Tag: white
The Stunningly Static White Evangelical Vote

The Stunningly Static White Evangelical Vote

By Nathan L. Gonzales, CQ Roll Call (TNS)

There’s plenty of discussion about the difference between midterm and presidential electorates, but there is one emerging constant: the white evangelical vote.

At least one interest group, Ralph Reed’s Faith & Freedom Coalition, claimed that conservative Christians played a “decisive role” in the recent midterm elections. But according to the exit polls, white evangelicals made up the same percentage of the electorate and voted nearly the exact same way this year as they did in the two previous elections.

In the recent midterm elections, white evangelicals or born-again Christians made up 26 percent of the electorate and voted for Republican candidates 78 percent to 20 percent, according to the National Exit Poll.

Two years before in the 2012 presidential election, white evangelicals made up 26 percent of the electorate and voted for Republican Mitt Romney 78 percent to 21 percent over President Barack Obama. And in 2010, white evangelicals made up 25 percent of the electorate and voted for Republican candidates 77 percent to 19 percent.

Reed’s analysis comes from a post-election survey conducted by Public Opinion Strategies. According to that poll, white evangelicals made up 23 percent of the 2014 electorate, which would actually be a decline of a couple of points, compared to the exit poll. But when comparing exit polls to exit polls, the white evangelical vote has been stunningly static.

Going further back to 2008, white evangelicals made up 26 percent of the electorate once again, but Obama creeped up to 24 percent of their vote compared to 74 percent for Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.

The 2006 elections appear to be the outlier for Democrats and white evangelical voters. In those midterms, white evangelicals made up 24 percent of the electorate but voted for GOP candidates by only a 58 percent to 41 percent margin.

In 2000 and 2004, white evangelicals made up 23 percent of the electorate and voted for George W. Bush with 68 percent and 78 percent. The 2002 exit polls were never released because of fundamental sampling problems.

Strong base turnout was a key component for Republican candidates nationwide earlier this month, but the exit poll data runs against Reed’s narrative that conservative Christians played an oversized role in this year’s midterms.

AFP Photo/Win Mcnamee

Want more political news and analysis? Sign up for our daily email newsletter!

Heroin Is The Drug Of Choice In White U.S. Suburbs

Heroin Is The Drug Of Choice In White U.S. Suburbs

Washington (AFP) – Anna Richter played high school basketball and grew up near a golf course in Centreville, Virginia, where the average family makes more than $100,000 per year.

She was 15 or 16 when she began popping prescription painkillers to get high. A couple of years later, she snorted heroin for the first time.

“I tried it and I loved it. And I could get it any time I wanted,” she told AFP.

Not only was heroin cheaper than pills like OxyContin or Vicodin, it gave her a euphoric high like none she had ever experienced.

“All those self-defeating thoughts were gone,” she said.

By the time she was 20, she was injecting heroin daily. She dropped out of college, moved back in with her parents and regularly stole money from them to feed her habit.

“There were a ton of overdoses in the area and I lost a lot of friends in Virginia due to this disease,” she said.

But none of that stopped her. The heroin users she knew were much like her — affluent, white and from educated families. They had endured no major struggles on which to blame their behaviors.

Heroin “has become so much more common. It is not like that dirty drug that people think of any more,” Richter said.

Indeed, a new study has found that heroin is increasingly the drug of choice for young people in the American suburbs, where an epidemic of prescription painkiller abuse has opened the path toward the cheaper street drug.

The study out Wednesday, “The Changing Face of Heroin in the United States,” spans the past 50 years and shows how heroin has made its way from the back alleys to the backyards of middle class America.

The data is based on nearly 2,800 patient surveys filled out between 2010 and 2013 at drug treatment centers across the United States.

On average, people are 23 when they start using heroin in the United States, according to the findings in JAMA Psychiatry, a journal of the American Medical Association.

More than 90 percent of those who began using heroin in the past decade were white.

Back in the 1960s and 1970s, more than 80 percent of heroin users were African-American males who lived in the inner cities and who began using at around age 16.

“In the past, heroin was a drug that introduced people to narcotics,” said lead study author Theodore Cicero, a researcher at Washington University.

“But what we’re seeing now is that most people using heroin begin with prescription painkillers such as OxyContin, Percocet or Vicodin, and only switch to heroin when their prescription drug habits get too expensive.”

Cost is a key factor for addicts, even in wealthy areas, experts say.

Painkillers are often $1 per milligram, or $80 for an 80 mg pill, whereas a bag of heroin could sell for $10 to $25.

A crackdown on pill mills and doctors who overprescribe or illegally distribute prescription pain medications has shrunk supplies of opioids over the past decade.

In addition, non-crushable forms of some pills have been released to discourage people from snorting and injecting them.

But experts say these changes have only pushed more drug abusers toward heroin.

“A lot of them seek out heroin because they don’t want to go through withdrawal,” said Kevin Bandy, clinical director at Hanley Center, a rehabilitation facility in West Palm Beach, Florida.

Some 467,000 people reported heroin use in 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has said.

The number of heroin users has more than doubled since 2007, and deaths from heroin overdose are also on the rise in some parts of the country, experts say.

About 3,000 people die in the U.S. of heroin overdoses each year, and more than 16,000 die from prescription painkillers according to government data.

Highly addictive, heroin can be even harder to quit because of the stigma it carries, according to Bandy.

“It is going to be pretty difficult to go tell your family you are having a problem with heroin. That would definitely get some gasps out of everyone in the room,” he said.

