fbpx

Type to search

Yes, There Is Evidence Of Russian Collusion (And Lots Of It)

Editor's Blog Featured Post Law Russia White House

Yes, There Is Evidence Of Russian Collusion (And Lots Of It)

Share
Trump

Reprinted with permission from Creators.

If Donald Trump believes his own tweets, then he must be feeling a huge sense of relief. According to the besieged president, he has been exonerated; the hoax has been disproved; and the witch hunt has been canceled.

“The Senate Intelligence Committee: THERE IS NO EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION BETWEEN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND RUSSIA!” he exclaimed in the predawn hours on Feb. 13, a theme he and his minions repeated throughout the day.

Sadly for Trump, he knows that hysterical statement — like thousands of others littering his Twitter feed — is fakery. The Senate Intelligence Committee, composed of Democrats as well as Republicans, has made no such finding and cannot credibly offer any conclusion because its investigation is not complete. And the Democrats, led by ranking member Mark Warner, D-Va., are waiting until they hear again from such key witnesses as former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen, who lied to the committee when he first testified.

It is true that Sen. Richard Burr, the North Carolina Republican who chairs the committee, said something like the remark that Trump falsely attributed to all its members. “If we write a report based upon the facts that we have, then we don’t have anything that would suggest there was collusion by the Trump campaign and Russia,” Burr told CBS News. Although Burr has tried in recent months to strike a bipartisan pose, this premature ejaculation suggests that he has returned to his previous habit of covering up for President Trump — as he did during the 2016 campaign, when he served as a “national security” adviser to the Trump campaign.

By the time Burr signed on with Trump, U.S. intelligence officials had briefed him — in his senatorial role — on the massive Russian election interference in support of the Republican nominee. In the midst of the campaign, Burr disingenuously denied that finding, putting party above country. Now knowledgeable people in Washington believe that the Trump White House urged him to knock down the Russia probe — and that he obediently responded.

The problem for Burr and Trump is that so much evidence of collusion is in plain sight.

What did it mean when an aide to one of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s favorite oligarchs told Donald Trump Jr. that the Russian government was sending an emissary with negative information on Hillary Clinton — and Junior took a meeting with that emissary in Trump Tower, along with Jared Kushner and then-campaign manager Paul Manafort?

What did it mean when in pursuit of Trump Tower Moscow, worth an estimated $300 million, Donald Trump and his representatives contacted Putin’s office — and then lied repeatedly about the project? What did it mean when the Republican National Convention changed the party platform to reflect Putin’s policy in Ukraine?

What did it mean when Manafort met with “former” Russian intelligence agent Konstantin Kilimnik to give him detailed, highly confidential Trump campaign polling data?

On the same day that Trump issued his triumphant tweets, a federal judge voided the cooperation agreement between Manafort and Robert Mueller’s Office of Special Counsel. Judge Amy Berman Jackson found that Manafort had repeatedly lied to Mueller, specifically concerning the polls he gave to the Russians, knowing they would go straight to the Kremlin — where Putin’s online troll army needed all kinds of opinion research as it prepared a secret campaign to denigrate Clinton and boost Trump.

As one of Mueller’s attorneys told the judge, that meeting between Manafort and Kilimnik “goes … very much to the heart of what the special counsel’s office is investigating.” And according to the special counsel, Manafort lied about the meeting because he feared that telling the truth would displease Trump — and jeopardize his chances for a presidential pardon.

We have seen this show before, when Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., misused the House Intelligence Committee as a public relations office for the Trump defense. But Rep. Adam Schiff, an experienced prosecutor who now runs that committee, has declared that the cover-up is over and the real investigation has resumed.

As this or that blustering tweet floats toward nowhere, we still await the findings of the investigator with the authority and resources to uncover the salient facts. Trump knows that is what really matters — and so does everyone else.

 

Tags:
Joe Conason

A highly experienced journalist, author and editor, Joe Conason is the editor-in-chief of The National Memo, founded in July 2011. He was formerly the executive editor of the New York Observer, where he wrote a popular political column for many years. His columns are distributed by Creators Syndicate and his reporting and writing have appeared in many publications around the world, including the New York Times, the Washington Post, The New Yorker, The New Republic, The Nation, and Harpers. Since November 2006, he has served as editor of The Investigative Fund, a nonprofit journalism center, where he has assigned and edited dozens of award-winning articles and broadcasts. He is also the author of two New York Times bestselling books, The Hunting of the President (St. Martins Press, 2000) and Big Lies: The Right-Wing Propaganda Machine and How It Distorts the Truth (St. Martins Press, 2003). Currently he is working on a new book about former President Bill Clinton's life and work since leaving the White House in 2001. He is a frequent guest on radio and television, including MSNBC's Morning Joe, and lives in New York City with his wife and two children.

  • 1

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.