Tag: ukraine whistleblower
No, Everybody Doesn’t Abuse The Presidency

No, Everybody Doesn’t Abuse The Presidency

The testimony of State Department official George Kent and acting U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine William Taylor confirmed the elements of the Ukraine scandal that have led to impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump, specifically that the president and his associates, especially Rudy Giuliani and Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland, sought to instigate and publicize a phony “investigation” of Joe Biden by withholding military aid from Ukraine.

None of the chaff thrown up by the Republicans during those hearings effectively contradicted the narrative outlining this abuse of power. Sooner or later, as the hearings continue, the majority of Americans will understand fully what Trump did and why his misconduct was so dangerous.

The Republicans will continue to object that the testimony given by Taylor and Kent, and the witnesses who follow, is only “hearsay.” Trump himself whines that the whistleblower’s complaint, approved by his own inspector general, is “second- and third-hand.”

But that complaint ignores three things: the July 25 phone call when Trump clearly demanded a “favor” from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky; Trump’s admission on the White House lawn that he had demanded an investigation of the Bidens on that call; and acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney’s admission that Trump had leveraged a political “quid pro quo” from Zelensky (which we should all “get over”).

If the Republicans really want firsthand, documentary evidence, their complaints should be directed to the White House, which has ordered every potential witness with direct knowledge not to testify and to withhold all relevant documents. If they are seeking facts, not just excuses to avoid the truth, they ought to join Democrats in demanding that Mulvaney and Giuliani step up to testify under oath, along with Sondland, former national security adviser John Bolton, Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and White House lawyer John Eisenberg, to name a few.

Then we can finally stop worrying about the whistleblower. That brave individual has completed his or her work anyway — by filing a complaint that led to the White House’s release of security assistance funding to Ukraine in September. Trump should thank that anonymous public servant — someone he has slandered as a traitor — for saving him from withholding the aid even longer and committing a worse offense.

Yet after all the facts are set forth, we will still hear the ultimate galling excuse uttered by every eager nimrod in this nation who believes Trump’s bluster. It is the same excuse offered by Trump and his apologists for each crime and misdemeanor he perpetrates, big or small: Everybody does it!

Is that cynical dismissal supposed to be taken literally? Those who say so should be required to name names. They won’t be able to come up with a single example, let alone “everybody.”

When asked whether, in a half-century of public service, he had ever seen a chief executive misuse foreign policy to serve personal or political interest, Bill Taylor gave a simple answer: no.

Unless and until someone provides a historical example to justify that repellent Trumpian claim, Taylor’s answer will stand. No previous president has exercised his authority in the style of a mob boss when guiding the foreign relations of the United States. Neither the Iran-contra scandal nor the Iraq weapons-of-mass-destruction fraud, destructive as they were, resembles such a breach of trust. Had former Presidents Barack Obama or Bill Clinton ever attempted to misuse the power of the presidency for personal gain, the Capitol would have exploded with bipartisan calls for impeachment.

The extortion of Ukraine is perfect, as Trump might say, in exemplifying an impeachable offense. If it isn’t treason, it is an act that advanced the interests of a foreign adversary against our own security and our alliances. And the plot’s failure does not erase the offense.

No, not everybody does it, and the man who did it must be sanctioned by Congress to ensure that nobody does it again.

To find out more about Joe Conason and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

‘Federalist’ Editor Tries To Expose Alleged Whistleblower On Fox News

‘Federalist’ Editor Tries To Expose Alleged Whistleblower On Fox News

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

As the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump moves along, one of the tactics of Trump and his supporters is demanding to know the identity of the Ukraine whistleblower. Fox News contributor Mollie Hemingway tried to out the whistleblower — or someone she believes to be that individual — during a Sunday morning appearance on the right-wing cable news outlet, inspiring host Howard Kurtz to stress that the person she was naming might not be the whistleblower.

Hemingway, a senior editor for the right-wing website The Federalist, was part of a panel discussion that also included Democratic consultant Philippe I. Reines, who served as a senior adviser to Hillary Clinton when she was secretary of state in the Obama Administration. When Kurtz objected to Hemingway naming the person she thought was the whistleblower on the air, she insisted that the person’s name was “already out there.”

Kurtz, however, stressed that outing a whistleblower could send a “chilling message” to other government whistleblowers in the future. The Fox News host asserted, “I don’t know whether this is actually the person or not, and I don’t want to speculate about that…. But there have been a few conservative outlets and commentators who have floated that name.”

