Tag: the beatles
Beatles Lyrics Inspire Misguided Probe

Beatles Lyrics Inspire Misguided Probe

In theory, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement is the state’s elite equivalent of the FBI. In theory, the agency saves its resources for investigating the most serious crimes.

Yet in the Bizarro World created by Gov. Rick Scott, almost nothing in government operates the way it was meant to. Recently the FDLE dispatched an agent to investigate a blogger who had used Beatles lyrics to poke fun at the governor.

The song was not “The Fool on the Hill,” an obvious choice.

Nor was it “Mean Mr. Mustard,” or “Baby, You’re a Rich Man,” or “Everybody’s Got Something to Hide Except for Me and My Monkey.”

The number in question was the benign and spacey “Magical Mystery Tour,” from the 1967 album of the same name. It was quoted in a Google Plus post by Daniel Tilson, a Democratic activist and frequent critic of Scott.

Tilson was scoffing at a “tax cut calculator” put on display in the Capitol that showed off the piddling $43 that an average Florida family supposedly would save annually from the governor’s proposed tax changes.

“Gov. Scott’s Magical Mystery Tax Cut Calculator,” Tilson called it, adding a line from the original Lennon-McCartney song: “Coming to take you away, take you away…”

Some person at FDLE (an “analyst,” the agency said) eyeballed those words on Tilson’s blog and perceived a potential threat to the governor. Could somebody be plotting to take him away, take him away…?

Not since Charles Manson got mesmerized by “Helter Skelter” has anyone twisted the words of a Beatles song so ludicrously — and Manson, let’s remember, is crazier than an outhouse rat.

Yet the FDLE, the top crime-busting force in Florida, detected possible ominous undertones in the lyrics of “Magical Mystery Tour.” An agent was promptly sent to interview Tilson.

He wasn’t home, so the female agent left a business card. Tilson said that when he called the number, the agent was polite and good-humored, almost apologetic.

And, honestly, you’ve got to feel sorry for her. You train to be a criminal investigator with the expectation that you’ll be out there tackling real crimes, not hassling opponents of a certain politician in power.

After Tilson wrote online about what happened, the FDLE hastily said the matter was closed. Its statement, in part: “Commissioner (Rick) Swearingen is reviewing the incident and believes FDLE could have better evaluated the post…”

You think?

Swearingen is new to the top job, having been hand-picked by Scott. The entire Cabinet is supposed to participate in the appointment process, but that’s not what really occurred.

The governor wanted to get rid of longtime FDLE chief Gerald Bailey and promote his buddy Swearingen, who was once in charge of Scott’s personal security detail.

Bailey later suggested he was canned because he fought pressure from the governor’s office to use the FDLE for political mischief and meddling. Scott denied that, though he conceded he could have handled Bailey’s dismissal more smoothly.

As a result of the fiasco, the governor and all three Cabinet members have hired a raft of pricey lawyers to defend themselves (and the Cabinet as a whole) in a suit charging that the abrupt and murky dismissal of Bailey violated the Sunshine Law.

That landmark statute requires state government to be conducted in the open, a practice that cramps the covert style of Scott, Attorney General Pam Bondi and the other Cabinet members

All their legal fees — possibly hundreds of thousands of dollars — will be covered by taxpayers. The Miami Herald and several major media outlets are among those suing to find out how Bailey got fired.

Meanwhile, Swearingen has said he wasn’t named FDLE commissioner just to be “the governor’s boy,” and vows to walk away from the job if he’s asked to do anything unethical.

Public confidence in the agency’s independence was not bolstered by the misguided “Magical Mystery Tour” probe.

Let’s hope that the FDLE hasn’t opened a permanent Division of Beatles Oversight. Many Floridians who voted for Scott couldn’t be blamed for now humming, “I Should Have Known Better.”

Everybody else is singing “Help!”

(Carl Hiaasen is a columnist for The Miami Herald. Readers may write to him at: 1 Herald Plaza, Miami, FL, 33132.)

Photo: Chris Sampson via Flickr

Ringo Starr Focuses On The Next Move

Ringo Starr Focuses On The Next Move

By Randy Lewis, Los Angeles Times (TNS)

A day before Ringo Starr’s new solo album, Postcards From Paradise, was slated for release, the former Beatle was at the hub of a frenzy of activity. He bounded from one room to the next in his top-floor suite at a West Hollywood hotel, hustling through a string of interviews.

His focus was largely on Postcards From Paradise, a collection of collaborations released Tuesday that features many of his rock star pals, including Joe Walsh, Todd Rundgren, Peter Frampton, Tom Petty & the Heartbreakers keyboardist Benmont Tench and producer-songwriter Glen Ballard. But it wasn’t long before Starr turned to thoughts about his next album.

“I’ve recorded the last three albums this way, at my home,” said the 74-year-old Starr, looking trim in his all-black outfit. “There’s none of the pressure of everybody being in the studio, and the red light goes on and everybody’s got to get it right. But then I went into a studio with Joe Walsh recently and we did it that way, and it was great.

“So I might do my next record the regular way,” he said.

Such continued focus on his next move is part of what’s allowed Starr to remain vital, but there are times in the new album where he revisits earlier chapters in his life. The record’s opening track, “Rory and the Hurricanes,” charts the excitement he soaked up as a lad in postwar Liverpool playing rock ‘n’ roll with like-minded pals, before he fell in with what he often refers to as “that other band I was in.”

“It’s a true story,” Starr said, relaxing in his chair. “We were living off bread, butter and jam. One day, we ran out of butter, and then it was just bread and jam. We went to London because that was the center of where everything was happening in music, but no girls would dance with us because we were from Liverpool, and we had the accents.”

In “Bamboula,” Starr reconnected with songwriter-producer-arranger-orchestrator Van Dyke Parks for a number rooted in the roiling rhythms and party spirit of the Crescent City. “I was experimenting, trying my English version of the New Orleans style, so I called up Van Dyke, who knows a lot about New Orleans music — and every other kind of music. He came over, and we worked it out.”

Parks, who met Starr through mutual friend Harry Nilsson in the 1970s, has contributed to each of Starr’s last three albums and said in a separate interview, “I was very honored he asked me.”

“His energy is amazing,” Parks added. “He’s a peer of mine — I’m a few years younger — and it’s almost like he should just kick back and lie down on a hammock. But you look at someone like Ringo — he doesn’t drink, he doesn’t smoke — and you see his obsession to make the world a more beautiful place, a place of great dreams. It’s a great thing.”

On April 18, Starr will be inducted — by one of his collaborators from that other band, Paul McCartney — into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame for his solo career, joining the other three Beatles as double inductees.

Starr scored a handful of Top 10 hits as a solo act following the Beatles’ breakup in 1970 — including two No. 1 hits, “Photograph” and “You’re Sixteen,” from his Ringo solo album. But there’s been grousing in some quarters as to whether his solo career warrants a separate induction, something Starr shrugs off.

“This wasn’t any doing of mine,” he said. “Paul said he thought it ought to happen, and he called and asked that if I were inducted as a solo act, would I accept? I said yes. It’s an honor, and it’s more recognition.”

With his signature hearty chuckle, he added, “I’ve been saying I’m only doing it so Paul can have a night out.”

“I sure am happy for it,” said Toto lead guitarist Steve Lukather, who has been a prominent member of Starr’s touring All-Starr Band for three years. “There would be no rock ‘n’ roll drummers if it wasn’t for him, if it wasn’t for all those kids seeing that man beat the [heck] out of his drums.”

As for the influence of his career apart from the Beatles, fans need look no further than Bob Dylan’s new album of pre-rock pop standards, Shadows in the Night.

