The stories you want. The opinions that matter.
No, thanks
Tag: european court of human rights
European Court Condemns Poland For Hosting Secret CIA Prisons

European Court Condemns Poland For Hosting Secret CIA Prisons

Strasbourg (France) (AFP) — Europe’s top human rights court condemned Poland on Thursday for hosting secret CIA prisons on its territory, saying Warsaw knowingly abetted unlawful imprisonment and torture of Guantanamo-bound detainees.

The European Court of Human Rights ruled in favor of a Palestinian and a Saudi national who were held in a U.S. detention centerfor several months in Poland in 2002-2003 before being transferred to the U.S. military prison in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The Polish government “enabled the U.S. authorities to subject the applicant to torture and ill-treatment on its territory”, the ECHR said in its rulings over the cases of Palestinian Abu Zubaydah, 43, and Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, 49, of Saudia Arabia.

The men’s lawyers had argued before the Strasbourg court that during their detention, they were repeatedly tortured by waterboarding.

The ECHR also found Warsaw guilty of allowing the men to be sent to places where they faced torture, further detention, and “flagrant denial of justice”.

The government was ordered to pay 100,000 euros (135,000 dollars) in damages to each plaintiff.

A decade later, both men remain at Guantanamo, and have as yet not had a hearing before a U.S. judge.

Poland has three months to appeal the decision to the Strasbourg court.

A spokesman for the foreign ministry told AFP the government had “no comment for the moment”, and that it would prepare a reaction for later on Thursday.

Poland’s president at the time, Aleksander Kwasniewski, was quoted by Polish news agency PAP as saying, “I respect the verdicts of independent tribunals, but I will not comment on them.”

An investigation into the detainees’ treatment was opened in Poland in 2008 but is still not concluded — a situation that has been condemned by the UN’s anti-torture body.

Poland is one of a number of European countries accused of having assisted the United States in its extraordinary rendition of suspected terrorists from the Middle East, Pakistan and Afghanistan to Guantanamo, in the wake of the September 11 attacks.

Macedonia was condemned by the ECHR in December 2012 over the case of Khaled el-Masri, a German of Lebanese origin who was arrested in Macedonia at the end of 2003 and transferred to a CIA prison in Afghanistan, where he was held in secret for five months.

AFP Photo / Mladen Antonov

Interested in world news? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

France Can Outlaw Full-Face Veil, Rules European Human Rights Court

France Can Outlaw Full-Face Veil, Rules European Human Rights Court

dpa

STRASBOURG, France — A French public ban on clothing that hides the face was upheld by the European Court of Human Rights on Tuesday in a decision that will have ramifications for 47 nations.
The case was brought by a French Muslim woman who said the ban on traditional garments like the burqa or the niqab — which either cover a woman’s entire body or just her face, usually only with an opening for the eyes — violated her rights.

While the court agreed that the law could impinge upon her religious freedoms and served no obvious public safety purpose, it argued that the law did not single her out as a Muslim.

More important, it ruled that the law served the greater good of trying to promote greater cohesion in society. That goal would be harder to ensure if people were allowed to hide their faces.
“The ban complained of could therefore be regarded as proportionate to the aim pursued, namely the preservation of the conditions of ‘living together,'” the ruling stated.

France passed a law in 2011 that bans such coverings because they are seen as promoting inequality. Anyone caught wearing the garment is fined $205.

The court’s rulings are binding for all 47 member states, meaning the decision clears the way for other countries to ban full-face veils. No appeal is possible.

The plaintiff, a 24-year-old woman who did not want to be named, argued that she had chosen to wear the burqa without any pressure from friends or family and said it allowed her to feel an “inner peace” that she was denied outside her home because of the public ban. Her lawyer also said she now feared retribution for her stance.

Amnesty International lashed out at the ruling.

“It represents a profound retreat for the right to freedom of expression and religion and sends a message that women are not free to express their religious beliefs in public,” it said in a statement.

“If one strips the court’s ruling to its barest essence, it is saying you cannot wear full-face veils because it makes people feel uncomfortable. This is not grounds to ban behavior or a form of expression — religious or otherwise — that in itself does no harm to others,” said John Dalhuisen, Amnesty’s Europe and Central Asia program director.

The French Interior Ministry estimates that about 2,000 women in that country are affected by the ban. The ban does not name the traditional Muslim dress by name, but refers to anything that covers the face. Exceptions are allowed for motorcycle helmets, athletes and masked artists.

Belgium has a similar ban.

Photo via WikiCommons

Interested in world news? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!