Tag: disability
Trump Proposes Social Security Changes That Impoverish Disabled

Trump Proposes Social Security Changes That Impoverish Disabled

Published with permission from the Independent Media Institute

American workers contribute to Social Security with every paycheck. When they do, they are earning comprehensive insurance protections. Social Security insures against the loss of wages due to old age, disability, or (for the surviving family of a worker) death. While Social Security is best known as a retirement program, disability and survivor’s benefits are equally essential.

An attack on any part of Social Security is an attack on the entire system and all current and future beneficiaries. The latest proposal from Donald Trump’s administration, which is designed to rip benefits away from hundreds of thousands of Americans with disabilities, amounts to a declaration of war on Social Security.

The Trump administration proposal would require millions of Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) beneficiaries to re-prove their eligibility for benefits as often as every six months—far more frequently than is currently the case. There is no justification for this policy. The United States already has some of the strictest eligibility criteria for disability benefits in the world. More than half of all claims are denied.

We should be making it easier for workers to claim the Social Security benefits they’ve earned with every paycheck, not harder. And ripping benefits away from current beneficiaries, who rely on them to survive, is even worse.

We know what the effects of the Trump proposal would be, because Ronald Reagan implemented a very similar benefit cut back in the 1980s. Reagan’s policy ripped away the benefits of 200,000 Americans with disabilities. The New York Timesreported that “people with obvious physical and mental disabilities” lost their benefits “without having been interviewed.”

Ultimately, Reagan was forced to reverse his attack on Social Security after massive public outcry, and bipartisan condemnation from Congress—but not before 21,176 people died, including several who died by suicide, “because their benefits were cut off.”

Donald Trump himself might not be a diligent student of history, but his advisers—men like Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s chief of staff and a longtime enemy of Social Security—know exactly what they are doing. They want to resurrect Reagan’s Social Security cut knowing full well that it killed people.

This could impact any of us, even those of us who are currently healthy. Imagine that you are hit by a car tomorrow, and suffer life-altering injuries that prevent you from working. You’re faced with crushing medical bills, and you’ve lost your income. In such situations, SSDI benefits are a crucial lifeline. Donald Trump wants to rip that lifeline away.

Trump and Mulvaney are targeting people with disabilities first, because they perceive them as politically vulnerable. But if they are allowed to get away with this attack, it will be only the beginning. They want to destroy every part of Social Security, including retirement benefits, and turn it over to their criminal friends on Wall Street.

We must stop Trump’s plan. The Social Security Administration is collecting comments on the proposal until the end of January. You can comment opposing the plan here. Everyone must also call their elected officials. Congressional condemnation played a huge role in forcing Ronald Reagan to reverse his version of the attack, and it can stop Trump in his tracks.

If we let the politicians in Washington, D.C., take away some people’s earned benefits, it means they can take away all of our earned benefits.

This article was produced by Economy for All, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

Alex Lawson is the executive director of Social Security Works, a non-profit advocacy group that supports expanding benefits to address America’s growing retirement security crisis. Lawson has appeared on numerous TV and radio outlets and is a frequent guest host of The Thom Hartmann Program, one of the top progressive radio shows in the country.

The Thrifty Traveler: Accessible Travel Offers Adventure, Affordability

The Thrifty Traveler: Accessible Travel Offers Adventure, Affordability

By Myscha Theriault, Tribune News Service (TNS)

In a recent study conducted by Mandala Research for Open Doors, an organization which works to create more inclusive travel experiences for people with accessibility needs, one thing was abundantly clear. American travelers with disabilities spend big bucks. More than 34 billion over the past two years, in fact. Something hospitality and restaurant venues may want to sit up and take notice of, especially with so many baby boomers developing mobility concerns as they age.

Of the travelers with adaptive or access needs surveyed in the study, 96 percent book restaurant services while traveling, 76 percent opt for hotel stays and 26 percent access rental cars. Additionally, a whopping 69 percent require someone else to assist them. According to this same study, 68 percent of travelers with disabilities do so for pleasure, and they average at least $500 per trip.

Adventure: Those who have only recently experienced decreased mobility issues might think extreme nature getaways are now out of the question. Think again. Exploring remote wilderness areas with mobility concerns may be a logistical and financial challenge, but it is far from impossible.

It can also be more affordable than you might think. Especially with organizations such as Wilderness Inquiry stepping up to the service plate. They offer adventure getaways to far-off destinations such as Tanzania, along with winter and summer excursions to Minnesota’s Boundary Waters Canoe Area, Olympic National Park and more. Fully integrated wilderness trips offer things such as adaptive kayaks suited to holding folding wheelchairs, support staff for things such as boat transfers, trail-to-trail transition and more.

