Married Status Adds New Wrinkle To Tax Time For Married Gays

Married Status Adds New Wrinkle To Tax Time For Married Gays

By Stephanie Akin, The Record (Hackensack, N.J.)

Tax time has been described as anxiety-inducing and unnecessarily confusing, and its inescapability has even been equated with death. Now, it’s a reason for celebration — at least for same-sex couples who for the first time can check off the box that says “married” on their 1040s.

Tim Eustace and his husband, Kevin, marked the occasion by going out to dinner in downtown Maywood, N.J., where they live. Jeff Farlow, 30, of Pine Hill posted his refund on Facebook. And Jeff Gardner, 45, of Hawthorne described a visit to the accountant with this incongruous adjective: “Momentous.”

Filing as a newly married couple entails its own set of headaches, and filing for the first time as a same-sex married couple comes with an assortment of questions. But many said the symbolic significance is worth the hassle — at least this time around.

“It’s another act that points out that the government legally recognizes us as a legitimate couple,” said Charles Cumpston, a retired publishing executive from Fort Lee. “That’s pretty incredible.”

For many, the status means a huge reduction in paperwork, lower bills for tax preparation and a bigger refund. But the transition hasn’t been completely without its glitches — this is a tax issue, after all.

Some have dealt with setbacks familiar to any married couple, including the realization that they fall in the group that pays the so-called marriage penalty. Married people often begin to pay more than they would if they were single as a couple’s joint income increases, regardless of whether they file jointly or as a married couple filing separately.

Some couples who fall in the opposite category, those who get a bigger refund filing jointly, are working to get reimbursed for past taxes they paid as single filers while they had civil unions or marriages recognized in other states.

And couples who were legally married in one state, but work in a state that doesn’t recognize gay marriage face another challenge: filing separate state tax returns as individuals there, a reminder, they said, of why a nationwide debate is still raging.

In New Jersey, couples with civil unions have been allowed to file jointly since 2008. But they still had to file separate federal forms as single people, which in many cases almost doubled their tax preparation fees, said Ted Carnevale, a CPA and chief executive officer at Gramkow Carnevale Seifert & Co. in Oradell.

The elimination of that requirement means that the same tax rules apply to married couples claiming all their income in New Jersey, regardless of their sexual orientation. But some couples still have a lot of questions, Carnevale said.

“You could have people who have been life partners together for a long time, and now their tax (situation) has changed dramatically,” he said. “They have been used to being together and filing a certain way.”

Carnevale said some couples are also confused about whether they can file joint federal returns if they have a civil union and aren’t married — they can’t.

But not every couple has managed a seamless transition to their new tax status, said accountant Phil Goldstein of Goldstein Lieberman & Co.

One pair of longtime clients has been agonizing over the news that their marriage would eliminate one spouse’s $6,000 refund, although it would mean an $11,000 savings for the higher-earning partner, he said.

“The one who made more said, ‘If it’s costing us more to be married than if we were single, I think we should separate,’” he said. The couple eventually resolved their differences and decided to stay together.

But, he added, he saw the dispute as another sign of marriage equality: it was a version of an argument he’d seen between dozens of heterosexual couples over the years.

“It doesn’t make a difference if it’s a heterosexual couple or a gay couple,” he said. “Money is money, and people fight over it.”

AFP Photo/Scott Olson

Start your day with National Memo Newsletter

Know first.

The opinions that matter. Delivered to your inbox every morning

Marjorie Taylor Mouth Makes Another Empty Threat

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene

I’m absolutely double-positive it won’t surprise you to learn that America’s favorite poster-person for bluster, blowhardiness and bong-bouncy-bunk went on Fox News on Sunday and made a threat. Amazingly, she didn’t threaten to expose alleged corruption by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy by quoting a Russian think-tank bot-factory known as Strategic Culture Foundation, as she did last November. Rather, the Congressperson from North Georgia made her eleventy-zillionth threat to oust the Speaker of the House from her own party, Rep. Mike Johnson (R-LA), using the Motion to Vacate she filed last month. She told Fox viewers she wanted to return to her House district to “listen to voters” before acting, however.

Keep reading...Show less
Trump Campaign Gives Access To Far-Right Media But Shuns Mainstream Press

Trump campaign press pass brandished on air by QAnon podcaster Brenden Dilley

Trump's Hour On CNN Was A Profile In Cowardice

Vanity Fair recently reported that several journalists from mainstream publications, including The Washington Post, NBC News, Axios, and Vanity Fair, were denied press access to Trump’s campaign events, seemingly in retaliation for their previous critical coverage. Meanwhile, Media Matters found that the campaign has granted press credentials to the QAnon-promoting MG Show and Brenden Dilley, a podcaster who has promoted the QAnon conspiracy theory and leads a “meme team” that creates pro-Trump content.

Keep reading...Show less
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}