: Meet The New Nazis Of Europe — The Other Cost Of Austerity

CPANY wrote, in response to emadis41:
The Muslims committed some of the most heinous crimes imaginable against thousands of innocent people in the name of their religion.
The Oklahoma City crime was committed by one person. There are a billion Muslims in the world and many are potential murderers. It is too risky to allow them to live in civilized countries, free to commit mass murder because of the libertarian traditions of those countries.
I clearly remember seeing television reports of Palestinian women dancing in the streets to celebrate the World Trade Center and related attacks of September 11, 2001. Three thousand people died and those scumbags are celebrating. That’s the kind of human garbage that you want to let freely roam our country? That’s what you consider “…the most peaceful citizens in the US”?
We are entitled to protect ourselves and moving the Muslims out is a good first step.
Link to comment

And racism rears it ugly head from ALL sources…it isn’t compartmentalized to the Republican party.

I do agree that this man’s behavior is absolutely wrong (and racism shows a person’s complete ignorance). Although (and this hurts morally to point out, but ethically it is important to the facts) the woman in white hit him first.

Your post is devoid of any substantive criticism. It’s all fluff. Everyone should “educate themselves” so that they can understand your pseudo intellectual statements.

If you have something to say, back it up with clear arguments.