Tag: us district court
Rising 'National Security' Concerns Over Shadowy Entity Behind Trump Bond

Rising 'National Security' Concerns Over Shadowy Entity Behind Trump Bond

After US District Judge Lewis F. Kaplan denied his petition for a stay, former President Donald Trump finally posted a $91.6 million bond for his appeal of writer E. Jean Carroll's judgment on Friday.

That $91.63 million includes the full $83.3 million judgment, along with a nine percent statutory interest the State of New York tacks onto surety bonds. That money has been set aside in a court-managed account to be paid to Carroll in the event Trump loses his appeal. The ex-president's bond was guaranteed by the Federal Insurance Company — a New York-based subsidiary of the company Chubb Group LLC, which is headquartered in Switzerland. In 2018, Chubb CEO Evan Greenberg served on a trade advisory committee in the Trump White House. The Washington Post reported that "it was not clear from court records what collateral Trump presented to obtain the bond from Chubb."

The environmental nonprofit group Rainforest Action Network (RAN) noted on its website that Chubb does business around the world, including with several major American adversaries. The group pointed out that Chubb is "insuring oil and gas extraction and transport in Russia, fueling Russia’s war on Ukraine."

"In fact, Chubb called Russian oil and gas 'one of the most promising activities' of its Russian operations,'" RAN wrote. "The insurer was recently backing Nord Stream 2, a massive, controversial natural gas pipeline built by Gazprom, the world’s largest producer of gas and a majority Russian state-owned fossil fuel company (which also happens to be funded by JPMorgan Chase)."

Former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann tweeted Friday that while Trump is "$90M down, $400M to go," the details of the bond agreement are murky and that "the public has no idea who may have actually put up the money or provided a guaranty to support the bond."

"But one thing’s sure: Trump is beholden to someone for a lot of money," Weissmann wrote.

In response to Weissmann's tweet, attorney and journalist Daniel Miller expressed concern, opining that the bond guarantee was a "matter of national security," adding "the public has to know this information before voting in November."

Notably, the Post reported Chubb's CEO was vocal in his disdain for the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the US Capitol, condemning "the violence and display of demagoguery we witnessed in our nation’s capital."

"We should all hope for a new era of respect and decency as we meet the many common challenges facing our nation," Greenberg said the day after the capitol riot.

Trump has yet to post his bond for appealing the $454 million civil judgment that he's been ordered to pay to the State of New York after losing his civil fraud case. Earlier this week, CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin said Trump may seek out foreign help to pay that judgment, particularly since American financial institutions may hesitate to give a loan to an adjudicated fraudster. In February, a judge denied Trump's request to pay a $100 million bond, suggesting Trump may not have the cash to cover the judgment on his own despite his multibillion-dollar net worth.

"What does that mean if a candidate for president is is on the hook for multiple, multiple millions of dollars to a foreign source? Because that, it seems to me, is the most likely source," Toobin said.

Reprinted with permission from Alternet.

Federal Judge Speeds Hearing On Trump Financial Records

Federal Judge Speeds Hearing On Trump Financial Records

A federal judge just decided to accelerate one of Trump’s court battles over his financial records. Now, the president only has until May 14 to prepare for a court hearing on the matter.

The judge moved things up because, as his order noted, both sides have already fully briefed the issue and there’s no need for another round of written material. The case had previously been structured so that the case would proceed in stages, but now things will move much faster.

Last month, the House Oversight Committee subpoenaed Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars, requesting 10 years worth of financial audits and underlying documents that explain Trump’s financial condition.

Trump sued the Oversight Committee to keep Mazars from revealing anything about his dealings. The Trump Organization, Eric Trump, Donald Trump, Jr., and Ivanka Trump all joined the lawsuit because they’re all implicated in Trump’s disreputable business dealings too.

Trump is seeking a preliminary injunction to prevent Mazars from complying with the subpoena until the court case between Trump and the Oversight Committee is concluded. It’s likely Trump hoped this matter could be dragged out a bit longer, as all he really wants to do is tie up the House in litigation until after the 2020 election.

The accounting firm has taken no position in the litigation. It merely said it agreed the subpoena does compel them to produce documents, but the dispute is between Trump and the Oversight Committee. With that, they said they don’t need to participate in the hearing.

Trump’s argument in this case is unique, but entirely in keeping with who Trump is. He alleges Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), chair of the House Oversight Committee, has made clear that he wants to see Trump’s financials for a law enforcement purpose, not a legislative purpose, and that even if Cummings intends to pass later legislation that would prevent Trump’s actions from occurring again in the future, that’s still improper.

Put another way, Trump’s argument is essentially that it isn’t fair that Congress is looking into his financial misdeeds. It’s quite the argument for a sitting president to have to make.

Trump is doing everything to try to stop the House from performing its constitutionally mandated oversight duties, but he’s running out of options.

Published with permission of The American Independent.