Richter said she was not ready to seek help when her parents finally gave her an ultimatum — get treatment or get out of the house.

She went through two weeks of painful detox, followed by six months of rehab, exploring the roots of her addiction and what caused her to seek out drugs.

“I am clean and sober for six years now,” she told AFP.

Richter said she has found a career — and a purpose in life — helping others enter rehab.

But she admits that she doesn’t know how to prevent other affluent suburban youth from succumbing to heroin.

“I can’t sit here and say there is something out there to stop these kids from doing it,” she said. “But we can show them that there is a solution. There is a way out.”

©afp.com / Andrew Burton

South Africa’s ANC Set To Win National Election As Counting Continues

South Africa’s ANC Set To Win National Election As Counting Continues

By Robyn Dixon, Los Angeles Times

JOHANNESBURG — South Africa’s governing African National Congress was headed for victory after the tallying of 70 percent of votes in Wednesday’s national election, but its major opponent made significant gains.

The ANC had won 62.5 percent of the vote in the latest tabulations, compared with 65.9 percent in the last election in 2009. The main challenger, the Democratic Alliance, or DA, was at 22.5 percent, up from its 16.7 percent support five years ago.

The new Economic Freedom Fighters party, a radical party pushing for nationalization of banks, mines and land, was at 5 percent. The EFF, led by expelled former ANC youth leader Julius Malema, appears to have picked up support among the disaffected young unemployed.

The margins could still change as more votes are tallied.

Despite scandals over corruption, dissatisfaction over the delivery of government services and an unpopular leader, President Jacob Zuma, the ANC continued its dominant position. It is still widely supported by black South Africans as the party that freed them from apartheid.

The DA appears to have retained control of the Western Cape province but failed to achieve its objective of taking control of another province. Helen Zille, the party’s leader, conceded Wednesday that her party hadn’t managed to push the ANC below 60 percent of the vote, nor had it won control of the most populous province of Gauteng.

The biggest losers appeared to be smaller parties such as the Congress of the People, which won 7.5 percent last election but this time came away with less than 1 percent.

Voter turnout also appeared to have slumped despite a comment Wednesday from chief electoral official Pansy Tlakula that participation was “extremely high.”

Voter turnout was 72 percent in this election, compared with 77 percent in 2009 and 88 percent a decade earlier — seen as a sign of disillusionment among some voters who are unwilling to vote for the ANC but reluctant to support the DA, still perceived by many as a predominantly white party.

Photo: CJ Glynn via Flickr

As Spidey Changes, So Does America

OK, people: chill out. Breathe. Relax.

Spider-Man is still white. He’ll always be white. He’s been white since that day in 1962 when Peter Parker, a high school science nerd, was bitten by that radioactive bug.

In the five decades since, he’s aged about 10 years, grown and lost four extra arms, been cloned, and made a deal with a devil that rewrote all of reality. It’s a litany of impossibilities that lends a certain context to the news that seems to have left observers meshuggeneh and verklempt: Marvel Comics has killed off Peter Parker and replaced him with a new Spider-Man, Miles Morales, who is black and Latino.

Fox News (who else?) asked if this represented “a radical left turn.” Gary Stein of the South Florida Sun-Sentinel wondered if this was a good idea or PC “run amok.” Simone Wilson, a blogger for the L.A. Weekly, celebrated a move that would “open the Spider-Man casting call from pasty crackers like Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst.” Someone on a message board at The Root, took Marvel to task for a “colored Spidey” created to make money. Someone on a USA Today message board derided “super hero affirmative action.” And that’s not to mention the folks who say President Obama had something to do with it. Or Glenn Beck, who blamed his wife.

As a Spider-fan of almost 50 years, I feel compelled to say a few things.

In the first place, this death of Spider-Man takes place in an alternate universe, alternate universes being about as common in comics as sex scandals are in politics. The “real” Spider-Man remains Peter Parker.

In the second place, this is the opposite of unprecedented. The “real” Nick Fury is a crusty white man who looks nothing like Samuel L. Jackson. And we learned a few years ago that the first Captain America was black.

In the third place, as your friendly neighborhood comics dealer will tell you, books starring, ahem, “colored” characters are usually poor sellers, so if this is a money grab, it’s a dumb one.

In the fourth place, the person who seriously thinks the Obamas had anything to do with this should seek help immediately.

In the fifth place, “affirmative action?” Actually, comics have long proven that courage comes in both black and white. Also, orange, blue and green.

In the sixth place, leave Maguire and Dunst alone. Pasty they may or may not be, but they seem to have a modicum of class, which is more than can be said of someone who calls white people crackers.

Of course, none of that addresses the underlying cause of all this angst. Meaning, the nation’s discomfort with its own changing face. America is fast becoming a country where no group will command a numerical majority. Whites will be just another minority group.

If some of us see that as a bracing challenge, others see it as cause for panic. But they better make their peace, because Miles Morales is just the tip of the edge of the rim of the iceberg. This change will not be forestalled. Seal the borders, gnash your teeth, bemoan the biracial Spider-Man. It doesn’t matter. The future will come, regardless.

A smart nation would prepare for that. So it’ll be interesting to see what this nation does.

That’s all I came to say. Now, if you’ll excuse me, my spider sense is tingling.

(Leonard Pitts is a columnist for the Miami Herald, 1 Herald Plaza, Miami, Fla., 33132. Readers may contact him via e-mail at lpitts@miamiherald.com.)

(c) 2011 The Miami Herald Distributed by Tribune Media Services, Inc.