Tag: pot
All-Cash Marijuana Businesses Push For Change In Banking Law

All-Cash Marijuana Businesses Push For Change In Banking Law

By Rob Hotakainen, McClatchy Washington Bureau (TNS)

WASHINGTON — At the Cannabis Club Collective in Tacoma, Wash., Brian Caldwell has installed a top-of-the-line alarm system, motion sensors and a safe, hoping to protect the cash he collects from the 200-plus customers who buy marijuana at his store on an average day.

“We pretty much had to make a bank within our walls,” he said.

And at Auntie Dolores, a marijuana edibles shop in Oakland, Calif., Julianna Carella uses pouches to bag her cash at the end of the day, then sticks it in her trunk, feeling nervous as she drives away.

“It’s actually a huge headache to have to deal with all that cash. … It’s horrible,” she said.

While voters in a growing number of states have embraced marijuana in recent years, federal law still prevents pot businesses from using checks and credit cards offered by banks. That means that by law, they can deal only in cash.

Reviving a fight that stalled last year, the all-cash establishments and their allies in Congress are pushing hard again to change the law, convinced that marijuana shops have become inviting targets for thieves.

“Quite literally, you have accountants stuff $50,000 worth of cash in their backpack and walk it to a depository,” said Rep. Denny Heck, D-Wash., a member of the House Financial Services Committee. “This is a recipe for mischief if we don’t solve it.”

There’s a new twist in this year’s debate, with some in the cannabis industry suggesting that foreign banks or American Indian-owned financial institutions could serve as alternative depositories if Congress doesn’t provide a fix.

Many say the situation is bound to worsen as marijuana grows in popularity and markets expand.

So far, voters in Washington, Colorado, Oregon and Alaska have approved the use of marijuana for recreational purposes, while 23 states allow it for medical reasons. And California voters, who in 1996 made the Golden State the first to back medical marijuana, are expected to decide a ballot initiative on recreational pot in 2016.

“You’re talking about cash businesses that are in the hundreds of millions and approaching billions of dollars in state markets,” said Leslie Bocskor, founder of Electrum Partners, a marijuana consulting firm in Las Vegas. “And that’s just frightening from a community’s safety perspective.”

The issue is gaining some traction on Capitol Hill. Last week, seven senators — including Patty Murray, D-Wash., and presidential candidate Rand Paul, R-Ky., introduced a bill that would allow state-sanctioned marijuana businesses to use banking services without prosecution.

While Paul has been busy courting legalization backers as part of his presidential campaign, it was the first time that Murray has lent her name to a pro-marijuana bill since joining the Senate in 1993.

“Patty is real emblematic of the momentum that’s been building,” said Heck, one of 27 House members backing a bill called the Marijuana Businesses Access to Banking Act of 2015. “She’s been pretty deliberative about getting there but, to her great credit, she did.”

Murray said in a statement that she wanted to give “much-needed clarity and security” to banks, credit unions and marijuana businesses.

Bocskor said many investors are eager to capitalize on marijuana companies if they can be made confident that their investments will be safe. His company is exploring alternatives, including the use of foreign banks — he noted, for example, that pot establishments in the marijuana haven of Amsterdam already accept credit cards. And he said it’s possible that outside firms could sign agreements to operate banks on Indian reservations, taking advantage of their tribal sovereignty.

“We believe there are advantages in it,” said Bocskor. “We would like to see Native Americans be able to use banking as another method to bring a little more economic development to the tribal lands. That can happen, but it’s a pretty heavy lift.”

Scott Jarvis, director of Washington state’s Department of Financial Institutions, questioned whether such a system would work, saying tribes would still end up “with a whole bunch of money that they have to get somehow to the real world system.”

The possibility of tribal involvement surfaced in February at a marijuana conference at the Tulalip reservation in Washington state. It came only months after the U.S. Justice Department said it would not prosecute tribes that wanted to regulate marijuana for recreational use if they did a good job policing themselves.

“It doesn’t surprise me that they’re looking at it,” Jarvis said. “There are major banks that supply services to the casinos but won’t touch the marijuana. They might get very nervous. …. It’s not a clear path down the highway.”

Robert Odawi Porter, former president of the Seneca Nation of New York and one of the conference organizers, said most tribes are still in the early stages of deciding whether they want to enter the pot industry at all. He predicted that any decisions on banking would follow, coming “pretty far down the road.”

“It’s certainly true that tribes can establish their own regulatory systems, but the challenge is the degree to which you have to interact with and integrate with the commercial banking system in the U.S.,” Porter said.

Caldwell, who has operated his business in Tacoma since 2011, said he’d be open to the possibility of banking with tribes.

“Some of the tribes have done a great job of managing cash with casinos and everything else — they’ve obviously got the experience for it,” he said.

For now, Caldwell said, he has one small bank account that he uses carefully to avoid getting “flagged.” He has 10 employees and draws from 200 to 300 customers per day, with 85 percent to 90 percent of his business done in cash.

“We’ve learned to deal with it,” Caldwell said. “You never have all your cash in one spot.” He’s hoping that Congress will approve Heck’s bill, which he said could even open the door for bank loans. “Oh, my gosh, I would be doing cartwheels.”

The Obama administration last year advised U.S. attorneys in states where the sale of marijuana is legal not to prosecute banks that allow pot stores to open accounts and accept credit card payments.

U.S. Treasury Department officials say that dozens of banks and credit unions across the country changed course and now do business with pot establishments. But most remain skittish, fearing the rules could easily change with a new administration in 2017.

Carella, who has run her Oakland shop since 2008, said her bank account was seized and she lost $8,000 last year when bank officials discovered they were doing business with a marijuana company.

Carella, who has 18 employees, said she sells products laced with marijuana to roughly 250 dispensaries in California, with 75 percent of them paying in cash. She said the administration’s promises have had little effect in persuading banks to do business with California operators.

“We cannot get a bank account,” she said. “It’s not the first time the Obama administration has given us false hopes.”

In Washington state, Jarvis said that nearly a dozen state-chartered banks and credit unions are now working with marijuana businesses.

“They’re pretty quiet about it,” he said. “Nobody wants to be known as a marijuana bank.”

Photo: Marijuana businesses aren’t allowed to deal with banks, but advocates want that to change. Rambling Dream via Flickr

U.S. Won’t Stop Native Americans From Growing, Selling Pot On Their Lands

U.S. Won’t Stop Native Americans From Growing, Selling Pot On Their Lands

By Timothy M. Phelps, Tribune Washington Bureau (TNS)

WASHINGTON — Opening the door for what could be a lucrative and controversial new industry on some Native American reservations, the Justice Department on Thursday will tell U.S. attorneys to not prevent tribes from growing or selling marijuana on the sovereign lands, even in states that ban the practice.

The new guidance, released in a memorandum, will be implemented on a case-by-case basis and tribes must still follow federal guidelines, said Timothy Purdon, the U.S. attorney for North Dakota and the chairman of the Attorney General’s Subcommittee on Native American Issues.

It remains to be seen how many reservations will take advantage of the policy. Many tribes are opposed to legalizing pot on their lands, and federal officials will continue to enforce the law in those areas, if requested.

Representatives for several of the largest tribes could not be reached for comment.

The policy comes on the heels of the 2013 Justice Department decision to stop most federal marijuana prosecutions in states that have legalized the possession or sale of pot. Colorado, Washington, Oregon, Alaska and the District of Columbia have all moved to legalize the drug, though the D.C. law may be scaled back by Congress.

Some tribes see marijuana sales as a potential source of revenue, similar to cigarette sales and casino gambling, which have brought a financial boon to reservations across the country. Others, including the Yakama Reservation in Washington state, remain strongly opposed to the sale or use of marijuana on their lands.

