fbpx

Type to search

Why Are Major Advertisers Dumping O’Reilly — But Sticking With Fox?

Business Media National News Politics US

Why Are Major Advertisers Dumping O’Reilly — But Sticking With Fox?

Share
O'Reilly

It’s hard to give the complete list of companies pulling their ads right now from Bill O’Reilly’s show on Fox News Channel, because the number keeps growing.

Chances are that in the time it took me to write the previous sentence, another corporate sponsor decided to suspend advertising. Just on O’Reilly’s show, understand. They’re still airing ads on Fox News Channel, whose chairman was fired last summer for a sexual harassment scandal.

Yeah. I know.

Last weekend, The New York Times reported that five women were paid a total of $13 million by either O’Reilly or Fox News and its parent company, 21st Century Fox, related to five separate accusations of sexual harassment and verbal abuse against O’Reilly.

Whell. This wasn’t supposed to get out.

From the network: “21st Century Fox takes matters of workplace behavior very seriously. Notwithstanding the fact that no current or former Fox News employee ever took advantage of the 21st Century Fox hotline to raise a concern about Bill O’Reilly, even anonymously—”

Do you see what they did there?

Translation: If this had really happened, these women would have trusted the network that employs and promotes Bill O’Reilly as its superstar to take up their cause against said superstar.

From The New York Times: “Current and former Fox News employees told The Times that they feared making complaints to network executives or the human resources department.”

 Back to the show.

The statement continues: “While he denies the merits of these claims, Mr. O’Reilly has resolved those he regarded as his personal responsibility.”

You may be wondering, “If they didn’t happen, why did O’Reilly feel a personal responsibility to resolve them?”

Oh, you and your questions. If I were O’Reilly, I’d be cutting off your mic right now.

The reporting of these settlements has triggered a collective corporate conscience that, until now, we had no reason to believe existed.

 CNN’s Tom Kludt is collecting corporate sponsor responses.

Fascinating reading.

Hyundai: “Hyundai currently has no advertising on The O’Reilly Factor. We had upcoming advertising spots on the show but are reallocating them due to the recent and disturbing allegations.”

Reallocating — such an interesting word. As is redirecting, which is also popping up in the coverage of these movable ads. My personal favorite is re-expressing, which sounds like a new method for breast-feeding.

See?  the network spokesman says. We’re not losing ad money. We’re merely shuffling the ads from the most popular show on Fox News Channel to “other FNC programs.”

In other words — and aren’t you glad I’m here to explain all this? — while these companies claim to be offended by the O’Reilly allegations, they’re still cool with the network that continues to enable him.

For example: “Mitsubishi Motors takes these allegations very seriously and we have decided that we will pull our advertising at the present time. We will continue to monitor this situation as we assess our long-term strategy.”

Imagine the possible conversation in that next meeting: “So, long term. Are we sometimes OK with sexual harassment? Or are we, like, totally against it now?”

Bayer included a list of side effects of its decision to suspend advertising, best read aloud by that fast-talking man in the drug ads:

“We have been informed, however, that programming changes may not become effective immediately. It is important to note that Bayer purchases packages of advertising time across all major networks without selecting placement on any specific program. We regularly evaluate our advertising purchases to make sound judgments.”

 Angie’s List isn’t pulling anything, including the wool over our eyes:

“Just as we trust members to make their own hiring decisions, we trust them to make their own media consumption decisions.”

Aw, they trust us. As if it’s our integrity and character in question.

On Wednesday, Donald Trump weighed in.

Of course he did. It’s not as if he has a country to lead.

 “I think he’s a person I know well,” Trump told The New York Times‘ Glenn Thrush.

Does he “think” he knows him but doubt it because he just sees him on his TV every night — never mind.

“He is a good person,” Trump continued. “I think he shouldn’t have settled; personally, I think he shouldn’t have settled.” (I think he thinks O’Reilly shouldn’t have settled.) “Because you should have taken it all the way. I don’t think Bill did anything wrong.”

Trump also said: “I’m automatically attracted to beautiful [women]. I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything — grab them by the p——. You can do anything.”

Oh, wait.

 Different show.

