Tag: federal investigation
 Rep. Matt Gaetz

Feds Probing Gaetz Over Possible Bribery In Bahamas Sex Trip

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

As the investigation into Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) continues, federal authorities are now taking a more in-depth look at his infamous trip to the Bahamas.

According to CNN, sources with knowledge of the investigation have revealed prosecutors working for the U.S. Department of Justice's Public Integrity Section are trying to determine whether or not the Florida lawmaker "took gifts, including travel and paid escorts, in exchange for political favors."

Investigators are now looking for evidence of "potential public corruption." Insiders also suggest that investigators are "scrutinizing Gaetz's connections to medical marijuana, both in terms of legislation he has sponsored and his connections to people involved in the industry, searching for so-called pay-to-play arrangements."

The Florida lawmaker has a reputation for advocating for medical marijuana and has supported a number of legislative actions in hope of passing the measure. The publication notes that one of Gaetz's close associates, Jason Pirozzolo, is a Florida doctor and founder of a medical cannabis advocacy group. In the past, he has also been described as a "marijuana investor." According to multiple reports, Pirozzolo is said to have traveled to the Bahamas with Gaetz.

The latest news comes as Gaetz faces an ongoing investigation into his alleged involvement with a 17-year-old girl. So far, multiple women have come forward with details about his alleged drug usage and wild parties. The Florida lawmaker's ally, former Seminole County tax collector Joel Greenberg, is also at the center of the scandal, and remains under arrest while facing dozens of federal criminal charges.

Last summer, Greenberg was hit with those multiple charges when federal investigators arrested him on charges of stalking and child sex trafficking -- which opened the door for an investigative probe that subsequently uncovered details about his ties to Gaetz.

As of April 24, Gaetz and Pirozzolo have not been accused of crimes but the investigation is ongoing.

Toyota To Pay $1.2 Billion Federal Fine To Settle Acceleration Probe

Toyota To Pay $1.2 Billion Federal Fine To Settle Acceleration Probe

By Jerry Hirsch, Los Angeles Times

Toyota Motor Corp. has agreed to pay a $1.2 billion fine to settle a four-year federal criminal investigation into whether it properly reported safety complaints about the sudden acceleration of its vehicles to regulators.

It is the largest penalty of its kind ever imposed on an automotive company, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said Wednesday.

In the agreement with the Department of Justice, the Japanese automaker admitted that it misled U.S. consumers by concealing and making deceptive statements about two safety issues affecting its vehicles, each of which caused a type of unintended acceleration. The case focused on reports of floor mats jamming gas pedals and sticking gas pedals.

“Toyota put sales over safety and profit over principle,” said George Venizelos, assistant director of the FBI. “The disregard Toyota had for the safety of the public was outrageous. Not only did Toyota fail to recall cars with problem parts, they continued to manufacture new cars with the same parts they knew were deadly.”

The automaker was formally charged with one count of wire fraud, but if it abides by the settlement terms, the Justice Department will defer prosecution for three years and then seek to dismiss the charge.

“Rather than promptly disclosing and correcting safety issues about which they were aware, Toyota made misleading public statements to consumers and gave inaccurate facts to members of Congress,” Holder said.

Car owners “have a right to expect that their vehicle is safe” and manufacturers must be forthright about safety issues and fix them quickly, he said.

“Entering this agreement, while difficult, is a major step toward putting this unfortunate chapter behind us,” said Christopher P. Reynolds, chief legal officer, Toyota Motor North America. “In the more than four years since these recalls, we have gone back to basics at Toyota to put our customers first.”

Reynolds said the automaker has made significant operational changes to become a more responsive company.

Toyota has improved quality control, responded more quickly to customer concerns, and strengthened regional autonomy and decision-making, he said.
Safety advocates said the settlement will grab the attention of the entire auto industry.

“It is a game changer,” said Clarence Ditlow, executive director for the Center for Auto Safety.

Safety advocates have long held two goals — unlimited civil penalties and unlimited criminal penalties “and the Justice Department settlement with Toyota make both a reality,” Ditlow said.

The fine is close to 350 times the maximum penalty that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration can levy on an automaker.

But the “possibility of criminal penalties is now front and center with automakers and that will change their behavior far more than a civil penalty ever will,” Ditlow said.

“Other car companies should not repeat Toyota’s mistake: A recall may damage a company’s reputation, but deceiving your customers makes that damage far more lasting,” Holder warned.

Toyota still faces a Securities and Exchange Commission investigation, according to a regulatory filing the automaker made last year.

Meanwhile, Toyota’s lawyers are in settlement talks over hundreds of civil lawsuits alleging wrongful deaths or injuries, potentially adding hundreds of millions to the tab.

