Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Wednesday, October 26, 2016

One of the unsung blessings of Twitter is the way it continually reminds us that willful ignorance is alive and thriving in the American body politic.

In the past week, we were treated to widely retweeted photos purporting to show Capt. Ron Johnson of the Missouri Highway Patrol throwing a gang sign. The first controversial image showed up on an unvetted CNN social media webpage called iReport, and Internet trolls took it from there.

The only problem is that the hand sign in question was the greeting of Kappa Alpha Psi, a historically black fraternity of which Johnson is a member. He was posing with a frat brother.

Anybody could be forgiven for not knowing what the gesture meant. But the automatic imputation of criminal intent is a problem — actually, it’s the problem at the heart of the unrest that has gripped Ferguson, Missouri for nearly two weeks.

The very reason that a black Missouri highway cop’s image is on every TV in the land is that he’s been sent to Ferguson to restore order. After demonstrations and looting erupted there in response to the shooting death of 18-year-old African-American Michael Brown by a white police officer, the city’s police department made matters considerably worse with its over-the-top militarized response. Authorities needed to hit the reset button fast, and Johnson was part of that effort.

After relieving Ferguson police, the governor put Johnson in charge. It’s no coincidence a black man was put in command. Johnson’s cadence and tone when speaking, his use of Biblical references, convey to the black residents of Ferguson that he is one of them. His job is to restore order, but his standpoint for discharging that duty is understanding, empathy — the very qualities that apparently were heretofore lacking in the Ferguson Police Department.

We’ll see how it works out.

Meanwhile, law enforcement bodies nationwide ought to be thinking about how to clone him.

Three police officers out of Ferguson’s force of 53 are black, in a town where two-thirds of the residents are African-American. The much-repeated statistic is all too common. America’s police forces do not look like the communities they serve. They never have, not in the riots of the 1960s and not now.

The Washington Post analyzed Census records and found that more than three-quarters of cities on which data is available have a police force that’s disproportionately white.

For decades, the courts have been striking down affirmative action hiring measures, but the NAACP and the Justice Department have been just as effective at rooting out tests used to exclude minority applicants to police academies.

Many, perhaps most, racially skewed police departments acknowledge the problem. Indeed, the failure to attract diverse recruits goes far beyond discrimination against minority applicants. To be an African-American or Latino member of law enforcement opens one up to accusations of being “more blue than black” or “brown” — a traitor to the community, as it were. That attitude has to change.

Another handicap for minority applicants is educational attainment. The deplorable high-school graduation rates of Latinos and African-Americans hamper recruitment. So do criminal records. The Washington Post recently pointed out that while about 8 percent of Americans have felony convictions, for black men the national average is above 33 percent (thanks to the disproportionate impact of the war on drugs on minority communities). In some departments, simply having a family member who has been involved in the drug dealing can exclude a candidate.

Making sure people of color are represented in their police forces isn’t a mere question of tokenism. It’s about the police and the community understanding each other. It’s about closing gaps in experience and perception that lead unnecessarily to tragedy and further conflict.

Police and communities of color urgently need to have an honest dialogue. Community members need to acknowledge that policing comes with inherent dangers that the average person doesn’t always recognize. Everyone knows now that Michael Brown wasn’t armed, but did the officer who shot him know it at the time? We don’t know that answer yet.

By the same token, police forces need to acknowledge their own behavior and attitudes that have cultivated community perceptions of hostility, whether they believe those views are accurate or not.

It has to be a two-way conversation, and a frank, genuine one at that. The alternative is playing out on the streets of Ferguson.

Mary Sanchez is an opinion-page columnist for The Kansas City Star. Readers may write to her at: Kansas City Star, 1729 Grand Blvd., Kansas City, MO. 64108-1413, or via email at [email protected]

AFP Photo/Mat Hayward

Want more political news and analysis? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 The National Memo
  • Dominick Vila

    Let’s keep things in perspective before we cast blame across the board. Most law enforcement agencies, including police departments, are not like the one in Ferguson. Most police officers do what they are expected to do. They enforce the law and protect law abiding citizens.
    The challenge is to identify law enforcement departments that instead of doing what they are being paid to do, take advantage of their badge and their weapons to terrorize or kill people. The only recourse, when it is clear that an officer, or a police unit, is taking advantage of their position to abuse innocent people, suspects, and even prisoners, is to get rid of them and replace them with people who take their jobs seriously, train them well, and put emphasis on what their role is.
    A facet of this issue that deserves review involves the militarization of police departments. While well intended, the decision to provide excess military equipment to police departments, mostly in the aftermath of 9/11, has had horrible consequences and is projecting an image of America that most of us are embarrassed to see.

  • FT66

    The problem is not militarizing police, the problem lies mainly in “WRONG JUDGEMENT”. There was no need of anyone to authorise military equipment be used on own people. There was no need of police going after protesters, instead of guarding places thought to be looted. There was no need of police shouting to people instead of staying aside and watch. Even though we do not know all the details of what happened in the whole incident , to my opinion I presume it will come to making wrong judgement.

    • joe schmo

      Water canons were used in LA during the Rodney King riots. Do you have a problem with that? It actually curbed the violence and they helped put an end to the violence. I know this because my brother in law was LAPD. Did you also know that a water canon has such force that it can cut a person in half. It’s not the police that need to change. It’s the people causing the problems. What’s wrong with abiding by the law and just listening when a police officer says, ‘turn around and get on the ground and put your hands behind your back.’

      Less force begets more violence…. Just look at how the Middle East and Russia are treating us. You are living in a psuedo Utopian world if you think the world is much safer than it used to be……