fbpx

Type to search

Donald Trump And The New Global System

Featured Post Politics Top News US White House World

Donald Trump And The New Global System

Share
Trump, Foreign Policy

Reprinted with permission from The Washington Spectator.

Well, Trump has certainly done what he promised he would do, and more, especially on foreign policy. No fake news there. In only the first three weeks of his presidency he set in motion an almost total disruption of U.S. foreign policy as we have known it for the last seven decades. From this apparent chaos, Trump hopes to create a system that favors the United States and its interests.

As former National Security Adviser Lt. General Michael Flynn wrote in his February 13, 2017, resignation letter: “In just three weeks [Trump] has reoriented American foreign policy in fundamental ways to restore America’s leadership.” In truth, the Trump foreign policy chaos is likely to accelerate centrifugal forces in the global system that will be the death-knell of American exceptionalism and leadership, hastening a rebalancing of global power with the United States as just another player.

The outcome of this chaos and disruption is likely to be different from what the president intends, and it means a dramatically different modus operandi for U.S. foreign policy, with no hope of returning to the “old order.”

In the first three weeks Flynn referred to, the litany of disruptions heralding the new chaotic era is long: insulting Mexico; a phone call with Vladimir Putin, denouncing the strategic nuclear New Start agreement and seeking a different partnership with Russia; calling the 70-year-old NATO treaty “obsolete”; banning travelers from seven predominately Muslim countries; halting refugee entry into the country for 120 days and cutting the U.S. refugee admission target in half; declaring that the United States will stop China if it tries to take over islands in the South China Sea; canceling U.S. participation in the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement; seeking to reduce U.S. funding for international organizations; insulting the Australian Prime Minister over a trivial refugee issue; promising a massive military budget increase and military buildup while calling for an end to military “nation building”—and surely many more actions I have left out.

Defenders of the way business used to be done have been outraged, on behalf of alliances, friends, treaties, agreements, or the legacy of what they accomplished when they were in office. But the seemingly random, uncoordinated, free-form Trump assault on 70 years of U.S. foreign policy, in its somewhat childish way, may accelerate the rebalancing trend already well underway before January 20, 2017. A Clinton presidency might have delayed this trend, but, inevitably, we are seeing the emergence of a different, non-hegemonic international system, one already apparent since the late 1990s, a world more similar to the Great Powers of the 1890s than to the “Cold Warriors” busily defending the old order.

Over the past 28 years, since the end of the Cold War, while neo-conservatives raged on about the victory of democracy and American global domination as far as the eye could see and pundits could predict, beneath the apparently calm surface of American hegemony, cracks in the Cold War system were already emerging, sometimes with a helping hand from the U.S. administration of the moment.

While NATO expansion, which provided reassurance to the former Warsaw Pact nations, was seen as a vital part of the Cold War victory, the expanded reach of the alliance and an implied promise that countries on the Russian border might soon become part of the “West” set Russian teeth on edge, contributing to an inevitable revival of Russian power and its unilateral self-assertion in the world. The rise of China, which began even before the end of the Cold War, was not something the United States could “contain” by military force or assertive policy; it is something that must be accommodated by recognizing that power relationships have changed and the previous rules in the Pacific, even broader global rules, had to evolve.

U.S. diplomatic and military dominance in the Middle East had already eroded well before the Obama administration offered support to democracy movements. Iran was already engaged in cross-region support for regimes and movements, a process that goes back to 1979. Saudi support for fundamentalist, violent jihadism was already apparent. Al Qaeda existed since the mid-1990s, its appeal amplified by the U.S. military presence in Saudi Arabia, the spiritual home of Sunni Islam. The Bush administration accelerated the cracking of the Middle East political glacier by invading Iraq. The later military “surge” put a pretty face on what was a strategic, military, and political failure and no sustained increase of U.S. troops could have guaranteed security or prevented the outbreak of tension between Sunni and Shia in the region.

Significant and growing U.S. counter-terrorism efforts that began in the Clinton administration, expanded with Bush’s Iraq invasion, and doubled-down with Obama’s drone strikes and special operations deployments did little to stem the metastasizing terrorist organizations. U.S. policy may even have stimulated the expansion and attractiveness of terrorist behavior by providing the extremists apparent evidence, however untrue, that the United States was an enemy of Islam.

Other fractures in the system were also appearing before Trump. Although the United States had been central to the creation of the global security and financial institutions of the Cold War, by 2015 both China and Russia had created new international institutions: organizations like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (China, Russia, four other members, and organizational ties with India, Pakistan, and Turkey, among others, but not the United States); the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (57 members, including the U.K., but not the United States); and the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (16 Asian nations, including China and India). In addition, Turkey, long a close NATO ally, resisted using its territory to create a northern front in the 2003 invasion of Iraq. And Indian military power and international assertion have been well under way over the past 20 years.

