Tag: gonzalo curiel
Judge Rejects Bid To Toss Trump University Lawsuit

Judge Rejects Bid To Toss Trump University Lawsuit

SAN DIEGO (Reuters) – A U.S. judge on Friday tentatively rejected Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump’s bid to dismiss a lawsuit by Trump University students who said they were defrauded through its real-estate seminars.

U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel in San Diego told a hearing he would take under consideration arguments on both sides in the case and issue a written ruling in the coming weeks.

The 2013 lawsuit, one of three over the defunct Trump University venture, was filed on behalf of students who paid up to $35,000 to learn Trump’s real estate investing “secrets” from his “hand-picked” instructors. The plaintiffs have sought class-action status.

The cases against Trump University have regularly cropped up during the presidential campaign. Trump was roundly criticized in May when he accused Curiel, who is of Mexican descent, of being biased against him because of the candidate’s pledge to build a border wall between the United States and Mexico.

Curiel, who was born in Indiana, is presiding over two of the cases, with one set for trial in late November. A separate lawsuit by New York’s attorney general is pending in that state.

Trump’s lawyers say Curiel should toss the 2013 California lawsuit on the grounds that the New York real estate mogul, though personally involved in developing the concept and curriculum, relied on other executives to manage Trump University by the time the plaintiffs purchased their seminars.

“By 2007, his involvement was fairly minimal. He was not the person running this company. He founded it, he established it and he went off and let other people run it. It’s like any other celebrity endorsement,” Trump attorney Daniel Petrocelli said during the hearing.

Trump’s lawyers claim references in marketing materials to “secrets,” “hand-picked” instructors or “university” were mere sales “puffery.” According to the defense, there is no evidence Trump intended to defraud students.

Lawyers for the students say the wealthy developer conducted the marketing for Trump University more than anyone else, starring in and approving promotional materials.

They claim Trump University instructors were high-pressure sales people, not “professors and adjunct professors” as Trump touted, and that New York authorities told Trump back in 2005 to stop calling his unaccredited venture a university.

“Somehow, belligerence trumps substance,” plaintiff’s attorney Jason Forge said. “If we say it loud enough, forcefully enough, it becomes true. Well, it doesn’t.”

Trump owned 92 percent of Trump University and had control over all major decisions, plaintiffs’ court papers say.

 

(Additional reporting by Karen Freifeld and Dan Whitcomb; Editing by Tom Brown and Jonathan Oatis)

Photo: Republican U.S. presidential nominee Donald Trump formally accepts the nomination at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio, U.S. July 21, 2016.     REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni

Fox News Joins Media Coalition Asking For Release Of Trump U. Depositions

Fox News Joins Media Coalition Asking For Release Of Trump U. Depositions

Published with permission from Media Matters for America.

Fox News joined a media coalition asking the judge in the Trump U. fraud case to release videos of presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump being questioned over the real estate program. The move by Fox comes after defending Trump from allegations of fraud surrounding the Trump U. controversy.

On June 11 Politico reported that a number of media organizations asked Judge Gonzalo Curiel to release video of Trump’s testimony in the Trump U. case. Lawyers for the media coalition argued that the lawsuit “has become a prominent election issue” and that Trump himself had cited Trump U. “as an example of his business success.” The initial coalition included all major TV news networks except for Fox News, as well as newspaper publishers from The New York TimesWashington Post, and Tribune Publishing.

On June 15, Politico reported that Fox News joined the effort, stating that they were not aware of the request and became interested in joining as soon as they learned of the move:

Fox News is joining a media coalition seeking to obtain full access to depositions presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump gave in a class-action lawsuit over his Trump University real estate seminar program.

When an array of news organizations moved last week to loosen restrictions on the deposition transcripts and videos, all the major news networks were part of the effort, except for Fox. Also on board were the New York Times, the Washington Post and Tribune Co., publisher of the Los Angeles Times and Chicago Tribune.

In a filing Wednesday with U.S. District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel in San Diego, lawyers for the media coalition said Fox was joining the consortium supporting the drive to remove confidential designations on parts of Trump’s testimony. If those restrictions are lifted, either side in the case would be free to release the transcripts in their entirety and likely the videos of the depositions as well.

Fox News’ decision to join the media coalition now ensures that right-wing media can continue their struggle to defend Trump by selectively using any video released.