Their multi-day Apostle Islands trips, for example, start out in their base camp near Bayfield, Wis. Prices for this particular destination run as low as $435 per adult, with youth prices ringing in at only $195 a pop. The facility features appropriate tent platforms, extended-top picnic tables for wheelchair access and a variety of universal design elements for front-country vacation success. Not only do these trip packages include all food, equipment and guide staff, but the organization also helps coordinate financial assistance for qualifying individuals. Wildernessinquiry.org has full details on destination selection and package pricing.

Access: Researching usability information for wheelchairs and walkers in advance can help excursionists plan ahead and get the most bang for their buck. Something accessible travel guru Candy Harrington knows something about, having covered this particular content niche for 20 years. As the founding editor of Emerging Horizons and author of seven guide books designed to meet the informational needs of travelers who vacation with wheelers and slow walkers, Harrington knows what questions to ask.

She suggests certain things are essential to ask when you call to research accessibility, particularly for wheelchair users. Her first piece of advice? Find out if the accessible room has a roll-in shower or a tub-shower combination. Says Harrington, “In the U.S. properties with fewer than 50 rooms are not required to provide roll-in showers.” Other tips include researching whether or not wheelchair access is available on both sides of the bed to address specific transfer needs and asking about dining-area accessibility so you’ll know whether or not to request meals be delivered to your room.

The most common problem according to Harrington is that little extra step between surfaces that many people aren’t able to navigate. Other prevalent pitfalls include too-high beds and hotel shower controls placed too far from the seating bench. The veteran travel journalist has seen them placed as far as 5 feet away! Harrington’s latest book, “Resting Easy in the US,” features accurate access descriptions and detailed photographs of over 90 unique properties across the country. Some of her favorite accessible getaways include Las Vegas, San Diego and portions of Yosemite.

Accommodations: Traveler on wheels Deborah Sakach favors more intimate inns as opposed to giant resorts and larger tour operations. According to Sakach, independent inn owners are generally the type of people who are going to “really think about your situation and help you have the very best experience in their area.” For example, when a jeep tour operator in Sedona couldn’t think of any wheelchair-accessible petroglyphs, her innkeeper remembered a new trail that afforded astonishing close-up views.

This was a far cry from some of her other travel experiences around the world, including getting tipped out of her wheelchair in Africa, refused deplaning assistance in Amsterdam and forced up a questionably safe incline in London. “Each disability is so unique that it does take thinking to make things work,” says Sakach, “That’s why a small inn works. It is intimate and they offer the interchange that helps make it happen.” Sakach’s love of how inns support unique travel needs led her to start her own travel business relating specifically to inn getaways. Iloveinns.com, Sakach’s booking website, offers discount information on charming inn venues around the country, including a buy-one-night-get-one-free program for travelers looking to save money.

One of the accommodation broker’s best bits of travel advice however is to keep an open mind. Says the veteran traveler, “The mishaps are not what I think about when I recall my trips. It’s the rich experiences that stay with you for a lifetime.”

(Myscha Theriault is a best-selling author and avid traveler. Having just finished a yearlong trip throughout the United States with her husband and Labrador retriever, Theriault is busy planning her next long-term adventure. Readers can keep up with her adventures on Twitter by following @MyschaTheriault.)

Photo: Even those in wheelchairs can go to the beach. kris krug via Flickr

With U.S. Encouragement, VA Disability Claims Rise Sharply

With U.S. Encouragement, VA Disability Claims Rise Sharply

By Alan Zarembo, Los Angeles Times

LOS ANGELES — As Malvin Espinosa prepared to retire from the Army in 2011, a Veterans Affairs counselor urged him to apply for disability pay.

List all your medical problems, the counselor said.

Espinosa, a mechanic at Fort Lee in Virginia, had never considered himself disabled. But he did have ringing in his ears, sleep problems, and aching joints. He also had bad memories of unloading a dead soldier from a helicopter in Afghanistan.

“Put it all down,” he recalled the counselor saying.

Espinosa did, and as a result, he is getting a monthly disability check of $1,792, tax free, most likely for the rest of his life. The VA deems him 80 percent disabled due to sleep apnea, mild post-traumatic stress disorder, tinnitus, and migraines.

The 41-year-old father of three collects a military pension along with disability pay — and as a civilian has returned to the base, working full-time training mechanics. His total income of slightly more than $70,000 a year is about 20 percent higher than his active-duty pay.

Similar stories are playing out across the VA.

With the government encouraging veterans to apply, enrollment in the system climbed from 2.3 million to 3.7 million over the last 12 years.

The growth comes even as the deaths of older former service members have sharply reduced the veteran population. Annual disability payments have more than doubled to $49 billion — nearly as much as the VA spends on medical care.

