Smart. Sharp. Funny. Fearless.

Monday, December 09, 2019 {{ new Date().getDay() }}

AOL chief executive Tim Armstrong can’t seem to decide why his company cut employees’ retirement benefits on Thursday.

The media giant will no longer contribute money to employees’ 401(k) accounts during each pay period; instead, AOL will offer employees a lump sum at the end of each year. The change will end benefits for employees who leave the company mid-year. It will also limit employees’ ability to invest money throughout the year.

Just don’t ask Armstrong why the change was made.

“As a CEO and as a management team, we have to decide: Do we pass the $7.1 million of Obamacare cost to our employees? Or do we try to eat as much of that as possible and cut benefits?” he said on CNBC. “For employees leaving to go to other employers, not matching those programs was probably the last thing on the list for us in terms of employee benefits that we wanted to keep.”

But in a conference call with employees later that day, Armstrong pointed to how much capital it takes to provide health care for its employees. According to a transcript of the conference call obtained by Capital New York, Armstrong singled out, but did not name, two specific employees.

“We had two AOL-ers that had distressed babies that were born that we paid a million dollars each to make sure those babies were OK in general. And those are the things that add up into our benefits cost. So when we had the final decision about what benefits to cut because of the increased healthcare costs, we made the decision, and I made the decision, to basically change the 401(k) plan.”

His reasoning came off as unprofessional to at least one employee. An AOL worker who was on the conference call told Capital New York: “people were just shocked that two particular women would be singled out on a company-wide call.”

Armstrong hasn’t yet offered AOL’s net income loss of 91 percent last year as evidence the company’s retirement plan needed to be amended. AOL’s net income is now $91 million, down from over a billion dollars last year, according to The New York Times.

Photo by archer10 (Dennis) / CC BY-SA 2.0

ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

For months, one postal worker had been doing all she could to protect herself from COVID-19. She wore a mask long before it was required at her plant in St. Paul, Minnesota. She avoided the lunch room, where she saw little social distancing, and ate in her car.

The stakes felt especially high. Her husband, a postal worker in the same facility, was at high risk because his immune system is compromised by a condition unrelated to the coronavirus. And the 20-year veteran of the U.S. Postal Service knew that her job, operating a machine that sorts mail by ZIP code, would be vital to processing the flood of mail-in ballots expected this fall.

Keep reading... Show less