Connie Schultz is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist and professional in residence at Kent State University’s school of journalism. She is the author of two books, including “…and His Lovely Wife,” which chronicled the successful race of her husband, Sherrod Brown, for the U.S. Senate. To find out more about Connie Schultz (con.schultz@yahoo.com) and read her past columns, please visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

Tags:
Connie Schultz

Connie Schultz is a nationally syndicated columnist for Creators Syndicated. Schultz won the 2005 Pulitzer Prize for commentary and was a finalist for the 2003 Pulitzer Prize for feature writing. She has also published two books: Life Happens: And Other Unavoidable Truths -- a collection of her previously published columns -- and ...and His Lovely Wife: A Memoir from the Woman Beside the Man, which chronicled her experiences on the campaign trail with her husband, Ohio Senator Sherrod Brown.

  • 1

9 Comments

  1. plc97477 April 9, 2017

    Few are pulling ads from faux noise because faux viewers are the people they are trying to impress. People who will believe anything you tell them. They are gullible and easy to distract.

    Reply
    1. dbtheonly April 9, 2017

      But that is the point of advertising.

      Much as we deplore Fox; they do have the viewers.

      Reply
      1. Danndwall April 10, 2017

        Google is paying $97 per hour! Work for few hours & have longer with friends and family! !wr356c:
        On monday I got a great new mclaren f1 from having earned $12778 this last four weeks.. 3 to 5 hours of work a day… Weekly paychecks… Bonus opportunities…Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        !wr356c:
        ➽➽
        ➽➽➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs356OnlineCapital/GetPaid$97/Hour ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫:::!wr356u:……..

        Reply
      2. dpaano April 11, 2017

        And we can be sure that if 45 says that O’Reilly is “ok,” then they will ALL believe this without a doubt!!!

        Reply
        1. dbtheonly April 11, 2017

          You may have it backward. Is it Trump saying O’Reilly is okay or O’Reilly saying Trump is okay?

          Doesn’t much matter. May be either at any time.

          I’m more looking at the Trump Breitbart impending divorce.

          Reply
  2. InGen12 April 9, 2017

    “Reallocating” these companies’ advertising to other FOX shows does nothing to exonerate these companies from their support of an entire network that is riddled with a culture of sexual harassment. Smoke & mirrors, people.

    Reply
    1. SharonWatson111 April 9, 2017

      ><???????????????????????????? $150/???????????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ???????????? ???????????????????????? ???????? ???????? ???????????????????????????? ???????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????????? ???? ???????????????????? ???????????????? ???????????? ????????????… ???????????????????????? ???????? ????????????, ???????????? ???????????? ???????????????? ???????????????????????????? ???????????????????????? ???????????????? ????????????????????!
      ➤➤➤➤➤➤➤➤ https://aturl.us/short/364lY

      Reply
    2. dpaano April 11, 2017

      Keep these companies in mind when it comes time to spend your hard-earned tax money!

      Reply
  3. Aaron_of_Portsmouth April 13, 2017

    Companies without a conscience have become adept at choosing the right words/phrases to hide the fact that they really have no conscience.
    —“Hyundai: ‘Hyundai currently has no advertising on The O’Reilly Factor. We had upcoming advertising spots on the show but are reallocating them due to the recent and disturbing allegations.’ “.
    Here’s an excellent sample of techniques taught in “Euphemisms For Business Execs 101”. This horse manure will make average Americans think that this is nice and that all will be well. When all it is is to ensure that “Money” take precedence over “Moral Fortitude”.

    And Trump’s outrageously open disdain for the rights of women is obscene—But hey, this is the way it is in Trump’s sordid mind.
    1) “He is a good person,” Trump continued. “I think he shouldn’t have settled; personally, I think he shouldn’t have settled.”
    2) “I’m automatically attracted to beautiful [women]. I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything — grab them by the p——. You can do anything.”

    Trump, Hyundai, Angie’s List, FOX are just few of the countless samples of moral decay in America, and the average Trumpoholic doesn’t give a damn about impugning the memory and standards set forth by Jesus the Christ-like figure for whom 99% of Americans claim to owe their loyalty to.

    What a brazen set of contradictions we have in play in a nation that claims to be Christian. Many Christians are true to the Message of Jesus, but not so with FOX, the GOP as an entity, and too many Trump fans. Trying to have their cake and eat it too is completely out of the question when purporting to be Christians, and at the same time show support for Trump, O’Reilly, and FOX.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.