Tag: 2016 democratic primaries
What Sanders’ ‘Concession’ Speech Means For Democrats

What Sanders’ ‘Concession’ Speech Means For Democrats

Bernie Sanders is ending his run in the Democratic primary. Well, sort of.

The Vermont senator’s live-streamed remarks Thursday — in which he stopped short of endorsing Hillary Clinton but said he would work together with her to defeat Donald Trump — were strong evidence that his crusade against the Democratic establishment is not over just yet, even though he no longer has any chance at winning the Democratic nomination.

“Election days come and go, but political and social revolutions that attempt to transform our society never end,” Sanders said. “That’s what this campaign has been about for the past year.”

Following his loss in the D.C. primary on Tuesday and in California a week earlier, Sanders’ stubborn refusal to fully concede shows that he wants to take every opportunity — even this very last one — to criticize the DNC for its reliance on large donor contributions and lack of appeal to his camp of young voters and progressives.

“I look forward in the coming weeks to continue discussion between the two campaigns to make sure that your voices are heard,” he said. “I also look forward to working with Secretary Clinton to transform the Democratic Party so that it becomes a party of working people and young people and not just wealthy campaign contributors.”

Even if Clinton has clinched the nomination, it only makes sense that Sanders’ campaign — which has framed itself as a “political revolution” — is milking all the influence it can in order leave some lasting imprint on the Democratic Party, instead of merely dissolving into a united anti-Trump general election effort.

Sanders drew ire from many Democrats last week after he refused to formally concede following his losses in New Jersey and California, which put Clinton solidly over the number of delegates required to win the Democratic nomination, and dragging out his campaign until the convention is unlikely to resolve their frustration.

But Sanders built his campaign on a wave of mostly young, mostly progressive grassroots supporters dissatisfied with mainstream politics, and his lack of a full concession shows that he wants to pin the Democratic National Committee for failing to reach out to them, living up to a campaign promise to attend he Democratic National Convention as a candidate.

In his remarks following a meeting at the White House with President Obama, Sanders called for a structural transformation to the party, including more outreach, more open primaries, and new leadership at the DNC — a pointed reference at current DNC chair and Florida congresswoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

By arguing that “we need major, major changes in the Democratic Party in converting it to a party of the people—welcoming working people, welcoming young people,” Sanders marked the beginning of a struggle with, and against, the Democratic Party, even after conceding that he doesn’t have a shot at the nomination.

Likewise, the extension of his campaign is also a way to amplify the voices of his supporters as loudly and for as long as he can. In order to shift the party to the left, this means showing that his “vision for the future of this country is not some kind of fringe idea. It is not a radical idea,” as he said in his speech on Thursday.

Sanders’ principal strategy for this amplification seems to be drawing attention to the party platform. Normally more of a procedural document that the focus of waning presidential campaigns, that might change this year: Sanders has selected unconventionally progressive representatives like Cornel West and Bill McKibben — both vocal critics of the Obama administration — who are likely to make a scene in Philadelphia later this month.

Sanders pledged in his speech on Thursday to ensure “that the Democratic Party passes the most progressive platform in its history and that Democrats actually fight for that agenda.”

Photo via YouTube

Obama Close To Endorsing Clinton For Democratic Presidential Nominee: Media

Obama Close To Endorsing Clinton For Democratic Presidential Nominee: Media

By James Oliphant

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – After staying above the campaign fray for months, U.S. President Barack Obama could endorse Hillary Clinton as early as this week as the Democratic presidential nominee, nudging Bernie Sanders to finally abandon his long-fought challenge, U.S. media reported on Monday.

The expected Obama endorsement, reported by The New York Times and CNN, would come as a welcome boost to Clinton and to Democrats concerned that the party needs to turn its attention fully to campaigning against Republican nominee Donald Trump.

While he has made remarks indicating a preference for Clinton, his former secretary of state, Obama has so far avoided a clear endorsement and has focused his remarks about the campaign on blasting Trump.

A senior White House official would not comment on timing of any endorsement but said Obama is eager to campaign where he might be useful.

Clinton has long been the front-runner to be the Democratic nominee in the Nov. 8 election but has faced an unexpectedly tough fight against Sanders, a U.S. senator from Vermont who has attacked her from the left.

She is expected to clinch the party nomination on Tuesday when voters in six states cast ballots. Her campaign hopes an expected victory in New Jersey will give her enough delegates to effectively lock up the nomination early in the evening, before the results come in from California, the biggest electoral prize and likely the last to report results on Tuesday.

But although he lags well behind in delegates needed to win the nomination, Sanders has vowed to take the fight to the Democratic National Convention in July.

Clinton supporters said on Monday that Sanders should acknowledge her victory and move toward uniting the party behind her.

“I think at the bare minimum what he can do is not try to delegitimize the process or call into question the fact that Hillary Clinton is truly the nominee after Tuesday,” Brian Fallon, Clinton’s press secretary, said on CNN.

Mo Elleithee, executive director of Georgetown University’s Institute of Politics and Public Service and a former Clinton campaign staffer, said her June 2008 concession to Obama in the closely fought Democratic primary that year should be a roadmap for Sanders.

“She gave her supporters who wanted a chance to vote for her a chance to vote for her. Then she stood up and said to her supporters, ‘Now let’s get behind the presumptive nominee,'” Elleithee said.

 

CALIFORNIA VOTES

Clinton has 2,357 delegates going into Tuesday’s contests, just 26 short of the 2,383 she needs to clinch the nomination at next month’s convention in Philadelphia.

Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota and New Mexico also hold nominating contests on Tuesday, but most attention will focus on California. Clinton once held a sizable lead there over Sanders, but opinion polls in recent days show a dead heat between the two.

While Clinton expects to become the presumptive nominee regardless of the California result, a Sanders victory there could embolden his supporters to urge him to wage a fractious convention fight.

It could also help Trump argue that she is a weak candidate. Trump secured the delegates he needed to clinch the Republican nomination last month, leaving him free to focus on battering Clinton.

Sanders’ campaign appeared to burn through cash to get to the final nominating contests, ending April with just $5.8 million on hand, compared to Clinton’s $30 million. The senator has not released his May fundraising figures. Spokesman Michael Briggs said in an email the campaign was “doing fine.”

Clinton heads into Tuesday’s contests with a victory this weekend in Puerto Rico’s primary. And though Sanders could campaign in Washington, D.C., ahead of the final primary of the year on June 14, Clinton is expected to win there.

Trump, a real estate developer, has regularly stirred up controversy on the campaign trail and has frequently dismayed Republican establishment leaders. In recent days, his comments about a judge he believes to be biased against him because he is Mexican-American have drawn a fresh wave of criticism, including concern in his own party.

On Monday Trump rejected criticism of his allegations of bias, insisting his concerns were valid.

The latest Reuters/Ipsos tracking poll shows Clinton with an 11-percentage-point edge over Trump, 46 percent to 35 percent, a marked change from just 10 days ago, when fewer than 4 percentage points separated the two.

 

(Additional reporting by Ginger Gibson, Amanda Becker, Emily Stephenson, Timothy Gardner and Doina Chiacu in Washington; Editing by Caren Bohan and Frances Kerry)

Arizona’s Primary Day Headaches Aren’t Finished Yet

Arizona’s Primary Day Headaches Aren’t Finished Yet

While the national media has turned its attention to the upcoming primaries in Wisconsin, voters in Arizona are fighting against the state’s weak response to complaints of long lines and a shortage of polling locations during its recent primary, last Tuesday.

But it seems uncertain there will be any remedy to the situation.

“I apologize profusely — I can’t go back and undo it,” said Helen Purcell, the Maricopa County recorder, during a highly charged public hearing on Monday in front of the Arizona House Elections Committee. Purcell had earlier caught flak for accusing voters of being responsible for the long lines.

In the first presidential election year since the gutting of the Voting Rights Act in 2013, polling stations in Maricopa County, home to the greater Phoenix area, were reduced from 200 in the 2008 primaries to just 60 this year, resulting in waiting times of up to five hours at some locations. In neighboring Pima County, which includes the greater Tuscon area, complaints arose about incorrect party affiliations, which, in a closed primary like Arizona’s, prevented voters from choosing presidential preferences.

During the public hearing hearing, person after person approached the podium, providing testimony of poll workers telling them that their votes weren’t going to count because the election was already decided, or because their party affiliation had been switched. Many also called for the Purcell’s resignation, or called the voting irregularities “a planned attack,” although there’s no evidence to support that claim. Others called for a re-vote.

Not possible, said J.D. Mesnard, a Republican committee member, because it would disenfranchise those who had already voted.

The threat of voter suppression has become much more real following the gutting of the Voting Rights Act in 2013, the result of Supreme Court’s Shelby County v. Holder decision. The VRA, among other things, required that states with a history of political or racial discrimination had to get approval from the Department of Justice or a federal court before making any changes to their electoral procedures or policies, to ensure the changes wouldn’t leave voters of color worse off. After 2013, Arizona was no longer legally bound to do so.

Meanwhile, a White House petition has attracted over 200,000 signatures demanding an investigation into reports of those unable to vote in the primary.

New Polls: Hillary Clinton Way Ahead In Super Tuesday States

New Polls: Hillary Clinton Way Ahead In Super Tuesday States

Hillary Clinton has had a tightly-fought race in February against Bernie Sanders, but she could soon be in for a raft of victories in the Super Tuesday contests on March 1.

A new set of polls released by Democratic-aligned firm Public Policy Polling finds Clinton leading in 10 out of 12 primaries to be held that day, with Clinton especially benefitting from the support of minority voters.

From the pollster’s analysis: “Clinton is benefiting in these states from overwhelming African American support. She leads by anywhere from 40-62 points among black voters in the nine of these states that have more black voters than the national average.”

The listing of polled states is as follows:

  • Alabama: Clinton 59 percent, Sanders 31 percent
  • Arkansas: Clinton 57 percent, Sanders 32 percent
  • Georgia: Clinton 60 percent, Sanders 26 percent
  • Louisiana: Clinton 60 percent, Sanders 29 percent
  • Massachusetts: Sanders 49 percent, Clinton 42 percent
  • Michigan: Clinton 50 percent, Sanders 40 percent
  • Mississippi: Clinton 60 percent, Sanders 26 percent
  • Oklahoma: Clinton 46 percent, Sanders 44 percent
  • Tennessee: Clinton 58 percent, Sanders 32 percent
  • Texas: Clinton 57 percent, Sanders 34 percent
  • Virginia: Clinton 56 percent, Sanders 34 percent
  • Vermont: Sanders 86 percent, Clinton 10 percent

Caveat: Two additional states that are voting on March 1, Colorado and Minnesota, were not included in this round of polling. PPP confirmed to The National Memo that this was because those states are holding caucuses rather than primaries, and are much more difficult to poll reliably.

For a variety of reasons, though, it might seem to an outside observer that Bernie Sanders could do quite well in both contests, given the nature caucus structures as well as the very progressive tendencies of those states’ Democratic voters.

Photo: Democratic U.S. presidential candidate Hillary Clinton meets with civil rights leaders at the National Urban League in the Manhattan borough of New York City, February 16, 2016. REUTERS/Mike Segar