Tag: ted yoho
#EndorseThis: AOC Humiliates Republican Bully Yoho On House Floor

#EndorseThis: AOC Humiliates Republican Bully Yoho On House Floor

Today's video isn't funny, unless you're amused by bullying misogynist members of Congress – in this instance, a rather obscure Florida Republican named Ted Yoho who has suddenly achieved a moment of fame by insulting the celebrated Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY).

Evidently furious over remarks she had made connecting poverty and crime, Yoho braced AOC on the Capitol steps, loudly berated her -- and then indelibly proved his originality and intellect by calling her "disgusting" and "fucking bitch." (Rep. Roger Williams (R-TX) joined in Yoho's tirade and later pretended not to have heard his colleague's obscene outburst. What a coward.)

If you know anything about AOC -- a young leader from the Bronx who doesn't play -- then you must know she would never accept such aggression from anyone. Following a self-pitying "sorry not sorry" non-apology from Yoho on the House floor, she delivered her response, on behalf of her mother and father and abused women everywhere.

Watch her eloquent answer and please share it, because at last one of these sleazebags got what was coming to him.



Despite Diehard GOP Opponents, House Passes Anti-Lynching Bill

Despite Diehard GOP Opponents, House Passes Anti-Lynching Bill

The House on Wednesday overwhelmingly passed the Emmett Till Antilynching Act — a piece of legislation that finally designates lynching a federal hate crime.

However, while 410 members of Congress voted for the bill — including every House Democrat in attendance — three Republicans and one Republican-turned-independent voted against the legislation.

Republican Reps. Louie Gohmert of Texas, Thomas Massie of Kentucky, and Ted Yoho of Florida all voted against the bill — a piece of legislation that Congress has tried and failed to enact nearly 200 times over the last century, according to the Washington Post.

Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan, a Republican who left the party and became an independent in 2019 over his opposition to Trump, also voted against it.

Another five Republicans had voted against the bill, but changed their votes to yeas before the vote ended, according to CNN’s Haley Byrd.

Among the GOP lawmakers who changed their vote at the last minute was Rep. Steve King, the Iowa Republican who has had his committee assignments stripped last year over comments supporting white supremacism.

Reps. Paul Gosar of Arizona, Chip Roy of Texas, Andy Biggs of Arizona, and Ralph Norman of South Carolina also first voted against the bill before changing their vote to yea.

Yoho told CNN’s Manu Raju that he voted against the bill because he believes it’s an “overreach of the federal government.” The three others who voted against the bill have yet to comment.

Democrats, however, hailed the passage of the bill, which is named for Till — a 14-year-old black teenager who was brutally beaten and then lynched in Mississippi back in 1955. Two men were charged with Till’s murder but were found not guilty by a jury of all white men.

Rep. Bobby Rush, the Illinois Democrat who introduced the bill, said in a statement that the bill’s passage marks a “historic day for this U.S. House of Representatives, this Congress, and the American people.”

“With the passage of this bill we correct a historical injustice, based on a lie, that took the life of this young man,” Rush said in the statement. “We also bring justice to the over 4000 victims of lynching, most of them African-Americans, who have had their lives tragically, and horrifically cut short at the hands of racist mobs and hate-filled hordes.”

“After 120 years, and 200 failed attempts, the House finally positions itself on the right side of history, outlawing the heinous act of lynching once and for all,” Rush added.

The bill now heads to the Senate, where it is not expected to face opposition.

The Senate passed the exact same bill by a voice vote last year, and Rush told the congressional newspaper Roll Call that he has been “assured” the Senate would pass the bill again by the end of the week.

If the Senate passes the bill as Rush said, it ill head to Donald Trump’s desk for signature next.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.

Photo Credit: Gage Skidmore
This Week In Crazy: #Benghazi Caused The ‘Charlie Hebdo’ Attack, And The Rest Of The Worst Of The Right

This Week In Crazy: #Benghazi Caused The ‘Charlie Hebdo’ Attack, And The Rest Of The Worst Of The Right

Welcome to “This Week In Crazy,” The National Memo’s weekly update on the wildest attacks, conspiracy theories, and other loony behavior from the increasingly unhinged right wing. Starting with number five:

5. Curt Schilling

Curt Schilling

Photo via Wikimedia Commons

On Tuesday, the Baseball Hall of Fame announced its four-member class of 2014: Randy Johnson, Pedro Martinez, John Smoltz, and Craig Biggio. Former Red Sox star Curt Schilling received 39.2 percent of the vote from the Baseball Writers Association of America, leaving him well short of the 75 percent threshold for induction. And he thinks that he knows why:

“I think he got in because of [Greg] Maddux and [Tom] Glavine. I think the fact that they won 14 straight pennants. I think his ‘Swiss army knife versatility,’ which somebody said yesterday, I think he got a lot of accolades for that, I think he got a lot of recognition for that. He’s a Hall of Famer,” Schilling said of Smoltz, while comparing their cases during a Wednesday interview. “And I think the other big thing is that I think he’s a Democrat and so I know that, as a Republican, that there’s some people that really don’t like that.”

That’s right: The liberal sports media is blackballing Schilling from the Hall because he’s a Republican!

Unfortunately for Schilling, his case is pretty thin. For one, his statistical case for enshrinement is pretty borderline. Furthermore, if Major League Baseball has any political leanings, they are decidedly conservative. And contrary to Schilling’s accusations, Smoltz is actually an outspoken Republican who has donated thousands of dollars to the GOP and campaigned for far-right candidates such as Ralph Reed and Karen Handel.

But that’s not to say that Schilling’s political leanings couldn’t hurt his Hall of Fame case. For example, following his high-handed opposition to government bailouts with a plea for a government bailout for his own failing company couldn’t have thrilled Hall of Fame voters who are tasked with evaluating candidates based on their “integrity” and “character.”

4. Ted Yoho

Photo: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Photo: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

On Tuesday, the right flank of the GOP House majority attempted to overthrow Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) and replace him with a more conservative leader. Despite the best efforts of Tea Party heroes like Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin, the effort failed; Boehner won re-election, and swiftly moved to punish the dissidents.

Rep. Ted Yoho (R-FL) was one of the rebels; he voted for himself as the new Speaker. And as he explained to WorldNetDaily’s Radio America on Wednesday, there’s a word for the consequences of democratic elections: Communism!

“We’ve grown up in a country that honors free speech. If I can’t speak what’s on my mind, if I can’t do what the people of my district sent me up here [to do] and have that voice of dissension without fear of retribution, I’m not in a free country,” the large-animal veterinarian turned congressman explained. “That would be something you would expect in China, Cuba or any other communist country.”

Right Wing Watch has the audio:

Thankfully, Yoho probably doesn’t have to fear Boehner’s Stalinist crackdown. After all, he only managed to secure two votes on Tuesday afternoon.

3. Phyllis Schlafly

Photo: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Photo: Gage Skidmore via Flickr

Like many Americans, Tea Party matriarch Phyllis Schlafly is concerned about the huge number of sexual assaults that take place on college campuses. But thankfully, Schlafly has a solution: Stop women from going to college.

“Long ago when I went to college, campuses were about 70 percent male, and until 1970 it was still nearly 60 percent. Today, however, the male percentage has fallen to the low 40s on most campuses,” Schlafly wrote in her latest column for WorldNetDaily.

Naturally, according to Schalfly, this shift has caused college men to completely abandon ethics and adherence to the law.

“Boys are more likely than girls to look at the cost-benefit tradeoff of going to college,” Schlafly explains. “The imbalance of far more women than men at colleges has been a factor in the various sex scandals that have made news in the last couple of years.”

“So, what’s the solution?” she continues. “One solution might be to impose the duty on admissions officers to arbitrarily admit only half women and half men. Another solution might be to stop granting college loans, thereby forcing students to take jobs to pay for their tuition and eliminate time for parties, perhaps even wiping out time for fraternities and sororities.”

Yes, Schlafly’s solution to stop assault in colleges is to limit the amount of women and poor people who can attend. Amazingly, this qualifies as a moderate opinion for her.

2. Bill Donohue

Screenshot: YouTube

Screenshot: YouTube

The horrific attack on Charlie Hebdo spawned no shortage of terrible responses from pundits, but Catholic League president Bill Donohue is in a class of his own.

In a statement on Wednesday, Donohue defended the terrorists who murdered a dozen people in cold blood. After all, the victims were pretty much asking for it.

Those who work at this newspaper have a long and disgusting record of going way beyond the mere lampooning of public figures, and this is especially true of their depictions of religious figures. For example, they have shown nuns masturbating and popes wearing condoms. They have also shown Muhammad in pornographic poses.

While some Muslims today object to any depiction of the Prophet, others do not. Moreover, visual representations of him are not proscribed by the Koran. What unites Muslims in their anger against Charlie Hebdo is the vulgar manner in which Muhammad has been portrayed. What they object to is being intentionally insulted over the course of many years. On this aspect, I am in total agreement with them.

Stephane Charbonnier, the paper’s publisher, was killed today in the slaughter. It is too bad that he didn’t understand the role he played in his tragic death. In 2012, when asked why he insults Muslims, he said, ‘Muhammad isn’t sacred to me.’ Had he not been so narcissistic, he may still be alive. Muhammad isn’t sacred to me, either, but it would never occur to me to deliberately insult Muslims by trashing him.

That’s right: Maybe if Staphane Charbonnier hadn’t been such a narcissist, terrorists wouldn’t have stormed into his office and killed him without remorse.

In fairness to Donahue, he did try to straddle both sides of the fence, saying, “Killing in response to insult, no matter how gross, must be unequivocally condemned.” But the overall message of his statement is impossible to miss.

This is probably why Donohue prefers to fight his wars against imaginary opponents, like cartoon characters and anti-Christmas storm troopers.

1. Rush Limbaugh

But when it comes to Charlie Hebdo-related stupidity, nobody tops this week’s “winner,” Rush Limbaugh.

Limbaugh didn’t go as far as Donohue and blame the victims for the attack. Instead, he picked a much more familiar target: President Obama.

According to Limbaugh, the massacre never would have taken place if Obama hadn’t lied about Benghazi.

“By going to the UN and saying a video was responsible for the death of a U.S. ambassador and three other Americans when it wasn’t. By sending Susan Rice on five Sunday morning talk shows to spread that lie, to run ads in Afghanistan or Pakistan starring Obama and Hillary, continuing this lie — these actions have consequences, ladies and gentlemen,” Limbaugh said.

“But we have a false narrative here, as it’s now called in the drive-by media,” he continued. “We got a false narrative ever since Benghazi happened. And my point is this country’s leadership has fed the beast. This country’s leadership has fed the rage. And not just this country — all of western civilization, which is cowering in fear. All the civilized world afraid to deal with this for what it is. All the western thinking closing Gitmo will solve it, getting out of Afghanistan will solve it. All we’re doing is trumpeting our weakness.”

Thus, Charlie Hebdo joins Ferguson and the Sony hack as news stories that Limbaugh linked to Benghazi.

It’s all fun and games until the House Oversight Committee starts investigating it.

Check out previous editions of This Week In Crazy here. Think we missed something? Let us know in the comments!

Get This Week In Crazy delivered to your inbox every Friday, by signing up for our daily email newsletter.

This Week In Crazy: Clinton Conspiracies, Coups, And The Rest Of The Worst Of The Right

This Week In Crazy: Clinton Conspiracies, Coups, And The Rest Of The Worst Of The Right

Welcome to “This Week In Crazy,” The National Memo’s weekly update on the wildest attacks, conspiracy theories, and other loony behavior from the increasingly unhinged right wing. Starting with number five:

5. Louie Gohmert

U.S. Representative Louie Gohmert (R-TX), who infamously once warned Americans of the grave threat posed by foreign “terror babies,” graduated to a new target this week: toddlers.

Speaking on the House floor on Monday, Congressman Gohmert argued that young children shouldn’t get legal status in the United States — because they don’t pay taxes.

After recounting the story of “a three-year-old [who] had someone convince them that they needed to try to get here,” Gohmert explained that this undermines the case for comprehensive immigration reform.

“We have people saying, oh, if we just legalize everybody that is here, all of this new tax money will come flooding in,” Gohmert said. “There can be no debate that young children who are not working, even if they are legalized, for those who make the argument, gee, look at all the tax money that the federal coffers will be getting if we just legalize everybody here, that is a bogus argument. It is a strained argument by people who want more people coming in illegally.”

Indigent toddlers weren’t the only target of Gohmert’s speech; he also accused President Obama of being “complicit” in sex trafficking, by “luring” vulnerable children into the U.S. with promises of amnesty.

His speech can be seen below, in all its illogical glory, via The Raw Story:

In related news, Gohmert and the GOP are still waiting for their poll numbers among Hispanic voters to skyrocket.
4. Ted Yoho

Earlier this month, Kentucky senator Rand Paul warned his fellow Republicans that they should ease up on their efforts to make it harder to vote, saying, “It’s wrong for Republicans to go too crazy on this issue because it’s offending people.”

On Tuesday, Right Wing Watch provided a handy example of what Paul was talking about. The website posted a newly discovered video of U.S. Rep. Ted Yoho (R-FL) suggesting that instead of a voter ID, citizens should have to present a deed to cast a ballot.

“I’ve had some radical ideas about voting and it’s probably not a good time to tell them, but you used to have to be a property owner to vote,” Yoho told a cheering crowd at Berean Baptist Church in Ocala, Florida, during his 2012 campaign.

Yoho added that early voting through absentee ballots is “a travesty,” and lamented that Florida governor Rick Scott’s decision to reduce early voting — which he later reversed under significant political pressure — didn’t go far enough.

Yoho is right about one thing: It’s never a good time to tell voters that you are running on Bryan Fischer’s “poor people shouldn’t vote” platform.

Despite this latest revelation, Yoho remains the most normal Republican candidate in Florida’s 3rd congressional district.

3. Bryan Fischer

Speaking of Fischer, the hate group leader checks in at number three for offering a Clinton conspiracy double play on the Wednesday edition of his show.

While discussing the right-wing meme that Hillary Clinton’s 2012 concussion rendered her brain damaged, Fischer took a moment to launch a new conspiracy theory: Bill Clinton is secretly sabotaging his wife’s still-nonexistent campaign.

“The fact that Bill Clinton dropped that little nugget, to me that was inexplicable,” Fischer said of the former president’s recent comments on Hillary Clinton’s recovery. “Unless maybe some part of Bill Clinton does not want Hillary to be president in 2016.”

Fischer’s evidence? Well, he doesn’t have any. But he has a feeling that Bill Clinton “doesn’t want to share the limelight. Doesn’t want to share the glory. And maybe he doesn’t want the media tracking his every move, for reasons I think are obvious to you and me.”

If The Daily Beast’s David Freedlander ever writes an update to his piece on the Clinton Crazies, Fischer is sure to be his first call.

2. Allen West

On Wednesday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) announced the five Democrats who will serve on the Benghazi select committee.

It may not shock you to learn that former congressman Allen West disapproves of Pelosi’s picks. But even by West’s standards, the content of his complaint is startling.

During an appearance on The Janet Mefford Show, West questioned the patriotism of Rep. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), saying, “I just don’t know where her loyalties lie.”

“You know, for her to have been a veteran, a wounded warrior for the United States Army, she should know that this is not the right thing,” West elaborated. “And hopefully, you know, she will remember the oath of office that she took as an Army officer and not the allegiance I guess she believes she has to the liberal progressives of the Democrat Party.”

This seems like a good time to mention that Duckworth lost her legs and partial use of her right arm during her service in Operation Iraqi Freedom, and was awarded a Purple Heart for her service.

West’s military career ended when he was forced into retirement rather than face a court martial for assaulting an Iraqi detainee during an interrogation.

The former congressman didn’t limit his criticism to Duckworth; he also told Mefford that Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA) is “one of those geeky little debaters that is going to try to micromanage every single detail” — because who wants a stickler for the facts in a federal investigation? — and that Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-CA) has a “very whiny way.” It almost makes one wonder what West would have said if Pelosi had bowed to left-wing pressure and named Rep. Alan Grayson (D-FL) to the committee.

Ultimately, it’s not surprising that West is angry with Pelosi’s choices for the committee. After all, letting Democrats participate in the process is clearly just another distraction from #Benghazi.

1. Larry Klayman

larry klayman

This week’s “winner” is right-wing activist Larry Klayman, who is calling for a “Second American Revolution” to stop Hillary Clinton from becoming the next president of the United States.

Writing in WorldNetDaily — which recently featured an article under the charming headline, “‘Worst’ fire season still better than Obama” — Klayman warns that “the possible election of the female partner of the Bonnie and Clyde duo of Bill and Hillary Clinton would usher in the death knell of the United States of America.”

Explaining that he “fought the Clintons tooth and nail during the 1990s…having pursued them for their commission of a host of crimes, ranging from Whitewater, to China-gate, to Travel-gate, and Monica Lewinsky-gate to name just a few of the 40 or so of their misdeeds,” Klayman writes that Bill and Hillary Clinton “would resume their practice of selling off anything of value for their political expediency…In effect, the entire country would be put up for sale at a Bonnie and Clyde auction to further subjugate the American people to political slavery under their rule.”

In fairness to his nemeses, Klayman does acknowledge that at least “they are not black Muslim-sympathizers like Obama and his racist comrades.” But still, Clinton is too popular for Republicans to stop — so the right wing must take matters into their own hands.

“All of this is why We the People must wage our Second American Revolution now, before it is too late, to free the nation and ourselves of the scourge of the likes of the Obamas and Clintons,” Klayman writes. “If we do not do it now, then all is likely to be lost.”

If Klayman’s plan to overthrow the government sounds familiar, it’s because he tried to do so less than a year ago. It didn’t work out. But if Klayman is serious about trying again, I know where he can find literally dozens of supporters.

Stay tuned for next week’s edition of the list, when Klayman claims that his stupid column was actually written by the DNC.

Check out previous editions of This Week In Crazy here. Think we missed something? Let us know in the comments!

Get This Week In Crazy delivered to your inbox every Friday, by signing up for our daily email newsletter.