This isn’t the first time someone appearing on Fox News has tried to out a person they believe to be the whistleblower: far-right talk radio host and Trump supporter Lars Larson, appearing on Outnumbered Overtime last week, named someone when speaking to host Harris Faulkner. But a Fox News spokesperson told the Daily Beast that the cable news outlet “has not confirmed or independently verified the name of the whistleblower.”

Mimi Rocah, a former federal prosecutor who often appears as a legal analyst on MSNBC, has asserted that when Trump demands the outing of the whistleblower, he is engaging in “witness intimidation and retaliation.”

Other legal analysts have asserted that in light of the testimony of various witnesses in the impeach inquiry — including diplomat William Taylor — the person’s identity is irrelevant at this point, as Taylor and others have verified the allegations in the whistleblower’s complaint. The whistleblower complained that on July 25, Trump tried to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky into looking for dirt on former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden.

Nonetheless, Trump and many of his supporters continue to obsess over the whistleblower’s identity — including Republican Sen. Rand Paul. At a November 4 MAGA rally in Kentucky, Paul — with Trump at his side — asserted that if journalists were doing their jobs, they would find out who he or she is and out the person.

On Sunday, Hemingway told the Fox News panel, “We could be talking about this reporting and talking about whether that’s accurate reporting or not. So, I feel a little confused why we are pretending it hasn’t already been reported.”

IMAGE: Mollie Hemingway, senior editor of The Federalist (screenshot).

 

Republicans Demand Hunter Biden, Whistleblower Testify At Hearings

Republicans Demand Hunter Biden, Whistleblower Testify At Hearings

 

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

House Republicans, in their ever-increasing efforts to disrupt congressional impeachment proceedings, have thrown one more curveball into the mix. They now want to have the whistleblower, an intelligence community official who has asked for anonymity, and Hunter Biden, the son of the Democratic candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden, to their list of witnesses to testify in open, public, televised impeachment inquiry hearings, according to The Washington Post.

Democrats, who hold the House majority, are expected to overrule the request.

Intelligence Committee Ranking Republican Devin Nunes sent an embarrassingly facetious threat with the GOP’s request.

“We expect that you will call each of the witnesses listed above to ensure that the Democrats’ ‘impeachment inquiry’ treats the President with fairness, as promised by Speaker Pelosi,” Nunes warned, clearly aware the request was likely to be denied. “Your failure to fulfill Minority witness requests shall constitute evidence of your denial of fundamental fairness and due process.”

IMAGE: House Intelligence Committee ranking member Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA).
Trump Says Whistleblower’s Attorney Should Be ’Sued For Treason’

Trump Says Whistleblower’s Attorney Should Be ’Sued For Treason’

Speaking to reporters Friday morning, Donald Trump suggested that the lawyer representing the whistleblower may have committed treason. Trump did not provide any evidence to back up his claim.

After demanding that the whistleblower be identified, Trump attacked the whistleblower’s lawyer.

“The whistleblower is a disgrace to our country,” Trump said. “And his lawyer, who said the worst thing possible two years ago — he should be sued. And maybe for treason. Maybe for treason. But he should be sued.”

Treason is a federal offense punishable by execution.

Trump may have been referring to tweets written in 2017 by the whistleblower’s attorney, Mark Zaid, referring to “a coup” within the Trump administration. Zaid defended the tweet, saying it “referred to those working inside the Administration who were already, just a week into office, already standing up to him to enforce recognized rules of law.”

This is not the first time Trump has cried treason with regard to the whistleblower.

In September, Trump suggested that the whistleblower and those who spoke to the whistleblowers were spies guilty of treason.

“You know what we used to do in the old days when we were smart? Right? The spies and treason, we used to handle it a little differently than we do now,” Trump said at the closed-door event.

Trump has a long track record of accusing those who disagree with him as traitors.

In 2018, Trump said text messages between FBI agents who did not vote for him “amounted to treason.” More recently, Trump wondered whether Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, should be “arrested for treason” for paraphrasing Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

According to Axios, Trump has thrown around the “treason” accusation at least 25 times, targeting among others: Hillary Clinton, newspapers such as the Washington Post and New York Times, and Democrats who have taken action to protect immigrants at the southern border.

No one that Trump has accused of treason has been arrested or charged by the Justice Department. According to NPR, no Americans have been prosecuted for treason since the time around World War II.

Published with permission of The American Independent.