fbpx

Type to search

Memo To Congress: Family Planning Needs More Funding

Memo Pad Politics

Memo To Congress: Family Planning Needs More Funding

Share

In times of economic uncertainty the demand for publicly funded family-planning services increases. Since the 2008 financial crisis and the ensuing recession, the need for Title X has grown dramatically, while funding levels have declined or remained flat. Over the past few years the Title X budget has been cut by $40 million. To make matters worse, the anti-family-planning and overall austerity sentiments that have since prevailed reduced and restricted family-planning budgets in many states. There have been fewer state and federal funds for women’s health during the very time that women have also lost jobs and insurance coverage.

When Title X centers lose funding, they are forced to make cuts in three places: services and supplies, hours, and staff. As a result of funding challenges, 6 in 10 Title X clinics have been unable to stock the most costly contraceptives, particularly long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) such as the IUD and implants, methods considered highly effective and most desirable among women wanting to avoid pregnancy.

Family planning is first and foremost a matter of women’s health and rights. But it is also central to women’s economic security. The continued fragility of the U.S. economy and the recession’s devastating impact on low-income families requires an increased investment in family planning. American families, many of them now headed by single women, face enormous challenges. Access to affordable contraception enables women to pursue educational and professional opportunities that strengthen their families and their communities. The majority of women who participated in a recent Guttmacher Institute study report that birth control enables them to support themselves financially, complete their education, and get or keep a job.

Given the tenuous state of the U.S. economy, the vulnerability of women’s health programs in the face of unrelenting political attacks, and the fraying social safety net more broadly, public funding for family planning is more critical than ever. Continued — indeed, increased — funding of Title X will maximize the impact and reach of the ACA and ensure continued quality care for those who remain uninsured.

Thank you.

Andrea Flynn is a Fellow at the Roosevelt Institute. She researches and writes about access to reproductive health care in the United States. You can follow her on Twitter @dreaflynn.

Cross-posted from the Roosevelt Institute’s Next New Deal blog.

The Roosevelt Institute is a non-profit organization devoted to carrying forward the legacy and values of Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt.

Photo: WeNews via Flickr

Tags:

23 Comments

  1. Dominick Vila March 24, 2014

    The chances of Family Planning institutions getting more funding from the GOP controlled House are like the chances of illegal immigrants getting taller ladders. The only thing Family Planning institutions can expect from the GOP is constant attacks, threats, and insults.

    Reply
    1. James Bowen March 24, 2014

      I don’t understand why family planning is even controversial. 98% of all Americans who are sexually active use contraception. This is one position that is just extremely at odds with the American public.

      Reply
      1. Dominick Vila March 25, 2014

        It is controversial because some religious organizations made it so, and because some popular figures in the media have gone as far as calling women who use contraceptives whores. The irony is that using contraceptives reduces the incidence of abortion dramatically, and that the people who oppose the use of contraceptives claim to be pro-life (pro-birth).

        Reply
        1. James Bowen March 25, 2014

          Absolutely. It is just hard to believe that a position that has almost no public support has gotten as far as it has.

          Reply
  2. disqus_ivSI3ByGmh March 24, 2014

    Republican concept of family planning – plan on having a large family and not getting any help.

    Reply
    1. paulyz March 24, 2014

      Wrong disqus, the Republican concept is: if you have children, you need to raise them responsibly, not expecting others, (taxpayers) to pay for their irresponsibility. A good economy with 2 parent families has always been the way towards upward mobility, not always making excuses & blaming others. We have seen just how the terrible economy under 6 years of Obama’s Big Spending policies have failed to help, indeed, he & the Democrats have made it much worse.

      Reply
      1. Joyce March 24, 2014

        Listen Paulyz – gop’s don’t want ANYTHING that will help women. Why is the responsibility of birth control always on the woman? if men had to take birth control, those republiCONS would be distributing them in men’s bathrooms. They won’t allow women access to birth control then complain because they’re having babies that MEN are partly responsible for. I hope that when you die and see our Savior, you will see how disappointed she is at the mess the men have made in this world.

