The stories you want. The opinions that matter.
No, thanks
Tag: same sex couple
N.C. Republican Dinged For Defending Right To Fire Gays

N.C. Republican Dinged For Defending Right To Fire Gays

By Franco Ordonez, McClatchy Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — As House Democrats made a Hail Mary attempt to force a vote on laws to protect gays in the workplace, Rep. Robert Pittenger (R-NC) continues to stand by comments he made earlier this month that businesses should be free to fire employees based on their sexual orientation.

Pittenger has been criticized for the remarks, but he said in a statement Wednesday that Americans are already well-protected. Current laws against discrimination should be enforced to the fullest, he emphasized. But he said Americans need more jobs and a stronger economy, not more regulations that stifle growth.

“It’s incredibly hard to operate or start a business already, and I don’t think America is begging for more obstacles to an economic recovery,” he said in the statement. “Where does it stop? Is the next regulation going to prohibit a layoff even during an economic downturn? Will the next law mandate full employment?”

Pittenger stirred up the gay rights debate when he told liberal political blog ThinkProgress this month that governments shouldn’t “impose on the freedoms we enjoy.” Asked his opinion about the Employment Non-Discrimination Act pending in Congress, Pittenger compared adding more laws to protect gays in the workplace to smoking bans — which he said are fine for public places, but he questioned the government role when it comes to private spaces.

The debate has pitted many Democrats and Republicans against each other. House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) has shown no interest in taking up legislation passed by the Democratic-led Senate last year that would prohibit workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

On Wednesday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) sought to force the hand of Pittenger, Boehner, and other Republican opponents. She joined other Democratic leaders in announcing a procedural push to force a vote on the bill.

“Unfortunately in South Carolina and 28 other states it is still legal to discriminate against people based on their sexual orientation,” Assistant Democratic Leader James Clyburn of South Carolina said Wednesday during a news conference. “And that is, plain and simple, wrong.”

Asked at the news conference about Pittenger’s remarks to ThinkProgress, Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO) said he did not have the context to comment on them.

Gay rights activists called Pittenger’s comments “absurd” and argued that discrimination in the workplace because of someone’s sexual orientation goes against American values.

“Representative Pittenger’s ill-informed opinion is also not consistent with the fair-minded opinion of most Americans,” said David Stacy, government affairs director for the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights organization. “The vast majority of Americans back commonsense workplace protections for LGBT Americans.”

Staffers for Pittenger said they’ve received no negative calls about his comments and that no constituents brought the issue up at any of Rep. Pittenger’s 13 town hall events over the last two months.

Pittenger, a Charlotte real estate investor, said he has an “open, non-discriminatory policy” and has hired members of the gay community. More than 96 percent of the top 50 Fortune 500 companies include sexual orientation in their non-discrimination policies, according to the Williams Institute. And, according to Pittenger, that’s the more appropriate place for these decisions to be made, in the free market. More government intervention is not the answer, he said.

“Where does the government’s role in dictating our daily lives end?” Pittenger asked in his statement. “That’s the debate we should be having.”

Samantha Ehlinger of the Washington Bureau contributed to this report.

Photo: Robert Pittenger (R-NC) via YouTube

Interested in U.S. politics? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Federal Government Halts Deportation of Undocumented Immigrant in Same-Sex Couple

ICE officials in Newark have cancelled the deportation of Henry Velandia, an undocumented Venezuelan immigrant married to an American graduate, in a case that has drawn national attention for its possible ramifications for undocumented immigrants and same-sex couples.

Mr. Velandia and his husband, Josh Vandiver, were married in Connecticut—one of five states, along with the district of Washington, D.C., that recognize same-sex marriage. (New York will become the sixth state on July 30.) Under the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), however, the spouses of undocumented immigrants cannot petition for legal residency for their same-sex partners—a right long afforded to heterosexual couples.

Even though the administration has said it will not defend DOMA in court, the Justice Department has stated it will continue to enforce the law, including in immigration cases. The cancellation of Mr. Velandia’s deportation, therefore, represents a significant development in terms of federal treatment of married same-sex couples. The New York Times reports:

On June 9, [the couple’s attorney Lavi] Soloway received a call from Jane H. Minichiello, the chief counsel at the Newark office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement [ICE], an arm of the Homeland Security Department, informing him that the agency had agreed to his request to close the deportation proceedings. According to Mr. Soloway, Ms. Minichiello said pursuing Mr. Velandia’s deportation “is not an enforcement priority at this time.” [NYT]

The decision to cancel Mr. Velandia’s deportations follows recently issued policy guidelines from ICE, expanding the criteria federal attorneys and agents can consider in choosing whether to deport undocumented immigrants. In particular, the memo encourages ICE officials to focus on those convicted of violent crimes or repeated immigration violations.

In addition, the memo suggests leniency for immigrants who meet certain qualifications, including college students and military personnel¬¬. As the International Business Times notes, the memo also lists “ties and contributions to the community, including family relationships,” as positive factors in weighing deportation [IBT]. ICE has not stated that it will halt deportation for other undocumented immigrants married to American citizens. But the case may well represent a long-term shift in federal treatment of same-sex couples, as well as undocumented immigrants more broadly.