Support President Obama

Democrats need your help to pass President Obama's second term agenda. Sign up and show him you have his back!

Email:


Zip Code:


Thank you for signing:
Support President Obama
Now take more action from our partners!
 

Politics

|

New Blow For Rice: Moderate Senator Voices Concern

November 28th, 2012 11:15 pm Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — A moderate Republican senator, vital to any White House hopes of getting U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice confirmed as secretary of state, said Wednesday she couldn’t back any nomination until more questions are answered about the deadly Sept. 11 attack in Libya and Rice’s State Department role during the 1998 U.S. Embassy bombing in Kenya.

In a fresh suggestion of eroding GOP support for Rice, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine emerged from a 90-minute, closed-door meeting with the ambassador voicing new criticism of her initial account about Libya. Collins also questioned what Rice, the assistant secretary of state for African Affairs in the Clinton administration, knew about requests for enhanced embassy security before the Nairobi truck bombing.

Pressed on how she would vote if President Barack Obama names Rice to succeed Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, Collins said, “I would need to have additional information before I could support her nomination.”

President Barack Obama came to Rice’s defense during a Cabinet meeting, calling her “extraordinary” and saying he couldn’t be prouder of the job she has done as U.N. ambassador. Cabinet members joined Obama in applauding Rice, who attended the meeting. Obama has not named a replacement for Clinton, who has said she intends to step down soon.

At the State Department, Clinton was asked about her possible replacement.

“Susan Rice has done a great job as our ambassador to the United Nations,” Clinton said. “Of course, this decision about my successor is up to the president, but I am very happy he has the opportunity with a second term to make a decision.”

The misgivings from Collins, the top Republican on the Homeland Security Committee, came one day after three other GOP senators said they would try to block Rice’s nomination. Sens. John McCain of Arizona, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire said they were more troubled than ever by Rice’s answers on Libya even though the ambassador conceded that her much-maligned first explanation was wrong.

In an unusual move, Rice and acting CIA Director Michael Morell have held two days of private meetings with Republican senators in hopes of assuaging their concerns. Privately, Senate Republicans said they had hoped the conversations would quiet the criticism as they want to avoid the spectacle of a postelection challenge to a female African-American nominee.

Instead, the sessions have cast further doubt on her chances for the top State Department job and increased the likelihood of a protracted fight if Obama does choose her. Although Democrats will have 55 votes in the next Congress, the president would need the support of five Republicans to avoid a filibuster of the nomination. Collins would be a prime candidate to help avoid a filibuster of the nomination.

Collins said she was troubled by Rice’s “political role” in downplaying the Libya attack as a spontaneous demonstration over an anti-Muslim video rather than a terrorist attack by al-Qaida affiliates in a series of Sunday talk show appearances on Sept. 16 — five days after the attack and weeks before the election.

U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed in the raid on the U.S. diplomatic mission.

Rice has said she was relying on talking points provided by U.S. intelligence.

Introducing another issue certain to be fodder for any confirmation battle, Collins said she pressed Rice about security at the U.S. Embassy in Nairobi in 1998 when a truck bomb was set off outside the facility, killing more than 200 Kenyans and 12 Americans.

“What troubles me so much is the Benghazi attack in many ways echoes the attacks on those embassies in 1998 when Susan Rice was head of the African region for our State Department,” Collins told reporters after the meeting. “In both cases, the ambassador begged for additional security.”

Collins said Rice told her she was not involved directly in turning down the request for improved security. The Maine senator said that in light of Rice’s position, she had to be aware of the general threats and U.S. Ambassador Prudence Bushnell’s requests for security upgrades in Kenya.

Review boards headed by former Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman Adm. William J. Crowe after the Aug. 7, 1998, bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania did not find reasonable cause that any U.S. employee breached his duty in connecting with the bombings. Rice was not blamed.

However, Crowe said the boards believed there was a “collective failure” by several administrations and Congress over a decade to invest adequately to shore up vulnerable U.S. diplomatic missions around the world.

Rice has emerged as the front-runner for the top job at State, though Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman John Kerry, D-Mass., passed over for the job in 2008, is considered a strong alternative.

In a clear message to the White House, Collins said Kerry would have no problem winning Senate confirmation.

“I think John Kerry be an excellent appointment and would be easily confirmed by his colleagues,” Collins said.

Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee, who is in line to become the top Republican on the Foreign Relations Committee, was more circumspect about Rice’s chances after his own meeting with the ambassador.

The GOP senator suggested that Obama “take a deep breath and nominate the person he really believes is the very best person for secretary of state, regardless of relationships.”

Corker, who traveled to Libya in early October, was highly critical of the administration and the intelligence community, saying that “the whole issue of Benghazi has been a tawdry affair.”

Democrats have rallied to defend Rice, casting the Republican criticism as political scapegoating.

“You know it’s a shame to create a sideshow that seems, I think, very clearly to be very political out of something that really has no bearing on what happened in Benghazi,” White House spokesman Jay Carney said Wednesday.

Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., a member of the House Intelligence Committee, called the criticism a “transparent attempt” to deny Obama a potential Cabinet choice.

The issue remained at the forefront as the Senate, in debating a defense policy bill, approved an amendment by McCain that would lead to an increase of up to 1,000 Marine Corps personnel to provide security at U.S. diplomatic missions around the world.

___

Associated Press writer Matthew Lee contributed to this report.

___

Donna Cassata can be followed on Twitter at



  • BDD1951

    Sure they are going to try to block her nomination. They hope that John Kerry will get nominated and they can try to get a republican in his MA seat. I’ll bet if they don’t confirm her that the Prez will nominate someone else. Be nice if he would nominate a republican senator and then maybe we could fill his seat wioth a Dem.

  • nobsartist

    Just another sore loser. You have to wonder after listening to her talk, did she suffer a stroke or is she just dim witted? Apparently she is stupid enough to think that Rice had something to do with the embassy attacks in 1998 and had something to do with Benghazi.

    Then again, she was an avid supporter of the AWOL coke head that lied us into two wars and is the only president to be convicted of war crimes so perhaps we should ask her where she was when Valerie Plame was outed as a CIA agent. Why was she silent then?

    She is just a slow speaking, dim witted, partisan hack sort of like the rest of the republiCONs that insist on making this some sort of issue.

    By the way, where is the JOBS PLAN?

  • charleo1

    You know, we often lament about the dearth of smart, dedicated public servants.
    Whether it’s in our cities, states, or at the Federal level. And we wonder why.
    It seems to me we would go a long ways in answering that question with the
    case of Susan Rice. At this point, we don’t know if the President will eventually
    nominate Ms. Rice. Or if Obama has the Senatorial votes to confirm her. My hope
    is that he will, and does. Because, this is an important battle. And now that certain
    Republicans have decided to play a dirty, unfair game of politics with this immensely
    devoted, eminently qualified person. It seems to me at this point, Obama practically
    owes her the nomination. She would probably disagree. But this goes to the
    heart of why we have such a hard time attracting the best of the best to serve our Country.
    First of all, if you’re Susan Rice, and have the credentials she has earned, why would
    you make serving in government your career in the first place? And if you’re Susan Rice,
    you know this will end your tenure at the State Department, one way or the other.
    Either as Secretary of State, or serving out the remainder of what is already an illustrious
    public life. But now, too political, in all probability to be nominated again by the
    next President. And, that will be the Country’s loss. And worse, it will convince the next
    brilliant, young person, with a desire to contribute to the Country they love, to see themselves
    in Susan Rice. And, see how filthy, and dishonest the politics in this Country have become.
    And America will lose again. And worse, we will never know how much.

  • charleo1

    What I would love to know, is who ordered Senator McCain to launch this crass, political
    attack on Ambassador Rice. And more to the point, what has happened to the Patriot McCain?
    The person that earned all the credentials, and all the integrity, and toughness we praise in
    our leaders in that stinking prison in Vietnam . Who refused to leave until all his Countrymen
    came home with him. In the early days of our war on terrorism, he showed that courage again.
    When many of us felt the torture being conducting in our name, was wrong. John McCain
    stood in opposition to his Party’s support of renditions, and so called, “enhanced interrogation
    techniques.” Standing on the Senate floor, his scars spoke as loudly as anything he said.
    Where is that McCain? In my mind, the clearly superior candidate to George Bush in 2000.
    Perhaps it was the Presidential campaign he lost in ’08. Or the near loss to an extremist,
    T-P artier, that wasn’t qualified to shine his shoes, much less fill them. Is McCain, after
    more than 30 years of public service, 40 with his military service, determined to use what is
    most likely his last term, to tear down that credibility, and inspiration he has given to Americans
    like myself, on both sides of the political spectrum. And, for mere politics? I don’t know
    John McCain anymore.