Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Tuesday, March 19, 2019

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet.

Confidence in President Donald Trump continues to tumble, as CNN announces he’s never polled lower as president. The CNN/SSRS poll found that a mere 38 percent of respondents rank the president’s performance positively, while 56 percent say they disapprove. When asked to rate Trump’s first six months, Trump’s approval drops to 36 percent.

Absolutely no president has plummeted as far and as fast as Trump. CNN notes that Bill Clinton is the only other president in the history of modern polling to receive a ranking below 50 percent at this point in office. But even the controversial Clinton managed to poll in the mid-40s.

Trump also faces an enthusiasm gap. Only 24 percent of respondents strongly approve of the president’s job performance, but a whopping 47 percent strongly disapprove. CNN notes that strong approval from Republicans has dropped to 56 percent.

Among the most startling revelations is that 76 percent of Americans don’t trust “all or most of what they hear in official communications from the White House.” A full 30 percent trust “nothing at all” from the White House.

Even white people without college degrees, considered to be Trump’s base, are souring on the embattled president. Just 50 percent still think he’s an effective manager, a 10-point drop since February.

A majority of Americans believe that Trump has “lowered the stature of the office of the president,” and a mere 30 percent of Americans have personal admiration for him.

With poll numbers this embarrassing, it’s no surprise the belligerent Trump is trying to erode Americans’ trust in the free press.


Chris Sosa is an associate editor at
AlterNet. His work has appeared in MicSalonCare2, Huffington Post and other publications. Previously, he was a vegan campaign specialist and media spokesperson for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Follow him on Twitter @ChrisSosa.

  • Share this on Google+0
  • Share this on Linkedin0
  • Share this on Reddit0
  • Print this page
  • 271

89 responses to “New Polling Data Find Trump’s Approval Rating Is The Lowest We’ve Seen Yet”

  1. Lynda Groom says:

    Maybe after a week of bluster and tweets about NK he’s hoping for a couple of points bump. We’ll see soon enough.

    • Dapper Dan says:

      I’m sure if we exchange nuclear fire with NK that’ll certainly boost his popularity like 911 did for Bush. Yeah right ????

    • dpaano says:

      Not at the rate he’s going now…..people are NOT thrilled about his threats to Kim Jong Un, especially when both he and Trump are total narcissists. You can’t win battles with threats back and forth, and one of these days, Kim is going to do what he’s threatening, and Trump is going to be left with the blame (which he accept and will probably pawn off on “his generals.”

  2. InformedVoter says:

    The FAKE MSM likes to tout their polls. What they fail to tell you is that they poll the east and the west with 75% penetration. Hence, their polls are extremely left-biased. They did the same leading up to the election and falsely led their followers with the impression that HilLIARy was ahead in the polls.

    • bobnstuff says:

      Here is a poll number for you. 47%. That is the percent that voted for him. That doesn’t even mean they approve of him, that’s just the number that didn’t vote for others. You can’t say that number is left or right, it’s just a fact. Now that number was only based on 54% of the registered voters since that’s all the even showed up to vote. So in fact he got only 27% based on the total of register voters. Try to spin those numbers.

      • InformedVoter says:

        Sorry bob, but you make this TOO easy! In Michigan alone, the estimate is that HilLIARy was attributed 100,000 too many votes alone – just in Detroit
        Bill Clinton received 43% of the popular vote in 1992 and 49% in 1996. So any argument you use to taint President Trump’s MANDATE falls on stupid ears like the low information sheep you are.

        obozo, on many occasions, while campaigning, told the audiences that were mainly latin, “no one will track you or your family, so go ahead and vote without fear”. If these were registered voters, then they were legally here. So why would they fear being tracked it they voted? Duh, he was encouraging illegals and those not registered to vote!

        And your 27% number is meaningless. Since no election resulted in any candidate, even the Reagan landslide years, gathering over 50% of the potential vote.

        I guess I showed you. Once more, you got your faulty logic shredded! Ho hum – getting tired of destroying low information sheep.

        • Independent1 says:

          You don’t seriously believe anyone here to believe those fantasy numbers you just posted, do you?? Because if you do, you’re an even bigger moron than any of us here previously thought!!!