        Reply
        1. Cyndi March 25, 2014

          Really?! The real answer is not having sex unless you are willing to accept the consequences of it…children.

          Reply
          1. Allan Richardson March 28, 2014

            When a couple fall in love, get married, and decide to have a child, while they are living a responsibly good life, can they FORESEE that one
            day, after this child and possibly another are born, he might lose his job, one of them may get sick and run up medical bills, a CHILD may get
            sick, a disaster may occur, etc?

            According to your logic, it is irresponsible for ANY man or woman EVER to have sex, since the future
            may hold misfortune or even catastrophe at any time, requiring them to ask for help and be accused of being irresponsible.

            Or are you implying that God has it in for some people because they don’t pray enough? Read some of the Bible books you never got to: Job, Isaiah, Hosea, Amos, and the Gospels, especially the Sermon on the mount and Matthew 25 (the whole chapter).

            Enjoy your non-reproductive life in your Shaker commune if you have no compassion for people living in relationships and families who experience bad luck.

            Reply
      2. Sand_Cat March 24, 2014

        Cretin

        Reply
      3. dmhlt_66 March 24, 2014

        You couldn’t be more WRONG!!!

        My source? None other than Rupert Murdoch’s Repubican-promoting, right-wing loving newspaper – THE WALL STREET JOURNAL:

        Of all the falsehoods told about President Barack Obama, the biggest whopper is the one about his reckless spending spree.

        Although there was a big stimulus bill under Obama, federal spending is rising at the slowest pace since Dwight Eisenhower brought the Korean War to an end in the 1950s. Even hapless Herbert Hoover managed to increase spending more than Obama has.

        http://www.marketwatch.com/story/obama-spending-binge-never-happened-2012-05-22

        Please READ the article – and stop watching Faux News, listening to Rush Limpballs, logging on to Freeperville and actually educate yourself.

        As the saying goes: Facts Really DO Have a Liberal Bias

        Reply
        1. pablosemenov321 March 25, 2014

          My Uncle Aaron just got an awesome 12 month
          old Audi A5 Convertible only from working part time off a home computer… find
          out here C­a­s­h­F­i­g­.­ℂ­o­m

          Reply
        2. Dominick Vila March 25, 2014

          Great post. Unfortunately, our conservative cousins are not interested in facts, probably because if they were known their party would not even appeal to its most radical members. They form opinions based on 30-second commercials, what Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity and the rest of the opportunists tell them, and what the Koch brothers propaganda network concocts.

          Reply
      4. Dominick Vila March 25, 2014

        Paulyz, I can tell you with absolute certainty that there are many registered Republicans, who consider themselves Tea Party supporters, who have children out of wedlock and use MEDICAID for pre-natal, birth, and post postpartum expenses. The truth is that issues like this are non-partisan and so widespread that political ideology, and what many of us consider sound family values, are irrelevant. We live in a new world, and we might as well accept it.
        Regarding Obama’s big spending policies. Do yourself a favor and do a bit of research into this subject. President Obama has reduced the Federal government civil servant workforce by about 700,000 positions. The deficit he inherited from a Republican administration has been cut in half and continues to drop. The reason our economy is not as strong as it should have been is because of the magnitude of the economic chaos President Obama inherited in 2009, not because of his policies, which helped avoid the collapse of the U.S. economy announced by former President Bush in 2008, and have helped us overcome the worst recession since the Great Depression.

        Reply
  3. terry b March 24, 2014

    Only truly ignorant people would not want birth control to be used in any health care program. Intelligent people understand that nothing prevents abortion like the pill does.

    Reply
  4. James Bowen March 24, 2014

    Very good article. There is perhaps not a more important program for the government to fund than family planning and contraception.

