Tag: governor
Former GOP Governor Warns Trump Bill Will Devastate Rural Health Care

Former GOP Governor Warns Trump Bill Will Devastate Rural Health Care

The Republican-controlled. Senate is expected to vote Monday night on President Donald Trump's signature domestic policy legislation, and one former high-ranking Republican is now urging his fellow conservatives to take a stand against it.

During a Monday segment on MSNBC's "The Weeknight," former Montana Governor Marc Racicot — a Republican who led the Big Sky State between 1993 and 2001 — slammed the bill as uniquely harmful for Americans in rural states like his. After hosts Michael Steele, Symone Sanders-Townsend and Alicia Melendez played a clip of Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX) defending the bill as good for the country, Racicot blasted his fellow Republicans as being in thrall of an "autocrat" and being more afraid of angering Trump than hurting their own constituents.

"That's patent nonsense. It's absolutely ludicrous," Racicot said. "In the state of Montana ... we have 56 counties. We're spread over 150,000 square miles, and 50 out of our 56 counties do not have the kind of facilities that allow for people to be treated without Medicare and without Medicaid."

"We don't have rural clinics or hospitals that can respond," he continued. "In addition to that, we have we have seven Indian reservations that, again, are placed in in harm's way ... the infrastructure that we put in place as a result of Medicaid serves those families as well. So it's just unbelievable to me that these Republicans would proceed thinking that they're people of conscience, and somehow they're doing something good for the country. I don't think they even know what's in the bill."

The Senate's version of the legislation already cuts Medicaid by roughly $1 trillion over 10 years, meaning many rural hospitals in predominantly red states like Montana are at risk of closing if the current version of the bill is signed into law. Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va) has already acknowledged that her constituents could be deeply impacted by the legislation.

Racicot went on to opine that one main reason the bill could be passed is because Republicans in Congress are operating "upon the basis of bigotry and the whining and complaining and grievance and resentment" of their fellow Americans. He added that it was "incredibly unfortunate" that so many members of his party were working "to the great detriment of the people of this country."

"What I'm really fearful of is that when they find out what this does, when they learn what it is — and I wish we could avoid the catastrophe — but I'm fearful we can't avoid this calamity until it happens," Racicot said. "And then it's going to be an ultimate disaster."

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Gavin Newsom

Fox Lies Obscure The Facts About Trump-Newsom Phone Dispute

A Fox News anchor, the network’s White House correspondent, and two of its prime-time hosts all apparently decided to lie to their audiences on Tuesday about a dispute over when Donald Trump last spoke to California Gov. Gavin Newsom, with each dissembling over what Trump or Newsom said rather than admitting that the president was wrong. And Trump’s own furious response to an inaccurate Fox chyron apparently set off that Orwellian chain of events.

A reporter asked Trump at an Oval Office event on June 10 when he last spoke with Newsom, whom the president has suggested should face arrest for his handling of rioting in the Los Angeles area. Trump replied that he called Newsom “a day ago” to criticize his response.

Newsom’s X account quickly reposted the video clip of the Oval Office exchange, saying, “There was no such call.”

As is often the case with Trump, it’s difficult to determine whether the president had been deliberately lying about the call, accidentally misspoke, or had some sort of senior moment. But the president quickly doubled down — albeit while directly proving his own initial statement was inaccurate.

Fox “news side” anchor John Roberts discussed the dispute a dozen minutes after Newsom’s post. He aired the video of Trump saying he had called Newsom “a day ago,” and provided Newsom’s post on X “pushing back.” Roberts promised to “try to get to the bottom of that and find out when the call actually happened."

Notably, on-screen text during the segment read, “Newsom says Trump never called him over L.A. riots.” That’s not true — Newsom responded on X to Trump’s claim that they had spoken “a day ago,” but the governor previously discussed a call with the president that he said occurred “late Friday night, about 1:30 plus, his time” in which he said Trump “never once brought up the National Guard."

That error may have proved crucial. The president, who is notorious for his obsession with Fox’s programming, was apparently watching Roberts’ show on Air Force One and took the time to quickly call the anchor to respond, as Roberts relayed on-air a half hour after his initial segment. He told viewers that Trump had told him he had a call with Newsom that lasted 16 minutes on which the president told the governor to “get his ass in fear and stop the riots” and that he produced “evidence” Newsom was “a liar."