          • InformedVoter says:

            Sorry id1, but I’ve destroyed your response. No wonder you guys are so poorly informed. You all just follow along like sheep and believe that HilLIARy is leading.
            So which numbers (remember you verified my numbers) are fantasy? I can’t wait for you to worm your way out of this one. You’ll probably claim, like you did with the auto bailout, that you never made such a statement. You’re such a loser.

          • Independent1 says:

            You’ve destroyed my response with what? Your pack of lies!

            In over 15,000 comments, I may have mentioned Snopes ONE TIME!! But at NO TIME have I EVER used Snopes as the basis of a comment. I have NEVER TRUSTED the website!!

            YOUR ARE A PATHOLOGICAL LYING FOOL!!!

            YOU CAN NOT PRODUCE ONE OF MY 15,000 COMMENTS WHICH HAS A DIRECT REFERENCE OR LINK TO THE SNOPES WEBSITE!! NOT ONE!!

          • InformedVoter says:

            POORly informed id1, only a loser like you would even think to keep copies of their responses. YUP, you regularly quoted “facts” from sites like SNOPES and here all along, these sites were nothing but Soros paid lie sites.

            I kned and predicted you’d back peddle.

          • Independent1 says:

            And the lies and deflection just go on and on and on:

            But now the charlatans behind the curtain (of the Obamacare health insurer fraud) are finally being revealed.

            Donna received the letter canceling her insurance plan on
            Sept. 16. Her insurance company, LifeWise of Washington, told her that they’d identified a new plan for her. If she did nothing, she’d be covered. A 56-year-old Seattle resident with a 57-year-old husband and 15-year-old daughter, Donna had been looking forward to the savings that the Affordable Care Act had to offer. But that’s not what she found. Instead, she’d be paying an additional $300 a month for coverage. The
            letter made no mention of the health insurance marketplace that would soon open in Washington, where she could shop for competitive plans, and only an oblique reference to financial help that she might qualify for, if she made the effort to call and find out. Otherwise, she’d be automatically rolled over to a new plan — and, as the letter said, “If you’re happy with this plan, do nothing.” If Donna had done nothing, she would have ended up spending about $1,000 more a month for insurance than she will now that she went to the marketplace, picked the
            best plan for her family and accessed tax credits at the heart of the health care reform law. “The info that we were sent by LifeWise was totally bogus. Why the heck did they try to screw us?” Donna said. “People who are afraid of the ACA should be much more afraid of the insurance companies who will exploit their fear and end up overcharging them.” Donna is not alone.

            And:

            No, she’s not alone. It’s not clear how widespread this practice has been, but some State insurance commissioners are starting to notice. In Kentucky, Insurance Provider Humana was fined $65,000 for sending out misleading letters.

            The Kentucky Department of Insurance has fined Humana
            $65,430 because it offered policyholders an unapproved opportunity to amend their insurance as part of a letter that regulators have called “misleading.”
            The department investigated letters sent in August to 6,543 individual plan policyholders in Kentucky. The letters said they needed to renew their plans for 2014 within 30 days or choose a more expensive option that complies with the Affordable Care
            Act. But regulators last month called the letters misleading,
            arguing they did not make sufficiently clear that policyholders could compare and choose competing plans on the state’s health insurance exchanges, which open on Oct. 1, and for which they could be eligible for federal subsidies.

            [Kentucky Insurance Commissioner Sharon] Clark gave the example of a single mother with children who was urged to sign up for a Humana plan with a monthly premium of $719.86. That price is higher than any comparable plan for sale on the state’s insurance marketplace, Clark said — not to mention that the mother might have qualified for tax subsidies to help pay for it if she went through the marketplace, as Donna did.

            So the next time you hear or read about how ObamaCare has caused someone to lose their inexpensive plan only to be forced to choose a much more expensive one. Don’t Believe It. As Adm. Akbar would say: It’s. A. Trap!

            https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2013/11/4/1252957/-How-ObamaCare-Cancelled-Your-Plan-is-really-an-Insurance-Co-Scam-to-Rip-You-Off

          • idamag says:

            Without the ACA, the insurance premiums would still go up. Obama did not get the insurance plan he wanted. He had to compromise greatly to get anything. With a decent congress, the ACA could be made better. Karen Ignagier, CEO of AHIP, yearly salary in 2007 was 1.58 million dollars. Ron Williams, CEO of Aetna, salary 2007 24,300,112 dollars. Angela Belaly, Well Point – $9,047,469. This is why insurance costs go up, not ACA or research. Last month, when I attended my cancer support group, we had a new member. He was a young man with little children. He had stage 4 lung cancer. He was so sick he could no longer work. For a short period, the company he had worked for, would insure him and then it was gone. The guy was scared that the ACA would be repealed and he would become a pre-existing condition. The other thing is that with trump’s plan, if you get sick, you pay more. One of my husband’s hospital bills was $700,000. 20% is $80,000. Add higher premiums to that. We are the most selfish country in the world.