Purdon said in an interview that the majority of Native American tribes, mindful of the painful legacy of alcohol abuse in their communities, appear to be against allowing marijuana use on their territory.

The federal government will continue to legally support those tribes that wish to ban marijuana, even in states that now permit its sale, Purdon said.

But the Justice Department will generally not attempt to enforce federal marijuana laws on federally recognized tribes that choose to allow it, as long as they meet eight federal guidelines, including that marijuana not be sold to minors and not be transported to areas that prohibit it.

“The tribes have the sovereign right to set the code on their reservations,” Purdon said.

John Walsh, the U.S. attorney for Colorado, said a primary purpose of the memorandum to be released Thursday is to assure U.S. attorney offices and tribes that despite the changes in Justice Department policy announced last year, federal prosecutors still have the authority to prosecute marijuana felonies on tribal lands.

In many cases, federal prosecutors are the only ones permitted by law to prosecute marijuana felonies on tribal lands.

Walsh said that the new memorandum, like the one issued for states last year, emphasizes that states or reservations must have “robust and effective regulatory systems in place” and that federal prosecutors reserve the right to take broader enforcement actions.

The policy is likely to be criticized in states opposed to marijuana sales, particularly those with Native American reservations.

Kevin A. Sabet, an opponent of marijuana legalization and former adviser on drug issues to President Barack Obama, called the policy an “extremely troubling development.”

“It once again sends a message that we really don’t care about federal drug laws,” he said.

Sabet, director of the Drug Policy Institute at the University of Florida, said, “Native Americans and their families suffer disproportionately from addiction compared to other groups. The last thing they want is another commercialized industry that targets them for greater use.”
___

(Times staff writer Hugo Martin in Los Angeles contributed to this report.)

AFP Photo/Desiree Martin

Pot Legalization Spreads Through The West And Into D.C.

Pot Legalization Spreads Through The West And Into D.C.

By Evan Halper, Tribune Washington Bureau

Joints, pot brownies, cannabis–dosed sodas, and other marijuana products will soon be sold in retail shops to any adult who wants them throughout a large chunk of the West, after voters in Oregon and Alaska approved legalization measures Tuesday.

And an initiative approved overwhelmingly by Washington, D.C., voters legalizes the use and cultivation of marijuana there, but stops short of allowing retail sales.

The states join Colorado and Washington, which legalized recreational pot sales only two years ago, in a remarkable change of fortune for legalization advocates who had been toiling for decades to lift the prohibition on the drug. Proponents this week overcame voter concerns surrounding the bumpy roll out of the taxing and regulatory plans for cannabis in the states where it was legalized in 2012 – as well as many unwelcome headlines – in a sign that voter unease with the drug is rapidly fading.

The outcome also was a clear sign that opinions on marijuana no longer fall neatly along partisan lines. The narrow passage of legalization in GOP-dominated Alaska, where 52 percent of voters cast ballots in favor, was considered a symbolic victory among cannabis advocates.

The vote in the capital also had political significance, playing out in the backyard of federal government as advocates try to persuade Congress to soften drug laws. The Washington, D.C., measure was driven in large part by racial justice concerns, in a city where African-Americans accounted for 91 percent of those arrested for drug possession, even though statistics show they are no more likely to use the drug than whites.

Organizers are now setting their sights on California for 2016, where they are confident the state’s liberal-leaning electorate will opt to legalize sales for recreational use. Such an outcome would create a bulwark for marijuana permissiveness in the West, which proponents hope to buffet by targeting other large states to the east for legalization measures in 2016 and shortly thereafter.

“This Election Day was an extraordinary one for the marijuana and criminal justice reform movements,” Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance, said in a statement. The alliance, a nonprofit bankrolled by billionaire George Soros, invested heavily in the Oregon measure through its political action affiliate, and it also provided advice and financial support to the Alaska initiative.

“These victories are even more notable for having happened in a year when Democrats were trounced at the polls,” Nadelmann wrote. “Reform of marijuana and criminal justice policies is no longer just a liberal cause but a conservative and bipartisan one as well. On these issues at least, the nation is at last coming to its senses.”

This election season was also notable for the opposition the marijuana movement attracted. Billionaire casino magnate Sheldon Adelson stepped up with $5 million to help defeat a fairly routine measure in Florida to legalize marijuana for medical use only. It was done in by a Florida state law that requires 60 percent approval for constitutional measures to pass. It fell just a few percentage points short.

Still, Adelson’s involvement in the campaign marked the first time a mega-donor has gotten so deeply involved in fighting such a measure. Opponents of pot said they had never before been able to afford television time, and in Florida they had the resources to mount a sophisticated multimedia effort. Adelson’s political adviser said the billionaire will be looking for other opportunities to fight legalization.

Smart Approaches to Marijuana, a national anti-pot group, is vowing to step up its efforts.

“This was not the complete slam-dunk the legalization groups expected,” said a statement from Kevin Sabet, president of the group. “Alaska barely voted to legalize, and several cities rejected marijuana retail stores outright. We are confident the more people know the truth about marijuana and the Big Tobacco-like marijuana industry, the more opposition to marijuana legalization will continue to grow.”

AFP Photo/Frederic J. Brown

Interested in more national and political news? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

A Rocky Start For Pot Stores In Washington State

A Rocky Start For Pot Stores In Washington State

By Evan Bush, The Seattle Times

SEATTLE — More than two months after the first state-licensed marijuana stores opened in Washington state, only one is selling pot in Seattle, and it might be weeks before another opens.

Meanwhile, in Bellingham — a city of about 82,000 people — four stores have opened.

What’s the problem here?

Chalk it up to unprepared applicants, difficulties for some entrepreneurs in finding legal locations for their stores and issues with city permitting, among the many problems.

Even Seattle’s first store hasn’t yet been able to bypass the red tape. Cannabis City is lacking permits to legally operate, according to the city’s Department of Planning and Development (DPD).

And without much marijuana available to sell, potential store owners say there’s little incentive to move quickly.

Many of the delays stem from the state’s retail marijuana lottery. In April, the Liquor Control Board (LCB) held a drawing to determine who could operate Washington’s 334 potential pot shops. The LCB chose 21 applicants at random for Seattle, of the 191 who applied.

The lottery was not merit-based. To qualify, applicants had to show they had the right to property suitable for selling pot under state law, but they did not have to prove their financial means or business capabilities.

In some cases, lottery winners either weren’t interested or capable of opening a store, Liquor Board spokesman Mikhail Carpenter said. “They’re not doing anything,” he said.

Killy Nichelin, whose company Iconic Cannabis received the 53rd spot in the lottery, said some winners looked to profit from their license alone, which they viewed as “golden tickets” to barter. Before the lottery, Iconic Cannabis leased and began to remodel a property in Ballard. When Nichelin’s company was not drawn, he sent an email to all the lottery winners seeking a partnership. Seven winners contacted him. They wanted his company’s location, knowledge and business plan. Some asked for money.

“These people are insane,” he said. “They got a lottery ticket, they didn’t prepare at all, and they thought they ruled the world.”

Nichelin said some of the people who wanted to partner didn’t appear to have the financial means to operate, nor did they have access to a good location. He wasn’t willing to give up prime, legal real estate to people he felt shouldn’t have been in the lottery in the first place.

“If we were to give up the building…we just handed someone a turnkey property,” he said. To afford rent on their location, Nichelin and his business partners opened a low-volume medical dispensary. They still hope to get a state license.

So far, the LCB has disqualified five Seattle lottery winners and begun to review some ranked higher than 21. The LCB this week also is sending letters to dozens of lottery winners, giving them 60 days to make significant progress toward their license or have their applications withdrawn, said Randy Simmons, the state’s marijuana project director.

Although he received the 25th lottery position, applicant Bob Ramstad said his company, Paradoxical, received a letter from the LCB in August. His application was being reviewed.

It was a surprise. Ramstad had secured property before the lottery but relinquished it when he wasn’t selected. He had to start his search anew.

Finding real estate has been difficult. Ramstad said he pored over 800 lease listings in Seattle and found just 20 that would be legal and suitable for a retail business. About half of those would require him to change the property’s allowable use to retail, which can take weeks. Ramstad said that once he signs a lease, he’ll be two months away from opening but said some landlords haven’t been willing to work with him for fear of a federal crackdown on pot businesses.

The city’s more than 400 parks, 97 public schools and about 200 child-care centers presented challenges for applicants, who are not allowed to be within 1,000 feet of them.

Trichome & Calyx’s Mehran Rafizadeh, for example, drew Seattle’s top lottery number, but his application is on hold as he and the LCB determine whether he chose a valid location.

Rafizadeh says a child-care facility opened within 1,000 feet of his location after his application was submitted.

Until a judge rules on his case, Rafizadeh doesn’t know if he can proceed where he is, be allowed to move or have his application denied altogether. He has a hearing scheduled for next month.

Two Seattle stores are scheduled for final inspections by the LCB.

One of those applicants, Oltion Hyseni, said the LCB will visit his 1960s-themed shop this week. If Ocean Greens passes, Hyseni said, that puts him on track to get his license and open the store by the end of the month.

For lottery winners who did lock down a legal location, complying with Seattle’s building and land-use code has been another hurdle.

Seth Sligar won the 12th lottery spot with his company, Bud Bouquets. Sligar said the LCB has approved his application pending a final inspection, but he’s still waiting to build out his storefront.

“I can’t swing a hammer until DPD tells me I can,” said Sligar, referring to the city’s Department of Planning and Development. There’s tons of building going on in Seattle right now. They’ll get to us when they get to us.”

Acquiring a permit to renovate a space or change its use can take six weeks to five months, said Bryan Stevens, a spokesman for DPD. Stevens said older buildings often require safety additions or seismic upgrades.

If the process takes so much time, how was Cannabis City ready to open July 8, more than two months before any other Seattle shop? It didn’t wait for the DPD, and instead filed for a change of use after opening.

That approach comes with risks. In June, the city sued its first pot producer for operating in violation of its building code.

If Cannabis City were not addressing its permit problems, Seattle could choose to take similar action.

“The space is technically not legal,” Stevens said. “However, we will allow a business to be used or remain open if they show progress to obtain a permit.”

Cannabis City owner James Lathrop said he didn’t know he needed a permit. “I took the space the way it was, and I opened it,” he said. “It’s just paperwork to move it from office to retail. It’s all in process.”

Stevens said as long as Lathrop continues on his path to compliance, he won’t be fined, but it could still be costly.

“When you’re asking for forgiveness rather than permission there’s a huge risk there,” Stevens said. “You may have to make physical changes to the space, safety changes. That can add some cost to the project.”

If any potential store owners are waiting for supply to stabilize, that could happen soon, said LCB spokesman Carpenter. Many of the state’s outdoor growers will harvest their first crop later this month or early next.

Lathrop said that if Cannabis City weren’t already operating, he would be in no rush to open his store’s doors. “There’s no supply,” he said.

Store manager Amber McGowan said pot producers are charging high prices, which has strained the retail business.

“It’s not yet really profitable,” she said. “We’re able to pay our bills and pay our staff. We have just enough money to turn around and buy product.”

Photo: Business partners Miles Thomas, left, and Killy Nichelin, right, recently opened a medical marijuana store in the Ballard neighborhood of Seattle after losing the state’s pot lottery. Meanwhile, the state has only licensed one marijuana store in Seattle. (Ken Lambert/Seattle Times/MCT)

Want more news and analysis? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!