Tag: renovation
Home Improvement Hot Spots: Who’s Rebuilding?

Home Improvement Hot Spots: Who’s Rebuilding?

By Janna Herron, Bankrate.com (TNS)

After doing just enough to maintain their homes in the wake of the Great Recession, Americans are starting to ramp up spending on backyard decks, spa-like bathrooms, and other vanity improvements.

The amount people spend on home remodeling and repair is anticipated to hit $325 billion this year, a level that hasn’t been reached since 2007, according to the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies. Hanley Wood, a marketing services company that owns real estate design and construction publications, including Remodeling magazine, offers a similar outlook, predicting the industry will fully recover this summer following 12 straight quarters of steady growth.

“The forecast looks very bright for the remodeling market,” says Tobias Morrison, national sales manager for Hanley Wood. “Thanks to rising consumer confidence, an improved economy, and an aging housing stock, we anticipate that the remodeling market will continue to improve steadily over the next several quarters.”

That’s good news for a lot of homeowners — whether or not they have a remodeling project in mind. According to the Joint Center, neighborhoods with high levels of remodeling activity enjoy stronger levels of price appreciation than areas with less activity.

Conditions Ripe For Remodeling

There are two big reasons for the recent surge in home improvement: rising sales of previously owned homes and increasing prices, says Abbe Will, a research analyst at Harvard’s Joint Center.

Sales of existing homes rose 3.2 percent in June to the highest pace since February 2007. The level was 9.6 percent higher than a year ago and pushed the national median sales price to an all-time record of $236,400. The latest Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller national home-price index showed values have risen 28.4 percent since February 2012, when prices bottomed after the downturn.

“Previous research has shown that a lot of remodeling happens around the time of sale, either before the sale or within a couple years after the sale,” Will says.

Sellers make improvements in hopes of getting a higher price, while recent buyers renovate what they don’t like in their new homes. “Home price is the other part of that because homeowners feel they can or should [renovate] their homes,” she says.

Where Are The Home Improvement Hot Spots?

Across the country, homeowners are expanding rooms, rewiring, and modernizing electrical circuits, and adding new floors and fixtures.

Yet, some communities are more active than others. Will says America’s remodeling hot spots tend to be areas where home prices have remained relatively stable during the downturn. They’re also places where the local economy is improving at a healthy clip, specifically many metro areas on the East and West coasts, she says.

Bankrate found a similar pattern when analyzing loan applications for home improvement projects from 2009 to 2013. The applications, which come from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s trove of Home Mortgage Disclosure Act records, show that much of the renovation activity is centered in California. When ranking counties in terms of loan applications for home improvement, eight of the top 10 were located in coastal areas.

But even in Milwaukee, smack in the center of the country, remodeling is heating up, thanks to a parallel rise in homebuying, says David Pekel, president and CEO of Pekel Construction & Remodeling.

“We keep hearing from clients that they put in several offers above the asking price and are still losing out on houses,” Pekel says. “So, they decided to stay put and add space to their current home instead with an attic conversion or an addition.”

How To Prioritize Your Renovation

So far, much of the remodeling activity has been focused on necessary projects, such as roofing or siding, Will says. Seven out of 10 remodelers say postponed projects, which are often maintenance projects, were driving growth in the industry this year, according to a survey from the National Association of the Remodeling Industry, or NARI.

But industry experts are starting to see a shift.

Morrison says kitchens are the top growth category, followed by heating and air conditioning, roofing, and bathrooms, while Pekel reported a surge in bathroom renovations in his community.

“Now we’re seeing homeowners moving back to discretionary spending projects, really for the first time in the last few years,” Will says.

For homeowners considering making improvements, the ones that recoup their cost at resale are often the least sexy, according to Remodeling magazine’s 2015 Cost vs. Value index. Home office remodels and sunroom additions are among the worst makeovers for the money. Replacing your front door is the best.

Take A Check?

Homeowners have been content to pay contractors out of their own pocket, though some in the banking industry say they’d expect an uptick in loan applications, especially if the housing market improves.

A NARI survey conducted at the end of 2014 found that 96 percent of remodelers were paid by check, while only a quarter say they were paid with credit cards, home equity loans, bank home improvement loans or cash.

A Bankrate analysis of government mortgage data also found that only 1.22 percent of cash-out refinances in 2013 — the latest available figures — were for the purpose of remodeling. That’s less than half the frequency reported in 2007, when the brunt of the housing crash had not yet taken its toll.

As lending requirements loosen and home values increase, mortgage brokers say they expect more homeowners will look to pay for improvements with home loans.