          • Independent1 says:

            A lot of good points. Sorry to hear about your husband having to go through an illness that ran up those hospital charges. it’s unfortunate that even with insurance that hospital costs can still be very significant and for many, drive them into bankruptcy.

            What many supposedly well off people, on the lower end of the millionaire scale fail to realize, is that even with their perceived wealth, that they can be forced into poverty by the medical costs associated with a major illness if they do not have a good health insurance plan.

            One key aspect about ACA that many fail to appreciate, is that ACA has forced hospitals to ‘clean up their act’. And I mean that literally. Hospitals have been forced to work at reducing readmissions rates which resulted from people acquiring a significant illness while in the hospital for a different illness. Prior to ACA hundreds of thousands in America were dying from illnesses that they acquired while in the hospital – and there’s still work to do, but the last I read, ACA had reduced the redadmission rate from around 19% down to close to 10% – which was projected to have saved close to 50,000 lives between 2010 and 2014.

            Thousands of people who are alive today because they didn’t pick up MRSA, C-Diff or some other illness while they were hospitalized maybe for some far more minor reason.

          • idamag says:

            We didn’t really suffer that much. We have Medicare and a supplemental. I was trying to point out the pitfalls for those who do not have that kind of coverage. The ACA reduced Medicare costs considerably. Before the ACA, my husband was paying for redundant costs because each doctor he was going to, took their own tests. Now, the doctors and hospitals have to share tests so there are not so many. Another thing that was onerous, was the so-called donut hole. After a certain amount, you had to pay full price for the drugs. Lovanox cost $1400 a month so we had to take a chance on dropping that one for that period of time. Instead the doctor gave him a lesser drug and big doses of aspirin. The aspirin was wrecking his stomach and making it bleed.Still we didn’t have that much to complain about. I feel worse about the young man, I mentioned above. He doesn’t have Medicare.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Sorry POORly informed id1, quoting a couple of “he said – she said” stories that insurance companies are gouging their customers does not explain away the double digit premium increases. The fact that you would even think that shows how POORly informed you truly are.

            When obozocare fails, the voters will blame the Dems for putting in the terrible legislation and for not working with the GOP to replace it with something that actually would work. it’s a BIG win-win for President Trump.

          • Independent1 says:

            And just for the record DIRTBAG!!

            Repealing the Affordable Care Act will kill more than 43,000 people annually
            https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/01/23/repealing-the-affordable-care-act-will-kill-more-than-43000-people-annually/?utm_term=.0bac8ba04707

            Obamacare has been good for the economy
            http://www.businessinsider.com/obamacare-has-been-good-for-the-economy-2016-5

            An Obamacare winner: Safety-net hospitals
            https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/05/24/obamacare-safety-net-hospitals-uninsured/9456671/

            Obamacare repeal costs: 3 million jobs gone, $1.5 trillion in lost gross state product
            https://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/05/obamacare-repeal-costs-3-million-lost-jobs.html

            Inside those big Obamacare rate increases: State hostility to the law costs residents plenty
            http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-obamacare-rates-20161031-story.html

            Price increases for Obamacare depend on where you live (especially if you live in a red state)
            https://www.cnbc.com/2016/05/24/cost-of-obamacare-price-increases-depends-on-where-you-live.html

            Obamacare Saved Thousands From Colon Cancer Death, Report Finds
            http://www.nbcnews.com/health/cancer/obamacare-saved-thousands-colon-cancer-death-report-finds-n710951

            HHS: Hospitals saved billions under ObamaCare
            (As did taxpayers by not having to reimburse hospitals for billions in free insurance giveaways)
            http://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/236603-hhs-hospitals-saved-billions-under-obamacare

            Researchers credit Obamacare with helping find early-stage cancer
            http://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coloncancer-obamacare-idUSKBN157292

            Hey, Paul Ryan, how about these great Obamacare numbers?
            https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/6/21/1541067/-Hey-Paul-Ryan-how-about-these-great-Obamacare-numbers?

