Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.
Friday, October 21, 2016

1.   The economy is still very difficult for voters at the pocketbook level. This economy is still very painful for people. In focus groups with swing voters who watched the president’s speech with us, participants were very graphic about their personal financial situations and economic outlook.  They are very much on edge financially, which is their dominant context because they live it every day. Every speech needs to start from a place that understands this is not theoretical or ideological, but tangible and painful for people.

You can’t survive on one income. You can’t buy gas.
I work 7 days a week to afford my house, my car.
Often times I worked 5 jobs, never saw the kids. They raised themselves. A majority of politicians don’t understand the hardship.

2.   The president can highlight economic progress without taking credit. For the first time since 2009, the president was able to highlight good economic news without shutting voters down; these voters in Denver applauded it. In past exercises, we have found that when President Obama takes credit for progress on the economy in these times, voters react badly and view him as out of touch. The president thread a very careful needle in this speech and it worked. These voters are open to the president’s celebration of good economic news, as long as the president does not take credit for it.  The way President Obama framed current economic growth was through business, not government – businesses hiring again and jobs coming back to America was news these voters were willing to celebrate. We should not underestimate voters’ responses—this was a major turning point.


3. Voters are aware of, and concerned about, the decline of the middle class. One of the biggest shifts came when President Obama talked about a decade of stagnation, and the need to reignite the middle class and restore the basic middle-class bargain. All respondents (including Republican-leaning participants) responded to this. But the president lost the Republicans in our audience when he said that the government works on behalf of the many, not just the few. They came back, however, when he returned to the values of free enterprise.


4. Voters support a growth agenda rather than an austerity agenda. Voters showed strong support for growth and jobs when the president asserted that “deficit reduction alone is not an economic plan.” The electorate is ready for a growth agenda that creates good, middle-class jobs, and this was clear in their responses to specific policy items. Every time the president mentioned investment, our swing voters in Denver were very receptive—investment in manufacturing, science, and infrastructure all got positive support. One of the strongest responses came when the president talked about not cutting funding for education, job training, Medicare, and Social Security benefits. On that point, independents and unmarried women responded most sharply, climbing above the Democrats’ line. The only group to respond negatively was the Republican bloc in our audience, which proved an outlier on many of these items.



5. Voters are looking for a balanced approach. Taken in the context of the sequester, there is significant support for President Obama’s balanced approach rather than the Republicans’ cuts-only approach to deficit reduction. Voters, especially unmarried women, responded with deep concern to the potential budget cuts. And the president got broad support when he talked about replacing reckless cuts with smart savings. He also won the voters in our audience when he talked about getting rid of tax loopholes and deductions for the well-off and the well-connected. This balanced approach was met with a great deal of approval from our audience, who fully grasped the contrast between closing loopholes for the wealthiest versus cutting retirement benefits for those who cannot afford it.


6. There is strong support for further and more progressive tax reform. There is strong support for reform, including closing loopholes and instituting the Buffett rule, to make sure the wealthiest pay their fair share. At the end of the speech we saw big shifts in support for the president in supporting the middle class and handling the economy.



7. Raising the minimum wage is a good start. Given the ongoing stagnation and difficulties at the middle and bottom of the income spectrum, voters are looking for policies that will grow the economy from the bottom up. Raising the minimum wage produced a strong result among all groups except Republicans. Democrats reacted very favorably, as did independents and unmarried women. When the president proposed linking the minimum wage to the cost of living all groups, including Republicans, spiked.



8. Unmarried women are the most engaged on their issues. When we have conducted similar exercises in the past among unmarried women, their movement on the dials presaged their level of engagement and openness to voting for Democrats. During the 2012 campaign, they were more tentative and more closely aligned with independents. In sharp contrast, unmarried women in our group in Denver moved in close concert with the Democrats, and climbed even higher than the Democratic line at several key moments—including when the president talked about his growth and investment agenda, not allowing the painful sequester cuts to hit programs like education and job training, not cutting entitlement benefits for those who need it most, and closing tax loopholes for the wealthy and well connected.



9. Republicans are on a path different from all others on economic and budget choices. The president’s call to raise taxes on the wealthiest instead of making reckless cuts to education received strongly positive responses from all groups except the Republicans in our audience. On these measures, all of the dials rose while the Republican line dropped. In several key places in the speech, Republican lines moved in the opposite direction of all other lines: “consumers, patients and homeowners enjoy stronger protections than ever before”; “this government works on behalf of the many, and not just the few”; “deficit reduction alone is not an economic plan”; “by raising tax rates on the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans”; “the Affordable Care Act is helping to slow the growth of health care costs”; “no one who works full-time should have to live in poverty — and raise the federal minimum wage to $9 an hour.” The point is not that Republicans were less receptive to the president’s speech than those who voted for him. We expected that. The striking observation is that these Republicans were unquestionably moving in the opposite direction as everyone else in the room. There is a difference between the points at which the Republican lines moved in unison with, just several octaves below, Democrats and Independents, and the points at which all lines moved up while Republican lines dropped.


10. Voters are receptive to smarter government that invests in broad-based growth. This is not 2010, when voters looked to punish the president for a lagging economy, the health care law, or high spending. While their trust in government has eroded, voters seem very open to the president’s call for smarter government that tackles big issues. For now, voters seem ready to support both his short-term plan and his long-term vision for restoring the economy.


Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2013 The National Memo
  • buona

    It is difficult for me to understand the citizen who considers a vote for that side which keeps taking from the middle class and fills their own pockets.

    • kanawah

      Two reasons, gullible and stupid.

  • EXCELLENT summary!!! Glad to have these statements so smartly stated, in the efforts to HELP OUR NATION!! [And I’m an activist single female MD PsyD who votes.]

  • tobewan

    Interesting point – When government doesn’t move to protect the nations vast majority, you have what took place during Bush’s 8 years and the GOP wants to continue. Government must be there to protect the many in the nation from the few, as President Obama seeks to do.
    It has been said that “Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely!” The Financial power of the few has corrupted absolutely. The “Haves” are not ceding their power nor their wealth quietly, but are fiercely fighting to maintain that power, and revealing their corruption through their manipulative efforts.

    As informative communication increases, the more their corrupted ways are manifest. This is in harmony with the incoming kingdom who righteously will overthrow all evil powers and the false beliefs so plentiful among people of every nation, to the end that the hearts of the people will be converted. Leveling of the “playing field” will take place, the “Haves” will become part of the “many;” and every form of Violence will STOP and guns will NO LONGER be needed or wanted.

    The various storms of society will come to an end, the upheavals and earthquakes among the world’s nations will cease by His Will, but only when it is understood that man cannot find a way to justly and beneficially govern himself, that everything man tries runs afoul and bankruptcy is world-wide, as we now see happening. All governments must and will bend to His righteous will.
    We have approached what we have been praying for, for nearly 2000 years – His Will be done on earth as it is in heaven. In harmony with that, let us continue to so pray, while we also salute any and all who seek our betterment – Gabby Gifford comes to mind, for example.

    • kanawah

      The corruption is the money form the disgustingly rich to the extreme right wing nuts, namely the Transylvania tea bags.

      The atrocity called Citizens United is facilitating the destruction of our nation. We are becoming a fascist oligarchy run by the likes of the Koch (crotch) brothers and many others hiding in the shadows.

  • Rick2101

    America has always been divided and in all likelihood will continue to be divided. I believe the division is between those to want more and those who simply want enough. The tricky part is telling the difference and figuring out “what is enough”. Perhaps having a healthy and educated population would be a good start. All Americans, not just those who have political contacts or access to wealth, must have a right to first-class healthcare and first-class education. A sick and ignorant people cannot progress. If it is not a right for the many, then it is simply a privilege for the few.

  • The bottom line, and what influences our decisions when it is time to vote, is whether or not we can support our families and live with a modicum of dignity. Unemployed and under-employed citizens are bound to be angry, and for good reason. For them, it doesn’t who created the mess, they want solutions rather than explanations.

    While it is clear to most Americans that the economy is improving and that President Obama’s policies are having a positive effect on its recovery, it is also evident to most of us that much remains to be done to accomplish sustainable growth and a stable economy.

    This should not be about who to blame and who is our savious, but whether or not there is alight at the end of a very long tunnel. I think that for the first time in 5 long years, we can finally hope for better days ahead, and that is something that was sorely absent 4 years ago.

  • kanawah

    The results show that the people do NOT support the republiskunk agenda. The only the republiskunks hold onto the house is by rigging the house elections. They have gerrymandered many states to the point that it is virtually impossible to kick them out of the house.