Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Monday, September 25, 2017

Reprinted with permission from AlterNet.

No, Donald Trump did not become “presidential” when he embraced Democratic leaders’ plans to fund hurricane relief and keep the government open through December.

No, Trump did not become “bipartisan” when he temporarily abandoned Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan in favor of Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi.

“What Trump did do last week, whether he knows it or not, is create a governing coalition of 150 Republicans and all Democrats,” says Politico. Whether Trump is willing and able to use this potential coalition to govern is the question that will dominate Washington through the end of the year. The prospects are not bright.

After all, Trump had a stronger governing coalition, at least on paper, when he came to office with a slim majority of Republicans in the Senate and a solid majority of Republicans in the House. He misplayed that hand into an impressive record of failure: defeat on repealing Obamacare; no progress on funding a border wall; and no action on tax reform, tax cuts or launching an infrastructure jobs program.

His self-incriminating behavior on the investigation of possible collusion with Russia during the 2016 campaign, in which he embroidered his foolish actions with outright lies and bald confessions, alienated would-be GOP allies. So did his ham-handed demands and threats to Republicans who objected to his antics.

If nothing else, with this latest gambit Trump has bought himself the possibility of a new start. Aligning himself with Democrats makes him look, if only for a moment, like a president willing to work with the opposition to get something—anything!—done. He has abandoned his dysfunctional alliance with the congressional Republicans and their unpopular agenda in favor of freedom of maneuver.

Trump is now, as Peter Baker in the New York Timessays, “in many ways, the first independent to hold the presidency since the advent of the current two-party system around the time of the Civil War.”

Desperate for a “win,” Trump could use his newfound independence to stabilize his presidency. But will he?

Bipartisan Steps

On health care, a sensible solution to the problems of the Affordable Care Act is beckoning. Senators Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and Patty Murray (D-Wash.) are preparing legislation that would shore up Obamacare health care markets and end the Trump administration’s gratuitious efforts to undermine the program.

The goal is to fund a key set of Obamacare subsidies known as cost-sharing reduction payments. Five governors urged Congress and Trump to fund the payments, which reduce deductibles and co-pays for lower-income enrollees, at least through 2018.

Having jettisoned the hard-right Freedom Caucus in the House, Trump now has the flexibility to endorse “five bipartisan steps toward stabilizing the health care system.”

And he has Senate leaders, independent of McConnell, who are willing to act.

“I’m going to sit down with Sen. Murray and with other senators and come to a conclusion about what I think we can pass,” Sen. Alexander said last week. “I want to be able to take to Sen. McConnell and Sen. Schumer a consensus proposal within 10 days or so.”

If Trump endorses the legislation, its chances of becoming law are good. Shoring up Obamacare would give him a substantive win and deliver real benefits to his constituents.

The only problem: to have real effect, Trump would have to act quickly, and he seems resolutely uninterested.

The president just cut funding for outreach programs to inform people of the ACA open enrollment season for the express purpose of sinking the law. He is pushing for another vote to repeal Obamacare, this time via the legislation of Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), Dean Heller (R-Nev.) and Bill Cassidy (R-La.)

Trump has separated himself from the congressional Republicans, but cannot separate himself from his core passion of undoing President Obama’s legacy.

Schumer’s Jobs Plan

Ditto on the president’s ever-receding plans for a trillion-dollar infrastructure jobs program. White House adviser Steve Bannon talked up the idea, but Trump’s Republican allies expressed no interest. Now Bannon is gone and Trump has thrown in with the Democrats.

If Trump were serious about a jobs program, he has a solution waiting on Chuck Schumer’s shelf. It’s called “A Blueprint to Rebuild America’s Infrastructure,” a well-thought-out proposal to use public spending to create jobs and upgrade the country’s decaying infrastructure.

The Democrats’ 10-year blueprint includes $75 billion for schools, $210 billion for roads and bridges, $110 billion for aging water and sewer systems, $180 billion for expanded rail and bus lines, $70 billion for deeper ports and upgraded airports, $100 billion for an updated electrical grid, $10 billion for VA hospitals, and $20 billion for broadband installations.

Back in January, Schumer introduced the plan as a way to drive a wedge between the new president and congressional Republicans. Now that Trump is at odds with GOP leadership, the president could go one step further and bring in Democrats as partners in governing by adopting Schumer’s plan as his own.