    Reply
  5. Charlotte Sines March 24, 2014

    I very firmly believe that the only reason Republicans are against women accessing birth control is due to fear of losing control. They are against Blacks and Hispanics having any control over their lives because the white males would lose control over them. The same goes for women. If women can control their own lives then men lose control over them. Fortunately the number of men who believe this garbage is dropping. Most men are not scared of women who want to control their own lives. They are strong in their own right and have no reason to feel threaten by strong women.

    Reply
    1. Cyndi March 25, 2014

      So why then do you continue being the victim that you say you are by allowing them to control you and your behavior. The reality is, no one controls anyone except themselves. Once you come to this eiphany all the male bashing, white bashing and republican bashing becomes meaningless bits of dribble. Focus on yourself and lifting up those around you, not trying to bring them down. Our country was founded on and thrived by our diversity and constant desire to accept others, enjoying the freedoms that our Veterans and our Constitution fight for and guarantee. Small government intrusion into our lives, businesses providing jobs and benefits that our society demands, encouragement and continued bettering of ourselves by education and community involvement…these are the things that bring us together no matter what our sex, color, ethnicity, social standing or any such superficial divisions. We are all the same and want the same things. No one is required to take care of you as an individual or your family or their health. That is for the individual to decide by making life choices toward the end that they choose for themselves and their families. Our Constitution guarantees the right to “pursue” not a guarantee that it will be given to you. Medicaid, food stamps, WIC, and others are only a means to help on a very temporary basis not for a lifetime…a Hand-up not a Hand-out.

      Reply
      1. Charlotte Sines March 25, 2014

        I never said I was a victim because I’m not. No one takes care of me. I support myself and follow my own conscience. I believe that everyone is equal and should be treated that way. My mother was a social worker all her life and my childhood was filled with activities to help others in every way we could.I was brought up to see that women and men were equals and that no one should ever be allowed to control others for any reason.

        Reply
      2. Sand_Cat March 26, 2014

        Aren’t you the one who suggested not having sex unless you want children? Isn’t that accepting victim status from the prudes who want to assure they control your sex life, along with everything else?
        You’re full of it, lady.

        Reply
      3. Allan Richardson March 28, 2014

        Nobody can control anyone except himself or herself? Really? You mean that everyone who was killed or wounded or forcibly deported in a war, or who starved to death because someone cornered the market on some foodstuff and kept it away from those who were hungry (look up the Irish potato “famine” caused by British soldiers forcing the export of wheat that could have fed the people), or who were poisoned by air or water pollution caused by others, etc. etc. WAS CHOOSING to have those things happen to them? Could the Jews have offered any meaningful resistance to the Nazis, or for that matter to the Spanish Inquisition, the Romans or the Babylonians? Could the Cherokee have refused to walk on the Trail of Tears and kept their homes in Georgia? The life choices that individuals make are quite often overruled by nature (anything from illness to natural disasters such as hurricanes or earthquakes), carelessness or malice on the part of others, or PUNITIVE LAWS passed by those who gained power, even in a democracy, by DECEIVING voters like you. Life choices are also often based on the belief (which may be universally shared, or at least reasonable, at the time) that a certain career is the best one to be educated to pursue, and then after the investment is made, that occupation “tanks out” and workers are left with the wrong skills, and no spare cash to switch to the right ones. The life choices of a young woman may be based on the belief that the man she loves will be a dependable and faithful husband, but after becoming dependent on him to support her and her children, she learns that he is abusive (possibly a danger to her or the children), refuses to work, is unfaithful, or just decides to dump her — or all of the above — and has money to get a good lawyer.

        If you believe that everyone has complete ability to make their own environment, Cyndi, your last name must be Lauper, because you are obviously shielded by your or your parents’ money from having to worry about anything in life, so you can afford to “just wanna have fun.”

        Reply
  6. Michael Nunez March 25, 2014

    Without centralized power to coerce, small groups of quacks and academics have no way to force people to chase their ever-shifting mirage of utopian illusions.

    Reply
    1. Allan Richardson March 28, 2014

      Without centralized power to referee and punish bullies, those bullies will eventually BECOME the centralized power. See Attila the Hun.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.