            Obamacare brings record low for US health uninsured rate
            https://www.cnbc.com/2016/05/17/obamacare-brings-record-low-for-us-health-uninsured-rate.html

            Obamacare Cutbacks Shut Hospitals Where Medicaid Went Unexpanded
            https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-11-25/obamacare-cutbacks-shut-hospitals-where-medicaid-went-unexpanded

            Hospitals See Troubles In Red States That Snubbed Obamacare’s Medicaid Deal
            https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucejapsen/2014/07/20/hospitals-see-troubles-in-red-states-that-snubbed-obamacares-medicaid-deal/#74e8e57f1120

            Senator Angus King: Obamacare opponents ‘guilty of murder’
            http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/30/sen-angus-king-obamacare-opponents-guilty-murder/

          • InformedVoter says:

            Sorry POORly informed id1, but quoting from extreme left-biased sources doesn’t prove any of your claims that obozocare is good. It’s dying under its own weight and you can’t spin that away! insurers are pulling out and 20 states now only have one choice. Most of the other are raising their premiums by 20+%, each year. It won’t be long before NO one can afford it.

            The very first link, about killing 43,000 has been debunked even by left-leaning sources, yet you continue to quote links like that. How low information does that make you look! Pretty damn low.

          • Independent1 says:

            Just more deflection! And you know what you can do with your deflections!!

            You’re such a worthless pathological lying fool that there’s not a rock too close to the ground for you to slither under. You’re nothing but a snake in the grass!!

          • plc97477 says:

            Hey I like snakes. Snakes are much more ethical than uninformed.

          • InformedVoter says:

            POORly informed pic, go ahead and keep believing the FAKE MSM lies. Just as you did before the election when they stated that HilLIARY would win and possibly in a landslide.
            So how did your believing the FAKE MSM polls work out for you! It worked out great for me. Ha ha ha

          • idamag says:

            Snakes are not going to destroy our government with their ignorance.

          • InformedVoter says:

            POOR id1, still trying to save face from telling me I was a liar because I provided links that showed the HilLARy was NOT ahead in the polls. You huffed and puffed then, just like you’re doing now.

          • Independent1 says:

            And who said anything about me keeping copies of my comments?? Disqus keeps those if you want to take the time to browse through them. You appear to be as totally uninformed about blogging as you are politics.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Sorry POORly informed id1, but your claim that you never used SNOPES is just back peddling on your part. You just don’t wish to look more foolish, like you did when you kept saying I was lying that HilLIARy was NOT ahead in the polls. I warned you then that your knowledge base was too dependent upon FAKE MSM sources.

          • Independent1 says:

            And like with everything else you post YOU’RE LYING ABOUT EVEN SNOPES!!!

            You are such a despicable worthless lying piece of crap that the world should come crashing about your head LOWLIFE!!

            CLAIM: Snopes.com is owned by ‘a flaming liberal’ with a partisan bias.

            First off, it’s clear that whoever wrote this piece made it up as they went along. Anyone who has spent even a few minutes browsing Snopes.com knows that the website is owned by two people, not one, husband and wife David and Barbara Mikkelson of southern California. This is stated on the website and has been common knowledge since the website’s inception.

            Second, the charge of partisanship is laid without evidence. At no time have the Mikkelsons publicly stated a political preference or affiliation, or expressed support for any particular party or candidate.

            Moreover, Barbara Mikkelson is a Canadian citizen, and as such cannot vote in U.S. elections or contribute to political campaigns. In a statement provided to FactCheck.org, David Mikkelson said his “sole involvement in politics” is voting on election day. In 2000 he registered as a Republican, documents provided to FactCheck.org show, and in 2008 Mikkelson didn’t declare a party affiliation at all. Says Mikkelson: “I’ve never joined a party, worked for a campaign, or donated money to a candidate” (source: FactCheck.org).

