Tag: mark judge
Ford Will Testify About Kavanaugh Before Senate Panel On Sept. 27

Ford Will Testify About Kavanaugh Before Senate Panel On Sept. 27

Lawyers for Dr. Christine Blasey Ford have reached a tentative agreement with Senate Judiciary Committee staff for her to testify on Thursday, Sept. 27 about the attempted rape she says Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh inflicted on her more than 30 years ago, when both were in high school. Negotiations over various other aspects of her appearance before the committee were expected to continue over the weekend, according to a Saturday report in The Washington Post  confirmed by other news outlets.

The chosen date was a victory for Ford and her attorneys, who brushed off deadlines set by Senate Republican leaders, notably Judiciary Committee chair Chuck Grassley (R-IA), and accused them of attempting to “bully” her. Grassley threatened more than once to move forward on Monday with Kavanaugh’s nomination unless Ford agreed to testify earlier, insisting first that she appear Monday, then Wednesday. The Ford team reportedly prefers next Thursday.

Kavanaugh will appear before the committee on the same date, presumably to reiterate his denial that the incident described by Ford — a violent assault in an upstairs bedroom at a teenage party — ever occurred. Ford also says a friend of Kavanaugh named Mark Judge participated in the assault, and that both were “stumbling drunk” at the time.

Evidently Ford has acceded to Senate Republicans’ refusal to reopen the FBI investigation of Kavanaugh. She has also asked that Judge be placed under oath, although he has expressly declined to testify. Following death threats and intense harassment that forced her and her husband to leave their California home, she also has made unspecified requests to insure her personal security in the Capitol.

Senate Democrats have supported Ford’s demands, and some have urged that the Senate reopen a full investigation of her charges rather than rush to confirm Kavanaugh. Democrats have said that other witnesses should be brought forward, including not only Judge but a therapist who interviewed Ford about the incident in 2012. They also want the Senate to investigate an attempt by Kavanaugh’s friend Ed Whelan, a conservative legal activist and White House adviser, to frame another man for the attempted rape in a bizarre Twitter feed last Thursday.

More Than Once, Kavanaugh Failed A Character Test

More Than Once, Kavanaugh Failed A Character Test

Probably it’s not possible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt whether or not Judge Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted then-fifteen year old Christine Blasey Ford at a high school house party back in 1982. However, that’s not the issue. Kavanaugh’s not being charged with a crime, but with being a creep.
Actually, there’s already ample evidence of that. But hold that thought. Nobody has a right to a lifetime appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court.
 No less an authority than that great American (and Kavanaugh’s former boss) Kenneth Starr says “it’s too late for there to be any serious consideration at this stage.” But what’s the rush? Republicans thought it was just fine to leave a Supreme Court seat vacant throughout 2016 for purely partisan reasons. There’s no compelling reason for hurry now. 
Except that the longer this spectacle continues, the likelier it appears that Kavanaugh will be forced to withdraw. Gun-shy Republicans in close congressional races may insist upon it. Because, see, chances are the judge doesn’t actually know if he forced the young girl into a bedroom, tried to tear off her clothes, pinned her down and clapped his hand over her mouth to silence her screams, or if he didn’t.
That’s because there’s plenty of circumstantial evidence that Judge Kavanaugh spent his years at Georgetown Prep getting hammered: knee-walking, toilet bowl-hugging, where-am-I-and-how-did-I-get-here blackout drunk. The other fellow Prof. Ford named as her attacker was his prep school pal, a conservative opinion writer named Mike Judge.
 Judge denies everything. “It’s just absolutely nuts,” he said. “I never saw Brett act that way.” However, Judge has also published two book length memoirs of his own struggles with drugs and alcohol. His book “Wasted: Tales of a Gen-X Drunk,”features one “Bart O’Kavanaugh,”who “puked in someone’s car the other night” and “passed out on his way back from a party.”
The pseudonym gives “thinly-disguised” a new meaning.
Also, in his high school yearbook, Kavanaugh himself claims membership in something called the “Beach Week Ralph Club” and the “Keg City Club.” (Ralphing, of course, being slang for projectile vomiting.) There are coarse sexual references too. At Yale, Kavanaugh belonged to a fraternity notorious for carousing. As recently as 2014, he gave a humorous speech to the Yale Law School Federalist Society on the theme of “how drunk were you?” in law school.
Answer: falling-down. Literally. 
None of this is a crime either, but it definitely lends credibility to Prof. Ford’s memory of Judge and Kavanaugh’s intoxication that awful night. She says that she only got away because while Kavanaugh was holding her down and tearing at her bathing suit, Judge piled on, they all three tumbled to the floor and she managed to escape—locking herself in a bathroom until she heard Beavis and Butthead stumble away.
As I say, the nominee may honestly remember none of this. But does he recall getting blackout drunk? I doubt he wants to answer that question. What people sometimes don’t understand is that heavy drinkers can carry on carousing and making idiots of themselves for hours before passing out cold—often with no memory in the morning.
Hopefully, Kavanaugh grew up. But it’s his boozing the Senate needs to question him about as much as Prof. Ford’s allegation. There are high-functioning alcoholics everywhere.
Perhaps this is all terribly unfair to Kavanaugh. But it’s an important job he wants. Then too, as Heather Digby Parton comments, “[w]hen it comes to unfairness and character assassination, he’s an expert.” 
Few in Little Rock have forgotten his years-long harassment of Vince Foster’s family after the White House attorney’s suicide. At the behest of the incompetent Starr, who got his own investigative tips from Rush Limbaugh, Kavanaugh made their lives miserable.
Digby: “He spent three years and $2 million attempting to dig up dirt on the dead man, at one point demanding that Foster’s teenage daughter give the authorities specimens of her hair—an apparent attempt to prove or imply that a hair found on Foster’s jacket had belonged to Hillary Clinton.”
Failing at that, Kavanaugh next served as one of Starr’s chief leakers in the Monica Lewinsky affair. Bill Clinton’s sexual sins brought out the Torquemada in him. “It is our job,” he wrote colleagues in Starr’s office in an email, “to make his pattern of revolting behavior clear—piece by painful piece.”
Revolting, no less. Prominent among the questions he thought the President needed to be asked under oath and on camera was this: “If Monica Lewinsky says that you ejaculated into her mouth on two occasions in the Oval Office area, would she be lying?” 
Pervert or prig? You tell me.
Next Kavanaugh wrote the infamous Starr Report whose salaciousness shocked most Americans, helping Clinton get away with it and humiliating Monica Lewinsky, whom the prosecutors seemed to regard as collateral damage.
All perfectly in character, it seems to me.
Seeing Through The Republicans’ Kavanaugh Charade