More than 875,000 veterans of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars have joined the disability rolls so far. That’s 43 percent of those who served — a far higher percentage than for any previous U.S. conflict, including World War II and Vietnam, which had significantly higher rates of combat wounds.

Disabled veterans of the recent wars have an average of 6.3 medical conditions each, also higher than other conflicts.

Incentives to seek disability ratings have increased due to changes in VA policy, including expanded eligibility for post-traumatic stress disorder and a number of afflictions that affect tens of millions of civilians.

Nearly any ailment that originated during service or was aggravated by it — from sports injuries to shrapnel wounds — is covered under the rationale that the military is a 24/7 job.

The disability system was unprepared for the massive influx of claims, leading to backlogs of veterans waiting months or longer to start receiving their checks.

But once the payments begin, many veterans say, they are a life-saver.

Ray Lopez struggled to keep a steady job after leaving the Marines in 2001. Stints as a TSA screener, insurance agent, and soft drink salesman ended badly.

At 35, Lopez is rated 70 percent disabled for back, shoulder, and knee pain, as well as post-traumatic stress disorder from having witnessed a deadly helicopter crash off the coast of San Diego.

He couldn’t support his wife and two children, he said, without the monthly $1,800 disability check. “If it wasn’t for that, I’d be on the streets,” he said.

Lopez trains boxers three days a week and is pursuing a community college degree.
___

The generosity of veterans benefits is on an upswing in a pendulum arc as old as the republic.

During the Revolutionary War, disability payments were limited to soldiers who lost limbs or suffered other serious wounds.

Lobbying by Civil War veterans led to coverage that included peacetime injuries and illnesses.

After World War I, compensation was scaled back to cover only combat injuries and diseases contracted in war. But World War II brought an expansion to include all conditions that appeared during service or shortly afterward.

In the 1950s, President Dwight Eisenhower — a former five-star general — tried to rein in the costs. He found little support in Congress, and the basic system has remained the same ever since.

The VA uses a formula that combines a veteran’s conditions into a rating of between 0 percent and 100 percent — in 10 percent increments. The higher the rating, the larger the disability payment.

Nearly half of those in the system have ratings of 30 percent or below. They can apply for higher ratings if ailments grow worse.
“The disability system has this escalator quality,” said David Autor, an economist at MIT. “Once you get on, you just keep going up.”

The current benefits boom began with a political battle over Agent Orange and other herbicides used to clear jungle brush in Vietnam.
In 1991, Congress and the VA started paying veterans who had served on the ground there — meaning possible exposure to Agent Orange — and went on to develop diseases that eventually included lung and prostate cancer.

Then in 2001, the VA added Type 2 diabetes to the list. The disease affects 1 in 4 U.S. senior citizens and has not been definitely linked to Agent Orange. But veterans groups lobbied to include it.

“The feeling was, let’s give them whatever they need and move on,” said Anthony Principi, the VA secretary at the time. Through 2013, the number of veterans receiving compensation for diabetes climbed from 46,395 to 398,480.

The Obama administration added three more conditions in 2010: Parkinson’s disease, a rare form of leukemia, and ischemic heart disease. Since then, more than 100,000 cases of heart disease — the leading cause of death in the United States — have been added to the disability rolls.

Veterans of all generations also have been encouraged to apply for compensation for post-traumatic stress disorder, with Vietnam and the recent wars driving the growth in roughly equal measure over the last decade.

Some veterans said they have lived with the disorder ever since leaving the military. Others kept it at bay until recent wars or major life changes released old demons. The economic uncertainties of retirement age also gave veterans more incentive to apply.

As post-traumatic stress disorder claims boomed, the Obama administration made them easier to win.

The VA had long required documentation of a traumatic event that resulted in post-traumatic stress disorder. But in 2010, in keeping with the current science, the administration said a qualifying trauma could simply be a fear-inducing situation such as traveling through enemy territory.

More than 1.3 million veterans of the Vietnam era received $21 billion in disability pay last year. From Afghanistan and Iraq, the cost was $9.3 billion — but it is growing fast.

Among disabled veterans of recent wars, 43 percent have tinnitus, the most common condition. Rounding out the top 10 are back or neck strain, knee problems, post-traumatic stress disorder, migraines, arthritis of the spine, scars, ankle trouble, defective hearing, and high blood pressure.

“They’re filing for the basic wear and tear of military service, not combat injuries,” said Phillip Carter, a veterans expert at the Center for a New American Security, a nonpartisan think tank.
___

The expansion of disability benefits signals a change in attitude about the purpose of the payments, long intended to compensate veterans for lost income. Studies have found that many disabilities in the system have no effect on average earnings. One showed that veterans receiving disability pay tend to have higher total incomes than those who do not.

