Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Monday, October 24, 2016

By Kathleen Hennessey, Tribune Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — A bitter fight between Sen. Dianne Feinstein and CIA Director John Brennan has President Barack Obama caught between a powerful political ally and a trusted senior adviser, a bind likely to tighten as the dispute raises questions of executive power and touches on a key piece of the president’s legacy.

In the days since the California Democrat angrily accused the CIA of trying to thwart her investigation into its now-defunct interrogation and detention program, the White House has tried not to take sides publicly. Obama went out of his way say the case was under review at the Justice Department and that he would not “wade into” it.

Obama has good reason to try to maintain distance.

As head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Feinstein has defended the administration on several intelligence-related issues, including the CIA’s embrace of lethal drone strikes. As one of the most senior Democrats in the Senate, she also has a reputation for remembering — and punishing — those who she believes have not treated her appropriately.

Brennan was Obama’s senior adviser on counterterrorism before the president picked him to head the CIA. His tenure could turn on whether the rank and file at the spy agency believe he has defended them against what they see as congressional Democrats’ unfair accusations of torture.

But neutrality may be difficult for the president to maintain. The tug of war over classified documents between an executive-branch agency and its congressional overseers has sharp constitutional overtones.

Obama is juggling political interests and legal precedent. He and previous presidents have long defended the executive’s right to withhold documents from Congress to ensure that advisers feel free to speak candidly without fear their words will later haunt them.

The tension was evident Thursday as the White House acknowledged that it withheld thousands of pages of documents from Feinstein’s Senate investigators out of “executive branch confidentiality interests.” McClatchy Newspapers reported that more than 9,000 documents were withheld.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said Obama’s aides believe the material — part of 6 million pages turned over — is not necessary to complete the Senate report, nearly five years in the making, on the so-called “enhanced interrogation” program launched by the George W. Bush administration after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

“All of these documents pertain to and come from a previous administration,” Carney said. “They have nothing to do with this administration. But these are matters that need to be reviewed in light of long-recognized executive prerogative and confidence — confidentiality interests.”

  • Gary Graves

    Obama tried to protect the presentiment of Bush Cheney. It would be a bad day for the expresident of the United States to be held on world charges of crimes committed. Still they do not respect Obama.

  • Softie

    Today’s liberalism is no different than its marxist, socialist, and communist ancestors.

    • Billie

      You don’t have a clue do you? Bush-Cheney should be tried for high treason. Their attack on Iraq was strictly for personal gain. They were foolish enough to think they could get in and get out in days and then put Halliburton in and fill their pocket with money. And what happened? A civil war in which over 4,000 American military were killed and over 20,000 permanently maimed. Not to mention the nearly million Iraqi citizens who were killed. Still as long as it’s a republican doing it, it’s okay with you and you ilk.

      • Softie

        Americans killed by democrat presidents in war during the 20th century total about 625,000. Not that far from 3/4 of a million. Here are the stats:Wilson (D) = 116,700 Americans killed in WWIRoosevelt (D) = 416,800 Americans killed in WW2Truman (D) = 34,000 Americans killed in KoreaLBJ (D) = 58,000 Americans killed in Vietnam”

        • lancesharpe

          What does that have to do with little bush invading Iraq lets blame Lincoln for the civil war he was a Republican.
          little bushes war was an international war crime.