Roberts also posted Trump’s statement on X, as well as an image of a call log showing that Trump placed a call to Newsom at 1:23 a.m. ET on June 7 (for Newsom, in California, 10:23 p.m. PT on June 6). MAGA influencers quickly presented that as case-closed proof that Newsom had lied and Trump had been vindicated.

The “evidence,” as Trump put it, that he spoke with Newsom on June 6/7 does disprove the claim from the inaccurate Fox chyron that Trump “never called” the governor. But Trump producing proof of a June 6/7 call to which Newsom already attested, but not the June 9 call he claimed, also suggests the latter did not occur. It only proves Trump’s Oval Office statement correct if one pretends that June 6/7 occurred the day before June 10.

Telling Fox viewers that the president was wrong about something, however, is not really in the job description for the network’s employees — such acts of reporting could even irritate the network’s audience enough to drive them to a competitor.

Roberts finessed that difficulty on-air by lying to his viewers about what the president had initially said. The Fox anchor claimed that Trump had said in the Oval Office that he phoned Newsom “the other day, maybe yesterday,” while not calling attention to the fact that the call log he had obtained placed the call several days earlier.

JOHN ROBERTS (ANCHOR): President Trump is winging his way to Fort Bragg, North Carolina aboard Air Force One. He is clearly watching the program and saw that we said that Gavin Newsom claimed that the call that the president alluded to that was made the other day, maybe yesterday, never happened. Well, the president told me this in recent moments. He said the first call was not picked up. The second call Gavin picked up. We spoke for 16 minutes. I told him to essentially “get his ass in gear and stop the riots, which were out of control.” More than anything else, this shows what a liar he is. He said I never called, here is the evidence. We will see if the California governor responds to that, but that from President Trump before Air Force One just a couple moments ago.

In another report on the dispute the following hour, Roberts again hid that Trump had been wrong, falsely claiming the president had said he spoke to Newsom “yesterday or the other day.”

Notably, neither of Roberts’ segments about Trump’s response aired the video of Trump’s June 10 claim that he had spoken to Newsom “a day ago,” which had been included in the initial report that provoked the president.

Others on Fox followed Roberts’ lead in shielding their viewers from the fact that Trump had said something that wasn’t true.

Peter Doocy, Fox’s White House correspondent, aired Trump saying he spoke to Newsom “a day ago” in a segment on Special Report, the network’s flagship “news side” broadcast. But he then suggested Trump’s response to Roberts disproved Newsom’s denial, saying, “Newsom then claimed, ‘There was no call, not even a voice mail.’ A screenshot of an iPhone call log provided to Fox's John Roberts shows two calls from the president to Newsom on Saturday. One lasted for 16 minutes.”

Fox’s hardcore Trump propagandists, of course, were all-in on the notion that Trump had caught Newsom in a lie.

Trump crony and Fox prime-time host Sean Hannity claimed on his radio show, “I just love when politicians get caught red-handed in a lie. Gavin Newsom saying that Trump never even called him, and Donald Trump actually takes a picture of his phone showing that they talked … for 16 minutes."

Jesse Watters, whose show generally amounts to a reheated TV version on the day’s takes from MAGA influencers, aired a version of Trump’s Oval Office statement about his call with Newsom that was cut to exclude the president’s statement that the exchange happened “a day ago.” Watters then lied about Newsom’s response.

“Newsom responded and he said there wasn't a phone call — he said Trump never called him, not even a voice mail, he said,” Watters claimed. “But John Roberts got Trump's call logs and it shows Trump called him late Friday night and they talked for 16 minutes."

“Why would Newsom lie and claim Trump never called him? Why would he do that?” Watters asked.

Watters also falsely claimed on The Five that “Gavin Newsom said Trump never called me. Trump showed his phone to John Roberts, he had a 16-minute conversation."

Watters added, “They just tell you you are not seeing what you are seeing and think they can get away with it."

Indeed.

Reprinted with permission from Media Matters.

Rambling Incoherently On War, Trump Threatens Protesters With 'Very Big Force'

Rambling Incoherently On War, Trump Threatens Protesters With 'Very Big Force'

President Donald Trump made a series of inaccurate claims in his remarks on Tuesday, conflating World War I and World War II, incorrectly suggesting he spoke with the governor of California on Monday when it was just after midnight Saturday morning, and asserting—contrary to the First Amendment—that protests, even peaceful ones, can be shut down with “heavy force.”

During remarks to reporters in the Oval Office, Trump was asked when he last spoke with California Governor Gavin Newsom. “

A day ago,” he said Tuesday afternoon, which was three and a half days after the governor confirmed his phone call. Trump also confirmed the call by sending a screenshot to a Fox News reporter. The screenshot read June 7, 1:23 AM.