In the age of an all-volunteer military and after two unpopular wars, disability pay has come to be seen as a lifetime deferred payment for service.

Espinosa, the Fort Lee trainer, said his monthly $1,792 disability check is scarcely making him rich. All of it goes for his son’s college education.

He has filed new claims for back and knee pain, gastrointestinal problems, and vertigo in an attempt to boost his 80 percent disability rating.

“I believe my disability rating — and I’m not trying to sound greedy — should be 100 percent,” he said. “I know what I went through.”

Photo via WikiCommons

Interested in national news? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Yes, Social Security Is an ‘Entitlement’ — Literally

Q: In a recent column, you advised a 55-year-old man who had just lost his job and had some back problems to file for Social Security disability benefits. To quote from your column: “It doesn’t hurt to try filing for disability benefits.” That’s what’s wrong with our country today. We have an entitlement culture. Everyone thinks they are due something from the government. And you are just perpetuating this entitlement problem by encouraging this guy to file for Social Security benefits!

Q: Your recent column advising a man to file for disability benefits really ticked me off. You [blankety-blank] liberals never met a government program you didn’t like. And by trying to get as many people as possible on the taxpayer’s gravy train, you’re just adding to the problem. No wonder our country is in such a mess. We need to start cutting government programs, not encouraging more people to apply for them!

A: Gosh, sometimes I write what I think is the simplest little column trying to help a guy in a tough situation — and I catch all kinds of grief for it. These two emails are just a sampling of the many I received chastising me for suggesting that a man file for Social Security disability benefits. And some of the responses I got were downright mean and nasty! I guess I pushed a few buttons that are indicative of the conservative “get the government off my back” mood our country seems to be in.

Here was the story. A 55-year old man had worked at the same job for the past 30-plus years and had recently been laid off. He said he was looking for work but wasn’t having any success. He mentioned that he had severe back pain and although he was reluctant to do so, his wife wanted him to file for Social Security disability benefits. He emailed me asking what chance I thought he had of qualifying for such benefits.

In my column, I essentially told him two things. First, I told him the obvious: He would have no chance if he never filed for disability benefits. And then I did say that it wouldn’t hurt to try filing for such benefits, and I told him how to do so. But the second thing I told him is that I thought there was a pretty good chance he would be considered simply unemployed and not disabled.

I explained that to qualify for Social Security disability benefits, you must have an impairment so severe that it is expected to keep you out of work for at least 12 months. Because he himself said he was looking for work, it sounded to me like he wouldn’t meet that legal definition of a disabling condition.

But here is the point: He has every right in the world to file for Social Security disability benefits. We all do. And it’s my job to tell him so. In this guy’s case, he worked and paid Social Security taxes for more than 30 years. He’s out of work. He has a medical condition that is causing him pain. And I have learned in four decades of working with the Social Security program that many people who file for Social Security disability benefits have more medical problems than they initially allege.

For example, in addition to his back problems, this guy might have high blood pressure. He might have a little heart tremor. He might have hearing loss. His back pain alone may not be enough to qualify him for benefits. But a combination of impairments might make him legally disabled.

I don’t know anything about the man other than what he wrote in his short email. But I would have been entirely negligent had I answered him by saying something like: “You’ve got a bad back. Well that’s tough! I’ve got a bad back, too. You are not eligible for Social Security disability benefits, and you have no right to apply for them!”

I guess that’s the message all the people who got upset with my answer wanted me to deliver to this guy.

Many people throw around the term “entitlements,” as if all government programs are free giveaways. And according to these folks, everyone today feels entitled to something, and that’s why this country is going to you-know-where in a hand basket! They are especially upset with those “[blankety blank] liberals,” who just encourage everyone to get on the entitlement train. And if you listen to the anti-government crowd, they’ll tell you that Social Security is the lead car on that gravy train.

Well, Social Security truly and literally is an “entitlement” program. Retirement, disability, and survivor’s benefits make up what is known as Title II of the Social Security Act. And the law says that if you work and pay taxes for a required amount of time and if you meet all the other eligibility requirements, you are indeed entitled to Social Security benefits.

I must, however, make this important semantic point: There is a difference between being eligible for a government benefit and being entitled to it. On the very first day of my training class, when I joined the Social Security Administration over 40 years ago, I was taught that everyone who works and pays taxes is potentially “eligible” for Social Security benefits, but you don’t actually become “entitled” to them until you file and sign a legal application for benefits and your claim is approved.

Like it or not, Social Security is an entitlement program. And as taxpayers, each one of us has every right to apply for such benefits.

If you have a Social Security question, Tom Margenau has the answer. Contact him at thomas.margenau@comcast.net.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM