Tag: muriel bowser
Joe Biden

Why Biden Opposes The District Of Columbia's Softer Criminal Code

Yes, Joe Biden believes that the District of Columbia should rule itself.

Yes, Biden believes that D.C.'s new softer-on-crime law was a bad thing and needed to be stopped.

But no, there isn't a disconnect between the first belief and the second. It's true that some of the changes in a criminal code have been misrepresented. But lowering the maximum prison time for a brutal crime, such as carjacking, is a terrible look when public fear of crime is high.

Thus, Biden is supporting a move in the Senate to reject the new law. Some history:

Mayor Muriel Bowser had rejected the measure, but the D.C. Council overrode her veto. Then the Republican-controlled House voted to kill it. Now the Democratic-majority Senate, with Biden's support, seems set to do the same.

The main gripe against Congress ditching something passed by the city council is that the district should not be controlled by politicians from Hawaii, Arizona or Maine. It should be a state with two senators and a fully empowered representative in the House. Thus, those who want the district to enjoy state-level sovereignty should not want legislators from elsewhere interfering with a law the city passed.

The good argument for D.C.-statehood is that the district has more people than Vermont or Wyoming. And racism surely plays a part in much of the reluctance to establish a new majority Black state.

Biden may agree but could also argue: That's fine, but until D.C. becomes a state, Congress gets a say on laws that get passed there. That's in the U.S. Constitution.

As for what's in the new criminal code, it's accurate to note that the maximum time in prison for carjacking would have been reduced to 24 years from 40 years. In the eight cases of armed carjacking from 2016 to 2020, the average sentence was only 15 years, so the change in the law wouldn't have done much soften the punishment. And in vetoing the law, Bowser said that she objected to only about 5% of the changes and could support an improved version.

As for the politics of it, some Republicans rant on about Democratic-run cities being pits of criminality. Most big cities are Democratic for a variety of reasons, and some suffer high crime.

That said, the rate of violent crime in Miami with a Republican mayor is nearly two times that of New York City, headed by a Democrat. Miami's rate of property crime, meanwhile, is more than twice New York's. (Weaker gun laws, as many Florida Republicans now advocate, is the last thing Miami needs.)

Also, the few fringe-left voices advocating for greater tolerance of criminality have little company. Voters in New York have been rejecting Democrats perceived as soft-on-crime Democrats — witness the significant move of many Asians and Latino voters toward Republican candidates in some neighborhoods.

Fears can be stoked. Even though violent crime in New York has been trending downward, the issue of public safety loomed large in a recent midterm election that flipped four congressional seats to Republicans. Most were in the suburbs where there is little violent crime.

So what's Biden up to? His motive could be simple opposition to a law that reduces punishments for serious crimes. It could be to seem tough-on-crime at a time when public disorder has become a potent campaign issue. It could be both.

But Biden knows full well that there is no easy way to explain criminal code reform that lowers maximum prison time for violent acts, even though the new maximum would still be high. If there's one thing Biden understands, it is politics.

Follow Froma Harrop on Twitter @FromaHarrop. She can be reached at fharrop@gmail.com. To find out more about Froma Harrop and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators webpage at www.creators.com.

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

Unrepentant Trump Justifies His Inaction During Capitol Attack

Unrepentant Trump Justifies His Inaction During Capitol Attack

Washington (AFP) - Former President Donald Trump defended his conduct during the US Capitol assault in an incendiary interview published Thursday, saying he did not regret summoning his rioting supporters to Washington.

He told The Washington Post he would have accompanied his ultra-loyal followers as they marched on the complex on January 6 last year, but was stopped by his security detail.

He offered no contrition for whipping up the crowd with bogus claims that victory was stolen from him through widespread fraud -- although he was clear in his condemnation of the violence that ensued.

"Secret Service said I couldn't go. I would have gone there in a minute," he said, in the wide-ranging interview, adding that it was the largest crowd he had ever spoken to.

Thousands of Trump's supporters stormed the Capitol last year in an effort to halt the peaceful transfer of power after Joe Biden won a decisive victory in 2020, described by the government as one of the most secure elections in US history.

Trump repeatedly boasted about the "tremendous" size of the crowd at his rally ahead of the riot and glossed over his explosive rhetoric that whipped up the crowd.

"I don't know what that means, but you see very few pictures. They don’t want to show pictures, the fake news doesn't want to show pictures," he said.

The ex-president defended his long silence during the attack, deflecting blame to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, even though she isn't responsible for policing at the Capitol and was a target of the mob herself.

He also pointed a finger at Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser, who "furiously tried to reach Trump's team that day," according to the Post.

"I hated seeing it. I hated seeing it. And I said, 'It's got to be taken care of,' and I assumed they were taking care of it," Trump said of the violence, which has been linked to at least five deaths.

The interview came after the House of Representatives voted to refer ex-Trump aides Peter Navarro and Dan Scavino for criminal contempt charges on Wednesday for defying congressional subpoenas to testify about the riot.