Almost all of Trump’s foreign policy actions have pumped on the gas, incentivizing others to accelerate the redistribution of power and influence and undermining of the former order. It is as if he intended, through disruption, to blow up business as usual. By unleashing battles with nations allied with the United States since the 1940s, insulting neighbors, abandoning carefully negotiated trade agreements, and asserting that America should come first, Trump has pushed buttons around the globe. The result is even less U.S. leadership and even more “go-it-alone” behavior.

As Trump moves close to Putin, the architecture of sanctions against Russia for annexing Crimea and invading Ukraine crumble and both Germany and France could move closer to Russia. As the United States emphasizes “old energy” and rejects the existing architecture of global trade agreements and dismisses international climate accords, China asserts a stronger role in global climate change and trade discussions. As the U.S. stance toward Iran toughens, China emerges as a potentially potent partner for Iran.

The Iraq invasion already condemned the U.S. to a marginal role in Syria; the Trump stance accelerates a role Russia was already playing in that country, including closer Turkey-Russia cooperation, independent of the United States. Russia organizes a conference to explore resolution to the conflict in Afghanistan, and invites everyone except the United States and NATO countries supporting the Kabul regime.

In Europe the centrifugal trend is very clear. The U.K. has decided to leave the E.U., further weakening that bulwark of the old order. France may move toward a more authoritarian regime this spring, with consequences for the future of European security and economic arrangements. The President of the E.U. Council of Ministers, Donald Tusk, described the changes in Washington as one of the “threats” now facing the E.U. And Germany, which has emerged as a more assertive power, faces difficult choices about how far it moves toward accommodation with Russia and whether it should develop more traditional instruments of power, such as military forces and nuclear weapons.

As the new German president, Frank-Walter Steinmeier put it: “The old world of the 20th Century is gone.”

President Obama seemed to understand that centrifugal forces were at work in the world and, whatever the critique of his foreign policy, was working to adapt the United States to that change, while continuing its leadership. He asserted the necessity, even the inevitability, of American leadership, but with a lighter and less interventionist hand. Wherever one looks, the unpredictability of the Trump White House—its insistence on the foreign and economic policy nationalism rooted in “America First,” its hostility toward immigrants, its stalwart assertion of the critical need to protect America’s borders, his determination to expand America’s military—all point toward the end of exceptionalism and American leadership, as well.

History was already writing a concluding chapter to the role of the United States as global leader. That conclusion may come faster than we expect, with high risk and dramatic change. It is not clear that the Trump administration will be able to cope with this change; dealing with the arrival of the new international order may fall to the next administration, should this one survive the chaotic transition.

Gordon Adams is Professor Emeritus at American University, a Fellow at the Stimson Center, and a policy consultant, living in Brunswick, Maine.

IMAGE: U.S. President Donald Trump boards Air Force One to travel to Palm Beach, Florida from Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, U.S.,  February 3, 2017. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

Tags:

17 Comments

  1. Joel Pierce March 13, 2017

    I profited 104,000 bucks previous year by doing an on-line job at home a­­n­­d I was able to do it by working part time f­o­r 3 or sometimes more hrs /day. I used an earning model I found online and I am thrilled that i was able to make so much money. It’s really beginner-friendly a­­n­­d I am just so grateful that i discovered this. This is what i do… http://ibty.co/lxj

    Reply
    1. Gerry Francis March 14, 2017

      Just because we’re discussing Trump, it doesn’t mean that everyone on here fell for his BS. Nobody believes you.

      Reply
  2. kjfkljklsf March 13, 2017

    hsfjksdhfjksd

    Reply
  3. Sand_Cat March 13, 2017

    Well, if Trump manages to lay “American exceptionalism” – why don’t we call it what it is: hypocrisy without the slightest self-awareness – to rest in a long-overdue grave and keep it there, he will have done the country one service, anyway.

    Reply
    1. dbtheonly March 14, 2017

      I disagree SC.

      Although it’s looking a little shaky at the moment, I truly believe that participatory democracy and a well regulated free market offer the best path to happiness for the greatest number of people in the world.

      American power should, shield fledgling democracies anywhere in the world. American economic power should be employed to promote free, and fair, trade anywhere in the world. American medical power ought to be employed to fight disease anywhere in the world. American economic power ought to be used to fight famine anywhere in the world.

      Reply
      1. Sand_Cat March 15, 2017

        I agree with everything you wrote. None of it has anything to do with the “American Exceptionalism” I’m talking about: the “right” to harshly criticize other countries while the US does the same thing, the right to “save” other countries from the people they elect (and while we’re at it, save US companies – who have ZERO loyalty to the US – money and preserve the slave labor environments in other countries they love so well).
        How many “fledgling democracies” has the US “shielded” lately? Do you consider Iraq and Afghanistan “fledgling democracies”? I certainly don’t. The US has undoubtedly overthrown or sponsored terrorism against more democracies than it has “shielded,” and will continue to do so as long as we maintain the illusion that we are some sort of super-moral nation which can do no wrong, that we can install “democracy” by force, that we have the right to do all sorts of things other nations don’t.
        An excellent example is the South China Sea thing: while China signed the Law of the Sea treaty that forbids the actions they are taking, who was it who refused to do so pretty much openly because we wanted to preserve our “right” to exploit other people’s exclusive economic zones? Go back and look at the arguments made in the Senate against it. They’re pretty much naked greed, saying we’re not signing anything that might keep us from taking resources anywhere we have the technology to exploit, regardless of who “owns” them.
        Our participatory “democracy” is more than a little shaky: for decades it’s represented the wealthy and powerful against the interests of the majority. The Supreme Court has now gutted the Voting Rights Act, and wait until Trump appoints a couple of neo-Nazis and they can start on the Civil Rights Act, plus continue their campaign against minority voters uninhibited by the Federal Courts. Trump and the thugs around him are the closest thing to a Fascist government we’ve ever had, and I’ll be surprised if they don’t get re-elected in four years, despite predictions here that he won’t last until summer.

        Reply
  4. Aaron_of_Portsmouth March 13, 2017

    The last time the US withdrew into a isolationist “America Only” mode was prior to WW2. Until Pearl Harbor, the US for the most part was content to ponder its own concerns, ignoring the advances of Hitler, and casting a blind eye to the ominous signs of an impending mass elimination of people for the sake of expansion/racialist dreams of a nation intent on seeing itself as “The Master Race”—all so that the US could concentrate on a fixation with its own “Group/National Identity”.

    And along comes Trump, FOX Nation, the GOP, and a bevy of Americans believing that it’s to our benefit to retreat again into a shell of isolation and nationalist conviviality, while devoid of any real concern for the well-being of others in the world, or even members within America who look different than the majority, and/or are of different nationalities.

    The era when such isolation was OK was long ago, and now appears infantile in the context of today’s world of a humanity more connected globally than ever before in the history of humankind.

    Conservative tendencies keep America under the “clouds” of a dark, childish, and antiquated state of mind which the GOP and Trump trumpets, and must dissipate in order for the “sun” of Progress, Maturity, Reciprocity, and world fellowship to shine.

    Reply
    1. Melindaccarter March 14, 2017

      Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj362d:
      On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      !mj362d:
      ➽➽
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash362ShopMagazineGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj362d:….,…….

      Reply
    2. dbtheonly March 14, 2017

      Flagged the spam for you.

      You’ve really nailed this one.

      On one hand Trump wants to MAGA and be the dominant world superpower. On the other hand Trump is disrupting trade and alliances that would allow for that.

      Unless Trump’s megalomania seeks absolute domination of the whole world beyond that achieved by Alexander or Genghis Kahn.

      Reply
      1. Aaron_of_Portsmouth March 14, 2017

        Thank you my friend. What a nuisance these childish attempts are to persuade one to get involved with get-rich schemes.

        Reply
        1. dbtheonly March 14, 2017

          Indeed, but my sympathy lies with those desperate enough to consider following any of those links provided.

          Reply
  5. FireBaron March 14, 2017

    For those people who still think Teflon Donnie will be a great president because he is a business man, ask yourselves this – how many other successful businessmen have had four corporate bankruptcies in businesses that almost never fail? Why is he the only casino operator who ever folded in New Jersey? Even more so, why did the Nevada Gaming Commission deny him a gambling license? Because of his history of failed casinos!

    Reply
    1. Mama Bear March 14, 2017

      perhaps one day the whole truth will come out – that his “businesses” were all fronts for money laundering.

      Reply
  6. Mama Bear March 14, 2017

    I am afraid the author has revealed a truth that most of us cannot pretend isn’t there.

    Reply
  7. jmprint March 14, 2017

    Every time I see a photo of Trumpf saluting one our great heroes in military I gag, he is one of the most unpatriotic individual in the US.

    Reply
  8. bwhobrey@mail.ru March 16, 2017

    I have earned 104 thousand bucks last year by freelancing on-line and I did that by wo­rking part time f­o­r few hours on daily basis. I used an earning model I came across from company that i found online and I am so excited that i made so much extra income. It’s so newbie friendly and I’m just so grateful that i learned about it. Check out what I did… http://www.wzurl.me/tEXzrw

    Reply
  9. Anton Coleman April 12, 2017

    Have you consistently attained too much money without trading in something or even just left out undertaking any kind of mlm marketing kind of job while not having to make an investment anything at all. I wish to inform you of a project wherein pretty much all methods is actually handovered to you and as a consequence it is a relatively easy as well as uncomplicated task. Its not necessary to launch your very own domain name and all that., almost all is going to be presented to you completely free. Customers will likely take a look at the landing page so you are going to get money for that. Its as easy as that. I’m getting large sums of money at home through this project exactly like 20 thousand bucks per thirty days or over and if you might wish to get paid like this so therefore follow these specific quite easy guidelines by surfing this internet site >>>>> http://www.doshort.com/58ss

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.