Tag: heat
Humanity Can Beat The Heat -- But Our Cities Need Millions More Trees

Humanity Can Beat The Heat -- But Our Cities Need Millions More Trees

Sitting in the AC, I look out the window and smile as dogs being walked collapse under the shade of my Norway maple. And who could blame them? Would any of us want to be out in this harsh heat wearing a fur coat?

This has been one of the few times I've given thanks I'm not in Paris. That's because, though much of Europe is baking, Paris is suffering even more than cities like London, where the temperature exceeded an unheard-of 100 degrees Fahrenheit.

Climate change is happening all over, but why is Paris doing worse than elsewhere? Not enough trees.

Trees provide shade, which cools the pavement below. They also increase water evaporation, another factor moderating the heat.

The concrete, metal and asphalt of cities soak up heat and radiate it back. Without much green to offset some of it, Paris has become a case study in the "urban heat islands." That is, parts of the city were found to be nearly 20 degrees hotter than neighboring areas.

The favorite French word for the heat wave is "canicule." Translation: "dog days."


Noting that a green umbrella helps lower temperatures, MIT's Senseable City Lab has put together a "Treepedia" that compares tree coverage in a number of cities. The researchers based the calculations behind their "green view index" on Google Street View panoramas.

Paris came in near bottom. It's tree canopy covered only 8.8% of the city. In contrast, London's shaded 12.7%. In Los Angeles, trees sheltered 15.2% of the city from the sun. There should be little surprise that Seattle's tree coverage was an admirable 20%.

Interestingly, New York City's "green view index" came in at a respectable 13.5%. Gotham is not all "concrete canyons," as lore would have it.

Complicating cities' efforts to plant more trees is the competition for limited space. For example, Athens has long been a hot, paved city. But proposals there to plant trees must fight demand for parking spaces. One must choose.

The heat problem has economic implications. By 2050, "urban heat stress" could cut a person's ability to work by about 20% in the hot months, according to a United Nations report by leading climate experts. Overheated human beings are more likely to suffer exhaustion, dizziness and even organ failure.

Trees, of course, play a big-picture role in the global warming crisis. Wherever they are located, trees store the carbon dioxide gases that warm the earth's atmosphere. They also release water vapor that helps form clouds. Thus, the massive deforestation in the tropics is harming quality of life in far-distant places, including northern urban centers.

The science here is not simple, though. Some effects of climate change could actually moderate the heat trend. As the Arctic melts, Science magazine reports, trees are growing in regions where ice predominated. In parts of Alaska where there was only moss and lichen, spruce trees are rising.

The bare tundra of northern Siberia is giving way to bushes and willows. Such a development, if it continues, would create no small forest. The Nenets autonomous district alone is the size of Florida.

In arid regions with milder climates, meanwhile, increased concentrations of carbon enable plants to use water more efficiently and thrive in drier soils. Carbon dioxide also acts as a fertilizer, promoting the growth of wood and leaves.

Certainly, multibillion-dollar things can be done to insulate buildings and retrofit the urban infrastructure to absorb less heat. But trees cost so little, do not require new technology and look nice, too.

Trees don't just stand there. They can help beat the heat and may end up saving civilization. Dogs already know this.

Follow Froma Harrop on Twitter @FromaHarrop. She can be reached at fharrop@gmail.com. To find out more about Froma Harrop and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators webpage at www.creators.com.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Weather Could Make Firefighting More Difficult In Northern California

Weather Could Make Firefighting More Difficult In Northern California

By Eryn Brown, Los Angeles Times

As two Northern California wildfires continued to burn out of control Sunday, weather in the days ahead is threatening to worsen and expand the blazes.

The Sand fire east of Sacramento grew to 3,800 acres Sunday, and forced the evacuation of hundreds of residents, destroyed 10 homes, and may not be fully contained until the first week of August, officials said.

A second blaze outside Yosemite National Park had chewed through 2,100 acres, forcing evacuations and was drawing closer to homes.