Seeing Through The Republicans’ Kavanaugh Charade

Facing a public relations debacle, Senate Republicans have come up with a surefire compromise to win confirmation of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court: Instead of simply dismissing the sexual assault accusation lodged against their nominee, they will pretend to investigate — and only then rubber-stamp him.

Won’t both sides be served by taking sworn testimony from the nominee and his accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, about his alleged attack on her in high school? The public hearings announced by the Senate Judiciary Committee for next Monday will feature “he said” and “she said” and nothing more. What could be fairer?

Only the Republicans who control this process could consider such an approach legitimate, let alone thorough. They want to assure midterm voters, especially women, that they have listened to Ford, considered her accusation seriously, and done the right thing. But they also want to rush Kavanaugh into a lifetime appointment on the high court, despite the fact that he lied to the Senate and the public under oath, repeatedly. They aren’t eager to look closely at the strong possibility that he is lying about his encounter with Ford, too.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), the Judiciary Committee chair, says he won’t allow the introduction of any evidence beyond the testimony of the two main witnesses. He sees no reason to seek the testimony of any additional witness or ask the FBI to investigate Ford’s story.

“The FBI investigation of Judge Kavanaugh is closed,” Grassley said, adding later, “We’ve got two people involved, and two people ought to be able to present their stories, and then we’ll have to be the jury.” He specifically excluded any testimony from Mark Judge, a friend of Kavanaugh identified by Ford as present in the room when the alleged incident occurred. Like Kavanaugh, Judge has issued a blanket denial.

So Grassley has barred the only potential witness who might corroborate the Republican nominee’s defense — on the surface, a very strange position for a Kavanaugh supporter. But the chairman’s reticence makes perfect sense to anyone who has examined the writings and social media droppings of Judge, which betray a strong misogynistic streak and more than a tinge of racism.

A senator who has read Judge’s collected works, now available on the internet, might ask him to explain his peculiar opinions about who is to blame when a woman is raped. Such a senator might inquire about his charming high-school yearbook quote: “Certain women should struck regularly, like gongs.” Such a senator might also question Judge about his 1997 memoir, Wasted: Tales of a Gen X Drunk, which features scenes of blackout drunkenness with a character called “Bart O’Kavanaugh.”

Judge has even more embarrassing material in his portfolio, all of which tends to undercut his role as alibi for his high school buddy. His confessed bouts of binge drinking and bizarre sexist bluster would likely make him an entertaining witness, but not in a good way for Kavanaugh. And his memoir’s theme of alcoholic youth corroborates Ford, who told the Washington Post that Kavanaugh and Judge were stumbling drunk when the alleged assault happened.

Rather than put Judge under oath, however, Grassley will pretend that the sole named witness, other than Kavanaugh and Ford, simply doesn’t exist. Meanwhile Judge, who clearly doesn’t fear a Senate subpoena, has informed the committee that he plans to skip its hearing altogether.

Somehow Grassley thinks most Americans won’t see through this charade, which mocks the fact finding that senators are actually supposed to do. He insults his colleagues as well by assuming that they will go along. Yet even in the ultra-partisan atmosphere of Washington, a fake pro-forma “investigation” of the allegations against Kavanaugh may not pass muster. Only one or two conscience-stricken Republicans need to dissent for this scheme to blow up.