Type to search

Cartoon: Justice Trump Style

Tags:
Jeff Danziger

Jeff Danziger lives in New York City. He is represented by CWS Syndicate and the Washington Post Writers Group. He is the recipient of the Herblock Prize and the Thomas Nast (Landau) Prize. He served in the US Army in Vietnam and was awarded the Bronze Star and the Air Medal. He has published eleven books of cartoons and one novel. Visit him at DanzigerCartoons.com.

  • 1

3 Comments

  1. Paul Bass June 8, 2016

    If Trump had a case, don’t you think his highly paid lawyers would have raised this issue?

    Reply
    1. Hollynjones4 June 9, 2016

      “my room mate Mary Is getting paid on the internet $98/hr”…..!gd441u

      two days ago grey McLaren. P1 I bought after earning 18,512 Dollars..it was my previous month’s payout..just a little over.17k Dollars Last month..3-5 hours job a day…with weekly payouts..it’s realy the simplest. job I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months. ago. and now making over hourly. 87 Dollars…Learn. More right Here !gd441u:➽:➽:.➽.➽.➽.➽ http://GlobalSuperJobsReportsEmploymentsProfitableGetPay$98Hour…. .★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★★::::::!gd441u….,….

    2. Beethoven June 9, 2016

      Judge Curiel has, from what I have read, made two decisions that Trump is complaining about. First, Trump’s lawyers made a motion for summary judgment, which is a standard defensive maneuver, and Trump insists that the motion should have been granted, and this proves the judge’s bias. But for Judge Curiel to grant that motion, he would have to rule that even if the plaintiffs proved every factual allegation they have made, they would have no case against Trump as a matter of law, and any lawyer with any sense at all knows that ruling could never stand up on appeal. Second, Judge Curiel ordered the Trump University training materials released to the press. He did so after a motion by members of the press, and if he had refused to release the materials, his decision would have been appealed, and almost certainly reversed on appeal. So basically, Trump’s argument is: “You should have ruled the way I wanted you to, because I’m Donald Trump, and because you didn’t do what I wanted, you are biased and hate me.”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.