The efforts of hundreds of firefighters could be complicated this week by extreme weather conditions. Thunderstorms are predicted near Yosemite, raising the possibility of lightning strikes, while the unrelenting heat and winds near Placerville could fan the flames and push the Sand fire deeper into brittle vegetation.

“Any time we have gusts along with high temperatures and low humidity it’s a recipe for aggressive fire growth,” Drew Peterson, a Sacramento, Calif.-based National Weather Service meteorologist, said of the conditions near the Sand fire.

Temperatures this week are expected to climb into the low 100s, with humidity hovering around 10 percent — a level that presents a significant fire danger.

To the southeast in Yosemite, meteorologists said they were unsure how expected thunderstorms in the area might impact the other large fire in the state, which had been burning for about a day.

“A thunderstorm is a mixed blessing,” said Hanford, Calif.-based National Weather Service meteorologist Gary Sanger. “You get rain, but you also run the risk of lightning and more fires, and gusty winds which can cause the fire to spread.”

About 1,500 firefighters aided by a dozen air tankers and water-dropping helicopters were battling the flames of the Sand fire Sunday, said Lynne Tolmachoff, spokeswoman for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. One inmate firefighter suffered minor injuries Saturday, she said.

By late Sunday, officials said, the fire had destroyed 10 homes in two separate areas and was 35 percent contained.

Half of the houses were near San Ridge Road near California 49, where the fire started Friday afternoon when a vehicle drove through dry brush, Tolmachoff said. The rest of the homes were to the south and east, burned by a part of the fire that “blew up” Saturday afternoon, stoked by a combination of high temperatures, low humidity, and 20-mph wind gusts, she said.

A Red Cross shelter at Ponderosa High School in Shingle Springs was set up to assist the roughly 1,200 people who’d been evacuated from more than 500 homes in the area, officials said.

Scott Gediman, a spokesman for the park in Yosemite, said that fire started at 4 p.m. Saturday near El Portal. He said more than 400 firefighters were attacking the flames on the ground and from the air, with more expected to arrive.

One home was burned and about 100 homes in the communities of Old El Portal and La Floresta had been evacuated.

“We have steep, rugged terrain and hot, dry conditions. It’s supposed to be over 100 here today,” Gediman said. “We’re working aggressively to get the fire out.”

Last year, the 410-square mile Rim fire burned an estimated 77,000 acres, or 120 square miles, within Yosemite National Park. Sparked in mid-August by an illegal campfire in the Stanislaus National Forest, the Rim fire was not fully contained until late October.

Peterson, the Sacramento-based meteorologist, said the Sand fire has so far proved to be easier to access for firefighters than the remote Rim fire.

Staff writer Adolfo Flores contributed to this story.

AFP Photo/Jorge Cruz

Interested in national news? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Summer ‘Polar Vortex’ Cooling Off Parts Of U.S. While The West Bakes

Summer ‘Polar Vortex’ Cooling Off Parts Of U.S. While The West Bakes

By Christine Mai-Duc, Los Angeles Times

LOS ANGELES — Put away those shorts and tank tops, Chicago, and get ready for another “polar vortex.”

That’s what some people are calling the unseasonably cold temperatures expected to come to the Northern and Eastern United States next week, as a patch of cold air flows from northern Canada to the Great Lakes area and slips eastward toward the coast.

The temperature in some areas will slide as low as 15 to 20 degrees below normal, and some states are likely to see cold rain and thunderstorms as the air mass moves in, according to the National Weather Service.

The upper Midwest could see some of the coldest weather, with highs in the low- to mid-60s, and parts of the Chicago area could even see lows overnight dip into the 40s, forecasters say.

Residents as far south as Nashville could feel a 10-degree drop.

The cool air isn’t expected to be anything like the polar vortex of this January, which brought record-breaking subzero temperatures, school closures, and wreaked havoc on air travel for weeks.

“I wouldn’t call it a polar vortex,” Mike Gillispie, a meteorologist for the National Weather Service in Sioux Falls, S.D., said of the latest temperature shift. “It’s going to be a shot of some colder air … but it’s not going to hang around for more than a few days.”

Still, some areas could flirt with record-low temperatures for July, said Andy Foster, meteorologist for the National Weather Service’s Central region.

The cool-down will bring little relief for the Western seaboard, which will continue to sit in a ridge of high pressure that has sustained high temperatures and drought conditions for months.

In fact, the warm air mass parked on the West Coast is helping create a trough between Canada’s Hudson Bay and the Southwest United States, where the cold northern air will be flowing.

AFP Photo/Mladen Antonov

Interested in national news? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Spurs Hammer Heat To Take 2-1 NBA Series Lead

Spurs Hammer Heat To Take 2-1 NBA Series Lead

Miami (AFP) – Kawhi Leonard tallied a career-high 29 points as the San Antonio Spurs thrashed the Miami Heat 111-92 in game three of the NBA finals.

Tim Duncan finished with 14 points and six rebounds Tuesday while Danny Green scored 15 points for the Spurs, who jumped out to a 25-point lead in the first half then held on for the victory and a 2-1 series lead.

Spurs coach Gregg Popovich said he was looking for more offence from Leonard on Tuesday. Leonard was hindered by foul trouble in the first two games, fouling out in the game-two defeat in San Antonio.

“We just wanted him to be who he has been the whole year,” Popovich said. “I think he overreacted to the foul situations in the first two games and he became very cautious and he doesn’t play like that.

“He has got to be active at both ends, so he figured it out.”

The first half was an old-fashioned shootout as San Antonio put on the best shooting display for a half in NBA finals history, hitting 19 of their first 21 shots.

The two-time defending champion Heat cut the deficit to seven points at one stage in the second half but they never could recover from the Spurs’ opening blitz that saw San Antonio shoot a superb 75.8 percent from the field to lead 71-50 at halftime.

“I don’t think we will ever shoot 76 percent (at halftime) in a half again,” Popovich said. “I mean, that’s crazy.”

Game four of the best-of-seven series will be on Thursday night in Miami.

LeBron James and Dwyane Wade pumped in 22 points each for the Heat, who suffered their first home loss of the 2014 post-season.

Rashard Lewis finished with 14 points and Ray Allen came off the bench to score 11 in the loss.

Heat coach Erik Spoelstra said his troops dug themselves too big a hole in the first half to overcome.

“They won the battle clearly tonight,” said Spoelstra. “We came out at a different gear than what we were playing. It just seemed we were on our heels most of the first half.’

Miami lost the finals in 2011 then won back-to-back titles in 2012 and last season — when they beat the Spurs in seven games.

This is the first NBA finals rematch since the Chicago Bulls battled the Utah Jazz in 1997 and 1998.

Tuesday’s contest was reminiscent of last year’s game three of the NBA finals.

San Antonio bounced back in game three, setting the finals record for most three-pointers in a game with 16. They went on to win 113-77, handing the Heat their worst loss in franchise playoff history.

Swingman Leonard led the scoring explosion Tuesday, with 16 of his points coming in the opening quarter for the Spurs, who are trying to win their fifth title since 1999.

Leonard shot six-of-seven from the field and made all three of his shots from beyond the arc in the first half. His first missed shot didn’t come until late in the second quarter.

The Spurs were so dominant on offence that at one point they were shooting 90 percent from the field — a better ratio than their free-throw shooting.

“I was just in attack mode and trying to be aggressive early,” said Leonard.

James did his best to keep the Heat in it in the first half, but he couldn’t do it by himself and the 71 points was the most given up by the Heat in a playoff half in their history.

“They just jumped on us,” James said. “This is something that at this point in the season shouldn’t happen.

“This is the last team in the NBA you want to dig yourself a hole against.”

Wade, who was fined $5,000 for flopping in game two, had five turnovers in the first half for Miami, who shot a respectable 47.6 percent from the field overall.

Wade came to life in the third quarter, scoring 11 points as the Heat cut the Spurs’ lead to 86-75 heading into the fourth. They held the Spurs to just 31 percent shooting in the third.

©afp.com / Timothy A. Clary