Tag: college sports
Far Right Turns On Gov. Kristi Noem, GOP’s Rising Star

Far Right Turns On Gov. Kristi Noem, GOP’s Rising Star

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem appeared to be a rising Republican star. She'd gained national notoriety among the Republican Party and her relationship with former President Donald Trump only made her more popular among conservative voters in and around her state. But, now it appears that is changing because she is drawing ire not only from her party but also individuals on the other side of the political aisle.

According to The Daily Beast, Noem initially seemed to anticipate signing the state's controversial new piece of legislation targeting transgender athletes' rights. In fact, on March 8, the Republican governor tweeted her anticipation. "I'm excited to sign this bill very soon," Noem tweeted at the time.

However, it's been weeks since her tweet, and the bill has still gone unsigned as she continues to slowly back away from it. Days after the tweet, Noem's office noted that the bill was being evaluated as the governor sought subsequent changes to the bill's verbiage.

"I've heard from individuals, not businesses, and not particularly from the NCAA," Noem said during a press conference.

When top business and sports officials, including the Greater Sioux Falls Area Chamber of Commerce and the Sioux Falls Sports Authority, began to express their disdain about the piece of legislation and its possible financial impact, Noem did as well.

The publication reports that while the bill was being evaluated, "instead of targeting drafting errors, she wanted two sections of the bill tossed out and two other parts revised. In this new version, transgender athletes could play college sports."

So why the changes?

In states where similar laws have been passed, there has been some blowback. For example, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) withdrew from a number of events scheduled in North Carolina when the state passed a similar piece of legislation back in 2017.

While sweeping anti-transgender legislation has become has passed in multiple states, it does not look like Noem is sure about South Dakota being added to the list. Over the weekend, she unveiled the "Defend Title IX Now" an initiative to reform the 1972 gender equality sports law to approach the situation differently.

While she has expressed concern about girls and women being able to compete fairly in sporting events, the potential business impacts appear to have her rethinking the legislative effort. She released a statement explaining the rights of the NCAA as a "private association."

"The NCAA is a private association—that means they can do what they want to do," Noem said. "If South Dakota passes a law that's against their policy, they will likely take punitive action against us. That means they can pull their tournaments from the state of South Dakota, they could pull their home games, they could even prevent our athletes from playing in their league."

On Monday, Noem also said, "I'm still excited to sign the bill," she said on Monday. "We saw some things that needed to be corrected that can be done with a style and form revision. The part we needed to fix were a trial lawyer's dream."

However, lawmakers have criticized her remarks. According to State Rep. Fred Deutsch, a conservative Republican, Noem did not "have her eyes on the ball," the publication reported.

"My take only: She got into this situation because it was a historic year with COVID, marijuana, money, and more," Deutsch told the Daily Beast. He also noted that her team should have been involved from the preliminary stages of the proposed bill. "That led to her tweet that she looked forward to signing the bill even though she apparently hadn't yet read it," he said.

Top Reads For News Junkies: ‘The Cartel’

Top Reads For News Junkies: ‘The Cartel’

It’s March, and the Madness is on! As you agonize over your brackets and watch every development in the games with bated breath, take some time in between quarters to peruse The Cartel: Inside the Rise and Imminent Fall of the NCAA. The book is an excoriating investigation by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Taylor Branch into the NCAA, which generates billions of dollars in revenue, and yet not a cent comes down to the “student athletes” sweating on the court. Game on.

You can purchase the book here.

USC’s Pat Haden Fined $25,000 For ‘Inappropriate’ Sideline Conduct

USC’s Pat Haden Fined $25,000 For ‘Inappropriate’ Sideline Conduct

By Gary Klein, Los Angeles Times

USC Athletic Director Pat Haden and Coach Steve Sarkisian were reprimanded and Haden was fined $25,000 by the Pac-12 Conference for “inappropriate sideline conduct” during the Trojans’ 13-10 victory over Stanford on Saturday, Pac-12 Commissioner Larry Scott announced Monday.
Sarkisian summoned Haden to the sideline late in the third quarter after the coach was called for an unsportsmanlike-conduct penalty. Haden, a member of the College Football Playoff selection committee, interacted with officials.
Haden’s actions sparked controversy and calls for him to be removed from the committee.
“The conduct by USC Athletics Director Pat Haden was inappropriate,” Scott said in a statement. “Such actions by an administrator in attempt to influence the officiating, and ultimately the outcome of a contest, will not be tolerated.”
Haden issued an apology to Scott, game officials, Stanford and fans Sunday night “for any distraction I might have caused.” He also said he would stay off the sidelines for two games.
“The conduct by both Sarkisian and Haden were in clear violation of our conference’s standards of conduct policy,” Scott said. “We appreciate the public apology and recognition of the errors in judgment, as well as Pat Haden’s self-imposed two-game sideline ban. We took this into consideration as we determined the discipline. Nonetheless, the actions fell short of our expectation of our head coaches and athletics directors as role models for our student-athletes and important leaders of our institutions.”

