Tag: flight attendants
Can Exhausted Americans Make The Most Of The 'Great Resignation'?

Can Exhausted Americans Make The Most Of The 'Great Resignation'?

Amazing to read that over 4 million Americans quit their jobs in September — part of a mass labor pullout being called the Great Resignation. The social and economic chaos unleashed by COVID-19 has apparently jumbled pre-pandemic assumptions.

Many of the job leavers have used the downtime time to re-imagine what they want out of life and are concluding that "work no longer fits into that picture," Barron's reports.

Where is this going? The answer depends on what the resignees did before they terminated their employment. Most probably don't plan to permanently erase paid work from their future but rather to take some personal time off. Best situated for trying out leisure are those who kept their paychecks during the shutdowns.

Others working the front lines may be quitting out of exhaustion. We speak of health care professionals burdened with treating thousands of dying patients. Or retail workers forced to confront mentally unbalanced shoppers throwing tantrums over mask mandates.

Same goes for flight attendants who had do deal with nasty, crazy passengers. Those who stayed on the job deserve a medal for valor, but it's understandable that some of their colleagues turned in their wings.

After a rest, many of these burnout cases may drift back into the work world. Some may have seen the labor shortage reducing the risk of temporary unemployment. They figured they could always get a job when the money runs out.

It's true that many of us learned how to make do with less. But making do with less is not the same as living on nothing. And Americans in general have not exhibited a genius for financial planning.

About 51% have less than three months of emergency savings, according to the website Bankrate. For those with only three months' worth who quit in September, the clock runs out in December.

Some Americans are reportedly moving their retirement up a few years. As for those we hear about with plans to retire at the tender age of 55, one must ask: Who the heck are they? Heirs? Lucky techies? Survivalists?

These child retirees may lack the assets usually prescribed for breadwinners choosing a standard retirement age. After all, a couple leaving the work force at 65 may need $300,000 just to cover health care expenses, Fidelity estimates.

A retirement adviser revealed to Barron's what he has to tell some clients seeking an early exit: "This isn't going to work out unless you're not planning on living past 75." With life spans growing, he cautions people even in their late 60s to amass enough savings to last 30 years.

This is not to dismiss the value of using the Great Resignation to reassess one's priorities. Many of us experienced the sweetness of more time at home with self-cooked meals, simple wardrobes and no commute.

But work is in the American DNA. An Italian friend once asked me why the Rockefellers work. I responded that in our culture, people find dignity in work.

In 1883, Theodore Roosevelt abandoned his soft life in New York to do brutal ranch work in the North Dakota badlands. "Far and away the best prize that life offers is the chance to work hard at work worth doing," he said, not surprisingly.

Also, having a place outside the home to socialize, such as an office, has psychological benefits. A way to stay moored to others, it wards off loneliness, which can lead to anxiety and depression.

But Americans need the money, too — even if not as much as they thought before. The proceeds from a job that doesn't crush the soul plus a better handle on spending could be the lovely flower that grows out of the Great Resignation.

Follow Froma Harrop on Twitter @FromaHarrop. She can be reached at fharrop@gmail.com. To find out more about Froma Harrop and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators webpage at www.creators.com.

Melanoma Risk Is Higher For Flight Crews That Work At 40,000 Feet

Melanoma Risk Is Higher For Flight Crews That Work At 40,000 Feet

By Karen Kaplan, Los Angeles Times

Attention pilots and flight attendants: For your safety, please fasten your seat belts, note the location of the aircraft’s emergency exits — and be sure to apply plenty of sunscreen to reduce your risk of melanoma.

When it comes to the risks of flying, skin cancer may not be the first health hazard that comes to mind. But a new study in JAMA Dermatology says that pilots are 2.22 times more likely than folks in the general population at large to be diagnosed with melanoma. For members of the cabin crew, the risk was 2.09 times greater.

Melanoma is the sixth most common cancer in the United States, according to the National Cancer Institute. Although other types of skin cancer are diagnosed more frequently, melanoma is more likely to be fatal, the American Cancer Society says. An estimated 76,100 Americans will be diagnosed with melanoma this year, and about 9,710 will die from it.

Dozens of studies have examined melanoma risk in flight crews, since working at 40,000 feet means greater exposure to cosmic rays and ultraviolet radiation. For the new study, researchers from the University of California, San Francisco combed through data on 266,431 participants in 19 published studies to see whether the danger was real — and if so, how big it was.

They found that for pilots and flight attendants, the risk of developing melanoma was more than double the risk seen in people who worked on the ground. However, only pilots faced an increased risk of death from the cancer — their mortality risk was 83 percent greater than for those in the general population. (For those who worked in the main cabin, the risk of dying from melanoma was actually 10 percent lower.)

The study authors noted that exposure to cosmic radiation is not likely to be a factor for melanoma. Many studies have measured the cosmic radiation that finds its way into a plane, and the amount is “consistently below the allowed dose limit of 20 mSv/y,” or 20 millisieverts per year. (A typical American is exposed to about 3.6 mSv per year, according to this report from the Environmental Protection Agency.)

UVB radiation probably isn’t the culprit either, since fewer than 1 percent of this radiation can penetrate aircraft windshields, the researchers wrote.

UVA, on the other hand, can penetrate glass, and the higher a plane flies, the more intense UVA radiation becomes. When planes fly above clouds or snow-covered mountains, they are exposed to even more UVA reflected from below, the researchers wrote. Studies of cells in lab dishes and in animals show that UVA damages DNA, causing the mutations that can lead to cancer.

It’s possible that when they are on the ground, pilots and flight attendants are bigger fans of activities that would increase their risk of melanoma, such as frequenting tanning salons. So far, there’s no hard data suggesting that this is the case, the UC San Francisco researchers wrote.

Instead, they noted that multiple studies have found that the more hours a member of the flight crew spends in the air, the more likely he or she is to be diagnosed with melanoma.

AFP Photo/Saul Loeb

Interested in health news? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!