<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Romney&#8217;s Taxes Tell Us About The Tax Code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nationalmemo.com/what-romneys-taxes-tell-us-about-the-tax-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nationalmemo.com/what-romneys-taxes-tell-us-about-the-tax-code/</link>
	<description>Breaking News, Smart Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 06:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClydeMcWhorter</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalmemo.com/what-romneys-taxes-tell-us-about-the-tax-code/#comment-41285</link>
		<dc:creator>ClydeMcWhorter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 07:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalmemo.com/?p=21962#comment-41285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the only way to reform the tax code is to repeal the 16th admendment to the US constitution.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the only way to reform the tax code is to repeal the 16th admendment to the US constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClydeMcWhorter</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalmemo.com/what-romneys-taxes-tell-us-about-the-tax-code/#comment-41284</link>
		<dc:creator>ClydeMcWhorter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 07:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalmemo.com/?p=21962#comment-41284</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It only requires What the voters accept!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It only requires What the voters accept!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClydeMcWhorter</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalmemo.com/what-romneys-taxes-tell-us-about-the-tax-code/#comment-41282</link>
		<dc:creator>ClydeMcWhorter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 07:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalmemo.com/?p=21962#comment-41282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dear J. Quit watching FOX news, and Rush BimBough. Is the $77,000.00 deduction, a medical deduction, or a business deduction??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear J. Quit watching FOX news, and Rush BimBough. Is the $77,000.00 deduction, a medical deduction, or a business deduction??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ClydeMcWhorter</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalmemo.com/what-romneys-taxes-tell-us-about-the-tax-code/#comment-41281</link>
		<dc:creator>ClydeMcWhorter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 07:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalmemo.com/?p=21962#comment-41281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you a natural blonde? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you a natural blonde? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elisabeth Gordon</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalmemo.com/what-romneys-taxes-tell-us-about-the-tax-code/#comment-40355</link>
		<dc:creator>Elisabeth Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalmemo.com/?p=21962#comment-40355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[huh?????...are you implying that unemployment is at a whooping 51%?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>huh?????&#8230;are you implying that unemployment is at a whooping 51%?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalmemo.com/what-romneys-taxes-tell-us-about-the-tax-code/#comment-40273</link>
		<dc:creator>Top</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalmemo.com/?p=21962#comment-40273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until your article addresses the fact that 49 percent of Americans paid NO income tax in 2011, you are barking up the wrong tree.  We live in a society where people want something for nothing - roads, healthcare, public schools, police and fire department protection - and nearly half are paying NOTHING into the system?  Perhaps you should change your focus from those who pay millions every year to those who don&#039;t pay one thin dime.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until your article addresses the fact that 49 percent of Americans paid NO income tax in 2011, you are barking up the wrong tree.  We live in a society where people want something for nothing &#8211; roads, healthcare, public schools, police and fire department protection &#8211; and nearly half are paying NOTHING into the system?  Perhaps you should change your focus from those who pay millions every year to those who don&#8217;t pay one thin dime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Revcarrie</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalmemo.com/what-romneys-taxes-tell-us-about-the-tax-code/#comment-40248</link>
		<dc:creator>Revcarrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalmemo.com/?p=21962#comment-40248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Republican thing would be funny if it wasn&#039;t so serious. You are right when they critsized Kerry and the wind boarding and now the whole thing has backfired on them with Ann Romney&#039;s horse.  If it is true that the horse&#039;s expenses are being taken as a business expense, it raises even more eyebrows and questions....like there weren&#039;t enough already when the sympathy card is being played for the MS factor as well.  The horse was transported over to England for the Olympics which is a MAJOR expense.  Why? What did the Romneys expect to gain by doing this?  This also means that Ann Romney was probably without her &quot;therapy&quot; for at least two weeks.  There is Muscular dystrophy and MS in my family.  We can&#039;t go two weeks or more without our physical therapy whether it be swimming or something we do at home.  What kind of fools do the Romney&#039;s think we are out here?
Everything they do seems to be for showboating purposes which backfires with most of us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Republican thing would be funny if it wasn&#8217;t so serious. You are right when they critsized Kerry and the wind boarding and now the whole thing has backfired on them with Ann Romney&#8217;s horse.  If it is true that the horse&#8217;s expenses are being taken as a business expense, it raises even more eyebrows and questions&#8230;.like there weren&#8217;t enough already when the sympathy card is being played for the MS factor as well.  The horse was transported over to England for the Olympics which is a MAJOR expense.  Why? What did the Romneys expect to gain by doing this?  This also means that Ann Romney was probably without her &#8220;therapy&#8221; for at least two weeks.  There is Muscular dystrophy and MS in my family.  We can&#8217;t go two weeks or more without our physical therapy whether it be swimming or something we do at home.  What kind of fools do the Romney&#8217;s think we are out here?<br />
Everything they do seems to be for showboating purposes which backfires with most of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jarheadgene</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalmemo.com/what-romneys-taxes-tell-us-about-the-tax-code/#comment-40065</link>
		<dc:creator>jarheadgene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 12:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalmemo.com/?p=21962#comment-40065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you not read anything previous? Quit changing the subject and trying to spotlight everything else but this article.....ROMNEY doesn&#039;t GIVE BACK...he takes and he takes and he takes.   DO YOU SERIOUSLY THINK...he will even give a moment to changing the tax code?  Why would he kill his golden goose?  Anyone who does not make $250K a year has absolutely no business voting for ROMNEY. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you not read anything previous? Quit changing the subject and trying to spotlight everything else but this article&#8230;..ROMNEY doesn&#8217;t GIVE BACK&#8230;he takes and he takes and he takes.   DO YOU SERIOUSLY THINK&#8230;he will even give a moment to changing the tax code?  Why would he kill his golden goose?  Anyone who does not make $250K a year has absolutely no business voting for ROMNEY. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dtgraham</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalmemo.com/what-romneys-taxes-tell-us-about-the-tax-code/#comment-40049</link>
		<dc:creator>dtgraham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 07:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalmemo.com/?p=21962#comment-40049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s nothing wrong with taking your wife out to riding stables a couple of times a week for a little leg muscle workout, even though there may be a number of other equally good options as you point out.  The Romney people are trying to portrait Dressage as the latest medical advancement and breakthrough for MS or something.  The reason is because the Dems are trying to do to Romney what the Repubs did to John Kerry in 2004 with his windsurfing, and they know it.  

A horse may be therapeutic in some ways, but it&#039;s hardly necessary for MS treatment and Dressage being needed is a sick joke.

A used windsurfer can be bought for $300.00.  The thing floats.  You throw it on the water, get on, and hope for some wind and a wave.  If Kerry could be made out to be seen as hoity toity (to quote Charles Krauthammer), then they know the vulnerable position that they&#039;re now in with Dressage.  Any connection that&#039;s made, whatsoever, with Rafalca and that &quot;sport&quot;, to Anne Romney&#039;s MS therapy should be loudly ridiculed by the Democrats.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s nothing wrong with taking your wife out to riding stables a couple of times a week for a little leg muscle workout, even though there may be a number of other equally good options as you point out.  The Romney people are trying to portrait Dressage as the latest medical advancement and breakthrough for MS or something.  The reason is because the Dems are trying to do to Romney what the Repubs did to John Kerry in 2004 with his windsurfing, and they know it.  </p>
<p>A horse may be therapeutic in some ways, but it&#8217;s hardly necessary for MS treatment and Dressage being needed is a sick joke.</p>
<p>A used windsurfer can be bought for $300.00.  The thing floats.  You throw it on the water, get on, and hope for some wind and a wave.  If Kerry could be made out to be seen as hoity toity (to quote Charles Krauthammer), then they know the vulnerable position that they&#8217;re now in with Dressage.  Any connection that&#8217;s made, whatsoever, with Rafalca and that &#8220;sport&#8221;, to Anne Romney&#8217;s MS therapy should be loudly ridiculed by the Democrats.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynda</title>
		<link>http://www.nationalmemo.com/what-romneys-taxes-tell-us-about-the-tax-code/#comment-39947</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nationalmemo.com/?p=21962#comment-39947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your ignorance of facts is showing.  Obama taught law courses at the University of Chicago Law School.  He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996.  In 1996 he became
a Senior Lecturer, which is considered a member of the Law School Faculty and regarded as professor.  BTW, he received a pay check while doing so.  Now perhaps you don&#039;t consider teaching a &#039;job&#039; which would be an insult to the hundreds of educators throughout the country.  The period of time he was a Senior Lecturer was from 1996 until 2004 when he got another job in government.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your ignorance of facts is showing.  Obama taught law courses at the University of Chicago Law School.  He was a Lecturer from 1992 to 1996.  In 1996 he became<br />
a Senior Lecturer, which is considered a member of the Law School Faculty and regarded as professor.  BTW, he received a pay check while doing so.  Now perhaps you don&#8217;t consider teaching a &#8216;job&#8217; which would be an insult to the hundreds of educators throughout the country.  The period of time he was a Senior Lecturer was from 1996 until 2004 when he got another job in government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
