Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Saturday, March 23, 2019

Texas’ Republicans aren’t done making medical decisions for women.

Fresh off their victory of banning abortions after the 20th week — even in cases of rape and incest — and implementing unnecessary regulations that could shut down a majority of the state’s clinics that offer abortion services, there’s another bill coming, according to the Houston Chronicle:

Reps. Phil King (R-Weatherford), Dan Flynn (R-Van), and Geanie Morrison (R-Victoria) proposed a so-called “fetal heartbeat bill” in the hopes that it could be rushed through the Texas legislature before the special session ends on July 31.

Fetal heartbeat bills are even stricter than the bill that was signed into law yesterday in Texas, as they attempt to detect the heartbeat of the fetus in the first 6 weeks of a pregnancy, when heartbeats have been shown to begin. This bill defines a heartbeat as “cardiac activity or the steady and repetitive rhythmic contraction of the fetal heart within the gestational sac.”

The new bill would place further time constraints on the legal abortion time period, as well as make women undergo mandatory ultrasounds to examine the heartbeat of the fetus.

Only North Dakota currently has a law this prohibitive on the books.

With the 20-week bans, Republicans may have the public on their side. However, the polling on bans in the first trimester are pretty clear. People don’t want them:


Texas’ Democrats have come up with a new strategy to prevent abortions without making decisions for women. They’re calling for looking into how birth control can prevent unintended pregnancies. This — along with a bill that would ban abortion restrictions until the death penalty is repealed — force Republicans to justify how their so-called “pro-life” beliefs aren’t just anti-choice.

Other points:

I’m pretty convinced that Scott Walker paid Time magazine to write a story about how his new budget isn’t right-wing enough. It includes mandatory ultrasounds and unaffordable tax breaks for the rich. And it keeps intact all the cuts that have made his state fall from 11th to somewhere in the 40s in job creation. Believe me, he’s right-wing enough.

Could Ted Cruz beat Hillary Clinton? Salon‘s Jonathan Bernstein says “yes.” The Daily Beast‘s Michael Tomasky just laughs.

Speaking of Ted Cruz… he’s great at making headlines and terrible at getting what he says he wants, says Slate‘s Dave Weigel.

And here’s some good news for liberals. Former Reagan advisor Bruce Bartlett sees a new age of enduring liberalism dawning if the right leader makes the right arguments.

Do you think Ted Cruz has a shot in hell? What are you reading?

  • Share this on Google+0
  • Share this on Linkedin0
  • Share this on Reddit1
  • Print this page
  • 185

3 responses to “MORNING LOL: Texas To Ban Not Being Pregnant?”

  1. Budjob says:

    Maybe it’s time to convince Mexico to invade Texass,and reclaim it.Then we could just sit back and watch those assholes disintegrate.It’s too bad the south lost the civil war,for if they had won the sane people in the rest of this once great country wouldn’t be stuck with all of the screwballs and nutcases,(AKA republicans) that reside in these horrible states!

    • Michael Kollmorgen says:

      Hell, as far as I’m concerned, Mexico could take back the majority of the southwest and I wouldn’t miss it.

      France could take back Florida, Louisiana and Russia could take back Alaska too.

      Would be nice if Canada would lay claim to the northern states.

  2. Lynda Groom says:

    I have a suggestion for all of those Texas male legislators who are so afraid of the uterus and the sometime result of sex. NO more bareback riding until marriage, and a commitment to care and feed any offspring. I wonder if that might fly with the boys?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.