Warren’s American Constitution Society Speech Previews Democrat Attacks on Trump

Warren’s American Constitution Society Speech Previews Democrat Attacks on Trump

Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren delivered an incisive 30-minute speech excoriating both Donald Trump and Senate Republicans on their approach to judicial issues.

Alternately sobering and critical, Warren grilled them on their stalling of Obama’s judicial nominees — from those at the district level to Judge Merrick Garland — as well as their comments on the Trump University lawsuit and the federal judge presiding over it.

Trump said that judge, Gonzalo Curiel, was unfit to preside over the Trump University case due to his Mexican heritage.

Warren, who has been widely named as a potential running-mate for Hillary Clinton, previewed the type of Democratic attack on Trump and the GOP that is likely to fill the airwaves as the media turns toward the general election race.

The American Constitution Society, a progressive legal association focusing on law and policy, hosts an annual convention to highlight key judicial issues and advance discourse.

Apart from Warren, other speakers at this year’s American Constitution Society National Convention include Vice President Joe Biden, White House Counsel Neil Eggleston, and Senator Amy Klobuchar, another name reported as a possible Clinton VP pick.

Here are ten of Warren’s best moments:

On the Republican campaign to stall Obama’s judicial nominations:

“What we’ve seen over the past three years — accelerating over the past three months, and even the past three weeks — is alarming. Powerful interests are now launching a full-scale assault on the integrity of the federal judiciary and its judges.”

On the state of the Supreme Court with only eight sitting justices:

“Judicial emergencies multiply. Cases pile up. Courts are starved for help. And now the Supreme Court of the United States sits paralyzed, unable to deal with its most challenging cases. All because extremist Republicans who reject the legitimacy of President Obama are determined to make certain our courts advance only the agenda of the wealthy and the powerful.”

On Republicans’ preference for judges with experience in corporate defense law:

“Senate Republicans and their big business allies don’t like nominees whose resumes reflect insufficient devotion to the interests of the rich and powerful — so they smear them.”

On the lack of professional diversity in courts:

“This approach is corrosive to the legal profession. It is corrosive to our courts. It is corrosive to the rule of law. It is the responsibility of every lawyer — no matter who their clients are — to stand up and fight back.”

On Merrick Garland:

“Judge Garland is not a politician. He is a judge with an unimpeachable record of putting the law first. And for that sin, he faces a nonstop, national campaign of slime. He faces historic disrespect from the Republicans who control the Senate. It is despicable. It must end.”

On the Trump University class action lawsuits:

“…in America, we have the rule of law — and that means that no matter how rich you are, no matter how loud you are, no matter how famous you are, if you break the law, you can be held accountable. Even when your name is Donald Trump.”

On Trump’s criticism of Curiel as a biased judge:

“Understand what this is. Trump is criticizing Judge Curiel for following the law, instead of bending it to suit the financial interests of one wealthy and oh-so-fragile defendant.”

On Curiel’s judicial record fighting drug trafficking in Southern California:

“Judge Curiel is one of countless American patriots who has spent decades quietly serving his country, sometimes at great risk to his own life. Donald Trump is a loud, nasty, thin-skinned fraud who has never risked anything for anyone and serves nobody but himself.”

On the Republican judicial agenda:

“Donald Trump chose racism as his weapon, but his aim is exactly the same as the rest of the Republicans. Pound the courts into submission to the rich and powerful.”

On what must happen next:

“All that is required for the rule of law and our independent judiciary to collapse is for good people to stand by, and do nothing. Now is not the time to stand by. Now is the time to stand up.Now is the time to say no. No, not here, not in these United States of America.”

Watch the full speech for yourself below:

Photo and video via YouTube

Even After Trump’s Curiel Remarks, Merrick Garland Probably Won’t Receive A Senate Vote

Even After Trump’s Curiel Remarks, Merrick Garland Probably Won’t Receive A Senate Vote

More than two months have passed since President Obama nominated Judge Merrick Garland to take the vacant seat of the late Justice Antonin Scalia and become the nation’s 113th Supreme Court justice. Garland is a moderate who has been praised by politicians in both parties and whose work on the D.C. Court of Appeals has displayed little discernible ideological bent.

The Senate’s refusal to vote on Garland’s confirmation isn’t surprising – Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConell announced that the Senate would not consider any Obama nominees the very same day Justice Scalia died, once again confirming the 114th Congress’s main objective: obstruction.

What may come as a surprise is that, even after Donald Trump became the Republican nominee, Senate Republicans still refuse to consider Garland over whomever the unpredictable Trump may pick.