            Anyone who claims proof to the contrary needs to come out with it.

            https://www.thoughtco.com/snopes-exposed-snopes-got-snoped-not-so-much-3299548
            And my first cut and paste from Snopes ever:

            The Snopes.com web site was founded by David Mikkelson, a project begun in 1994 as an expression of his interest in researching urban legends that has since grown into the oldest and largest fact-checking site on the Internet, one widely regarded by journalists, folklorists, and laypersons alike as one of the world’s essential resources. Snopes.com is routinely included in annual “Best of the Web” lists and has been the recipient of two Webby awards. Snopes.com personnel have made multiple appearances as guests on national news programs such as 20/20, ABC World News, CNN Sunday Morning, and NPR’s All Things Considered, and they and their work have been profiled in numerous major news publications, including The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and Reader’s Digest.

            With over 20 years’ experience as a professional researcher and writer, David has created in Snopes.com what has come to be regarded as an online touchstone of rumor research. The site’s work has been described as painstaking, scholarly, and reliable, and has been lauded by the world’s top folklorists, including Jan Harold Brunvand, Gary Alan Fine, and Patricia Turner.Hundreds of the site’s articles have been cited by authors in a variety of disciplines, and various of their articles have been published in textbooks currently in use in the U.S. and Canadian school systems.

            The Snopes.com web site is (and always has been) a completely independent, self-sufficient entity wholly owned by its operators and funded through advertising revenues. Neither the site nor its operators has ever received monies from (or been engaged in any business or editorial relationship with), any sponsor, political party, religious
            group, outside business organization, or government agency that is not disclosed here.

            Snopes.com strives to be as transparent as possible, check out the following links to learn more about our operation:

            http://www.snopes.com/about-snopes/

          • InformedVoter says:

            POORly informed id1, the owners are going through a bitter divorce. The husband has a trophy new wife and spent tons of money on her.

            YUP, the SNOPES site has been rated as I claimed: “flaming liberal” with a horrible accuracy rate, with the extreme error in favor of the left.

            In court document the husband/wife filed regarding the divorce, they indicated their “research” team is comprised as I stated, with no verification of what the analyst posted.

            Just about all the so-called fact check sites do business the same way. Once more revealed in court documents.

            You are so poorly informed and desperate to justify the voters REJECTING HilLIARy, that you’ll believe anything that might lessen the humiliating loss. OMG, the Martians sent technical bots to earth to reprogram ALL the voting machines and since they can’t be seen by humans, no one saw them do it.

            Ha Ha Ha

          • Independent1 says:

            You’re such a withering lowlife you can make up fantasies in a heartbeat!!

            Just remember LOWLIFE that God has made it clear that pathological liars like you will burn in Hell for eternity!!!

            Revelation 21:

            7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.

            8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

            So keep it up LOWLIFE. We all know where you’ll soon be!!!!

            AND IT SHOULD BE CLEAR TO YOU BY NOW THAT NOT ONE SANE POSTER ON THE NM BELIEVES ONE WORD THAT YOU POST SO YOU ARE CLEARLY WASTING LOTS OF TIMES WITH YOUR IDIOCY!!

            PROVING EVEN MORE JUST HOW MUCH OF AN IDIOT YOU REALLY ARE – JUST LIKE TRUMP!!!

          • InformedVoter says:

            Sorry id1, but your problem is that you can’t handle the truth!

            I could care less if none of your low information “friends” believes me nor not. It’s their loss. They believed the FAKE MSM that HilLIARy was leading in the polls. You told me then that no one believed me when I posted that President Trump was leading.

            Now that obozo’s care is failing of its own accord, you’ll soon back peddle on that too.

          • Independent1 says:

            And the scumbag just continues with more lies and lies and lies!!

            You are such a pathetic weasle that it’s impossible to describe just how evil you really are!!

            Obamacare IS NOT failing on its own – the GOP is working to sabotage it!!!

            The GOP’s Obamacare sabotage continues

            ANOTHER WEEK, another insurance company deserting patients in a wide swath of the country. Last Tuesday, Anthem announced it would pull out of the Obamacare marketplace in Ohio, potentially leaving individual insurance-buyers in about a fifth of the state’s counties without Affordable Care Act coverage to purchase. The news came after insurers in Various other states announced or threatened market exits or big rate hikes over the past several weeks.

            Are these moves more evidence that Obamacare is fundamentally unworkable? Hardly. Of greedy insurance companies callously disregarding their customers’ health? Not that either. Anthem explained clearly what is responsible for its retreat: Republican sabotage of the health-care system.

            The Trump administration has been serially unclear about whether it will keep funding a crucial subsidy program, known as cost-sharing reductions . Without them, insurers would have to jack up premiums to cover their costs or leave markets that would become deeply unprofitable to them.

            Just as experts and industry officials predicted, insurance companies have done both as the uncertainty about these subsidies has grown.

            https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-gops-obamacare-sabotage-continues/2017/06/09/c0469574-4d40-11e7-a186-60c031eab644_story.html?utm_term=.3c79715cb775

            And the GOP is just cementing its reputation of being nothing more THAN MURDERERS!!!! JUST LIKE YOU!!!!

          • InformedVoter says:

            Oh my, but you really do like proving you are POORly informed. They pulled out because not enough young folks signed up and because obozo underestimated the true cost of providing care. The Dems had no idea (and they still don’t) what was in the bill. Pelosi’s famous quote comes to mind – or have you forgotten it.

            If obozocare was worth keeping, it would have paid for itself. Sanders is hoping it’ll fail so he can push for single payer healthcare.

            You are just too stubborn or stupid to admit that obozocare is failing from it’s own problems and the voters will take it out on the Dems. Do you really think any voter will believe it’s because the insurance companies are greedy – grow up!

          • Independent1 says:

            And every number and comment you posted is a fantasy – you cannot substantiate ONE THING in your post with a bona fide source other than the false accusation that Obama lied about OBAMACARE when Obama DID NOT LIE!!!

            Obama only stated what the ACA legislation was set up to permit. IT WAS NOT OBAMA’S FAULT THE INSURANCE COMPANIES TRIED TO DEFRAUD THEIR INSUREDS BY DELIBERATELY CANCELLING POLICIES SO THEY COULD CON THEIR INSUREDS INTO SIGNING UP FOR HIGHER PREMIUM POLICIES!!!!!!

          • InformedVoter says:

            Sorry id1, but obozo DID lie. They knew going in, before the legislation took affect that the public would not be able to retain their good healthcare plans. It was a pack of lies by the Dems.

            And to even suggest the insurance companies defrauded their clients is naive at best and make you a bigger fool.

        • bobnstuff says:

          BS!!!!!

          • InformedVoter says:

            Even your own link supports my numbers. So which numbers are BS? Ha, ha, you are such a loser! and you’ve got dummies like Aaron and ID1 supporting you. How can you deny that I’m correct when I refer to you low information sheep as POORly informed. I wonder how you have enough gutz to even respond!

          • bobnstuff says:

            I guess you can’t read then. To bad to sad for you. Your loser can’t claim a great victory when only three times since Hover has a president been elected with a smaller percentage. In many cases even the losers had a higher percentage of the vote.

        • Talk about “low information”—You’re the poster boy, uninformed one.

          As for the forces of Darkness blocking humankind’s onward march, you stand out as one of the most pitiful and desperate little men, hanging on desperately to Trump’s trousers, with nose still epoxy’d to Trump’s orifice at the terminus of his large intestine.

          • InformedVoter says:

            POORly informed AofP, did you bother to check out poorly informed bob’s site. Only 5 since 1940 had more than 50%, so much for “most”. i stick to my original statements.

          • Please remove your nose from Trump’s orifice. It’s damaging your olfactory nerves, which are damaging the connections to your brain.

          • InformedVoter says:

            POORly informed AofP, you just can’t seem to come to terms with President Trump’s voter MANDATE victory can you!

          • InformedVoter says:

            Ha, ha, Your own link shows just 5 since 1940 having more than 50%. Your own lies have done you in, once more!
            And you dare to call me low information.

          • bobnstuff says:

            Funny, I guess you need help with your reading skills. Only Truman, Kennedy, Nixon’s first but not second, Clinton both, GW first and of course Trump didn’t have Over 50%. 10 out of the last 17 elections were won with over 50%, that is the majority. Even the ones that didn’t get 50% still did better the Trump.

          • InformedVoter says:

            POOR bob, but of course it never was a crying point like you fools have made it. In the end, it will turn out that President Trump did win the popular vote. Michigan revamped their entire voting with new equipment because of the scandal of the 100,00 illegal votes HilLIARy received.
            You continue to prove that you can’t handle the fact that the voters rejected HilLIARy. If you factor in the yuge leads your FAKE MSM claimed she had, then President Trump received 60% of the popular vote. That was a neat study done overseas.

            Bottom line, you’re privileged to have President Trump for the next 3.5 years. Even the most left-biased sources are admitting there is zero chance of impeaching President Trump.
            I just love watching you guys foam at the mouth and squirm.

          • bobnstuff says:

            Wrong again. You can lie all you want about fake news and made up stories but you still can’t change the fact that Trump didn’t win the popular vote, you keep making up or repeating lies but it doesn’t change the fact that Trump isn’t liked by even half the country. The fact that you show zero proof of anything you say and none of it even makes sense. Your hero lost the popular vote, he has no mandate, he doesn’t even have a party behind him anymore. People don’t like him, they don’t trust him and he has a provable record as a lying fraud. Every day it looks more and more like he will be lucky if he serves a year let alone three and a half more.

          • InformedVoter says:

            You just can’t handle that the voters REJECTED HilLIARy! The popular vote doesn’t matter and that’s why the founders put in the EC! Even you site shows that popular vote from 1940 was barely over 50%. President Trump never campaigned in CA which he would have done if popular vote mattered.

            YUP, his base is intact and even growing. If the election were to be held today, he would win by a larger margin and even carry the national popular vote too. And that just frosts you doesn’t it!

          • bobnstuff says:

            Who cares if he campaigned in California, he lost there, he would have lost there even if he had lived there. He lost the popular vote. If the voters rejected Clinton they rejected Trump even more. He is president, but he has no mandate, if anyone would have one it would have been the one with the most votes.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Sorry POORly informed bob, but you just don’t seem to understand. What a surprise. He elected to not spend time or money in CA because he was smart enough to realize he didn’t need the popular vote to win. Had he campaigned in CA, he would have received more popular votes. Just look at the red/blue map of the US and it’s CLEAR he received a MANDATE! You can try to deny it, but it just makes you look dumber.

          • bobnstuff says:

            He didn’t campaign in California because he know it would do no good. It makes no difference, he didn’t get the votes. If he didn’t get the vote he didn’t get a mandate. He’s still a loser. The mandate he got was from cows, He won the states with more cows then people.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Sorry POORly informed bob, but President Trump got 306 EC votes and the hag, HilLIARy only received 227. = MANDATE!

            Why was it a MANDATE = cows can’t and didn’t vote.

          • bobnstuff says:

            In fact those cows did get a vote since the EC is set up to give the states with less people and more cows greater power in electing a president. The EC doesn’t give a mandate it just puts the president in office. A mandate comes from a majority of the people.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Sorry POORly informed bob, but the EC was put in place to prevent urban areas or most populous states from having an inappropriate amount of influence. The margin of victory is what indicates a MANDATE!
            And if you consider how large a margin of victory that the FAKE MSM polls predicted HilLIARy was going to receive, then the MANDATE is even more enormous!

          • idamag says:

            Hillary got almost 3 million more votes than trump. I am in the more votes. That is because I have experienced diversity in people and thought. That is because I get my news from reliable sources and not the far right news sources.

    • Rant all you want to; dismiss the obvious till the cows come home; make of yourself a man naked in the open for all to see the warts of ignorance which bespeckle your torso and limbs. But your braying like an ass won’t help Trump’s failings. His free-fall won’t be stopped by some raucous simpleton of a cheerleader.

      So, bray on, uninformed one. You amuse us as any simpleton or knave is required to.

      • InformedVoter says:

        Poor AofP, but President Trump’s base is not in free-fall. In fact it’s larger today than on election day! Hence the articles published that he’d win even more decisively than he did.
        Are you going to deny that the polls are 75 east/west? I’d love to see you try that!

        • Same lame response. Have you not grown up? You’re stuck in a cesspool of nonsense.

          • InformedVoter says:

            POORly informed AofP, The polls are fake and so are the stories of his base eroding, but you just go ahead and keep on believing the FAKE MSM lies. You believed them before the election, why would anyone think you learned anything!

      • idamag says:

        He is a racist. He is from one of those isolated communities whose only diversity was black cows or brown cows. He hates the gov’mint that sends out his subsidy checks. He trusts no one from the big nearest city of 40,000 people.

    • ⭐️ BRAINTHRUST 5000 ⭐️ says:

      ^ this guy yells at javascript for days at a time.

      • InformedVoter says:

        Hey HELLpy, the poster of usually inaccurate statements with an accuracy rate of less than 20%;
        This is a computer generated response, but you will fabricate that you sent an automated response and continue to lower your accuracy rating.

        • ⭐️ BRAINTHRUST 5000 ⭐️ says:

          This is an automated response. You will reply anyway.

        • Budjob says:

          You rank right up there with the rankest!

          • InformedVoter says:

            Sorry bud, but I’m not the one who keeps changing his moniker to keep from getting deleted from using the system. Old HELLpy;’s accuracy rate is below 20%. That’s less than one out of five statements!

          • ⭐️ BRAINTHRUST 5000 ⭐️ says:

            Wait, who or what is going to delete me if I change my display name? I have never changed my account. How are you this goddam stupid ABOUT EVERYTHING?

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey HELLpy, the poster of usually inaccurate information; this is an automated response because you are accurate less than 20% of the time!

          • ⭐️ BRAINTHRUST 5000 ⭐️ says:

            This is an automated response. You will reply anyway.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey HELLpy, the poster of usually inaccurate information; this is an automated response because you are accurate less than 20% of the time!

          • ⭐️ BRAINTHRUST 5000 ⭐️ says:

            This is an automated response. You will reply anyway.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey HELLpy, the poster of usually inaccurate information; this is an automated response because you are accurate less than 20% of the time!

          • ⭐️ BRAINTHRUST 5000 ⭐️ says:

            This is an automated response. You will reply anyway.

          • ⭐️ BRAINTHRUST 5000 ⭐️ says:

            No, I didn’t think you could answer the question. Just to sum up, you think I’ve changed accounts (I haven’t) to escape deletion (for unspecified reasons) but somehow your imaginary accuracy rating (which does not exist) is still able to keep track of my lies (I have never lied).

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey HELLpy, the poster of usually inaccurate information; this is an automated response because you are accurate less than 20% of the time!! !

          • ⭐️ BRAINTHRUST 5000 ⭐️ says:

            Uh huh. This is an automated response. You will reply anyway.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey HELLPY, the poster of usually inaccurate information; this is an automated response because you are accurate less than 20% of the time!

          • ⭐️ BRAINTHRUST 5000 ⭐️ says:

            Uh huh. This is an automated response. You will reply anyway.

          • ⭐️ BRAINTHRUST 5000 ⭐️ says:

            I mean, I know that you have an IQ of, what, 80? But do you really think I’ve made 28K posts in the week that I’ve been using this display name?

            What am I saying, you are a moron traitor. Of course you think that.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey HELLpy, the poster of usually inaccurate information; this is an automated response because you are accurate less than 20% of the time!

          • ⭐️ BRAINTHRUST 5000 ⭐️ says:

            OK traitor. This is an automated response. You will reply anyway.

          • InformedVoter says:

            Hey HELLpy, the poster of usually inaccurate information; this is an automated response because you are accurate less than 20% of the time!

          • ⭐️ BRAINTHRUST 5000 ⭐️ says:

            OK traitor. This is an automated response. You will reply anyway.

      • The uninformed one suffers the same delusions of grandeur as Donald. And both are incredibly dense.

  3. dpaano says:

    Trump lives in a dream world of his own making…..his own ego won’t let him realize that he’s faltering, so he lies to not only his base, but also to himself! It’s pretty sad!

  4. Richard Prescott says:

    Trump’s “size” problems began in the GOP debates, traversed through the election and culminated with his inauguration. At every step he claimed no problem to the biggest, greatest, largest of whatever.
    And not all polls deal with only where the supposed InformerVoter states. Many polls reported are ones that cater to his base.
    The one thing that is generally true. All poll numbers have been dropping. One can ty to spin it any way they want. But the numbers themselves do not lie. Only the (fake) interpretation of them by you-know-who.

  5. yabbed says:

    Let’s see the BigFatBuffoon brag about this. 🙂 What a loser.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.