John Stearns, a senior loan officer at American Fidelity Mortgage in Wisconsin, recently arranged a cash-out refinance for a homeowner who wanted a new roof and windows.

“I even got him a lower rate,” Stearns says. “Yesterday, I had a guy email me looking for a home equity loan to remodel his bathroom. He wanted $10,000 to $20,000.”

Photo: Brock Builders via Flickr

Displaced Wrigley Field Bleacher Season Ticket Holders Complain, Adjust

Displaced Wrigley Field Bleacher Season Ticket Holders Complain, Adjust

By Paul Sullivan, Chicago Tribune (TNS)

With opening day on the horizon and the Wrigley Field bleachers resembling an erector set, some denizens of the most famous seats in sports are wondering if life will ever be the same.

The bleacher season ticket holders are temporarily without a home, and some blame the Cubs for catering to a younger crowd that drinks more and pays more attention to its smartphones than the game itself.

“It’s all about the party,” veteran bleacherite Linda Eisenberg said.

The Wrigley bleachers have been gutted this offseason to add lucrative patio sections, two jumbo-sized video boards and advertising signage as part of the Ricketts family’s $575 million renovation plan.

Team management misjudged the effects of a harsh Chicago winter on the construction timeline, ensuring the bleachers would not be ready for the start of the season April 5 against the Cardinals.

The Cubs insist the left-field bleachers will be ready by May 11, with the right-field bleachers slated to open sometime in June. Bleacher season ticket holders were offered refunds, down payments on next year’s tickets or relocation to seats in the “bowl” area, which some found lacking.

“The seats that were available weren’t that good — either upper deck or back of terrace,” bleacher season ticket holder Donna Wakefield said.

So what to do?

Wakefield, who is part of a group that calls itself “Bleacher Refugees” and has had buttons and T-shirts made with the moniker, took the money. Tim Shockley, another bleacher season ticket holder, said most of the bleacherites he knows also opted for refunds, figuring the early games are played in miserable weather anyway.

“If it was in the middle of summer, I’d really be (ticked),” he said. “There are more night games affected than day games, and we’re not big fans of night games — it’s a different crowd.”

After getting her $440 refund for 15 games, Eisenberg, a right-field regular, will miss her first Cubs opener in so long, she can’t remember the last time it happened.

“This totally (ticks) me off, and I’m not drinking the Kool-Aid that this is the year,” she said. “If you have to fix the ballpark, why are you starting in the bleachers? The bleachers were redone ten years ago, and now they’re redoing them again?”

Speaking Monday night at a reception at the Mid-America Club at Aon Center, Ricketts said: “It is about a five-year project and it’s largely done in the offseasons. This year a couple of things were in the way against us in terms of construction….We’re trying to do things the right way, just make sure we don’t take any shortcuts.”

Season ticket holder Rich Skinner also opted for the refund and wishes the Cubs had done more to appease the refugees.

“Some benefits or some type of incentives would’ve been great,” he said. “We have not seen that yet….Now there are all these rumors floating around that they won’t be open until even later, and they haven’t really communicated that information back to us. At this point, I don’t know if I’ll be watching any games in the bleachers this year.”

Wakefield has been sitting in the bleachers since the 1970s and has had a season ticket there for 18 years. Like Eisenberg, she believes the renovation will “lead to more drinking and partying” in a section synonymous with drinking and partying.

“Getting angry isn’t going to do me any good,” she said. “I wasn’t happy with the (2006) renovation, but I dealt with it. This isn’t a restoration, not when they’re doing this much. They’re really going for ‘Let’s see how much beer we can sell and how many partiers we can have, and who cares about the game?’

“That’s really how (the Rickettses) see the bleachers. They forget there is a group of us who’ve sat there 20, 30, 40 years who pay attention to the game, keep score, and sit there because we feel it’s the best view.”

Things change, but Cubs fans don’t. In the 1980s, fans upset about the idea of Tribune Co. adding lights wore bright yellow “No Lights in Wrigley!” T-shirts.

The end of the bleachers as we knew it arrived in 1985, when the Cubs announced they would sell the $3.50 tickets in advance for the first time. The success of the ’84 Cubs, who ended a 39-year postseason drought, had fans lining up before dawn for seats. President Dallas Green changed the day-of-game bleacher ticket policy for “security” reasons as traditionalists moaned.