Dylan joins a long line of contemporary musicians who’ve tackled the Great American Songbook, a stream of interpreters that’s also recently included Lady Gaga as well as Rod Stewart, Linda Ronstadt and Nilsson.
Starr, however, was the first major rock musician to go there with his 1970 solo album, “Sentimental Journey,” which he always said was recorded as a tribute to the music his parents had on at home when he was a boy in Liverpool.

“I heard a couple of tracks from the Dylan album, and he’s really singing carefully — he sounds great,” Starr said. “I love Bob, I still go see him every time he comes around.

“Who else do you want to ask me about?”

(c)2015 Los Angeles Times, Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC

Photo: Facundo Gaisler via Flickr

Weekend Reader: ‘Yeah! Yeah! Yeah! The Beatles And America, Then And Now’

Weekend Reader: ‘Yeah! Yeah! Yeah! The Beatles And America, Then And Now’

Fifty years ago today, four mop-topped lads from Liverpool with a loud new sound — the Beatles — made their American television debut on CBS’ The Ed Sullivan Show

Even before the hugely successful broadcast that Sunday evening, a sense of history hung in the air, as hundreds of young fans set up camp outside the Plaza Hotel in midtown Manhattan, where the Beatles were staying, just blocks across town from the Ed Sullivan Theater on Broadway. More than 50,000 requests for the 700 available studio audience seats at that first show had piled up in the producers’ offices, with celebrities such as Walter Cronkite and Jack Paar pleading for tickets on behalf of their teenage daughters (among the fortunate handful who got in was Julie Nixon, the future president’s 15 year-old daughter). 

Having worked in broadcasting and newspapers for decades, Sullivan was stunned by the pandemonium that suddenly engulfed him and the city, as he admitted while introducing the Beatles for the first time: “Now yesterday and today, our theater’s been jammed with newspapermen and hundreds of photographers from all over the nation, and these veterans agreed with me that this city never has witnessed the excitement stirred by these youngsters from Liverpool who call themselves The Beatles,” he said. “Now tonight, you’re gonna twice be entertained by them. Right now, and again in the second half of our show. Ladies and gentlemen, The Beatles! Let’s bring them on.” 

Opening with “All My Loving,” the first set then spotlighted Paul McCartney singing “Till There Was You” and concluded with their number-one hit, “She Loves You”; the second set, closing the show, included “I Saw Her Standing There” and “I Want To Hold Your Hand” — all accompanied by an endless cacophony of high-pitched adolescent screams. 

Who knew that was how a revolution would begin?

In honor of this poignant yet happy anniversary, Weekend Reader features an excerpt from Michael Tomasky’s terrific new e-book, Yeah! Yeah! Yeah! The Beatles and America, Then and Now — available for $5.49 on Amazon.com.

 

How big an event was The Beatles’s first appearance on The Ed Sullivan Show? The numbers are still staggering: More than one-third of the country watched—73 million people, in a nation then of 191 million. The equivalent today would be 100 or 105 million people watching something. That is true only of Super Bowls, typically viewed by 110 to 120 million Americans now (112 million, this recent one). The M*A*S*H finale in 1983 is still tops, percentage-wise; it got nearly half the country, 106 million out of 234 million. But outside of those two examples, nothing else quite stacks up, 50 years later.

Buy From Amazon.com

The appearance lit a fire that raged across the country. Suddenly that back catalog of songs, the tunes that Capitol Records exec Jay Livingstone had insisted throughout 1963 wouldn’t do anything in America, now proved rather handy for the label, and for a few other clever ones as well. A label called Swan had purchased the rights to “She Loves You” in 1963, after Capitol took a pass. Swan immediately rushed out “She Loves You,” and, immediately, it went to #2. In late March it even dislodged “I Want to Hold Your Hand” from the top spot. Vee-Jay brought out “Please Please Me,” and a Vee-Jay subsidiary called Tollie released the band’s cover of the Isley Brothers’ “Twist and Shout.”

On February 21, the group flew home. By then they had the two top spots on the singles chart. By February 29, they had numbers one, two, and six. On March 7, one, two, and four. On March 14, one, two, and three. On March 21, one, two, three, and seven. On March 28, one, two, three, and four. That was mostly back catalog. March brought the release of a new song, “Can’t Buy Me Love,” and on April 4, the group claimed the top five spots on the Billboard singles charts, which had never happened before and has never happened since.

The album charts told a similar story. On February 1, The Singing Nun was at the top. The only rock’n’roll records in the Top 10 were the Beach Boys’ Little Deuce Coupe and Elvis’s Fun in Acapulco soundtrack; calling the latter rock’n’roll is being perhaps a tad generous, but he was The King, so let’s give him that one. Peter, Paul, and Mary had three albums in the Top 10. Two positions were held by none other than John Fitzgerald Kennedy. One was the BBC’s tribute to JFK performed by the cast of the innovative current-events television series That Was the Week That Was, which featured David Frost and Roy Kinnear (who the following year played the pudgy bumbling scientist in Help!). Why it was credited to Kennedy I’ve no idea. The other was an album of excerpts of Kennedy’s most important speeches. Joan Baez and the West Side Story soundtrack rounded out the Top 10 of that final pre-Beatles week.

The next week, Meet the Beatles! was at #3, and finally, on February 15, the group sent Soeur Sourire scurrying. Meet the Beatles! stayed #1 for 11 weeks. It was dislodged by … The Beatles’ Second Album, more back catalog. It stayed #1 for five more weeks. On May 2, the group held three of the top four album spots: the Second Album at #1, Meet at #2, and Introducing … The Beatles at #4. The fever finally broke in early June—until late July, when A Hard Day’s Night came out and nailed down the top spot for 14 more weeks, into late October. So 30 of the 52 weeks of 1964 had a Beatles album at the top of the charts.

What did grown-ups make of all this? The idea that this was all potentially quite subversive wouldn’t really take root for another year or two. So the general posture of the adult world, in early 1964, was a kind of dismissive indulgence; let the girls get this out of their systems, and in a few months’ time, those Beatles will be back home and will have gotten decent haircuts and jobs down on the docks, or wherever it was that the young men of Liverpool worked. Entertainers poked fun at them. A little hip gyration or head shake from an adult, on TV or at a party, accompanied by a “yeah, yeah, yeah,” would set the other adults to laughing or rolling their eyes.

This mockery was also the basic posture of the protectors of high culture in America. In those days, The New York Times did not write about this sort of falderal; neither did The New Yorker or any other serious magazine. “Music” was classical music, jazz, and Broadway.

Buy From Amazon.com

The Times covered, with considerable head-shaking bemusement, their arrival in New York as a news event (whatever several thousand girls screaming at an airport was, it was certainly that). And it made one exception to its rule about what constituted music in this single high-profile case—Theodore Strongin, one of the paper’s music critics, filed a brief, 324-word report on February 10 that attempted (although not really) to take the group seriously as music, delivering verdicts like: “The Beatles’s vocal quality can be described as hoarsely incoherent, with the minimal enunciation necessary to communicate the schematic texts.”

But some people knew; they could see that this was an earthquake. Ten or so years ago, I had the opportunity to talk to Nora Ephron about all this. She covered the group’s arrival in New York as a young reporter for the New York Post. Over the course of the four days they were in the city, she was assigned to follow them wherever she could, so she got to know them. She was exactly their age, and she was attractive; so naturally, she recalled, they teased her and flirted with her. The press conference and photo session in Central Park, the one where it was just the three of them without George, who was sick in bed back at the Plaza; she showed up late for that one, she remembered, and ran, embarrassed, into the gaggle as they needled her. You can practically hear them, in that sing-songy Scouse accent they made famous: “Oh, look, Nora’s come.” “Good of you to join us, Nora.” “So, Nora, can we start, then?”

She was enchanted. I don’t remember her exact words. I do remember, very clearly, the rapturous look on her face—the look of someone recalling a still-loved old flame or a cherished memory. And I do remember her saying that yes, she knew instantly—there was something different about them. She was way too old for their music at that point, even though she was their age. But all the same she could tell that this was something new, and life was about to change.

If you enjoyed this excerpt, you can purchase the full e-book here.

Michael Tomasky is a columnist for The Daily Beast and editor of Democracy: A Journal of Ideas. Yeah! Yeah! Yeah! is his first e-book.

Change Across The Universe

Change Across The Universe

It’s an odd thing.

Sometimes, when I speak before high school or college students, someone in the audience, knowing I began my professional life as a pop music critic, will ask what I think of music today. I always demur that I don’t listen to a lot of it, but that most of what I do hear kind of, well … bores me. While there are exceptions — i.e., Adele — much of it feels corporate, cold, plastic, image-driven, less reflective of talent than tech, more programmed than played.

Of course, the old folks are not supposed to get the young folks’ music. That’s the whole point of the young folks’ music.

But here’s the odd part: After I’ve said all this, as I’m bracing to take my lumps for being antique and out of touch, the young people — many of them, anyway — tell me I’m right. They agree with me. That’s not supposed to happen and it says something that it does.

What it says is worth pondering as we commemorate a milestone in popular music and culture. On Friday, it will be 50 years since the Beatles landed in New York City. They would appear on The Ed Sullivan Show — in 1964 Sullivan was what passed for music television — over three successive Sundays, twice from New York, once from the Deauville Hotel in Miami Beach. They also squeezed in a concert in Washington.

There is a great photo that captures the pandemonium of that era: It shows a hapless New York City cop carrying some girl who just fell out, limbs splayed, knocked senseless by proximity to the “lads from Liverpool.” John Lennon, Paul McCartney, George Harrison and Ringo Starr brought their bright harmonies, jangling guitars, long-for-1964 hair and cheeky irreverence to America, and American girls responded in shrieks while suddenly ignored American boys practiced looking indifferent, as if they were cinderblocks who could stand, unmoved and unchanged, by the wave now washing over them.

But they were not cinderblocks, they were sandcastles. We all were. The Beatles rode the forefront of a wave that would reshape everything — music, fashion, culture, politics — and neither America nor the world would ever be the same.

It is hard to imagine that Justin Bieber or Chris Brown, extraordinarily popular as they are, gives anyone that finger-stuck-in-a-wall-socket shock of something new, that lunar landing sense of discovery, that fizzy realization that you have found something made for you, about you, definitive of you and your times — not them and theirs. Has that happened since hip-hop hit middle age? Hasn’t the culture become repetitive and pro forma, contenting itself with staged provocations (Madonna kissing Britney, Kanye mugging Taylor) that pretend to portend Something New Happening, but really do not? Like they’re all just trying too hard?

It’s too bad. That moment of Something New Happening is the birthright of every generation. To hear young people agree with some aging Boomer about their music is to feel they have been cheated. Apparently, some of them know it. They’re the ones telling me I’m right and listening to Beatles songs on their phones. When I was that age, I’d have put my ears out rather than listen to Nat King Cole.

Because popular music is about breaking away from the staid normalcy of what came before. But maybe in an era where mom has tattoos and dad has a boyfriend, there’s nothing left to break away from. That’s pop culture’s victory and burden, the unseen thing Justin Bieber and Rihanna struggle against.

They ply their trade in a day when change has a tour jacket and a corporate sponsor. But as that girl passed out in a policeman’s arms could tell you: It’s just not the same. Fifty years ago, change stepped off a jet at JFK and sent the country into an uproar. We have gained much — but lost a few things, too — on the long and winding road since then.

(Leonard Pitts is a columnist for The Miami Herald, 1 Herald Plaza, Miami, Fla., 33132. Readers may contact him via email at lpitts@miamiherald.com)

Photo: Wally Gobetz via Flickr