Tag: state abortion restrictions
Another Day, Another Abortion Restriction

Another Day, Another Abortion Restriction

The tan business envelope is postmarked Jan. 31, 1957. It is addressed to “MISS JANEY BEBOUT,” arriving via airmail from Annapolis, Maryland. Not to her home but to the house of a sympathetic aunt who could keep a secret, one town away in Ashtabula, Ohio.

The sole content of the envelope is one sheet of paper, crackly with age and separating at the folds. It is a form letter from the Maryland secretary of state’s office detailing requirements for marriage.

The letter reads, in part:

“IT SHALL BE UNLAWFUL WITHIN THIS STATE FOR ANY FEMALE BELOW THE AGE OF SIXTEEN YEARS OR FOR ANY MALE BELOW THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN YEARS TO MARRY. … EXCEPT ON THE CERTIFICATE OF A LICENSED PHYSICIAN, WHICH SHALL BE PRESENTED FOR THE APPLICATION FOR THE MARRIAGE LICENSE, TO THE EFFECT THAT THE GIRL IS PREGNANT.”

Note how the law insulated boys from adulthood a little longer, the better to preserve their options.

Maryland required no blood tests. The application fee for a marriage license was $1; if granted, the license cost an additional $2.

On the day this envelope was mailed, Janey was an unmarried 19-year-old, four months pregnant with me. She and my 20-year-old father would marry 11 days later in Cumberland, Maryland, after fleeing — “eloping,” she insisted to her children, “because we were so in love” — their family farms in the middle of the night.

I recognize my mother’s loopy handwriting in dark blue ink on the back of the envelope. She noted the mileage on my father’s car before they started driving and the total upon their return after a short honeymoon in Washington, D.C. She chronicled their gas stops, too, most in $1 increments.

They were two farm kids with virtually no money and no plan beyond saving my mother from a lifetime of public humiliation as an unwed mother. In 1957, marriage was her only option.

I just, this week, discovered this envelope. In a curious twist of timing, I found it one day after Ohio Gov. John Kasich vetoed the so-called heartbeat bill but signed into law his 18th restriction on a woman’s constitutional right to abortion. This latest one prevents a woman from getting an abortion after 20 weeks, which is when many medical abnormalities are first detected. No exceptions for rape or incest and a limited one to protect a mother’s life.

Kasich is not fooling anyone who’s paying attention, including Dawn Laguens of the Planned Parenthood Action Fund:

“(Kasich) may hope that by vetoing a six-week ban — which would have virtually banned abortion with almost no exceptions — he comes off as moderate,” Laguens said in a statement. “The 20-week ban will force women to travel long distances and cross state lines in order to access safe, legal abortion.”

Right-wing extremists who support laws such as this are driven by an insatiable desire to shame women. They want us to feel dirty and immoral and unworthy in the eyes of God as they define him.

Most of these legislators are men whose maleness exempts them from ever knowing what it feels like to have no control over their bodies or their daily lives. If they are impotent, they can take a drug to give them erections. If they want to have unprotected sex, they can do so without worrying about what an unplanned pregnancy would do to their bodies and their health, their families and their future.

These men will never know the desperation of scraping up enough money for a plane ticket, a train ticket, bus fare or gas for the tank of a car to get them to a state that still protects a woman’s constitutional right. They do not worry about bringing into the world children they — and we as communities — cannot afford.

My mother had no option but to give birth to me. Some readers who oppose abortion rights love to remind me that my mother didn’t abort me. Far too many of them wish aloud that she had, and isn’t that an interesting approach for people claiming to cherish life?

The discovery of that envelope reminds me, yet again, of what it was like not so very long ago for women like my mother. From the moment she found out she was pregnant until she and my father made that middle-of-the-night journey to a state that would marry them, she lived in fear of being exposed as an unmarried woman who dared to have sex.

A devout Christian, she was pro-choice when abortion rights became the law of the land, in 1973. A devoted mother, she encouraged all of her daughters to visit Planned Parenthood before having sex. “Stay in control of your life,” she once told me.

My mother never fully shed the shame of her unplanned pregnancy all those years ago.

“I still would have had you,” she told me when I was 36 and a newly single mother. “It just would have been so different here” — she pointed to her heart — “if the choice had been all mine.”

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist and professional in residence at Kent State University’s school of journalism. To find out more about Connie Schultz (con.schultz@yahoo.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

IMAGE: Demonstrators hold signs outside the U.S. Supreme Court as the court is due to decide today whether a Republican-backed 2013 Texas law placed an undue burden on women exercising their constitutional right to abortion in Washington, U.S. June 27, 2016. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Missouri Governor Jay Nixon Vetoes ‘Extreme’ Abortion Bill

Missouri Governor Jay Nixon Vetoes ‘Extreme’ Abortion Bill

In a week when the federal government placed even more restrictions on women’s rights, there was a silver lining on the state level: Governor Jay Nixon (D-MO) vetoed an extreme abortion bill on Wednesday.

House Bill 1307 would have tripled the mandatory waiting period before an abortion to 72 hours, which would have given Missouri the longest waiting period in the country, along with Utah and South Dakota. Since the bill does not provide an exception for rape and incest, it also would make Missouri, along with South Dakota, the only states with such a long waiting period and no exceptions.

“This extreme and disrespectful measure would unnecessarily prolong the suffering of rape and incest victims and jeopardize the health and wellbeing of women,” Nixon said. “By failing to include an exception for rape and incest, House Bill 1307 demonstrates a callous disregard for women who find themselves in horrific circumstances and would make Missouri one of just two states in the nation to take such an extreme step. Lengthening the already extensive waiting period serves no demonstrable purpose other than to create emotional and financial hardships for women who have undoubtedly already spent considerable time wrestling with perhaps the most difficult decision they may ever have to make.”

The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Chuck Gatschenberger (R), said in April that the bill was completely reasonable, and compared abortion to purchasing a new car.

“In making a decision to buy a car, I put research in there to find out what to do,” he said.

Missouri’s current abortion law is still pretty extreme. Women have to wait for 24 hours before they can have an abortion, which is already a serious restriction, especially on women who have to travel far and suffer financial duress in order to receive medical care. Missouri only has one abortion clinic, in St. Louis.

The current law also requires doctors to present their patients with materials explaining the possibility of an abortion causing pain to the fetus, and an image and ultrasound depicting the heartbeat of the fetus. Doctors also must provide women with materials that explicitly state that “the life of each human being begins at conception. Abortion will terminate the life of a separate, unique, living human being.”

The bill was pushed through Missouri’s GOP-controlled House and Senate, and is only one of more than 30 anti-abortion bills that have been proposed this year. Women’s rights advocates protested the bill for 72 straight hours in May, to no avail.

The legislature will decide whether to override the veto in September. According to News-Press Now, “they could have the numbers to do so.” An override would require more than two-thirds of the vote in both chambers; the bill passed the House with more than two-thirds of the vote, and the Senate was one vote short, with one Republican absent.

Missouri isn’t the only state attempting to make abortion even harder for women to access. In June, Governor Bobby Jindal (R-LA) signed a bill that could force three of Louisiana’s five abortion clinics to close. Governor Rick Scott (R-FL) signed a bill in June that would make abortion illegal for a woman if doctors determined that the fetus would be viable if born. New abortion laws also went into effect in Alabama and Mississippi on July 1.

In fact, more state abortion restrictions went into effect from 2011-2013 than in the last decade as a whole.

Photo: GovernorJayNixon via Flickr

Interested in U.S. politics? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!