To calm Republican concerns that he isn’t really a conservative, Trump released a list of his possible Supreme Court nominees last month. The list is tailor-made for establishment conservatives, including anti-abortion judges like Raymond W. Gruender, who was involved in enforcing a South Dakota law requiring doctors to tell women that abortions “terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique living human being,” and William H. Pryor Jr., who has publicly denounced Roe v. Wade, calling it a “a constitutional right to murder an unborn child.”

Gruender and Pryor may have sounded like candy to a child to Senate Republicans, but what about Trump’s claims that Judge Gonzalo Curiel shouldn’t preside over the Trump University lawsuits against him because he’s “Mexican”? Or his claims that it would be “wild” if he came back to face Curiel as president? The Economist said of those comments, “If Mr Trump wins the White House, he will have a bully pulpit at his disposal from which he could unravel basic principles of American democracy.”

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley said Trump’s remarks should not raise concerns over his ability to nominate a Supreme Court justice. Actually, he believes that “you don’t have any more trouble with what Trump said than when Sotomayor was found saying in speeches that, quote, ‘A wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male.'”

After Grassley’s refusal to disavow Trump’s racist remarks, Senator Harry Reid lambasted him during his opening floor remarks last Tuesday. “Instead of rising above bipartisanship and condemning Trump’s racist attack on a highly qualified judge — by the way, who was born in Indiana — Grassley kisses Trump’s ring and toes the party line,” the Senate minority leader said before reading an excerpt from the Roll Call report in which Grassley stated that Trump “must respect the judiciary” because he has “seen statistics that he’s won over 400 cases, only lost 30.”

“How about that? I find it curious that the chairman doesn’t have time to read Merrick Garland’s questionnaire or give him a hearing but has time to study Donald Trump’s success rate in the courtroom,” Reid commented after reading the excerpt.

Grassley responded by saying that he wouldn’t have said what Trump said about Judge Curiel and disagreed with his assessment, but based on his “Q&As with Iowans last week, they are more concerned about the jobs report that came out on Friday and about how we can get more Americans back to work with decent paying jobs.”

Other members of the Senates Judiciary Committee also refuse to consider Garland’s candidacy despite their negative views, and even fear, of Trump. Senator Lindsey Graham, who has become one of the GOP’s few remaining opponents to Trump, met with Garland but still refuses to support a vote on his nomination. Graham accused Trump of “playing the race card” and called his attacks on Judge Curiel “the most un-American thing from a politician since Joe McCarthy.” Still, he would rather Trump, who he has said he won’t vote for, choose the next Supreme Court justice over even considering the moderate Garland, who he has called “a very capable, honest judge.”

Senator Mike Lee has said that Trump scares him “to death,” and is not ready to endorse him. Still, he stands with his party’s strategy and refuses to support a vote on Garland.

Senator Jeff Flake has stated that Trump’s comments about Curiel ethnicity may provoke a challenge to trump’s candidacy at the convention. “The whole thing that we Republicans say we’re against, this identity politics, to say that if you’re a certain gender or you’re a certain race that you have to vote that way,” Flake said. “He’s just trying to confirm that stereotype that’s completely wrong. It’s offensive, it really is.” Senator David Purdue said he was “troubled” by Trump’s remarks. Still, they will not vote on Garland.

The Republican argument for refusing to vote to fill Scalia’s seat has been that the American people should have a say on his replacement, ignoring that the American people voted for President Obama to make that choice in 2008 and 2012. The Senate’s refusal to vote on Garland’s confirmation is unprecedented. A scholarly article by law professors Robin Kar and Jason Mazzone found that there have been 103 instances in which a president nominated and appointed a new justice prior to the election of the next president. The study did not find a single exception to this practice in American History.

President Reagan, for example, nominated Anthony Kennedy when he was approaching his final year in office, and the Senate unanimously approved Kennedy in February 1988 – less than a year before the end of Reagan’s second term. This is the first time in American history that a president has been denied even the opportunity to fill a vacant seat on the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court has had eight justices – a number Ruth Bader Ginsburg called “not a good number” — for almost four months now. A March CNN/ORC poll found that two-thirds of Americans want the Senate to hold confirmation hearings on Garland’s candidacy.

 

Photo: U.S. Supreme Court nominee Judge Merrick Garland walks after a breakfast with Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) on Capitol Hill Washington, April 12, 2016. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas