Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Monday, September 26, 2016

July 8 (Bloomberg) — Looking at the news from Washington a little more than a week ago, Americanophiles in Turkey were confused: Was the U.S. moving more toward openness and tolerance or back to more fundamentalism? Were Americans following Kemal Ataturk or Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan?

The Supreme Court ruled, barely, for gay marriage with limits. The Senate cleared immigration reform amid warnings the measure would die in the House. Across the country, states were close to banning abortions.

The picture isn’t as mixed as it appeared from Istanbul. The move to greater inclusiveness for gays, including acceptance of same-sex marriage, and a more liberal immigration policy, are on a continuum; the only questions concern timing. Abortion is different. But the swing to the right on this issue is deceptive, reflecting temporary political realities and apt to produce a backlash.

A divided Supreme Court, in a 5-to-4 decision, overturned the Defense of Marriage Act, which denied federal benefits to gay married couples. The states still may sanction or prohibit the unions. To date, 13 states and the District of Columbia allow gay marriages. There remain thorny questions such as what to do about federal spousal benefits for gay and lesbian couples living in states where same-sex marriage isn’t legal.

Opponents claim gay-marriage proponents only have support in liberal states; conservatives say they have the upper hand in most of the rest in what promise to be ferocious battles over the next few years; Oklahoma and Mississippi aren’t fertile ground for same-sex marriages.

True and misleading. First, there are a number of states — including Illinois, Hawaii and Oregon — where approval should be relatively easy in the near term.

Public opinion continues to move in the direction of more tolerance; a July 1 Princeton Survey Research Associates poll for USA Today found that 55 percent of Americans said same-sex marriage should be accorded the same recognition as traditional marriage, a record high, compared with 40 percent who said it shouldn’t. The only groups opposed were Republicans and older Americans.

With the Supreme Court victory, says Chad Griffin, the president of Human Rights Campaign, gay-rights organizations are intensifying grassroots efforts in many states with an eye to victories in state legislatures or voter initiatives.

That’s the focus, but he doesn’t rule out other modes of pressure such as calling for convention boycotts in states that outlaw same-sex marriages: “Everything is on the table.”

And, he says, the legal battles will continue in search of a more sweeping Supreme Court ruling making this a Constitutional right: “Within five years we’ll have equality in all states,” he predicts.

On immigration, it’s instructive to talk to strategists of the two parties: Republicans are squirming over the House leadership threat to kill the Senate-passed bill, and Democrats are unified and exuberant. Senate Democrats unanimously supported the bill, as did 30 percent of Republicans, including some conservatives such as Arizona’s Jeff Flake, Orrin Hatch of Utah and Marco Rubio of Florida.

  • Dominick Vila

    In the end it all depends on how courageous and obliging members of the House of Representatives are. The reason so many House Republicans, including Speaker Boehner, are reluctant to bring the immigration reform Bill passed by the Senate to the floor for debate and a vote is because they fear the retaliation they will encounter from a significant number of constituents when they run for re-election and the ire of those who fund their campaigns.
    This exercise has little to do with what is right and consistent with our values, it is all by cultural intolerance and the need to preserve a status quo that benefit sectors of our economy that depend on illegal immigrants to stay in business and profit.
    If a bill passes it is likely to be so meaningless it will not be worth the paper it is printed on.

  • Allan Richardson

    The key is how successful will voter suppression be in upcoming elections.

    If you want to protect your vote from the new wave of James Crow, Esq. laws being passed in Texas and elsewhere, go to http://www.whitehouse.gov, get a signon if you do not already have one, and sign the petititon “Resume Enforcing the Voting Rights Act Section 5 Immediately.” The petition explains what I believe is a valid loophole in the recent decision striking part of the VRA, and urges the President to exploit that loophole.

    https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/resume-enforcing-voting-rights-act-section-5-immediately/Ckj7Q0rW

  • howa4x

    Gays want to marry so how can a true conservative be against marriage. Republicans are all over the map on the issue of rights and freedom. In their mind it means you can own lots of guns and can pollute the air and ground water with out government interference. But in a bi polar way they see that denial of rights to gays, and women to be an act of faith. Being conservative they should realize that there is a separation of church and state and to deny rights on religious grounds just makes you look like you don’t know what you are talking about using the constitution in the same sentence