Previously, Toyota agreed to pay $1.6 billion to settle a class-action case brought by thousands of Toyota owners who contended that sudden-acceleration problems damaged the value of their vehicles.

Toyota has faced sudden-acceleration complaints since 2009, after a California Highway Patrol officer and his family were killed when a Lexus ES crashed outside San Diego. That crash is thought to have been caused by a floor mat jamming the gas pedal in the open position. But investigators said the car was too badly damaged to be sure.

In the months after that wreck, Toyota recalled millions of vehicles, and its top executives came from Japan to testify before several congressional committees investigating the problem.

Toyota has repeatedly denied that its vehicles have an electronic flaw that might cause them to accelerate unexpectedly. Toyota has blamed such incidents on three possible causes: drivers mistaking the gas pedal for the brake; gas pedals getting stuck under floor mats; or sticky gas pedals that don’t throttle back quickly as foot pressure eases.

A 10-month investigation, conducted primarily by NASA engineers, found no evidence that electronic defects or software code errors could have caused the thousands of sudden-acceleration incidents reported over the last decade. That review blamed the incidents on the same mechanical issues identified by Toyota.

Last year, however, an Oklahoma City jury found that faulty electronic systems caused a Camry sedan to suddenly accelerate and crash, killing one woman and injuring another.

“The settlement with the Justice Department focuses on a narrow area, what they disclosed on floor issues and sticky pedals. But it still doesn’t get to what Toyota knew about the vehicle electronics,” said Sean Kane, president of Safety Research & Strategies.

“The NASA probe was a great start but the conclusion doesn’t match the study,” he said. “The study found a handful of electronic problems that need to be explored further.”

Photo: Toyota Motor Europe via Flickr

New Federal Investigation May Be More Damaging To Christie’s Presidential Ambitions Than Bridgegate

New Federal Investigation May Be More Damaging To Christie’s Presidential Ambitions Than Bridgegate

Things are going from bad to worse for Governor Chris Christie (R-NJ).

Already embroiled in a scandal over lane closures on the George Washington Bridge in September, the Republican governor now faces greater scrutiny as federal auditors have launched an investigation into the way he used Superstorm Sandy relief funds.

The probe comes months after New Jersey representative Frank Pallone (D) penned a letter to the Inspector General of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, in which he questioned how Christie spent funds approved for marketing purposes.

The new inquiry will review where the $25 million in Sandy relief money actually went and ensure the governor used taxpayer money to promote tourism in New Jersey rather than advance his own political agenda.

Pallone and other Democrats have long expressed suspicion about the odd bidding process that resulted in Christie hiring an advertising firm charging $4.7 million in the wake of Sandy over the alternative, which charged only $2.5 million at the time. The main difference between the two firms involved their marketing plan proposals: The one that charged the most money featured Christie and his family in the advertisements, while the other did not include either.

Even Republican senator Rand Paul (KY) suggested a “conflict of interest” occurred when Christie spent $25 million on commercials in which he appeared, while he also happened to be running for re-election.

On Monday, Christie spokesman Colin Reed responded to news of the investigation, brushing it off as “routine and standard” and noting that the governor’s plan had been approved by the Obama administration.

“We’re confident that any review will show that the ads were a key part in helping New Jersey get back on its feet after being struck by the worst storm in state history,” Reed added.

Christie’s much-praised response to the storm helped lead him to a landslide re-election, which made him one of the top contenders for the White House in 2016. However, several Republicans — including Fox News’ Roger Ailes — believe that the governor’s embrace of President Obama, days after the storm and just before the 2012 presidential election, cost Mitt Romney the presidency.

If the report finds that Christie wasted or misused taxpayer funds, this will damage his image as a small-government conservative and inflame a sore memory for many on the right.

Rasmussen Reports poll released Friday found that a majority of New Jersey voters – 54 percent – “believe it’s at least somewhat likely that Christie was aware” that traffic lanes on the George Washington Bridge were closed as an act of retaliation against Fort Lee mayor’s refusal to support the governor’s re-election.

Additionally, 56 percent believe that Christie should resign if it is proven that he knew about and approved the closures – which would also signify he lied when he apologized and vowed he was neither aware nor involved.

The latest federal investigation into Christie’s use of Sandy relief funds also raises questions about the governor’s ability to prioritize governing over his presidential ambitions.

“This was money that could have directly been used for Sandy recovery,” Pallone said. “And, as you know, many of my constituents still haven’t gotten the money that is owed them to rebuild their homes or raise their homes or to help.”

According to Pallone, had the governor decided to hire the less expensive firm, he would have been able to distribute grants worth $50,000 each to 44 “Sandy-impacted” homeowners.

Photo: Gage Skidmore via Flickr