“Recently, other countries celebrated the victory of World War I, France was celebrating, really,” Trump told troops at Fort Bragg on Tuesday afternoon. “They were all celebrating. The only one that doesn’t celebrate is the USA and we’re the ones that won the war. Without us, you’d all be speaking German right now. Maybe a little Japanese thrown in. But we won the war.”

The United States was part of a coalition during both WWI and WWII. Trump was speaking about WWI, but then claimed, “Without us, you’d all be speaking German right now. Maybe a little Japanese.”

That’s a reference to World War II—Japan was on the side of the Allies, with the U.S., in WWI.

Also on Tuesday, Trump declared that anyone caught protesting his controversial military parade on Saturday will be met with “very heavy force,” despite the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution clearly protecting political protests.

“We won the war, and we’re the only country that didn’t celebrate it, and we’re going to be celebrating big on Saturday,” Trump claimed. Veterans Day was initially created as Armistice Day to honor those who died in World War I.

“And if there’s any protestor that wants to come out, they will be met with very big force. By the way, for those people that want to protest, they’re gonna be met with very big force. And I haven’t even heard about a protest, but, you know, this is people that hate our country, but they will be met with very heavy force.”

The First Amendment protects both political speech and the right to “petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

Trump did not state “violent protestors,” or “rioters.” He said “any protestor.”

Watch the videos above or at this link.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Trump Demands Removal Of Unflattering Portrait In Colorado Capitol

Trump Demands Removal Of Unflattering Portrait In Colorado Capitol

You’d think President Donald Trump would have enough on his plate, what with singlehandedly tanking the economy and threatening to deport his political enemies. Yet he somehow found time to complain that a portrait of himself in the Colorado Capitol is too ugly to be his.

“Nobody likes a bad picture or painting of themselves, but the one in Colorado, in the State Capitol, put up by the Governor, along with all other Presidents, was purposefully distorted to a level that even I, perhaps, have never seen before,” the president posted on Truth Social on Sunday evening.

“The artist also did President Obama, and he looks wonderful, but the one on me is truly the worst,” he added, before criticizing the artist and making the crude remark that “she must have lost her talent as she got older.” Trump also demanded that the state’s Democratic governor, Jared Polis, take the picture down.

“Gov. Polis was surprised to learn the President of the United States is an aficionado of our Colorado State Capitol and its artwork,” spokesperson Shelby Wieman said in a statement to Axios.

By Monday afternoon, the Associated Press reported that the portrait would be taken down.

The painting, created by Colorado-based artist Sarah Boardman, was unveiled on Aug. 1, 2019, according to The Denver Post. It shows Trump in a dark suit and red tie, and hangs in the Gallery of Presidents in the rotunda Colorado Capitol.

It’s no surprise that Trump, a well-documented misogynist, would insult the female artist behind the “distorted” portrait. Boardman has a long resume showcasing her talents, but she’s painted only two presidential portraits for the state—the ones of Obama and Trump. The other 43 presidents were painted by the late artist Lawrence Williams, who died before he could finish Obama’s portrait.

Boardman, who proudly includes the Trump portrait on her online resume, previously told The Denver Post that she aimed for both Obama and Trump’s portraits to feel apolitical.

“In today’s environment it’s all very upfront, but in another five, 10, 15 years he will be another president on the wall,” Boardman said. “And he needs to look neutral.”

Trump has a massively inflated sense of self, of course, so it’s unclear if “many people from Colorado,” as he claims, have actually called to complain about the portrait. Interestingly, it was the people of Colorado—and Republicans, in particular—who spearheaded the effort to commission and fund the painting in 2018.

According to The Denver Post, Kevin J. Grantham, then the president of the Colorado state Senate, raised nearly $11,000 in an online fundraiser for the portrait after no donations had been received to fund the commissioned work more than a year into Trump’s first term.

That said, it’s also unclear why Trump believes the governor was involved in the artistic direction of the painting or what triggered this outburst in the first place.

Following his tantrum, Trump posted two additional photos of himself on Truth Social, seemingly to share pictures he considered, uh, more flattering. However, he probably would’ve been better off not sharing—for the entire world to see—the portrait he supposedly despises.

Reprinted with permission from Daily Kos.

Shop our Store

Headlines

Editor's Blog

Corona Virus

Trending

World