Photo via Wikicommons

Interested in more sports and national news? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Northwestern Football Players To Vote On Unionization Friday

Northwestern Football Players To Vote On Unionization Friday

Last month, the National Labor Relations Board made a surprising decision that recognized football players at Northwestern University as employees of the university, and, consequently, gave them the right to unionize. On Friday, Northwestern football players will hold a vote that will determine whether or not the players uphold the NLRB’s ruling. And while the vote is fast approaching, its results will likely not be known for months.

When did the unionization process begin?

On January 28, 2014, Northwestern football players became the first college athletes to request representation from a labor union. The movement was originally started by former Wildcats quarterback Kain Colter, who reached out to the president of the National College Players Association (NCPA), Ramogi Huma, in the spring of 2013. In January, Huma filed a petition at the NLRB on behalf of the players. He also filed union cards, which establish a union as an individual’s exclusive bargaining mechanism, for an unknown number of Northwestern players. Huma told ESPN’s Outside The Lines:

This is about finally giving college athletes a seat at the table. Athletes deserve an equal voice when it comes to their physical, academic and financial protections.

The move is supported and backed by the United Steelworkers union.

What is the NCPA?

The National College Players Association is a major advocate for the unionization of college athletes. Huma, a former linebacker for the University of California, Los Angeles, established the association in 2001 after witnessing the injustices of the collegiate athletic system. In 1995, his teammate and football star Donnie Edwards gave an interview in which he said he had no food in his refrigerator. Upon returning home, he found $150 worth of groceries at his door, and was subsequently suspended by the NCAA for accepting the food that reportedly came from a sports agent. Conversely, the NCAA was simultaneously selling Edwards’ jersey for a handy profit. This convinced Huma that college athletes did not have a voice in such issues, a problem he seeks to address through the NCPA.

According to Huma, unionizing is not about money, but rather about covering medical expenses, confronting safety issues, and improving school-practice balance. In other words, issues  that are not always covered by scholarships (as recently illustrated by University of Connecticut star basketball player Shabazz Napier’s report that he sometimes went to bed hungry).

Why do Northwestern players want to unionze?

Kain Colter explained:

The action we’re taking isn’t because of any mistreatment by Northwestern. We love Northwestern. The school is just playing by the rules of their governing body, the NCAA. We’re interested in trying to help all players — at USC, Stanford, Oklahoma State, everywhere. It’s about protecting them and future generations to come.

Right now the NCAA is like a dictatorship. No one represents us in negotiations. The only way things are going to change is if players have a union.”

Northwestern students have pointed to the long hours required by football practice as business-like. Football players devote 50 to 60 hours per week to their sport in the month before the season starts, and 40 to 50 hours per week during the season. This is in addition to their normal academic activities, including going to class, doing homework, and finding time for meals and sleep.

Advocates for unionization have also made it clear that their primary priority is not getting paid more, but ensuring that their medical expenses are properly covered and that their scholarships finance the actual cost of attending college (when considering extenuating factors brought about by being an athlete).

That being said, the secondary goals of unionization include being able to accept corporate sponsorships and negotiating a share of the revenue that results from college games.

Why don’t some people want them to unionize?

Some Northwestern players have made it clear that they side with head coach Pat Fitzgerald’s opposition to the unionizing. According to an internal document obtained by CBS Sports, one player said:

This is not what we wanted. How can we get back to being students and not employees? Specifically student athlete status and not employees.

Fitzgerald partially framed the decision as one of loyalty, sending an email to his team reading:

Understand that by voting to have a union, you would be transferring your trust from those you know — me, your coaches and the administrators here — to what you don’t know — a third party who may or may not have the team’s best interests in mind.

Players have also been warned that unionizing could mean the end of Division I football at Northwestern, make it difficult for players to land jobs after graduating, scuttle plans for a $25 million athletic center, and hurt alumni donations. There has also been speculation that if players were to be treated as employees, their scholarships would be taxable. Currently, the Internal Revenue Service does not consider athletic scholarships taxable, nor does it tax them. Huma has argued that unionizing would not change the status of the scholarships.

How likely is unionizing?

At this point, the likelihood of the players deciding to unionize is unclear. Opinions seem split down the middle, and players are not required to vote if they feel uncomfortable; 76 players are eligible to vote, but many have avoided questions regarding their opinions on the matter.

Regardless of the vote’s outcome, it is unlikely that the public will know of its results soon. If players do vote to unionize, it is highly likely that an appeal will be filed by the university for consideration by the full NLRB. If the university refuses to comply or bargain with players, the case could go to court.

Photo: Party_Of_Five via Flickr