Cubs fans survived, but the “end of the bleachers” happened again later that season when the team added a no-alcohol “family section” near the left-field foul pole, and again on opening day in 1988 when it banned beer vendors from roaming the section. Last rites for the bleachers were held once more in 2006 after a $13.5 million renovation project added 1,790 seats, and again in 2012 when the Cubs added an exclusive patio section and LED board in far right field.

The latest renovation plan has endured several delays, and even after winning city approval last year, the Cubs face a lawsuit from rooftop owners.

Will the influx of patio dwellers change the bleacher atmosphere for good? Shockley says the “patio-ites” are overwhelming the bleacherites and spend much of the game “looking at Waveland or Kenmore, the opposite direction of what’s going on.”

But he said he’s “realistic” about the changes and believes everyone will get used to the changes.

“At first, everyone was freaking out and screaming bloody murder: ‘This is outrageous, it should be like it was in the ’60s,’ ” Shockley said. “I’m like, ‘No, we (stunk) most of the ’60s.’ A lot of people don’t want to move on and upgrade (Wrigley). But, hey, you need revenue to make investments (in the team), and you need more seats for new revenue.

“As far as I’m concerned, they have good baseball management now and we just have to change with the times. It’s like a mom-and-pop store going national. It’s up to you whether to still buy the product or just stay home and pout.”

For better or worse, Wrigley 2.0 is coming, and the bleacher refugees eventually will return to their natural habitat.

Photo: Chuck Berman via Chicago Tribune/TNS

Inspector General Criticizes Consumer Bureau’s Headquarters Renovation

Inspector General Criticizes Consumer Bureau’s Headquarters Renovation

By Jim Puzzanghera, Los Angeles Times

WASHINGTON — A government watchdog criticized the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s controversial headquarters renovation, whose price tag has risen to an estimated $216 million, saying there was not a “sound business case” for the project because the agency never analyzed other options.

The inspector general’s report, released Wednesday, said bureau officials have been “unable to locate any documentation of the decision to fully renovate the building.”

The bureau also failed to follow its own guidelines for approval by an internal investment review board, or IRB, because a required analysis of alternatives to the renovation was not completed, the report said.

“We cannot conclude whether a complete analysis would have altered the decision to approve funding for the renovation,” said the report by the Federal Reserve’s inspector general, which is the official watchdog for the bureau.

“However, without this analysis, the value of the IRB process as a funding control is diminished and a sound business case is not available to support the funding of the renovation,” the report said.

Some House Republicans who strongly opposed the creation of the bureau in the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial reform law have been highly critical of the headquarters renovation. They said the plan is too costly and shows there is not enough congressional oversight of the bureau.

Under the Dodd-Frank law, the bureau’s funding comes directly from the Federal Reserve and does not have go through the congressional appropriations process. Congressional Republicans have been trying to change that arrangement as well as make other alterations to the bureau’s structure that would weaken its power.

“When they passed the Dodd-Frank Act, Democrats in Congress and the White House made the CFPB unaccountable to taxpayers and to Congress,” said House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, a leading bureau critic.

“We’re seeing the results of this dangerous unaccountability today in a Washington bureaucracy that is running amok, spending as much as it wants on whatever it wants,” he said. “It’s outrageous.”

The bureau is renovating the seven-story downtown Washington building that previously housed the Office of Thrift Supervision, which was closed as part of the 2010 overhaul of financial regulations.

Bureau officials said the 36-year-old building needed significant renovations, including updating its electrical and ventilation systems.

“The CFPB’s headquarters is a government asset that is past its prime and needs to be brought up to current standards,” bureau spokeswoman Jen Howard said Wednesday. “Government buildings are frequently renovated.”

But the estimated cost of the project has been rising, adding to the ire of Republicans.

The price tag increased from $95 million in early 2013 to $145.1 million late last year and now is $215.8 million, the inspector general’s report said.

Howard said the bureau “has been open and transparent about our cost estimates.”

And she questioned the report’s cost estimate, saying it should still be $145.1 million. The $215.8 million figure includes related costs, such as moving expenses and renting interim space, the report said.

Howard said including other expenses, such as rental costs, in the renovation estimate “is incorrect and misleading.”

Based on the new inspector general’s estimate, the renovation’s cost of approximately $590 per square foot is more than it cost to construct the Trump World Tower in New York City, the Bellagio Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas, and the world’s tallest building, the Burj Khalifa in Dubai, according to Hensarling and Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.), who requested the inspector general’s report.

“The continuously growing price tag is a tremendous waste of funds and, amazingly, there is still no assurance the $216 million price tag won’t grow higher,” McHenry said.

Photo via WikiCommons

Interested in U.S. politics? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!