Tag: political violence
Phony Populism Is Leading America Toward Real Violence (Again)

Phony Populism Is Leading America Toward Real Violence (Again)

Every time I hear somebody say that America's contemporary political climate is uniquely violent, I wonder: "Where were you during the Nixon years?" Too young to remember the assassinations of Martin Luther King and Bobby Kennedy? The Chicago police riot at the 1968 Democratic Convention? The killings at Kent State? A "Weatherman" bomb factory detonating in Greenwich Village? Patty Hearst and the Symbionese Liberation Army? The 1992 Los Angeles riots…

The list could go on indefinitely. Politics in America has been a blood sport basically all my life. I've gotten regular death threats for as long as I've written this column, starting during the Clinton administration. One guy used to phone late Friday nights from a pay phone outside a liquor store, threatening to murder me and rape my wife.

Detailed, graphic threats at that.

After the phone company traced the calls, the police assured me that anonymous callers are cowards who get a thrill out of talking dirty. He would never show up. As, indeed, he never did. I always wondered what he was doing with his other hand.

Cell phones have pretty much put an end to such calls. They can't find your number. It might surprise you, however, to learn how many guys are dumb enough to commit the crime of terroristic threatening in an email. These days, as soon as they start, I simply block them. But I also keep a file. The only interesting thing is the psychological projection: who they think they're talking to, and who they pretend to be.

Hairy-chested he-men, mostly. Guys who, in the immortal words of Fifties wrestling icon Dr. Jerry Graham, "men fear and women adore." (Donald Trump stole his whole act from the grappler billed as "The Arizona Assassin, but that's another story.) In my experience, real tough guys don't go around boasting about it. Only professional wrestlers and Republican politicians.

OK, that was a cheap shot. But consider Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) the congressman who tweeted a cartoon video of himself killing Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and attacking President Biden with a sword. Rather like my guy outside the liquor store, I'd say.

See, the thing that drives these boys crazy about AOC isn't simply her Bernie-crat politics, but her quick-witted New York bartender's demeanor: She's the kind of beautiful woman skilled at fending off jerks who make clumsy passes.

Politically speaking, I've got my own issues with AOC and "The Squad." Democrats who label themselves "Socialist" are doing the right-wingers' work for them. In much of the country, the label's simply toxic, and no amount of clever apologetics can make it less so.

But I digress. Sentenced to double-secret probation by House Democrats, Rep. Gosar was championed by virtually the entire GOP delegation in a scene right out of Animal House. Evidently it's perfectly alright to fantasize publicly about murdering a colleague and assaulting the president if you were just kidding.

And also, like, a total dork.

Then there's Sen Josh Hawley of Missouri, another virile Republican specimen last seen raising his fist in solidarity with Trump's January 6 insurrectionists. Hawley gave a recent speech at the National Conservatism Conference calling for "revival of strong and healthy manhood in America." Judging by media accounts, it sounded like a declaration of war against Ivy League gender studies departments, who Hawley thinks are responsible for young men wasting their precious bodily fluids playing video games and watching porn.

Literally, that's what he said.

"Hmmmm," observed the Washington Post's conservative columnist Kathleen Parker. "Why is it that the guys who look as though they've never so much as pushed a lawn mower are always the ones who want to saddle up and save the womenfolk?"

Cruel, unfair, and precisely on target.

My response to Hawley is as follows: Your assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to watch this week's Michigan-Ohio State football game. Do you still think effeminate girly-men are taking over the USA? Closer to home, the Missouri-Arkansas game would do.

Everywhere you look, privileged characters with fancy private school degrees are venting populist rage. Stirring up the mob. Not only Sen. Hawley (Stanford and Yale), but establishment figures like Sen. Ted Cruz (Princeton, Harvard), J. D. Vance (Yale Law) fill the air with violent invective.

To longtime conservative author David Brooks, they're "wrong to think there is a unified thing called 'the left' that hates America. This is just the apocalyptic menace many of them had to invent in order to justify their decision to vote for Donald Trump."

But the mob is definitely listening. At a right-wing rally in Idaho recently, a young man asked publicly when it would be OK to shoot Democrats. "How many elections are they going to steal before we kill these people?"

The crowd applauded. Lies and crackpot rhetoric have consequences.

So when will the shooting start?

This is America. Stick around.

Man wears "MAGA" hat at the January 6, 2021 Capitol insurrection.

Poll: Nearly Half Of Republicans Justify Political Violence By ‘Patriotic Americans’

Reprinted with permission from Alternet

Nearly half of Republican voters believe there will come a time when the so-called "American patriots" will "have take the law into their own hands," the findings of a new survey reveal.

The new survey, conducted by GW Politics Poll, analyzed the belief systems of Democrats and Republicans. Based on the survey's findings, there are stark differences between Democratic and Republican voters' perspectives of the law and their trust and confidence in the government.

Republican voters in states former President Donald Trump won during the 2020 election have a higher level of trust in their state and local officials than Republicans residing in blue states won by President Joe Biden. While the same trend is evident where Democratic voters are concerned, the survey indicates it is far "less profound."

Danny Hayes, a George Washington University political science professor and co-director of the GW Politics Poll weighed in with more details about the survey findings.

"Most of the state and local officials who run our elections are long-time public servants whose goal is simply to help our democracy operate smoothly," Hayes said. "But if we've gotten to a place where voters trust the electoral system only when their side wins, then that undermines the idea of non-partisan election administration, which is essential for democracy."

The survey highlighted the following:

"Support for fundamental principles such as free and fair elections, free speech, and peaceful protest are nearly unanimous among both Democrats and Republicans. Their views on other democratic values, however, differ dramatically. Over half of Republicans (55 percent) supported the possible use of force to preserve the "traditional American way of life," compared to 15 percent of Democrats. When asked if a time will come when "patriotic Americans have to take the law into their own hands," 47 percent of Republicans agreed, as opposed to just 9 percent of Democrats."

The reference to patriotic Americans could raise concerns given what transpired at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, the deadly event serves as a reminder of what could happen when Americans "take the law into their own hands."

House Republicans Don’t Mind Racist Insanity — But They Fear Swing Voters

House Republicans Don’t Mind Racist Insanity — But They Fear Swing Voters

Reprinted with permission from American Independent

House Republicans are reportedly considering removing Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia from one of her committee assignments not because of her extremist comments and actions, but to avoid having to take a politically risky floor vote to punish her.

Greene, infamous for her repeated racist, antisemitic, and Islamophobic comments and her promotion of the right-wing QAnon conspiracy theory, has been olds appointed to both the House Education and Labor Committee and the House Budget Committee. The two largest teachers unions in the country, representing millions of teachers, have urged her removal from the education panel in reaction to her repeated claims that mass school shootings were actually "false flag" events staged to shore up support for gun control measures.

Since taking office last month, Greene has endangered her colleagues in Congress, refusing to wear a mask or to go through a metal detector. She has refused to apologize for her violent rhetoric and lies, instead raising funds through campaigns that portray her as a scrappy fighter being censored by the left.

House Democrats on Monday filed resolutions to censure Greene and to strip her of her committee assignments. No House Republicans have publicly backed these efforts.

A handful of Senate Republicans, including Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and the Republican Jewish Coalition have spoken out against her.

House Democratic leaders warned this week that they would force a floor vote if Republicans did not act to deal with Greene within three days.

On Monday, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy met with other members of his caucus to consider how to deal with the situation. According to Politico reporter Rachael Bade, they hope to remove her from the education committee to avoid having to publicly vote on a punishment.

"The feeling in the meeting was that a floor vote, and forcing Republicans to take a yes or a no vote on removing a colleague, would be catastrophic on the campaign trail," Bade told CNN on Monday. "They could either get hit from the base or, if they're from a swing district, they could be labeled as someone protecting a QAnon conspiracy theorist."

During Greene's primary campaign, some House Republicans condemned her hateful rhetoric, but after she won the nomination, they rallied around her. The party gave her funding, and McCarthy publicly embraced her, urging Americans to give her a chance in office before judging her.

On Monday, five House Republicans filed an amendment to the resolution against Greene seeking the removal from her committees of Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar of Minnesota, whom they accuse of antisemitism for comments critical of Israel.

Omar apologized for the comments several days after she made them, noting, "Anti-Semitism is real and I am grateful for Jewish allies and colleagues who are educating me on the painful history of anti-Semitic tropes. My intention is never to offend my constituents or Jewish Americans as a whole. We have to always be willing to step back and think through criticism ... This is why I unequivocally apologize."

No apologies from Greene have been forthcoming.

Published with permission of The American Independent Foundation.