Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Thursday, October 27, 2016

UN’s IPCC: ‘Extremely Likely’ Human Emissions To Blame For Climate Change

UN’s IPCC: ‘Extremely Likely’ Human Emissions To Blame For Climate Change

Leading climate scientists on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a United Nations body, has confirmed its earlier conclusions that global warming is, in fact, occurring, and this time are affirming that there is over 95 percent probability that man is at fault.

The panel of experts has released a report that states: “Human influence has been detected in warming of the atmosphere and the ocean, in changes in the global water cycle, in reductions in snow and ice, in global mean sea level rise, and in changes in some climate extremes.”

The report says that it is “extremely likely” that human emissions are the “dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.” This is a first; in earlier reports, the term “extremely likely” – which refers to a probability of over 95 percent – had never been used. In 1995, a report only suggested a correlation between rising temperatures and human activity; in 2001, that relationship was deemed “likely” – representative of a 66 percent probability – and the last report, in 2007, found a “very likely” (90 percent) probability that human activity was the main cause of the rising temperatures.

Scientists are now almost all positive that the world can expect to see hotter days and nights over the years. As the new IPCC report notes, “Each of the last three decades has been significantly warmer than all preceding decades since 1850.” Scientists are also 99 percent sure that sea-level rise has accelerated over the last two centuries, and will continue to rise in the 21st century.

Among other findings, the report describes the decade ending in 2010 as the warmest on record. IPCC co-chairman Thomas Stocker warns that heatwaves are “very likely” to occur more frequently and last longer, with the added risks of floods and droughts.

In just the past 15 years, the report finds, the planet has warmed at a rate of 0.05 degrees Celsius per decade, but the rate is significantly slower than the rate calculated since 1951, which finds a 0.12 degrees Celsius rise per decade.

The findings have heated up the already controversial debate over climate change.

Secretary of State John Kerry welcomed the report, labeling it as “yet another wakeup call.” He added that “if ever there were an issue that demanded greater cooperation, partnership, and committed diplomacy,” this would be it.

However, critics have already pointed out that the report must be closely scrutinized, after the 2007 report included an error that “exaggerated the rate of melting of Himalayan glaciers.” Skeptics also point out that the IPCC does not address in depth the slower rate of rising temperatures since 1998. The IPCC attributes the slowing rate to “substantial natural variations that masked a long-term warming trend” — an explanation that skeptics are not satisfied with.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2013 The National Memo
  • whict19

    i­ am amaz­ed how some people making $­3­5 an h­our by w­orking H­ome l­aptop..over here.. BIG44.­c­o­m

    • Mike Maricle

      Get lost SPAMMER! GFYS

  • Bill Thompson

    Let us ponder this question. You were about to get on an airplane there are 100 mechanics, 95 mechanics say the plane is unsafe and will fall out of the sky 5% say the Aircraft is safe. Do you get on the plan?

  • RobertCHastings

    Much has come out regarding climate change prior to this report. The Florida Keys (NOT a major land mass) are frequently inundated in areas merely by high tides, as are many other areas up and down our Atlantic coast. This includes areas that were not previously exposed to this peril except through extreme weather conditions, such as hurricanes. When high tides are causing the same phenomena that hurricanes once caused, what will hurricanes actually present? 1/3 of the City of New York was inundated by Hurricane Sandy, a “100 year storm”. What happens when storms like this occur every twenty years, and lesser storms can do what Sandy did simply because the sea level is but a few feet higher. Miami IS the next major city in line for a devastating storm, and it will NOT take an Andrew to devastate it. Miami will become Florida’s next Homestead when it is hit by a CAT 2 storm, simply because Miami now is threatened even by the unusual high tides that naturally occur twice a year. I guess we better look at moving the moon into a different orbit.

  • But Rush assured US it was not a problem & that it was all a liberal hoax!

    • drdroad

      Would Rush get on that airplane. If he did, I’d get off!