D.C. Councilwoman Beats Mayor In Democratic Primary

D.C. Councilwoman Beats Mayor In Democratic Primary

By Lalita Clozel, Tribune Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON — Muriel Bowser, a relatively little-known District of Columbia councilwoman, triumphed in Tuesday’s Democratic mayoral primary over incumbent Vincent Gray, whose tenure has been tarnished by a corruption scandal. The win most likely means she will be the next mayor in the overwhelmingly Democratic city.

Bowser emerged as the front-runner in a field of seven challengers after federal prosecutors tied Gray to an illegal “shadow campaign” that helped him win the mayor’s race in 2010. In court and in documents, prosecutors alleged Gray had worked with a prominent businessman who funded the effort, a charge Gray has repeatedly and vehemently denied.

In her victory speech Tuesday night, Bowser, 41, presented herself as a clean break from Gray’s administration.

“Corruption in City Hall is unacceptable,” she said. “We know we need a fresh start. Are you with me?”

In the November election, she will face another council member, David Catania, a Republican turned independent. Recent polls indicate that she would beat him in a potential matchup by 20 percentage points or more. Since 1974, when Washington began to elect its mayor, Democrats have always won, making the party’s primary the crucial election.

Much of Bowser’s support appears to have come from voters exasperated by the corruption scandal. At 22.5 percent, voter turnout was strikingly low compared with the 2010 mayoral primary, which brought out 40 percent of registered Democrats.

“The only thing I know about her is that she is not Vince Gray,” said Jonathan King, a 34-year-old patent attorney who voted for Bowser at a polling place just a few blocks from her campaign headquarters. “I did not fall off an apple cart … and I think he knew about it,” he said, referring to Gray and prosecutors’ allegations.

Until the last month of the election, Gray led in the polls, remaining relatively untarnished by the scandal despite guilty pleas by people connected to his 2010 mayoral effort.

But in early March, Jeffrey E. Thompson, an influential businessman in the health care industry, pleaded guilty to running a number of illegal campaigns, including one to benefit Gray. Prosecutors alleged that Gray knew about Thompson’s plan to channel more than $600,000 in illegal contributions to help elect him and that he had presented Thompson with a $425,000 budget request, according to documents and statements made in court.

Gray denied the charges and said that if indicted, he would refuse to step down as mayor. He has not been indicted.

Bowser has close ties to former mayor Adrian Fenty, who lost the 2010 election when many African-American voters, disillusioned by the impact of accelerating gentrification in the city, turned to Gray.

She first joined the council in 2007 in a special election to replace Fenty, benefiting from his support after volunteering in his campaign. Some of her top aides had run Fenty’s campaign.

But on Wednesday, Bowser sought to distance herself from Fenty’s record, saying she had “a bird’s-eye view of the things that went right during those four years, and the things that went wrong.”

“This will be the Bowser administration,” she said at a news conference at the National Press Club.

Re-elected to the council to represent the northern tip of the city in 2008 and 2012, Bowser has brushed off accusations that she has insufficient experience. On Wednesday, she said that she would focus on school reform, “open and honest government” and “policies that grow our middle class.”

Bowser has been involved in the city’s politics since she was a child, when she helped her father campaign for a seat on a neighborhood commission in the 1970s. Her first elected position was as a member of the Advisory Neighborhood Commission for Riggs Park, the neighborhood where she still lives. She served two terms.

A native of Washington, Bowser graduated from Chatham College, an all-women’s school in Pittsburgh, and earned a master’s degree in public policy from American University.

Photo: Matt Dunn via Flickr

Washington Mayor Ousted In Primary Race

Washington Mayor Ousted In Primary Race

Washington (AFP) – Washington Mayor Vincent Gray lost his bid to run the U.S. capital city for a second term late Tuesday, bumped from the job by city councilwoman Muriel Bowser.

With 100 percent of precincts reporting, the D.C. Board of Elections announced challenger Bowser earned 44 percent of the vote in the Democratic primary, compared with Gray’s 33 percent. Several other candidates earned between 0 and 12 percent of the vote.

Gray conceded the race around midnight, the Washington Post reported. Voter turnout was muted.

The mayor had been dogged by a federal investigation into apparent wrongdoing in his victorious 2010 campaign, a probe which earned him ugly headlines in the run-up to the primary.

Washington is heavily Democratic, and while Bowser still must face off against a challenger, general elections in the city are rarely close affairs.

However, with independent city council member David Catania on the ballot it is expected to be the most competitive general election in years.

Bowser, a little known council woman from the city’s Ward 4 when she launched her campaign one year ago, took to the stage in front of her supporters as the results slowly trickled in.

“I know a thing or two about winning a race,” Bowser said, according to the Washington Post. “You go to all eight wards, you talk to a lot of energetic people.”

With Washington as the federal capital, Congress has jurisdiction over the city. While most local affairs are managed by the city council and executive, Congress can step in to exercise greater oversight, a situation that can lead to friction between the city and U.S. authorities.

AFP Photo/Jewel Samad