Congressional Democrats would jump at the chance to enact a real jobs agenda and moderate congressional Republicans outside the South would be enticed by the concrete benefits of such a plan. Trump’s loyal base would go along, and Democrats would have little choice but to moderate their hostility toward the president, at least on economic issues.

The problem is that Trump isn’t serious about creating jobs. He is serious about privatization schemes, euphemistically known as “public-private partnerships,” that enrich politically connected investors. Talking about “jobs for Americans” is Trump’s hook to sell the gullible on a policy payday for his cronies and allies.

Embracing Schumer’s jobs plan would require Trump to change his way of doing business. Even the big potential benefits of joining forces with the Democrats on jobs seems unlikely to overcome the president’s preference for grift.

As his reaction to neo-Nazi marchers in Charlottesville confirmed, Trump’s populism is fundamentally animated by race, not economics. He would rather attack the legacy of President Obama than improve the health care system. He would rather be “America’s first white president” than America’s first jobs president.

He could save his presidency, but he prefers to be himself.

 

Jefferson Morley is AlterNet’s Washington correspondent. He is the author of the forthcoming biography The Ghost: The Secret Life of CIA Spymaster James Jesus Angleton (St. Martin’s Press, October 2017) and the 2016 Kindle ebook CIA and JFK: The Secret Assassination Files.

 

 

5 Responses to Trump Might Be About To Launch His Dumbest Gambit Yet To Save His Presidency

  1. What has been shaping up decades is now upon us—the transformation of a bitterly partisan system into a Banana Republic, complete with monkeys in suits and one sporting a pompadour. With a so-called “economic nationalist”(whatever that means) back at Breitbart eager to toss bombs at the current ruling despots in Congress, a befuddled Donald peeved that the previous President makes him look like a petulant knave who escaped detention, the rise of racism and nihilism presented by the Alt-Right, and Conservative Ideology gripping millions in a paralysis of Will to move beyond the Dark Ages of bigotry, greed, fear of dark-skinned humans, and stodginess, there is nothing of significance on the bleak political landscape except a setting sun of immorality and confusion.

  2. “Trump can’t” “Trump won’t” how long will people continue to use these words as if they had meaning?

    Trump may or may not throw in on an infrastructure plan. He may or may not support a plan to salvage Health Care. (In my opinion better chances if he can sell it as a repeal and/or rename it TrumpCare).

    Logic and rationality are not Trump. Predicting Trump is an exercise in futility.

    Suggest we look at each Trump proposal as it comes and support anything we feel will benefit the country. Just don’t expect consistency.

    • Yes, it’s difficult to predict what a mentally ill person (a psychopath) will do:

      Psychopath definition from Merriam-Webster: a person who is mentally ill, who does not care about other people, and who is usually dangerous or even violent

      And even those outside America agree: ‘Malignant narcisissm’: Donald Trump displays classic traits of mental illness, claim psychologists
      http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/donald-trump-mental-illness-narcisissm-us-president-psychologists-inauguration-crowd-size-paranoia-a7552661.html

      It’s truly unfortunate that the 2016 election highlighted the voting ignorance of the American electorate (millions of Americans too clueless to discern a mentally ill person when one was staring them in the face) and our country is now stuck with a psychopath as its president.

      • Psychology is not my field, I1. I can’t make those calls.

        I view it that we can not rationalize the inherently irrational.

        Instead, let’s focus on what we can do. Starting with removing Republicans from any office we can.

        • And one way to do that (remove more Republicans from office), would be to someehow get millions more Americans to wake up and realize, that the Republican party hoodwinked them by intentionally allowing a mentally ill person (which every politician should have clearly seen long ago) to represent their party in a national election for president; which allowed the Republican party to then juryrig the election which put that mentally ill person in the Oval Office to govern the nation; just so the Republican party can advance it’s evil corporate/fascist agenda.

          Exactly how do you propose to change the mindset of millions of Independents and clueless Republicans who are now still supporting the GOP and Donald Trump despite the fact that the party has clearly displayed its treasonous ways; which haven’t changed these idiots mindset? What major pivotal issue for the nation is going to change these people’s minds if it’s not making the case that the GOP has INTENTIONALLY allowed an insane person to become the nation’s president??

Leave a reply